Strollerderby

Child Tragedies: Why Blame The Victims?

Posted by rebecca odes on July 18th, 2011 at 9:52 am

alg leiby kletzky boy 300x182 Child Tragedies: Why Blame The Victims?I can’t stop thinking about Leiby Kletzky. If you’ve been fortunate enough to miss last week’s horrendous news, he’s the 8 year old who was abducted and murdered in Brooklyn. Not just murdered, but dismembered in his killer’s kitchen. The abduction  occurred while Kletzky was wandering alone through his neighborhood, a freedom he had reluctantly been granted after begging to be allowed to walk home from day camp by himself. This is the part of the story that twists parents’ guts. I relate to this child’s desire for autonomy, to his mother’s desire to trust him.  Now that the worst has happened, these impulses are seen as clearly, horribly wrong.  “That poor mother,” people say, pointing not just at her grief, but her guilt.

When something happens to a child, especially something this monumentally gruesome, people are at a loss. They want to know why.  Since there is no answer to this question, they look for the next best thing: HOW? This tragedy has brought up a debate among parents about how loose we hold the reins on our children. But that question brings up others. Are we suggesting that this tragedy was their fault? Leiby Kletzky’s parents may have made a choice some see as questionable, but their choice was not unconsidered.  They debated, discussed, even practiced the walk with their son.  8 is quite young to walk alone in a city, but in a neighborhood police describe as a “zero crime area” should it really be too young?

Is allowing your child out onto the street alone “asking for it”?

On a question originally intended for Free-Range Parent Lenore Skenazy’s blog, but re-routed to his own site. Cul-De-Sac Hero contrasts our response to child abductions with the way we look at rape victims:

What astounds me, is that any suggestions to women that they should moderate their behaviour to help them reduce the risk of becoming victims of rape – such as dressing appropriately for the situation, avoiding dark alleys and not drinking too much at parties – is called “victim blaming” and hateful and results in marches and protests.

However, telling parents that their behaviour is the only reason for childhood abductions and murders is perfectly ok. Why do some victims completely bear responsibility for the criminal acts performed against them, while others are completely free of it?”

The author wonders whether this difference is related to the lack of a “childrenism” movement equivalent to feminism, arguing that child advocacy does not always have children’s interests in mind.  These crimes are not exactly parallel, and this comparison brings up more issues than I can manage in less than a dissertation. But here’s one that screams out: We hold parents responsible for just about everything that happens with their children.  Why should we not hold them responsible for allowing them to fall prey to predators? When a child is murdered, parents are effectively the living victims. But we also see them as enablers for failing to protect their children, or teach them to protect themselves.

Ultimately, the reason I think we hold parents responsible when something awful happens is that it gives us a sense of control.    When we look to the details surrounding a tragedy, what we really want to do is find out how to differentiate ourselves: I’m different. I’m smarter. This happened because the child’s mother made a bad choice, because he lives in a big city, because he wasn’t educated properly. Anything but the truth, which is that we are all vulnerable.

Being a parent is about protecting your child, but it’s also about allowing the child to stretch, learn and grow. The opportunities for growth are also, sadly, opportunities for  children to get hurt, or worse.  After a tragedy, we always want to turn back the clock and do things differently. It may not be the easiest way to process this, but I think we should resist the urge to suggest that the parents could have prevented this horror, and put the blame where it belongs: on the psychopath who committed the crime.

It’s not easy being a parent: “I didn’t count on motherhood being so hard.”

 Child Tragedies: Why Blame The Victims?

Go Back To Strollerderby

13 Comments

I honestly think a lot of it is wanting to prove that it could never, ever happen to you. There are some things that are more likely to happen to some families than others for obvious reasons – if the child is cared for by a parent, that child is never going to die in a way that’s related to a day care center, if the family doesn’t own a car there’s not going to be a car accident caused by one of the parents, etc. – but tragedies happen to all kinds of people. We just don’t want to believe that they could ever happen to us.

Diera commented on Jul 18 11 at 10:53 am

FYI: cul-de-sac hero isn’t the best guy to be linking to on this. His point, at least judging by other posts of his that I’ve read, isn’t that parents aren’t responsible for their kids getting murdered (not my opinion! his! his!), but that women ARE responsible for getting raped because of what they wear or how much they drink. I skimmed through his blog and he’s kind of a woman-hating creep.
I agree with Diera’s point – blaming someone else for tragedy is a way of warding it off and pretending that it could never happen to you. Well, it can. But it probably won’t, and it’s best not to live your life with the expectation that something bad will happen. It doesn’t add up to happy or healthy kids, or a satisfying life.

Bunnytwenty commented on Jul 18 11 at 11:45 am

@Bunnytwenty; yes @Diera’s conclusion was mine in the post as well-that this is a way of differentiating ourselves. I did not delve into cul-de-sac hero’s backstory, and I have questions about the analogy (as I mentioned). But I think if you take the essence of the idea that we should not be blaming victims, there is an interesting point to be made here.

Rebecca Odes commented on Jul 18 11 at 11:49 am

Rebecca – agreed, and I understand. I just wanted to point out that where that blog is coming from may not be where you’re coming from, or would want to appear to be coming from.

Bunnytwenty commented on Jul 18 11 at 12:53 pm

Blaming victims is wrong, but understanding them and their actions as they contribute to the crime has value, just like data about the perpetrator, the location, the motive, and the circumstances. The desire to convince oneself of having control is at the root of blaming victims. The appetite for the illusion of control seems at an all time high, as we give up ever more freedom in the name of security we will never really have.

lam commented on Jul 18 11 at 12:56 pm

@bunnytwenty- I totally appreciate the heads up! Just wanted to make clear that I was referencing just this one piece of his point, not his whole shtick…

Rebecca Odes commented on Jul 18 11 at 1:01 pm

Last week a toddler in my extended family died in one of those awful, just-looked-away-for-a-second accidents.
As the mother blames herself (the excursion was her idea), the father blames himself (he was the parent on duty, who wasn’t looking at the awful moment), the owners of the hazard blame themselves (maybe we should have fenced … )
… the grandparent generation is pointing out the amazing number of lucky moments it takes to get a child to adulthood.
Whether it’s narrowly missing being part of the freeway accident or fishing your kid out of the swimming pool or catching the baby biting the so-called childproof lid off the aspirin bottle, we were the recipients of amazing luck on countless occasions.
It hurts dreadfully that luck occasionally deserts families. But please, let’s not blame the parents. Even when you’re doing a dynamite job 24/7/365, a momentary inattention shouldn’t be fatal. And it usually isn’t.

Maggie commented on Jul 18 11 at 7:18 pm

This was nothing like the parents fault. Blame isn’t just pointless; it’s cruel. Bad news..it’s an ugly world. Bad things happen, and sometimes you can’t do a damned thing to stop it. So you obsess, and make yourself miserable, or you do the best you can, and live your life taking reasonable precautions. Beats not living at all, and that’s the alternative. To hide, and whimper, and cower. No thanks. I don’t want to go to my deathbed saying, “I did nothing, but at least I was safe.”

Holly commented on Jul 20 11 at 2:35 am

I think the comparison with rape victims is spot on. “When we look to the details surrounding a tragedy, what we really want to do is find out how to differentiate ourselves: I’m different. I’m smarter.” In a case of rape victim, other women feel safer ‘knowing’ that they dress more conservatively, or don’t dance as suggestively or don’t accept drinks from strange men or don’t have one night stands… so they won’t be raped… right? No one wants to type cast themselves as a “typical” victim.

And when there is no typical victim, which is usually the case in random isolated incident tragedies, society creates one – the neglectful parent.

JP commented on Jul 20 11 at 3:10 am

I believe that in this day and age, parents are getting lazy and dont want to take blame for what they have done. Take Casey Anthony for instance, she was “supposedly” a good mother, but my take is a long list of why I think someone like her should not walk free. Personally, a parent allowing any young child to walk home alone be it from school, camp, a friends house anymore can be dangerous and 9 out of 10 times it is. Parents need to pull up their boot strings and do the job they are supposed to do and teach their kids every important lesson in life and quit putting it all on TV. As a parent of a 2 yr old and 5 month old, I would NEVER consider putting my children in danger by letting them be on their own at a young age. People need to think of what they are doing before they do it and allow something like this to happen. What is this world coming too??

Christina commented on Jul 20 11 at 5:08 am

I live in queens ny, I now live only a few miles from where little Liebby was abducted and I grew up on the border of queens and one of the bad parts of Brooklyn. However even being so close to a bad neighborhood, in our little neighbor it was relatively safe. Most of the kids who went to my elementary school lived within a 5 block radius and most of us were granted at a young age to walk home by ourselves, then one day one of my male classmates was nearly abducted thankfully a good Samaritan intervened if not god only knows what would have happened to that boy. But I remember my mother bringing me to the emergency PTA meeting they had the night after the attempted abduction and all the parents were outraged and blaming the poor mother for her lack if parenting skills yet most if the other parents were in the same boat because they allowed their young children to walk alone. I couldn’t have been any older than 9 and I remember asking my mother why they were blaming his mother when it was not her fault. My mom simply responded that in times of tragedy people like to point fingers even if those fingers are pointed at the victim. When my mom started letting me walk home from school we went over the walk several times and went over defense strategies such as screaming “I don’t know you” if a stranger tried to grab me as to alert other people around me that something wasn’t right. Thankfully I never had to defend myself or alert a soul that someone was trying to harm me. But in this little boy’s case he was looking for a stranger for help another thing children are taught to do if they are lost. Sadly this stranger was a monster. I think it’s horrible to be blaming the mother and I will admit I thought to myself “who let’s their 8 year old child walk alone in this day and age?” but then I got the facts. When you live in a fairly safe neighborhood you do want to give your child freedom and it’s something the parents went over with their child. There is no one to blame here other than the monster who took that little boy’s life. It’s just a sad and horrible tragedy.

Felicia commented on Jul 20 11 at 6:08 am

@Christina–Your kids are still young. These things are inconceivable when your kids are babies and toddlers and you have your eyes on them every second of every day, which is appropriate and an absolute necessity at that age. My kids are seven and nine, going into second and fourth grade. This story just tore me apart because I can completely imagine being Liebby’s mother and having that conversation with him. He wants to do it on his own. His friends do it. Other parents are fine with it. He’s responsible. He’s good at helping with chores independently. He can go into a store and buy himself an ice cream by himself. He can go to the neighbor’s house and ask to borrow a couple of eggs if I ask him. He’s in school and camp by himself all day and he manages his own food, personal care, conversations with adults just fine. He can make phone calls on his own and he knows all about the rules for dealing with strangers as you’ve been over them a thousand times…. What kids can do at this age grows by leaps and bounds and yet every “next logical step” feels enormous and terrifying. How much freedom do you give them? You don’t want to hover, yet you have to let them try on their own. You teach and teach and teach, you practice over and over and over… but still, this stuff is so hard. This is the furthest thing from negligence and anyone who blames the parents is evil themselves. This is not their fault. My heart goes out to them.

CK commented on Jul 20 11 at 10:49 am

Rebecca, thank you for your thoughtful contribution to this discussion. However, I do not have a schtick. I occassionally write thought-provoking blog posts about sometimes controversial issues as time permits. Still, thanks for acknowledging that there is a discussion to be had without resorting to an inflammatory manner of speaking..

@BunnyTwenty – I don’t understand which posts you read which lead you to call me hateful names. It’s not fair to twisting my words in such a manner. I’ve explained my position more clearly now, so, if you’d like to debate on these points, please feel free to comment directly on my blog.

culdesachero commented on Jul 22 11 at 9:32 am

Add your take:

Note: Babble is a supportive, diverse community. We encourage a range of opinions,
but any unduly hostile comments will be removed.


Comments are delayed up to 15 minutes

Most Popular on Facebook

Best of Babble.com


  • Lori Garcia
  • Joslyn Gray
  • Amber Doty
  • Julianna Miner
  • Monica Bielanko
  • Sierra Black
  • Meredith Carroll
  • Carolyn Castiglia
  • Sunny Chanel
  • Madeline Holler
  • Rebecca Odes
  • Danielle Smith
  • Danielle Sullivan
  • Katherine Stone
  • Disney Online Moms & Family Portfolio

    The Walt Disney Company supports Babble as a platform dedicated to honest, engaged, informed, intelligent and open conversation about parenting. However, the opinions expressed on this site are those of individual parents/writers and do not reflect the views of Disney. In addition, content provided on this site is for entertainment or informational purposes only and should not be construed as medical advice, diagnosis, treatment, or safety advice. Click here for additional information. Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Interest-Based Ads

    More in Strollerderby (50 of 11490 articles)