Strollerderby

Restaurant Slammed for “Baby Tax”

Posted by monica bielanko on November 30th, 2011 at 8:43 am
warnh086 no children allowed in this area 300x206 Restaurant Slammed for Baby Tax

What's next? A breastfeeding tax?

Moms were shocked when, while dining at Cosmo’s Restaurant (England’s largest eatery) with their babies, they were asked to pay $5 just for bringing the children in the restaurant.

As Shine Yahoo reports, Sheridan was surprised, to say the least. “I was astonished as we explained she was exclusively breastfed and would be sitting on our laps, therefore not consuming any food or occupying an extra seat. They said it was their new policy. That was all,” Sheridan told London’s Evening Standard.

Outraged moms took to the web to vent their anger over Cosmo’s baby tax policy leading to the restaurant’s apology on their website for “mistreatment by our staff”. The message also clarified the fee was supposed to apply to toddlers who are eating the restaurant’s food. Cosmo said “We will be in contact with Natasha Young and Anna Sheridan with a personal apology for their mistreatment by our staff.”

Even if it was a misunderstanding or if the restaurant tweaked the policy to cover its butt, I think it’s awesome that parents are not tolerating the no kids allowed movement that seems to be spreading across the globe. As Yahoo puts it, “Many parents feel marginalized, even bullied when they take their toddlers out to a restaurant. While they may have gotten used to fellow patrons complaining about their crying babies, being charged extra for the privilege is the last straw.”

Exactly. Restaurants banning kids, airlines forcing babies to the back of the plane or splitting families up altogether. And here’s another one Yahoo sites: moms in the English town of Bath were charged $3 for bringing in baby food and not ordering off the children’s menu. After moms protested the restaurant withdrew its baby fee policy. Sheesh. What’s next? A breastfeeding tax? Or as one commenter on the Evening Standard wrote: “You might as well charge a pregnant women for taking up extra space.”

It’s hard enough taking children out in public but if I choose to do so I should be given the same treatment as anyone else at that restaurant. Unless my kids start to act out and I do nothing about it, leave me alone. It’s shocking to me that of the nearly 80 comments after this post, so many people think it’s acceptable to ban children from restaurants.

What are your thoughts about the no kids allowed movement?

 Restaurant Slammed for Baby Tax

Go Back To Strollerderby

18 Comments

As long as the restaurants post their child policy noticably, somewhere you can see before you enter the restaurant, I support them. If they want to have an atmosphere that doesn’t involve kids, then that’s their choice. If they want to discourage bringing kids by adding a fee, then that’s their choice. It’s also your choice whether you want to frequent such establishments. Personally, if I’m with my child, I wouldn’t go there. But, if I am going out without my child, it would be the first place I’d head to.

Plenty of children do “act out”, and it’s not up to you to decide when you kid has acted out too much. Parent get used to their children, and even if you do do something about your kid acting up, and stop it, your kid has still disrupted other patrons.

Whenever I go to a restaurant with my child, I make sure it’s a place where kids are welcome. I don’t want to disrupt the owners, workers, or other patrons. Just like I wouldn’t go to quiet restaurants if myself or my partner had vocal tourette syndrome.

You say “While they may have gotten used to fellow patrons complaining about their crying babies……”. Yeah – because it’s all about you and your poor feelings when you’re complained to about your crying baby. You don’t even think for a second about the other patrons and their legitimate right to complain.

Gib commented on Nov 30 11 at 9:56 am

It’s enough for me that British mums throw a right stonking wobbler.

bob commented on Nov 30 11 at 10:44 am

Shame it’s come to this. Unfortunately, you can thank those parents who inflicted misbehaved and uncontrolled children on the public at large. You know the ones. The ones who let the kids screech, scream or cry without taking them out. The ones who let them run or amble around causing risk of burns from food or drink to not only themselves but the other patrons, Or the ones who let their kids walk over with sticky fingers and bug other people. And god forbid you ask nicely, or even give a look. Most of these parents feel “entitled” to their time and hell and be damned those around them. So it is THOSE parents who have ruined it for others. Shame. Since they latter manners and courtesy maybe this will be the t4aching tool they need. Too bad for those of us whose kids were taught to sit nicely, converse and respond to others with manners.

fed up commented on Nov 30 11 at 11:15 am

I think it depends on the place and the time. If its casual dining, I don’t really take issue with children, even if they are acting up a little. That being said, if I hired a sitter, made reservations, put on pantyhose and went out with my husband at a splashy place – only to have my conversation interrupted by a cranky toddler, then I have a problem.

LS commented on Nov 30 11 at 11:21 am

Oddly, whether it’s a cranky toddler or an asshole on his cellphone, discrimination is discrimination. And that shit’s illegal!

Leanne commented on Dec 01 11 at 10:27 am

To Leanne: Discrimination is *not* illegal. Discrimination in certain circumstances (e.g. hiring practices, public accommodation) against certain protected classes (e.g. races, religions) in certain locales (e.g. USA, UK) is unlawful. AFAIK, neither “parents with children” nor “cell phone users” are protected classes in any locality. Therefore, it is perfectly legal to discriminate against those classes. It is the decision of the business owner if this is a profitable action, however.

MailDeadDrop commented on Dec 01 11 at 10:47 am

@FED UP – exactly. Where I live there are way too many kids whose parents permit them to do whatever they want and don’t even seem to be trying to teach them manners. And if you tell their kid not to do something (like, say, don’t run into the street when there’s a car coming) they freak out and tell you it’s not your job to parent their kid. I know that, but I just kept your kid from getting run over because you weren’t paying attention. Maybe you should have been doing that.
These same parents are the ones who let their kids run around a restaurant and annoy other people. I don’t mind your kids being there – mine’s there, too. But keep them at your table and don’t let them run loose like they’re at the playground or something. If they act up, correct them. If they won’t stop, take them outside. I’m sorry, but it’s one thing for kids to be a little loud and entirely another for you to ignore when they go from loud to obnoxious. Kids are great, and we should let them be kids, but part of being a kid is learning what behavior is appropriate where. Parents need to be teaching their children these things. If I see a kid who is just being a kid with a parent who is actually TRYING to teach them the proper way to behave, I can deal with that – they have to learn by doing, right? It’s when the parents ignore the behavior or act like it’s okay (some even encourage it) that I have a real problem.

Heather commented on Dec 01 11 at 10:53 am

Also, I’ve been to restaurants that have “no kids” and “kids” sections. I see that as a kind of “happy medium” kind of like “smoking” and “non-smoking” sections. And ones that have policies like “no kids under 10 after 8pm.” I don’t take offense to these kinds of policies. Most kids that age are in bed by then anyway. Plus, they’re not saying not to bring your kids there, they’re just trying to make everybody happy.

Heather commented on Dec 01 11 at 11:03 am

So the fee was for toddlers who are eating the restaurant’s food? And that’s ok? Don’t they already charge for the meal? that may be the restaurants choice and my choice is to not be a patron. Children are a part of society. Those that don’t like that should crawl back into their caves and stay there. Where are all these misbehaving children anyway? My family eats out alot, we travel by plane alot both business and personal, and frankly I just have never seen behavior that would result in such a revolt by society as a whole. What is wrong with people!

michelle commented on Dec 01 11 at 11:06 am

@@. Well if you didn’t see it yourself Michelle, it must not ever happen anywhere.

goddess commented on Dec 01 11 at 11:11 am

@ Goddess – its called tolerance and I have lots of it for children who are still learning as should others. All the complainers will be relying on these kids when their old and gray. They deserve more respect than they are getting. I have no tolerance for mis-behaving, rude adults – they should know better. Where’s the tax/discussion for the yahoo who’s yelling on the phone in public, who cuts you off in traffic, who doesn’t hold the door for you, etc?

michelle commented on Dec 01 11 at 11:29 am

I agree with Michelle.

Manjari commented on Dec 01 11 at 11:50 am

They do not have a charge for a non-child coming into the restaurant, so it’s discriminatory, just as a $5 “old person” or “black person” or “ugly person” fee would be illegal. you have public accomodations, you open yourself up to this and I’d venture to guess that British law and E.U. law might even be stronger than U.S. law in that regard (although without the right to bring a multi-billion $ lawsuit if you’re unhappy) are pretty clear about this.

Bubbah commented on Dec 01 11 at 11:51 am

@Bubbah – read MailDeadDrop’s comment on the legality of the issue. Also, in the UK and EU, you have the right to sue for damages, however, it is not generally a right most invoke.

My opinion on the issue has been impacted when my husband and I went out for an anniversary dinner a few years back. We saved to go out to a great restaurant and made reservations, hired a sitter – we were new parents and this was the first time we were going out in style in nearly a year. We went out, only to be seated next to two couples who brought their toddlers with them for cocktails. At 8:30pm. They were cranky and bored, and screamed the whole time. It was unpleasant for servers and guests. I get it that maybe they, in their higher income bracket, could afford to go out at a good restaurant like it was no big deal. But for us, at the time, this was a real treat. I wish that they had thought of others (other guests at the restaurant, the exhaustion of their children, etc.) before themselves, but they did not. Maybe that’s unfair to think, but honestly, it feels like some people have lost the sense of “occasion” in going out. I don’t want to feel like I can’t bring my child with me to places (grocery shopping, casual dining), but there are certain places where my kid just isn’t ready to go yet (an evening concert, a fancy dinner). And I have to sacrifice what I want, when I want it. We’ll enjoy that as a family when he’s ready.

LS commented on Dec 01 11 at 12:56 pm

I’d have to say that I’m with Michelle and LS on this one. How about when you head to a restaurant and the only booth that’s available looks like a couple of cattle have been foraging through it, becuase the kids have trashed it and the floor and the staff haven’t cleaned it up yet. Maybe it’s going too far to charge a fee just to bring a kid in, but even those of us with kids have had a meal ruined by screaming or over active toddlers….

lysa commented on Dec 01 11 at 2:26 pm

Michelle, when I have pa
paid a sitter or arranged and driven my children to a family member, made reservations at a nice restaurant for which I am paying top dollar, I am not going to “tolerate” crying, screeching, screaming, wandering children.
Parents either should not bring young children into nicer restaurants unless they are CERTAIN they will behave, or they remove them as SOON AS they cause a disturbance. That is called “courtesy” and “responsibility”. To let them carry on and ruin others’ experience for which they are paying is called “selfish”, “irresponsible” and self-entitled”.

BTW- totally agree on the cell phones, in public, traffic courtesy and door holding. Pet peeves of mine as well. I’ll up your ante though- electronic -devices at the table! Won’t -and never did- permit my kids to do that either. Sagging pants, exposed underwear, muffin tops- anything else?
Oh yes, pleases, thank yous and excuse me. Gotta have those as swell.

goddess commented on Dec 01 11 at 2:36 pm

For those that think its appropriate to have child bans, what about disabled people who can cause commotions? Should they be banned also because they cannot mentally understand that they are in a public place and should have manners? I understand outrage against children who are disobedient and their parents aren’t doing anything about it, but as far as banning children in general (especially infants), thats certainly discriminatory to families, just like it would be to families with members who are mentally handicapped.
On the flip side, yes, people need to be more courteous when they do bring children out in public places. I have seen many moms/dads who are inconsiderate of waitstaff or other patrons and let their kids do whatever they want. If a child is unruly and will not settle down, I think it would be appropriate for that parent to leave with their child, at least until the child can be settled down. But not all children act that way in public and not all parents let their children do whatever they want. The rest of parents should not be punished for the few that do not properly handle their children.

Denise commented on Dec 02 11 at 2:27 pm

The problem is that many parents of small children are unable to keep their children quiet and not distrub the other patrons. I have seen parents allow loud talking, I mean LOUD talking, climbing around and under tables, along with crying infants that makes a meal out miserable for all within earshot. Those of us who don’t appreciate others’ children are seen as unkind and intolerant. Many toddlers and infants are not capable of sitting long periods of time and voice their displeasure at being forced to do so. Why do parents assume we all think their child is adorable…we don’t! I had a parent apologize ahead of time for their son kicking my seat on a flight. I paid good money and had to put up with an extremely uncomfortable 2 hour flight. It isn’t their child’s fault…it is theirs!!! I agree with no babies/toddlers allowed. I think babies need to be at the back of the plane with acustic curtains separating them from the rest of the passengers. I love having adult only restaurants!!!!

Deb commented on Dec 02 11 at 3:51 pm

Add your take:

Note: Babble is a supportive, diverse community. We encourage a range of opinions,
but any unduly hostile comments will be removed.


Comments are delayed up to 15 minutes

Most Popular on Facebook

Best of Babble.com


  • Lori Garcia
  • Joslyn Gray
  • Amber Doty
  • Julianna Miner
  • Monica Bielanko
  • Sierra Black
  • Meredith Carroll
  • Carolyn Castiglia
  • Sunny Chanel
  • Madeline Holler
  • Rebecca Odes
  • Danielle Smith
  • Danielle Sullivan
  • Katherine Stone
  • Disney Online Moms & Family Portfolio

    The Walt Disney Company supports Babble as a platform dedicated to honest, engaged, informed, intelligent and open conversation about parenting. However, the opinions expressed on this site are those of individual parents/writers and do not reflect the views of Disney. In addition, content provided on this site is for entertainment or informational purposes only and should not be construed as medical advice, diagnosis, treatment, or safety advice. Click here for additional information. Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Interest-Based Ads

    More in Strollerderby (50 of 11490 articles)