Posted by Shannon LC Cate on August 6th, 2009 at 10:39 am

Federal Program Aims at Increasing Adoption of Black Foster Kids

micayla 300x177 Federal Program Aims at Increasing Adoption of Black Foster KidsWhile only about 15% of U.S. American children are African American, over 30% of the children in U.S. foster care are Black.  A new federally funded campaign aimed directly at encouraging Black parents to adopt Black children from foster care launched this week to try and balance some of the disparity.

Programs to help place children with biological relatives have already moved the numbers of Black children in foster care from Continue reading »


Posted by jeannesager on June 30th, 2009 at 9:27 am

Dad Who Dumped 9 in Nebraska Expecting Another

gary staton 300x183 Dad Who Dumped 9 in Nebraska Expecting AnotherRemember the Nebraska child haven fiasco of 2008? The straw that finally broke the law’s back was the dad who dropped not one but NINE of his kids off at a hospital.

Gary Staton’s back in the news, but he’s not getting his kids back. Instead, he’s having ANOTHER one. Continue reading »


Posted by Shannon LC Cate on June 20th, 2009 at 12:30 pm

Foster Children or Political Pawns?

img 0110 300x300 Foster Children or Political Pawns?A West Virginia couple who had been fostering their 19-month old daughter since she was a few weeks old were recently allowed to keep her and proceed with adopting her, after an attempt to remove her from their home.

The little girl’s birth mother lost her parental rights after failing to improve her situation and the child was released for adoption.  In spite of the fact that she had been in her foster home longer than her six foster siblings, and in spite of her foster mother’s expressed interest in permanently adopting her, Baby Girl C. was ordered removed and placed in a new home until she could be adopted by someone other than the parents who had fostered her since birth.  The foster parents, supported by the state’s Department of Health and Human Resources won an appeal to the West Virginia supreme court, and retained custody of the girl whom they intend to adopt.

How could the child’s guardian ad litem and the initial ruling judge have come to a conclusion so clearly not in the best interest of a child?  The foster parents were a lesbian couple.  The child was ordered to be placed in a “traditional home with a mother and father” though state law provided for no such move on the part of a healthy, well cared-for child.

While West Virginia does not allow same-sex couples to adopt children together, the state does allow singles to adopt.  One of the foster moms has already adopted a child through the foster system and both women have gone on to foster seven children together with the full endorsement of the state.  In its ruling on the case, the West Virginia supreme court blasted the earlier decision:

“Despite the number of times that this court has stated the best interest of the child is the polar star upon which decisions involving children are to be based, DHHR did not even consider whether the individual needs of B.G.C. would be best served by removing her from petitioners’ care…”

And though part of the reasoning for the removal was also supposedly that the home had reached its legal limit of children, many of the children in the home had come more recently than Baby Girl C, and were far less bonded with the foster parents.  The supreme court also called this part of the decision a violation of the best interest standard:

“The agency simply turned a blind eye to the fact that B.G.C. had been placed in the foster home a number of months before some of the other children then in the home, and ignored any consideration of the impact relocation would have on B.G.C.‘s emotional, physical and mental development.”

If you have a toddler, you can imagine how tearing that child from your own care and placing her/him in the care of another family might effect “emotional, physical and mental development” I’m sure.  Would your toddler happily embrace “new parents” however more socially acceptable than you (perhaps wealthier, living in a nicer house, with a stay-at-home mom or some other “better” social status according to mainstream notions of better)?  I thought not.  Mine neither.

It’s time for adults to stop using children as hammers to pound their own ideologies and start really basing these kinds of decisions on the best interests of children.


Quick Search



About This Blog
Updated more than twelve times daily by the wittiest parents in the blogosphere, Strollerderby provides a scroll of breaking news, spot-on reviews of entertainment and products, and irreverent discussions of hot topics.

Send tips to strollerderby@babble.com

Click here to read about our bloggers.


Babble BlogS