Strollerderby

Back When Thin Wasn’t In: 8 Vintage Weight Gain Ads

Posted by meredith carroll on December 2nd, 2011 at 1:20 pm

Marilyn Monroe in The Prince and the Showgirl trailer cropped 275x300 Back When Thin Wasnt In: 8 Vintage Weight Gain Ads

Yes, Marilyn, by today's standards you are considered a plus-size woman

Imagine a time being a size 12 didn’t make you plus-size? When being called “zaftig” was a compliment? When spilling out of your jeans meant you had sex appeal?

Hard to imagine right? And yet. There was a time.

Take a look at these vintage weight GAIN ads (courtesy of Retronaut.co) after the jump and imagine living during that time. It must have been nice, right? Sigh.

 

weight 1 Back When Thin Wasnt In: 8 Vintage Weight Gain Ads

As If It’s Hard to Gain Weight? Ha!
Just ask me for tips. I’ve got loads of ‘em.

 

Marilyn Monroe image via Wikipedia.com

All other images courtesy of Retronaut.co

Follow Meredith Carroll on Twitter.

 Back When Thin Wasnt In: 8 Vintage Weight Gain Ads

Go Back To Strollerderby

26 Comments

Uh, Marilyn Monroe was really really tiny.

By today’s standards.

BlackOrchid commented on Dec 02 11 at 1:19 pm

@Blackorchid — I’ve read she was around a size 12.

Meredith Carroll commented on Dec 02 11 at 1:27 pm

A size 12 isn’t what it used to be! It is bigger now that it used to be. Even clothes I had in the 80/90s that were say 10s are smaller than the 10s they make now. The clothing companies are making things bigger to fit bigger people. Everyone is fatter. It’s disgusting. These ads were probably from a time when food was scarce or more expensive than now. You’re right, with cheap food, fake food with all sorts of weird chemicals, readily available around the clock, it’s no challenge to gain 5 lbs in a week nowadays. (I think I may have done this last week….eek!)

Suzie commented on Dec 02 11 at 1:33 pm

You guys never buy vintage clothing, do you?

lol the sizing has changed A LOT

I’m (honestly) 110 pounds and only 5 foot 4 – and I often have to wear a size 10 or 12 from my local vintage boutique. People in the 50s and 60s were much, much tinier – not just weight – height and bone.

BlackOrchid commented on Dec 02 11 at 1:37 pm

Blackorchid..watch Some Like it Hot! Marilyn was not tiny. I wish I lived in these times. As a true size 8, even my size is considered “bigger”.

jess commented on Dec 02 11 at 1:40 pm

she had ups and downs in her weight, but she would never be considered tiny by today’s standards. She wouldn’t be considered big either…

From what I can see her dress sizes woudl have ranged from a 4 to an 8 in today’s sizes, and was around 5’5… No way she would have made it in today’s Hollywood without being considered large.

Sarah commented on Dec 02 11 at 1:44 pm

I’ve seen her actual costumes at the Smithsonian, from films including Some Like it Hot.

They’re tiny!

It’s a total myth that MM was somehow zaftig. She was curvy (boobage) but still very small.

BTW Grace Kelly was frighteningly small. Her costumes must be seen to be believed.

BlackOrchid commented on Dec 02 11 at 1:48 pm

Sizes really have changed a lot. The women in the ads look like they might be a size 6 or 8 in today’s sizing, and they all have incredibly tiny waists. So what they’re really advertising is that you should have round hips and larger breasts, and a small waist – or actual curves and a little bit of padding and roundness instead of aiming for overweight. They’re hardly “spilling out of their jeans,” or “fat.” Think, going from a size 0 to a 6 in today’s sizing, not a size 6 to a size 12. A size 12 in today’s sizes would have looked decidedly large a few decades ago.

sarahh commented on Dec 02 11 at 2:01 pm

Yes, Marilyn was a size 12 — which is a size 6 by today’s standards. Wedding dresses often use “old” sizing, and mine was a 12, wheras I am a size 6 in street clothes.

Joanna commented on Dec 02 11 at 3:40 pm

I second what Sarahh said. I think this article might be misunderstanding what they mean by ‘skinny’. Look at the add comparing the ‘skinny’ girl to the ‘curvy’ girl. Their arms are exactly the same size, one is just flat chested and narrow. Despite what most of us are force-fed, I think curves by the standards shown in these adds are still generally considered ideal. Perhaps not much in the media, but in every day life for sure. I’m 5’8” and even post baby I weigh maybe 110 and I get TONS of ‘too skinny’ comments. Despite what we’re all told, trust me, being built like twiggy doesn’t necessarily mean no more self consciousness over your figure and tons of compliments left and right. Sizing definitely varies by clothing line and time period. I wear a 00-2 at stores like old navy but when I shop at a higher end store or vintage it goes up to the 2-6 range. I think it has to do with brands assumptions about their target markets. Stores like walmart have me shopping in the kids section in my 20′s (for me and my daughter!) because of the assumption that the income range that shops at walmart must be overweight. Which is quite sad, really. To be honest if I were a 1950′s gal I’d probably be lapping up these curvy supplements like a champ :)

skelly commented on Dec 02 11 at 8:23 pm

I think actresses and models in vintage photos look a little zaftig to us now because we’re used to the Photoshop standard. These women were thin. This is what thin women look like when they’re not photoshopped into oblivion.

Lilmouse commented on Dec 02 11 at 10:08 pm

I think they was just telling them they was to skinny and wanted them to gain weight because they didn’t like boney woman back then=]

Clara commented on Dec 03 11 at 11:08 am

Skinny was considered unhealthy then. Plus these women were real women and not lipo’d and plastic surgery zombies. Yes the sizes were WAY different by today’s standards. I have a vintage size 14 swimsuit I found that is small, like a 6 or something. I still think these ads are fabulous, these all look like real women, not some drugged out junkies.

mama b commented on Dec 03 11 at 1:44 pm

right now i’m a giant pregnant person, but before that i was a modern day 2/4 and a vintage 10 or even 12 is about the same as that. also i think that a lot of girls and women still hope for that tiny waist and big breasts and butt!

Taz commented on Dec 03 11 at 5:48 pm

My grandma was 117 lbs. at 5’9″ in her teens and twenties and was considered way too thin back in the day. If she were young today she’d probably be a model with her lean frame and striking facial features. I can remember her saying when the whole Kate Moss “waif” look was in that she couldn’t believe what was considered unattractive back when she was young was considered the height of fashion now.

I considered wearing her wedding gown but even though I was 100 lbs. at the time, I was still too big to fit into it (I’m only 5′ 2″).

CW commented on Dec 04 11 at 6:35 am

Marilyn was a 36D and had 36″ hips…but a 23″ waist. So she was curvy but not skinny nor was she fat…but in today’s society those curves would have still been considered big. However those ads seem to want curves to land specifically in the boob area…so even back then, men and women were obsessed with the size of women’s breasts! :)

Trina commented on Dec 05 11 at 4:23 pm

Plus in “Some Like It Hot”, Monroe is wearing skin tight clothing, so of course it accentuates her curves, making her look “big” to our eyes.

Alicia commented on Dec 05 11 at 7:26 pm

I think that “skinny” is a euphemism for “flat-chested” in these ads.

laurena noela commented on Dec 05 11 at 9:21 pm

i agree the person tho wrote this doesnt seem to understand sizing back then and skinny meant flat chested

katie commented on Dec 06 11 at 12:37 am

Every woman is beautiful. No matter what shape you are there is 15 men within a 5mi radius who wanna “hit that”. Women are beautiful without the desire of men, though beauty is designed for attracting a mate. A number doesnt make you fate or thin, its entirely up to how confident YOU are. Take it from a dominatrix, You are not over/underweight unless You say so.
I agree sizes expand and contract, I have a size 14 dress made in 1956 that measures to the average size 12 today. Food was not scarce back then, exercise and work is scarce today.

Liz commented on Dec 24 11 at 11:42 am

apparently i was dropped in the wrong decade.

jazzymay commented on Jan 06 12 at 1:35 pm

LIZ you are right. At just about any size (I am an 18 now, have been everything from 8 up), I find there is no shortage of willing men if you are smiling, confident, and can project a sexy vibe. As Katherine Hepburn (I think) said, back in the day, “the average man is more interested in a woman who is interested in him then he is in a woman with beautiful legs.”

aimee commented on Feb 17 12 at 4:16 pm

Number one, Marilyn Monroe would not be considered “plus-size” by today’s standards. I find that really strange when articles make that claim. If she was a size 12 back then, it’s only because clothing sizing was different. A size 12 in the 50′s is like a size 8 today. Go to a vintage clothing store and you’ll see. A size 12 has a very tiny waist. Secondly, I don’t believe a size 12 today is considered “plus-size”. Most stores and brands consider plus-size 16 and up. Oh, and NONE of the women in those ads are “plus-size” by any era’s standards! They are all quite thin!!

Charlotte Harlott commented on Feb 19 12 at 4:05 pm

Alas I was born in the wrong era, but hey at least I get to do more than cleaning when I choose not to do it for a day that is. And my husband has given up on the idea of dinner actually being ready when he gets home unless it’s pizza hut LOL

Jennifer commented on Feb 22 12 at 4:53 am

How about we judge a woman based on her CONFIDENCE and not the size of the clothes, “fat” or “skinny”? And how about we change ourselves for ourselves, not to please society?

Olga commented on Mar 06 12 at 5:09 pm

Coming from a woman who didn’t really get her curves until her mid-twenties (after having three kids), ads like these would just cause the “skinny and scrawny” girls to have the same issues for having no curves, as many girls do today for having “too many” curves. We need to teach young girls, and guys alike, that God has made you, and you are “fearfully and wonderfully made”. God doesn’t make anything that’s worth-less. Don’t get your value from others or even from within (emotions change like the wind); your value comes from the Lord. He alone provides true self-esteem and purpose. (Psalm 139)

Jenny commented on Apr 22 12 at 3:23 pm

Add your take:

Note: Babble is a supportive, diverse community. We encourage a range of opinions,
but any unduly hostile comments will be removed.


Comments are delayed up to 15 minutes

Most Popular on Facebook

Best of Babble.com


  • Lori Garcia
  • Joslyn Gray
  • Amber Doty
  • Julianna Miner
  • Monica Bielanko
  • Sierra Black
  • Meredith Carroll
  • Carolyn Castiglia
  • Sunny Chanel
  • Madeline Holler
  • Rebecca Odes
  • Danielle Smith
  • Danielle Sullivan
  • Katherine Stone
  • Disney Online Moms & Family Portfolio

    The Walt Disney Company supports Babble as a platform dedicated to honest, engaged, informed, intelligent and open conversation about parenting. However, the opinions expressed on this site are those of individual parents/writers and do not reflect the views of Disney. In addition, content provided on this site is for entertainment or informational purposes only and should not be construed as medical advice, diagnosis, treatment, or safety advice. Click here for additional information. Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Interest-Based Ads

    More in Strollerderby (50 of 11490 articles)