Strollerderby

For Shame! TMZ Publishes Photos of Michelle Duggar’s Miscarried Baby

Posted by monica bielanko on December 15th, 2011 at 10:10 am
tmz 300x213 For Shame! TMZ Publishes Photos of Michelle Duggars Miscarried Baby

TMZ pixelated the home page image with a warning to those who click the link to view the photos.

Harvey Levin and the gang at TMZ should be absolutely ashamed of themselves. They’ve gone too far.

Yesterday the gossip site published seven photos the Duggar family took of Michelle’s miscarried baby and distributed at a funeral service for the girl they named Jubilee Shalom. The site blurred the home page image and then provided a link so that creepy voyeuristic idiots can gawk at images of a sweet little baby. Classy move, guys. Not that we should expect anything more from y’all, I guess. But exploiting a sweet little baby?

Although, as I wrote about on Being Pregnant, I question the Duggars’ judgement in handing out those photos, especially since they’re aware of their celebrity status and could’ve foreseen something like this happening. 

Nonetheless, TMZ’s decision to publish the photos is appalling, and I predict they’ll take them down — but they’ll wait until the controversy is over and they’ve got several billion page views out the whole controversy.

Here’s the copy TMZ posted with the images:

The Duggars held a memorial today at their church in Arkansas, where they distributed the above photographs — containing messages like, “There is no foot too small that it cannot leave an imprint on this world.”

The photos were first posted on Twitter by a family member — and then surfaced on a fan site.

We reached out to the family for comment — so far, no word back.

I’m not sure what to say about this ordeal. The Duggars tweeted the photos? Does that change your feelings about TMZ publishing them? And how do you feel about taking photographs of a miscarried baby to hand out at a funeral?


More Reading:  Duggars Share Photos of Miscarried Baby At Funeral

 

Suffering in Silence: How one woman coped with a miscarriage

 For Shame! TMZ Publishes Photos of Michelle Duggars Miscarried Baby

Go Back To Strollerderby

16 Comments

I don’t for a second discount or doubt their grief but I think what makes people uncomfortable about this is that it could be construed as them exploiting the miscarriage to promote their political and theological agenda. I find that in poor taste.

Widelawns commented on Dec 15 11 at 1:18 pm

When we lost our baby girl at 23 weeks in October 2010, the nurses strongly encouraged us to take some pictures. In fact, one of the nurses, unbeknownst to us, took some beautiful artful photos of Evangeline in private, after taking some of us holding her. We cherish these photos still, even now that we’ve had a healthy little boy this year. At her memorial service we handed out candles with little sepia toned photos of our little girl attached and this year on the anniversary of her death I used this picture as my Facebook profile pic. I think we need to remove the stigma. I was more upset about TMZ blurring out the image as if it’s offensive. They are just tiny, sweet little feet.

Sarah commented on Dec 15 11 at 1:53 pm

I think if they tweeted them and even by handing them out at the service, given their public status, they must have expected that the photos would be distributed. Also, given their obvious pro-life status, they probably don’t mind people seeing the development of a mid-pregnancy fetus. I think they are tasteful and loving photos.

Larissa commented on Dec 15 11 at 1:58 pm

Lots of families cherish the photos they have of their stillborn babies. Now I Lay Me Down To Sleep is an organization of professional photographers that donate their time and talents to photograph babies that have passes away- such that the families will have those momentos.

If the Duggars handed the photos out at the memorial service (and you don’t mention if it was public or private/family only) then they did not intend to hide the photos.

mommacommaphd.wordpress.com commented on Dec 15 11 at 2:21 pm

I think what really upsets the liberal, prochoice media is that there is absolutely no denying that you are looking out two tiny little perfect human feet. A human being died. Not a “fetus”. A baby was lost. It puts the decision to abort in a whole new perspective, and many liberals don’t like that.

Andrea commented on Dec 15 11 at 3:04 pm

Andrea: it’s literally impossible (seriously, look it up! I dare ya) to get an abortion without significant health concerns at 6 months gestation. At the point at which most abortions take place, 7-8 weeks, it would take a magnifying glass to see the fetus’s feet, which would have just begun to form. So to frame this as a question of abortion is typical of how pro-lifers like to bend the truth in order to support their agenda.

Bunnytwenty commented on Dec 15 11 at 5:04 pm

I for one sure wish that I could have pictures of my children that where still born. That was many years ago 1st. a son full term 34 years ago and then a daughter again full term 29 years ago. Back then most people has no idea what still born was or did they have compassion for the losses. I was told to get over it! I could go on about the cruelity, but shall not. It took me many years to be able to talk about them without the tears. Still it hurts, just in a different way. So yes take pictures, have a celebration how ever you want and not be bothered by insentitve people that by the grace of what ever have not had to deal with such sorrow.

Cathy commented on Dec 15 11 at 8:10 pm

@Bunnytwenty – the picture is the only fact I was referring to. Those little feet do not belong to a “fetus”. They belong to a baby. The picture allows no denial.

Andrea commented on Dec 15 11 at 8:38 pm

I agree w/Sarah, blurring out those tiny feet offended me far more than the Duggar family sharing these precious photos with their family and friends. I’ve had mulitple miscarriges in the past so I know what it is to lose a unborn child. Many parents who lose a baby during the second trimester have similar photos of thier little ones taken and find great comfort in those few photos. Unless you’ve been in the horrific situation of having a unborn child die for any reason, you just can’t understand how much a simple photo can mean to you, nor would you ever think there’s a hidden agenda in this sad situation. I don’t personally think the release of these photos were done to push the Duggar’s beliefs of pro life, it has to do w/a family who lost a baby who they clearly wanted, cherished, and loved. It was their way of honoring thier daughter, Jubilee and allowing all the members of thier family to grieve her tragic loss. I thought the photos were beautiful and heartbreaking….

Sanriobaby =^.^= commented on Dec 15 11 at 8:59 pm

I suffered a miscarriage this year very similar in nature to Michelle’s. Why anyone would want a photo is beyond me. And I wasn’t allowed such a luxury, my baby having passed naturally and not coming out looking like anything but random bits of tissue. But, her photos should have been kept private. VERY private. I’m talking not handed out to anyone, anywhere. Some people just love the limelight I guess.

anon commented on Dec 16 11 at 11:46 am

I’d also love to point out that the Duggar baby was not a stillborn baby, but a first trimester miscarriage, which happens to millions of women, some who don’t even realize it. I feel for the Duggars, I truly and wholly do. But, let’s not exaggerate this.

anon commented on Dec 16 11 at 11:47 am

Actually, it was a 2nd trimester miscarriage. 4 more weeks and that baby could have survived in a NICU. I thought the pictures were beautiful. I agree that there is such a stigma about baby loss, regardless of how far along the mother is. While tmz was likely just trying to get press, I think that if the duggars are comfortable enough to have their entire life in the public eye then it would have been hypocrisy to hide this part of it. They are showing that even though this was baby #20 she was loved and wanted. As someone who has suffered from infertility I have to stop myself from feeling resentful of people who seem to pop out babies left and right, but I would never write off someone’s loss as insignificant. I hope the pictures touch someone in seeing how precious and perfectly formed those feet and hands are.

Shana commented on Dec 16 11 at 6:23 pm

Tmz shouldn’t be ashamed here. I would never show my dead baby to the world. But that’s my choice. The duggars are famous for having babies. They lost one, why not share their loss of a loved one to the world? They already share their 19 kids to the world. They are blessed so it seems. Maybe this was gods way of leting them know to shut down shop.

maria commented on Dec 18 11 at 5:13 am

Uh… In case this is lost on you, Strollerderby.., you just published the photos as well. Pixelated or not… you are just as guilty as TMZ.

LLN commented on Dec 19 11 at 12:51 am

I don’t think that picture is disturbing at all. Many people distribute photos of their loved ones (specially in memorials). As far as I know, they only had put the picture on their website, so I don’t think they were trying to “convince” anyone about something. Again, they had put the picture on THEIR website! I can’t stop thinking that the media has spread the picture all over the world and pixelated it only to criticize them, to make they look like “bad parents”. Seriously, I don’t understand why the picture is pixelated! I think that a pro-abortion propaganda is far more disturbing than this picture!

Andrea commented on Mar 30 12 at 3:17 pm

How you choose to grieve is just that- your choice. I don’t like the Duggars and certainly don’t agree with having so many children. I come from a background where the health of the mother takes priority- so that she is around and healthy to nurture and raise the children she brings into the world. That said, I also have great empathy for her loss. From their perspective, this was their child, a sibling and I understand that honoring the life is important for their healing. The photos don’t offend me, what does is the venom and hatred directed at them- and their willingness to turn EVERY event in their lives into a TV episode. Jackie O suffered a miscarriage, so do many other famous women, but you don’t see the public overexposure. I certainly could chime in with the haters, but I will refrain- and offer my own prayer that Jim-Bob and Michelle finally hear the message and STOP having more kids. Risking your life and health and the well-being of the children you already have is just wrong. Be thankful for what you have. There are some of us who would be grateful to have just one child.

Rachel commented on Apr 07 12 at 8:03 pm

Add your take:

Note: Babble is a supportive, diverse community. We encourage a range of opinions,
but any unduly hostile comments will be removed.


Comments are delayed up to 15 minutes

Most Popular on Facebook

Best of Babble.com


  • Lori Garcia
  • Joslyn Gray
  • Amber Doty
  • Julianna Miner
  • Monica Bielanko
  • Sierra Black
  • Meredith Carroll
  • Carolyn Castiglia
  • Sunny Chanel
  • Madeline Holler
  • Rebecca Odes
  • Danielle Smith
  • Danielle Sullivan
  • Katherine Stone
  • Disney Online Moms & Family Portfolio

    The Walt Disney Company supports Babble as a platform dedicated to honest, engaged, informed, intelligent and open conversation about parenting. However, the opinions expressed on this site are those of individual parents/writers and do not reflect the views of Disney. In addition, content provided on this site is for entertainment or informational purposes only and should not be construed as medical advice, diagnosis, treatment, or safety advice. Click here for additional information. Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Interest-Based Ads

    More in Strollerderby (50 of 11490 articles)