Strollerderby

10-Year-Old’s Mom Arrested for Letting Him Get Tattooed: Cheer or Jeer?

Posted by meredith carroll on January 19th, 2012 at 1:37 pm
ht Chuntera Napier nt 120119 wblog 300x168 10 Year Old’s Mom Arrested for Letting Him Get Tattooed: Cheer or Jeer?

Chuntera Napier was arrested for allowing her 10-year-old son to get a tattoo

OK, maybe it’s not as bad as the drunk Georgia dad who tattooed his 1-year-old son. But in the eyes of the state law, there is little difference.

A Georgia mom let her 10-year-old get a tattoo. She thought because she gave her consent, it would be OK.

She was wrong.

Chuntera Napier was arrested after her son Gaquan got a tattoo memorializing his 12-year-old brother Malik, who died after being hit by a car, according to ABC News.

“My son came to me and said, ‘Mom, I want to get a tattoo with Malik on it, rest in peace,’” she told WSBTV, an ABC News affiliate. “It made me feel good to know that he wanted his brother on him.”

She argued if he had asked for a SpongeBob tattoo, she would have denied the request.

Gaquan’s tattoo, on his right arm, depicts his brother’s name and basketball jersey number. Someone at school saw it and alerted authorities. His mom has been charged with misdemeanor cruelty and being party to a crime. However, she still doesn’t understand the offense, since her permission was given.

The tattoo artist is also under investigation.

While Gaquan’s tattoo clearly isn’t as whimsical as a Sponge Bob image, I can see why it would be illegal for a 10-year-old to get inked — period. Perhaps as his mom, Chuntera could have helped him deal with his grief a bit differently and memorialize his late brother in a more legal way until which time he was old enough to get a tattoo, if he still wanted one.

Do you think the law is too strict in a case like this, or is a tattoo on a 10-year-old never right?

Image: Cobb County Sheriff’s Office

 10 Year Old’s Mom Arrested for Letting Him Get Tattooed: Cheer or Jeer?

Go Back To Strollerderby

24 Comments

she’s not the one who DID the tatooing, is she? Shouldn’t the artist be in more trouble than her?

Richan commented on Jan 19 12 at 2:18 pm

I don’t know. I think the circumstances should be taken into consideration. This is not some whimsical tattoo that he’s going to regret later in life… it’s a tribute to his dead brother. I don’t think it’s any worse that the idjits who get newborns ears pierced.

Shandeigh commented on Jan 19 12 at 3:00 pm

It’s legal to allow a child to get their ears pierced, right? How is this categorically different?

Diera commented on Jan 19 12 at 3:12 pm

I hate tattoos so I personally am already a little biased-I just think their tasteless. Memorializing can be done is other ways and this was completely irresponsible of the mother. She should absolutely be held accountable.

Sally commented on Jan 19 12 at 3:32 pm

I was against it until I heard it was a tribute to his late brother. I actually think it’s sweet, though I would probably make him wait until he was 13 to get it.

CW commented on Jan 19 12 at 7:18 pm

I agree with the ear piercing comments. I think that’s totally barbaric until the kid is old enough to WANT it done. In this case, the kid wanted it done and I think circumstances may need to play a factor in this issue.

Rachael commented on Jan 19 12 at 10:22 pm

I don’t think it’s ANYTHING like getting your ears pierced, what a ridiculous comparison. Having ink in your arm for the rest of your life is way “worse” than having miniscule little puncture holes in your ear lobes.

Having said that, I’m all for tattoos but 10 is too young. What about when he grows and the tattoo gets distorted? My parents went mad at me when I got one at 18.

Me commented on Jan 20 12 at 3:42 am

If the parent allowed the child to get a tattoo then no one should have any say so in it. Thousands of thousands of kids get the skin pierced and no one never says nothing, a teenage can drop out of school at 16, and we want to know what is wrong in society. People tend to your own business and allow parents to raise their own children. That is what is wrong with America. Your kid shows their butt in a store and you discipline your child and you get home to the cops sitting at your house because now you have abused your child. But wait when your child breaks into your gun cabinet and takes a gun to school and shots someone, then everyone wants you to be on trial for murder. Society either needs to make a decision to allow parents to raise their kids or decided that the parents will not be held accountable for the actions of their child. Leave the woman alone. She did nothing wrong. Just because it was not right in your eyes and may not be okay for your child does not mean it was wrong for her child to remember his brother in such a manner of love.

Jasper La'Conya commented on Jan 20 12 at 2:18 pm

Jasper, you said it all!

I’d probably at least wait till my kids are done growing (so it doesn’t stretch) to get a memorial tattoo.

Dawn Rose commented on Jan 20 12 at 4:32 pm

@ JASPER LA’CONYA: Kudos! You make an excellent point.

Andre H commented on Jan 20 12 at 5:05 pm

Based on the type of tattoo and it’s significant meaning, I would give this mom a pass but she should have waited a few more yrs til her son was a bit older and more physically mature. Based on how most of us would interpret the law, I completely understand why she felt that she wasn’t doing anything illegal. Now the tattoo artist on the other hand, it’s his/her responsibility to know the state law about such things and if this person was licensed, then they should have known better and should ultimately be held accountable, not the parent. However you may feel about tattoos, at least most of us can say that this mom’s heart was well meaning and I hope she doesn’t get into too much trouble.

Sanriobaby =^.^= commented on Jan 20 12 at 5:08 pm

Its best to keep the law as is. The tattoo artist should know the law and refused to do it. He’s at fault, not the mother.

Cheri commented on Jan 20 12 at 7:52 pm

what ever happened to this being a free country?? I think it is stupid to waste tax payers dollars on something so petty! Its not like he wanted a gangs stamp on himself he wanted his dead brothers name! I think this country is going to hell in a hand basket with all the laws! We have enough laws, take and spend the money on real criminals that need to be in jail@

Hope commented on Jan 20 12 at 10:46 pm

Totally agree with Jasper. And where is this law saying that children need to be of a certain age to get a tattoo? You can’t just arrest this woman because of a biased opinion. I mean, I wouldn’t personally let my child get one at this age, but I had no idea that it was illegal!

Andrea commented on Jan 21 12 at 12:08 am

@Andrea — I’m not sure what you’re talking about when you say a “biased opinion” — there is actually a law in Georgia that states that a child under the age of 18 cannot get a tattoo, period.

Meredith Carroll commented on Jan 21 12 at 12:35 am

Most states actually say minors can’t get tattooed period. I did a little research on this because I also blogged about this. In this particular case while the mother was definitely misguided and ignorant to the law I think the tattooist should have known better. So it sounds like she didn’t go to a legit tattooist. Well unless she held a gun to the tattooists head, but I didn’t get the impression that that’s what happened. This boy has a lot of growing to do still though so it’s perfectly reasonable for someone to say don’t tattoo a 10 year old. I just really think the tattooist is way more at fault here than this mother. Who I imagine is trying to cope with her own grief right now.

Monica commented on Jan 24 12 at 8:40 pm

I mean seriously!! He wanted it and she allowed it. I think that this isn’t even news worthy or arrest worthy at that..

Melissa commented on Jan 24 12 at 8:42 pm

And if it is illegal to tattoo someone under 18 why did the tattoo artist do it in the first place? He/She is to blame as well…

Melissa commented on Jan 24 12 at 8:45 pm

I believe that in this day and age, where tattoos are splattered across every rap artist, country artist, all the actors in action movies, etc, it would only be natural for a boy to think that it is acceptable to have a tattoo of his late brother, regardless off age. I agree that his mother should have made him wait a little longer, but as a society, we have fueled the idea that tattoos are sexy, macho, and normal. I do think it is sweet for him to remember his brother in this way, as my brother remembers our grandfather, and got a tattoo on his arm for him. My brother is only 16. I believe in body are and expressing yourself. Just before you judge this mother, look at our media, and society, and ask, who is really to blame?

Dani commented on Jan 24 12 at 8:47 pm

ear piercing, tattooing, and circumcision are all unnecessary body modifications , yet newborns can get earrings and their foreskin sliced off without consent , boy asked for it mother did not do it without his consent or force him, also why should the tattoo artist be more heavily prosecuted? not his job to discern what is right for someone else’s child. Might i add i do not think the mother should be prosecuted for allowing her son to get a tattoo, nor should the tattoo artist unless when opening shop he was given federal guidelines ..unless he wasn’t licensed ….then that is a whole can of worms he brought on himself ., personally i would not allow my children to get tattoo’s while they are under my roof, when they are on their own as adults they can do what ever the hell they want, tattoo their faces, metal spikes coming out of their skull whatever do i think the mother should have waited..yes because . for one the skin stretches as you age the tattoo is going too look askewed, two, because while his heart was in it at the time, later on he might regret it. or even worse throw it in her face

Diana commented on Jan 24 12 at 10:47 pm

I agree 100% with Jasper.

Charity commented on Jan 29 12 at 11:34 am

I agree – what’s the difference between any other body modifications we (society) do to our children withOUT their consent? This kid wanted it done, his mom said yes. True, if it really is the state law that anyone under 18 can’t get a tattoo (consent or not), then the tattoo artist should have said no. But again, the same goes for ear piercings, yet almost every girl gets them done long before they’re 18. With that being said, we have buried two beloved sons and if our living daughter wanted to get a tattoo in memory of her brothers at age 10, I would make her wait until she’s 18. I feel the same way about piercings, even ears. Also imagine the state of mind the mother is in, assuming her child’s death is fairly recent (within a couple of years) – I know what she feels – when your child dies, you’re living in this fog. You want your child back more than anything in the world. You want your child remembered by everyone forever. You fight to keep their memory alive because everyone keeps telling you to “forget” and “move on”, when that’s not a choice us as bereaved parents have. We can’t forget our children, nor would we ever want to. Dead or alive, they are our children forever and loved eternally. When you have living children left, you are willing to give them everything they want because you will never be able to give your dead child anything ever again. So when her son expressed interest in getting this tattoo in memory of his brother, I don’t blame her for saying yes. However, if our daughter wants tattoos or piercings, she can wait until she’s 18 like I did. I want her to be able to get them without my consent if she wants them. I MIGHT let her get her ears pierced if she really wants them starting around 12 years old.

Heather commented on Jan 29 12 at 6:44 pm

This is the law in many states. For a reason. For one, a child can’t make those kinds of important life decisions. They just do not have the capability to consider all the consequences. And, whether or not she agrees with the law, she broke it. I don’t see the debate in this.

anon commented on Jan 29 12 at 7:05 pm

Jasper (and his followers)–children can’t get body piercings in most states either. For whatever reason, ear piercing is ok with parental consent. I’m not saying that makes sense, but laws are laws. Yes, we should be able to raise our children how we see fit, but you can’t just go around breaking laws because you disagree with them.

anon commented on Jan 29 12 at 7:09 pm

Add your take:

Note: Babble is a supportive, diverse community. We encourage a range of opinions,
but any unduly hostile comments will be removed.


Comments are delayed up to 15 minutes

Most Popular on Facebook

Best of Babble.com


  • Lori Garcia
  • Joslyn Gray
  • Amber Doty
  • Julianna Miner
  • Monica Bielanko
  • Sierra Black
  • Meredith Carroll
  • Carolyn Castiglia
  • Sunny Chanel
  • Madeline Holler
  • Rebecca Odes
  • Danielle Smith
  • Danielle Sullivan
  • Katherine Stone
  • Disney Online Moms & Family Portfolio

    The Walt Disney Company supports Babble as a platform dedicated to honest, engaged, informed, intelligent and open conversation about parenting. However, the opinions expressed on this site are those of individual parents/writers and do not reflect the views of Disney. In addition, content provided on this site is for entertainment or informational purposes only and should not be construed as medical advice, diagnosis, treatment, or safety advice. Click here for additional information. Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Interest-Based Ads

    More in Strollerderby (50 of 11490 articles)