babble » blogs » Strollerderby
Strollerderby
Unmarried With Children: Kids More Likely To Have Unmarried Parents Than Divorced Ones
Sometimes I’m not sure which is harder: being married or being a parent. I find both equally difficult and equally rewarding. Both require reservoirs of patience and understanding. Yet, being married is not a requirement for parenthood and more and more Americans are choosing to have children and live together without marrying.
As the New York Times reports, that number has increased twelvefold since the seventies. According to a report released last week, children are now more likely to have unmarried parents than divorced ones.
Whoa! That’s wild. When I was growing up around half of my friends’ parents were divorced. I didn’t know a single couple that was unmarried.
The report was published by the National Marriage Project, an initiative at the University of Virginia, and the Institute for American Values. Both groups that argue in favor of the institution of marriage and believe that cohabitation is a growing risk for children, and that their lives are less stable in such families.
Here is how the study breaks down:
According to the National Survey of Family Growth, part of the Centers for Disease Control, 42 percent of children have lived with cohabiting parents by age 12, far more than the 24 percent whose parents have divorced.
The numbers also suggest a correlation with class. Americans with only a high school diploma are far more likely to cohabit than are college graduates, according to the report.
W. Bradford Wilcox, director of the National Marriage Project and an associate professor of sociology at the University of Virginia says cohabitating parents are twice as likely to break up as parents who are married.
I can understand that. During the worst arguments of my marriage, sometimes the only thing keeping me from bailing is that damn marriage certificate and the pain in the ass that filing for divorce would be. Yes, we’ve had some bad fights over the years.
The unmarrried with children movement appears to have educational influences. Wilcox says out-of-wedlock births among white women with a high school diploma jumped nearly 30 percent in the late 2000s. In contrast, the rate for white college graduates stayed flat at about 2 percent.
The report cites other studies that have concluded children of unmarried couples tend to do worse in school and are less psychologically healthy than the children of married parents. Babble’s Madeline Holler, who married her husband when their daughters, 10 and 6, were sitting in the backseat of the family car, isn’t worried about it.
Truthfully, I am not the least bit worried that anything related to my marital status since becoming a parents has had any impact whatsoever on any of my kids. None. Even when we lived in a not-so-progressive city, even when some members of our extended family were confused by our refusal to make it official, there was no scarring, none. Which is not to say I’m not screwing up my kids. It just has nothing to do with Mommy and Daddy pre-Vegas.
I agree. America is filled with all kinds of different families and as long as parents are doing their job I don’t think it matters whether or not they have a binding legal document. I think the study doesn’t take all factors into account and is definitely biased toward marriage. What do you think?
This Stepfather asks: Was I a dad or just a stand-in?
Go Back To Strollerderby
10 Comments
[...] Conclusions from the Social Sciences, including at the Huffington Post, UPI, Syndey Morning Herald, Babble, Natchez Democrat, Washington Times, Fredericksburg Free Lance-Star, MercatorNet, The New American, [...]
Why Marriage (Still) Matters « Family Scholars commented on Aug 24 11 at 11:03 amVoice of Reason commented on Aug 23 11 at 11:41 amI think that having a wedding is not the same as being married and that you’re either committed or you’re not.
/
I also think you’re quoting Madeline Holler and not Meredith Carroll.
Andrea commented on Aug 23 11 at 12:49 pmMarriage is a legal and public commitment to assume responsibility for your own life and the lives of the children you may have. Unmarried parents expect the government (meaning other taxpayers) to play the role of husband, and this is what I find so bloody repulsive. Why should I pay for the uneducated who refuse to grow up, mature and take responsibility for their own children? It does NOT take a village to raise a child, it takes a FAMILY. The ideal liberal state would have all children raised without parents, and all income diverted into taxes so the state can best decide how to divvy it up – hint: it won’t be based on making intelligent choices and working hard. And that has just worked out ever so well in the past (hello Soviet Union).
Jenna commented on Aug 23 11 at 3:33 pmWow Andrea, I’m truely sorry for how angry at the world you seem to be. I hope things get better for you.
Stacie commented on Aug 24 11 at 9:04 amMy aunt raised her daughter alone, by choice (sperm donor), no government intervention. Friends of our family got married after having their two kids–as we met them after the kids were born, we had no idea they weren’t married until they told us they’d done so on their recent vacation. Again, no government intervention. “Unmarried parents” doesn’t necessarily mean single mom on welfare–it could just as easily mean two dads who can’t get married in their state, or a mom and a dad who could get married but choose not to.
Voice of Reason commented on Aug 24 11 at 11:52 amExactly, Stacie. This article is ONLY about cohabitating parents, which makes Andrea’s angry outburst even more bizarre – and irrelevant.
michelle commented on Aug 24 11 at 11:53 amSigh. I’ll say it again. Correlation does not equal causation. Unmarried parenthood is a *symptom* of poverty and underachievement, not a *cause* of it. It is one of the consequences of the disappearance of middle class jobs in the US, which resulted in a general slide into poverty and social dysfunction for people who do not have college degrees. Yes, there are educated gay parents and there are educated single parents by choice, but again, that is not the real story. The real story is: Underemployed men with few prospects are not good marriage material.
michelle commented on Aug 24 11 at 11:55 amAndrea’s outburst is also stupid. The government is already very hands off in this country and getting more so. That’s partly why people are in this mess.
Bunnytwenty commented on Aug 24 11 at 1:10 pmFrom her paranoid notions of what liberals want, to her idea of how the Soviet Union worked, to her idea that somehow not having a wedding makes two parents living together single parents (and welfare cheats?), Andrea never fails to make me laugh. Bravo, troll!
Lisa commented on Aug 24 11 at 8:13 pmWow, that was almost an invocation of Godwin’s Law. Which I do think needs to be expanded to the Soviet Union, these days.
Add your take:
Note: Babble is a supportive, diverse community. We encourage a range of opinions,
but any unduly hostile comments will be removed.
Comments are delayed up to 15 minutes







Lori Garcia
Joslyn Gray
Amber Doty
Julianna Miner
Monica Bielanko
Sierra Black
Meredith Carroll
Carolyn Castiglia
Sunny Chanel
Madeline Holler
Rebecca Odes
Danielle Smith
Danielle Sullivan
Katherine Stone
The Walt Disney Company supports Babble as a platform dedicated to honest, engaged, informed, intelligent and open conversation about parenting. However, the opinions expressed on this site are those of individual parents/writers and do not reflect the views of Disney. In addition, content provided on this site is for entertainment or informational purposes only and should not be construed as medical advice, diagnosis, treatment, or safety advice.

10