Strollerderby

Pediatricians Turn Away Patients Whose Parents Refuse Vaccinations

Posted by danielle sullivan on July 5th, 2011 at 10:47 am
1028452 61302173 Pediatricians Turn Away Patients Whose Parents Refuse Vaccinations

Does your pediatrician enforce a vaccination policy?

If your pediatrician sent you a letter that said if you didn’t follow their vaccination schedule, your child could no longer be a patient, would that bother you? Or would it bother you more to know that your newborn was sitting next a family of children who weren’t vaccinated ever?

Eight pediatricians at one pediatric office in Chicago recently informed their patients by mail that they will “no longer see children whose parents refuse to follow the childhood immunization schedule developed by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the American Academy of Pediatrics.”

Dr. Scott Goldstein, one of the pediatricians who participated explains why in an article in the Chicago Tribune:

“All of the available research shows that the safest and most effective way to vaccinate children is on the schedule set by the CDC and AAP. To go against that schedule goes against proven scientific research and puts patients who do follow the schedule at risk.”

She says that out of the 5,000 to 6,000 patients in the practice, only a dozen or so have left due to the new policy.

Dr. Minal Giri, medical director of Melrose Park Pediatrics, says she had similar results, and that “only a handful of parents expressed concern” after her medical practice implemented a vaccine policy in back in the fall of 2008:

“The impetus behind the policy was to protect our patients. We have newborns, we have pregnant moms, we have kids with cancer who are immune-compromised, and it is a risk for them to have people coming in who have not been vaccinated.”

As far as I know my pediatrician’s office has no such policy. I have never received anything in writing stating otherwise. If it did, I might have to leave simply because I am holding off on the Gardisil vaccine. But since that is not a vaccine for an airborne disease that might be spread in an office, I’m not sure it should fall under the same regulations. Yet if the doctors mandate that a parent must follow the recommended schedule of vaccinations according to the AAP, I would have a problem.

I really haven’t given much thought to whether the children next to us in the pediatrician’s office are vaccinated. I tend to worry more about keeping my kids away from the other children in general, due to all the germs already there.

Does your pediatrician mandate that you must follow the vaccination schedule? Would you leave their practice if they did? Does it bother you to think your child is sitting next to an unvaccinated child? Have you ever thought about it at all?

 

Image: Stockxchng/zeathiel

Read more about Vaccinations, and why parents are still skeptical.

 Pediatricians Turn Away Patients Whose Parents Refuse Vaccinations

Go Back To Strollerderby

51 Comments

My kids aren’t vaccinated and I’d probably prefer them be around non-vaccinated kids! But that’s probably a whole other story LOL. We did have a pediatrician that seemed to encourage you to vaccinate “or else” but they never followed through. We felt more comfortable being in a practice that didn’t push vaccines and so we moved on to one that has a very small number of vaccinated patients.

Steph

Stephanie Precourt commented on Jul 05 11 at 11:31 am

Well it would suck to leave, but if they mandate Gardisil or flu vaccines and demand we keep the schedule, I guess I would. [leave]

goddess commented on Jul 05 11 at 11:47 am

I get that these articles generate alot of “energy”, so that’s why they continue to be published. But really… “sit next to an unvaccinated” child…are you kidding? I would much rather have my child sit next to an unvaccinated kid than a freshly vaxed one! Where they “shed” the disease for up to 6 weeks. And spare me the “protect” our children with Cancer routine…rule number one when my family member had Cancer…stay AWAY from freshly vaccinated children/people…they are contagious!! (no, I’m not making this up.) It sounds much to me that the pediatricians in Chicago are getting a very large incentive from the big pharma programs. (like so many do) So yes, I would leave..they clearly are NOT looking out for their patients, but for their own profits. There is no money in healthy people. (makes you wonder doesn’t it)

healthy mom commented on Jul 05 11 at 12:11 pm

Kudos!

Joulia commented on Jul 05 11 at 12:31 pm

A pediatricians’ office in our town recently changed their policy to require all patients to follow the schedule. The reason: lawsuits. Some parents choose not to vaccinate their kids and then sue the docs who tolerate it when the kid comes down with a vaccine-preventable illness. You would think the parents should be responsible, but they claim the doctors are negligent for not forcing them. Sounds crazy, but this is a litigious society, I guess.

Chris commented on Jul 05 11 at 12:48 pm

My pediatrician group has refusal to vaccinate forms for parents who opt out or wish to delay specific vaccines. They will not treat patients who have parents who refuse ALL vaccines, however. Frankly, I don’t blame them. I have heard of parents who objected to all vaccines and then sued the pediatrician when their child got killed by a vaccine-preventable illness (on grounds that the pediatricians are the experts and should have made them due it despite their refusal). I guess this is what you get when you live in a litigious society.

ChicaDificil commented on Jul 05 11 at 12:51 pm

Northwestern is one of the top teaching hospitals in the US and this practice is excellent (many friends of ours go there). Glad they’re cutting the cr*p and refusing to indulge certain people.

michelle commented on Jul 05 11 at 1:07 pm

I actually worried about this with friends of ours. They’ve since moved, so it’s no longer an issue, but they didn’t vaccinate their children AND the kids regularly fly to Eastern Europe to visit family. Many stories you hear about a normally-dead illness resurfacing come from non-vaccinated kids/people who were overseas and then traveled back to the US, so it was definitely a concern of mine how I’d keep my kid away from their kids until mine was fully vaccinated and okay. I was relieved when they moved and I didn’t have to confront them (not in a bad way, but I would have been honest about why I wasn’t coming around anymore).

Lara commented on Jul 05 11 at 1:49 pm

While I personally choose to have my LO follow the schedule, I’d leave a practice that wouldn’t treat all children. To me, they are letting down the children who may need a doctor the most and that is very unethical.

Alison commented on Jul 05 11 at 2:28 pm

Yes, as a mother with a newborn, I absolutely worry about children (and adults) who have not received their vaccinations, particularly whooping cough, measles, and meningitis.

Meagan commented on Jul 05 11 at 4:21 pm

Personally, I think there is good reason to vaccinate. I believe in the evidence that has disproven connections between vaccines and illnesses and that those who do not vaccinate are relying on herd mentality, which is highly irresponsible. I think it is well within a doctor’s right to institute a practice policy that says all patients must be vaccinated.

That said, I think parents need to find doctors who fit their needs. As a parent, if I didn’t believe in vaccinating, I likely wouldn’t feel comfortable with a doctor/practice that firmly believed in rigid schedules and would seek a doctor/practice that was less rigid. So, my guess is the 15% of patients who left are probably better matched with their new doctors.

NS commented on Jul 05 11 at 4:58 pm

Great policy. I hope more doctor’s offices apply this pressure for having the essential vaccines adhered to. I don’t think unvaccinated kids should even be allowed to go to public school either. If parents make this selfish decision, let them take responsibility for having their kids homeschooled. The rest of us responsible adults actually take the small (but horrible) risk of an adverse reaction to ensure our children and community at large our protected. There needs to be consequences for those who choose to take advantage of the herd protection without contributing to it.

Stacy commented on Jul 05 11 at 5:06 pm

Dear un-vaxxers, Please don’t give me or my children an infectious disease because you choose to believe you are smarter than years of science and medicine. The facts are in. The science is in. The statistics are in. Expose your child to polio if you must, but don’t give it to mine. Your conspiracy theories and house wife worries are killing children. Please don’t turn our nations health status back to 1960′s India.

Thanks. – a mom with a brain.

Facts are facts commented on Jul 05 11 at 5:09 pm

Actually, you cannot expel students from public schools permanently. They are mandated to educate each child. But please, rest easy, in the event of an outbreak, every child who is un-vaccinated or under-vaccinated for that particular disease is required to stay home until the outbreak is over.
BTW- would you impose this exclusion on those who cannot vaccinate due to adverse reactions or higher than normal familial risk?
Children (and adults) with mitochondrial disease are the latest on the list of recommendations against vaccines.

goddess commented on Jul 05 11 at 5:39 pm

facts: Don’t be ignorant. There DO exist adverse reactions to vaccines- read the package inserts. Our eldest suffered sever cortical atrophy from his infant DTP vaccines and died as a result of those complications. Don’t believe it doesn’t happen.
Thanks. a mom with a dead child due to his vaccines.

goddess commented on Jul 05 11 at 5:41 pm

I’m sorry for your loss Goddess. Can you please explain how a variant of Alzheimers is caused by vaccines? That is a genetic driven degeneration. How is DTP responsible?

I also wonder if it’s prudent for you to advise against vaccines. As a mother who knows the crushing heartbreak of loss, do you want to advocate against life saving advances?

Facts are facts commented on Jul 05 11 at 6:05 pm

good. Anti-vaxxers put us all at risk. Far more children die of vaccine preventable diseases than die from adverse reactions to vaccines. I sought out a pediatrician with this policy. And those of you who are worried about catching the disease from “shedding” must be complete idiots. The only thing that might happen to a healthy child (and this is very unlikely) is that they would essentially become vaccinated, not sick with the disease the vaccine prevents.

Heather commented on Jul 05 11 at 6:08 pm

“event of an outbreak, every child who is un-vaccinated or under-vaccinated for that particular disease is required to stay home until the outbreak is over.”

Oh good. Glad those kids will be safe since they were responsible for starting it. Great.

My kids deserve to be in a safe environment. If you choose to ignore the basics of health and safety, keep your kids home.

Facts are facts commented on Jul 05 11 at 6:10 pm

@fact: I can certainly explain how an encephalitic reaction ot the pertussis component takes place. Please read up on cortical atrophy., as shown via CT and MRI studies in a 6½ month old infant- not a senior citizen.
Please, though, point out exactly where I advised against vaccines in general? My younger 3 children are all up-to-date on their vaccines (excepting Gardisil) (10 yrs old, 12yo and 21yo). However, I DO advise against a mandate that does not provide for religious, philosophical and medical exemptions, as I find it unconstitutional- and an assault- to force people to inject their children with substances to which they object, against their will. As that parent who suffered grievous loss, I cannot, in good conscience, advocate that.
It’s likely my son would not have died from pertussis- yet dead he is form the very vaccine meant ot prevent it.

goddess commented on Jul 05 11 at 6:20 pm

If your children are vaccinated, why are you worried?

goddess commented on Jul 05 11 at 6:21 pm

Again- my kids are vaccinated. But in the event that they mandate vaccines I do not accept, I will still advantage them to the education they deserve- and for which my taxes pay. :-)
If HPV or the flu worries you so much, teach them abstinence, no needles and keep YOURS home during flu season :-) Or better- why not use your trusty vaccines and quit worrying?

goddess commented on Jul 05 11 at 6:27 pm

Anyone know of a peds office that mandates the CDC schedule in Aurora?

S commented on Jul 05 11 at 6:40 pm

Goddess: Because my baby can’t be vaccinated until he is two months old and won’t be fully protected right away. When he is old enough to either be fully protected or to not be at such risk of severe complications, then i won’t worry.

Also i don’t feel comfortable with a doctor who bases recommendations not on science and my child’s well being, but on appeasing the worried little mommy. That’s not what i pay my doctor for.

S commented on Jul 05 11 at 6:50 pm

Funny! My doctor (a fully qualified MD who also practices a number of alternative therapies) DOES NOT vaccinate (young) children or babies in her practice. Any parent that wants vaccines has to take their child to the travel clinic. She will not vax any child until the age of 6. She rocks!

Andrea commented on Jul 05 11 at 8:53 pm

Anyone who has researched this knows that there is a small risk of an adverse reaction that could include brain damage or death. Obviously, those statistics represent real people. Who can blame Goddess for her stance? She’s not just pulling it out of thin air that some people are better off not taking the risk. That said, I think it’s reasonable to expect vaccinations for all children where there is no indication of increased risk for adverse reaction or other medical justification for not vaccinating. Parents ought to have the right to decide whether or not to vaccinate. But everyone else also has the right to encourage legislation that would bar those kids from attending public school, or choose doctors who will not expose them to additional risks for the benefit of a minority of patients. Non-vaccinated kids also have the right to a publicly funded education. I’m sure the more adventurous of the pro-vaxers can suggest how those things can be negotiated.

lam commented on Jul 05 11 at 9:19 pm

@s: When we had our kids, we basically didn’t take them out in public much for the first 2 months before their 1st vaccines. :-)
I paid my doctor to listen to my observations and not sweep them under the rug and keep the baby vaccines after his first adverse reaction. Doctor’s aren’t gods.

goddess commented on Jul 05 11 at 9:47 pm

@Lam- it’ll cost to have those kids tutored at home and likely cut into the money spent in the actual school buildings. Expect larger class sizes as teachers are siphoned off to tutor at-home.

goddess commented on Jul 05 11 at 9:49 pm

Goddess: I am truly sorry for what happened to you and for the fact that your doctor didn’t listen to you. I never defend doctors who minimize their patients’ legitimate concerns, and i certainly don’t advocate giving a kid something that makes him sick. (One reason to vaccinate healthy kids is to protect children like yours who can’t be vaccinated on schedule for whatever reason.)

That said, it doesn’t make sense for me to plan to not take the child to the doctor until he is fully vaccinated. I’m not worried about my kid catching something on his front porch or even at the grocery store. I’m worried about taking him into a waiting room full of kids whose parents follow the “Dr. Bob” schedule or some other non-evidence-based schedule pulled out of someone’s ass.

S commented on Jul 05 11 at 10:15 pm

Great! I do not want my children around those who do not vaccinate. It is really tragic how my generation doesn’t know what it’s like to get polio, measles, mumps, etc. I think if we did, more parents would vaccinate. This attitude of calling these illnesses normal childhood diseases is crazy!

Have any of you had to take care of children with these illnesses? Have any of you had the pleasure of taking care of babies with whooping cough? Oh, and these babies with whooping cough were too young for the vaccine. It’s heart breaking to watch a baby struggling to breath. It’s heart breaking to watch the parents having to deal with this illness.

Those who can vaccinate should! I’m talking everyone unless the child is allergic or is immunocompromised. Adults should make sure their vaccinations are up to date as well.

I vaccinate to protect my children and community.

Carrie commented on Jul 05 11 at 10:34 pm

@s: I never said FULLY vaccinated- I said until the first set of vaxes- that’s 2 months old. That’s the way it was done for a long time. In fact, when we had our last, he was a preemie-and we didn’t let ANYONE visit with kids until after his first set of vaccines.
Our practice always kept a sick and well room, and let those with sick (young) babies into an exam room, so as to not expose them to other sick kids. Even RSV can kill a newborn. And that’s actually a disease that makes keeping them home October thru March much more compelling than any logistical risk of being exposed to a vaccine-avoidable disease from a child who hasn’t been vaccinated.
BTW- DTaP and TDaP only have approx. 80% efficacy rates. Your child COULD become sick from one who HAS been vaxed.

goddess commented on Jul 05 11 at 10:36 pm

@Carrie- have YOU held one who died from brain damage that occurred as an adverse reaction form a vaccine? Both REALLY, REALLY and TOTALLY suck. Bu YOU only get to choose risks for YOURS. Not those in the care of others.

goddess commented on Jul 05 11 at 10:38 pm

Goddess: I cannot imagine that these offices with mandatory vaccination policies would not make exceptions for children with a medical reason to avoid vaccination. So that might be a source of disconnect here.
I understand that RSV is quite dangerous, but that’s not a risk that i can realistically reduce any further (I work from home, but who knows what my husband will bring home from work, or what grandma will bring over). I understand that vaccines aren’t 100% effective, but i’ll take 80% immunity over 0%. I’m talking about risks that can be reduced.
And actually with the doctors listening to you thing, our opinions might not be so terribly far off. Again, i don’t know your story, but it is terrible and unforgivable that your doctor ignored your child’s situation. In my case, i called the pediatrician’s office and felt like i was being sold a damn car or something (We offer Dr. Bob! We’ll work with you until you come up with a schedule you like! This was _after_ i specified that my husband and i are quite happy with the CDC schedule unless we see an actual adverse effect in our kid). When i made my snotty comments, i was referring to that kind of overly conciliatory attitude, not to people like you who have legitimate medical reasons to withhold vaccines.
(Philosophical exemption, however, i cannot get behind. I see conceding to vaccination as the cost of living in a society. Particularly when the “philosophy” is “That scares me for vague reasons i don’t understand and can’t explain”.)

S commented on Jul 05 11 at 11:42 pm

@goddess we aren’t talking about “public.” We are talking about the pediatrician’s office… a place where sick children regularly congregate, and where I’m bringing my newborn for his 1 month checkup on Friday.

Obviously children who have had reactions have a valid reason NOT to vaccinate, which makes it all the more important that children who.do NOT react poorly to vaxes (vast VAST majority) get their shots.to protect those kids… and my baby.

I’m so sorry you lost a child and I can’t tell you how greatful I am, that in spite of that, you get your children vaccinated where you can. The thought of losing my new baby gives me hormonally encouraged weeping fits.

Meagan commented on Jul 06 11 at 12:13 am

@goddess – Whether or not something like that is feasible isn’t exactly what I meant to get at, though I would look to the data on special needs resources/compensation for an idea. My point is that there are tools available to deal with these differences. People need not vilify those with a different opinion/choice when they can lobby their school boards and elected reps on the issue if it means that much to them. My kids are homeschooled, and fully vaccinated and not babies anymore so it’s not such a big deal to me, though my son contracted chicken pox from a non-vaccinated child when he was a baby and that really angered me at the time.

lam commented on Jul 06 11 at 12:18 am

@meagan- each pediatrician has the right to determine the criteria for their clientele, as we do for doctors. Others brought up mandatory vaccination in society at large and in order to attend school, in particular. If you go back and read, you’ll see i did not even enter the discussion until those points were also brought into the discussion. I have no issue with peds who adopt this criteria,. If they insist on flu vaccines and Gardisil, I will go to another practice or use Urgent Care.
@Lam- do you know that they sold us a bill of goods on that Varivax right? It is only 40% efficacious and that only lasts for about 10 years. They had to add a second shot to th3e schedule and are worried that the immunity form that may also fade by the time those kids reach adulthood. What we may have done was shift the burden of the disease from chldhood, when people are most likely to contract and recover form chicken pox without issue onto the adult population which fares much worse and have much more serious side effects. We all know the rates of vaccinations are much higher for the childhood population than the adult, and we may be in for a big nightmare later on.
Varivax was a WONDERFUL vaccine – for those who had under;lying conditions that made contracting chicken pox unwise- especially those with neurological deficits. But that would not have been as lucrative as scaring the population at large and pushing for a mass vaccination schedule that guarantees a regular and repeating income source.
I was so PRO vax- even after our son died- until I saw what happened with the chicken pox vaccine, then saw all of the other drugs that have been relkeased0 and recalled – after grievous injury, incomplete studies and under-reported side effects. Gardisil is just more nail in the coffin of that faith I once had.
I do believe vaccines were a miraculous invention- and I DO understand they will have their sacrificial lambs. But I do not trust each and every one coming down the pike now- from companies whose greed exceeds their honesty and integrity, IMHO.
With that in mind, I do support ad will fight for, all 3 forms of exemptions- as no government should force any chemicals into anyone’s bodies without their consent- or the consent of their guardians. To em, that is an egregious affront to our society. As Franklin said: ““Anyone who trades liberty for security deserves neither liberty nor security” ~ Benjamin Franklin

goddess commented on Jul 06 11 at 9:16 am

I’d happily leave the practice. I’m delaying (to clarify: the latter end of the CDC’s range) and selectively vaxing my daughter, in part due to a family history of allergic reaction to some of the common preservatives. I likewise feel that children are over-vaccinated and that the super-combo shots aren’t the greatest idea. To paraphrase what someone above said, I pay my daughter’s doctor to listen and advise, not demand I follow without question.

I have an issue with how little doctors listen to their patients. When I was pregnant, my OB was insistent that I receive a booster to my pertussis vaccine, as well as a flu shot. It didn’t matter how many times I told her that I *could not* have those vaccines do to a serious allergy, she was adamant that I had to have them and was alway aggravated when I refused.

The vaccines we are having are ones that I feel the risk is generally outweighed by the benefit (DTaP, polio, MMR). I’ll let her choose if she wants Gardasil when she is older.

@Goddess– very sorry for your loss.

Samantha commented on Jul 06 11 at 12:51 pm

Idiot parents sue conscientious doctors for not “making them” vaccinate their kids — when the parents refused to. Good for these doctors for protecting their asses.

ChiLaura commented on Jul 06 11 at 3:12 pm

I would feel more comfortable with a pediatrician who required vaccinations. Just my opinion.

Meg commented on Jul 06 11 at 3:48 pm

If airlines can decide whom to allow in first class, physicians can decide whom they will consent to treat in their practice. You no like? You go somewhere else. If all the unvaxxed kids end up at the same place, where they all proceed to become infected with measles or worse, well, maybe that’s a wakeup call. I’m sick of parents trusting herd immunity while willfully risking other people’s infants.

katelet commented on Jul 06 11 at 4:46 pm

Of course, one would hope that they would mercifully consent to accept children with severe allergies or other conditions that preclude vaccination. It would be cruel to force them into the unvaccinating practices.

katelet commented on Jul 06 11 at 4:47 pm

Yeah- like the ones who had adverse reactions and can’t have them anymore- and their siblings.

goddess commented on Jul 06 11 at 5:22 pm

Wondering how many of you [adults] have gotten the newer TDap- as opposed to the TD they used to use?
And did you know in the Long Island outbreak of pertussis this year- 100% of the cases were in VACCINATED individuals? So much for efficacy – which is 59-89% for the pertussis component.

goddess commented on Jul 06 11 at 5:39 pm

It would bother me if my pediatrician wasn’t on the same page with me about my childs health so if I wasn’t vaccinating and they had a problem with that I would leave even if they didn’t have a policy forcing me too. We are vaccinating on schedule though and I wouldn’t have a problem with their office having this policy, but I’ll admit I had never thought about it before.

Jenna commented on Jul 07 11 at 12:44 am

And I don’t know for sure but from the article it sounds like they are not turning away kids who shouldn’t vaccinate for medical reasons, they mentioned that they have immunocompromised patients (who can’t recieve vaccinations) so they’re apparently not kicking them out. I would take that to mean they’re not turning away all unvaccinated kids, just those who’s parents are choosing not to with no medical reason.

Jenna commented on Jul 07 11 at 1:03 am

For the same reason I love that parents get to make these choices, so should a small business owner.

Becca commented on Jul 07 11 at 10:01 am

nice article

john commented on Jul 07 11 at 11:13 am

@Goddess- Thank you so much for telling us your story. You have my deepest sympathies. As a pregnant woman, I do have fears of vaccinations, but I also fear that I will put my child at great risk if I don’t vaccinate. Your story was a worse case senario and it’s every parent’s worst nightmare come true. I can’t begin to imagine the pain you went and are continuing to go through. There is so much information about the pros and cons that I know I’m not the only one who’s confused about what to do. My husband and I have decided that we are going to vaccinate our child, but will do so at slightly later intervals, but I don’t feel great about that either. We all want our children to be safe and healthy. I don’t blame the doctors for not wanting patients who don’t vaccinate, especially if they are at risk for getting sued later on. But I do feel that it’s still a disservice to those kids. Maybe at some of the bigger practices, they can separate these kids in different waiting rooms or service them for non emergency visits on certain days/times. I know in larger cities, some offices have separate waiting rooms for just the babies. But I think that the most important thing we can all do for our kids is be the best avocate for them. Good doctors are informed and won’t be threatened by a parent who question’s thier child’s treatment. A good doctor will give you the best information available to help you as the parent make informed decisions. If your doctor is dismissive, threatened, or offended in any way by your questions, then that’s your sign to get another doctor. Parents have the right to decide whether or not to vaccinate, but if they choose not to on philisophical beliefs alone, then they should sign some waiver acknowlegding they understand the risks and opt out of being able to sue if their child gets sick from something they wouldn’t have gotten had they vaccinated in the first place.

Sanriobaby =^.^= commented on Jul 07 11 at 7:42 pm

ITA sanriobaby- and thank you and all the others for their kind thoughts. I only wish to accord each person the right to investigate and make the best choice for their own child according to their own consciences.
Listen to your guts- some doctors are only listening to the sales pitches of reps that have not EVEN a bachelor’s degree. [truth]
One would hope most are better and most probably are- but one who dismisses everything out of hand- run, Forrest, run! Get one who listens- or at least can back up his OPINIONs with actual studies. Not a pen or even travel tix from Merck.

goddess commented on Jul 07 11 at 11:41 pm

My name is Gary. When I was born in 1951, the world was obsessed with vaccines to prevent such things a small pox; a disease that killed countless children. Within 2 weeks of vaccination, I was a patient at Milwaukee’s Children’s Hospital, diagnosed with post vaccination encephalitis. While the mortality rate of post vaccination encephalitis is very high, I survived. While the rate of impairment of cognitive abilities is great, I remain intact.

In 2000, my daughter was born, and later diagnosed with moderate to severe autism, by three different doctors Every symptom that she has, so did I. I fit the DSM-4 perfectly.

To assume that vaccines have no connection with autism is, at best, foolish, and at worst, negligent to your Hypocratic oath.

Your job is to treat patients, not to question what is their best beliefs and hopes for their offspring.
Gary

kurioryu1013 commented on Jul 12 11 at 9:34 pm

as i watch tv i am bombarded with commercials for pills that i seem to need but dont.our animals need several vaccinations a year now.kids are getting more vaccinations now than ever before.and the food everything being sugar free, low fat,and high fiber why are we so unhealthy?ill tell you why they are lying to us.the food in the stores is garbage.the pills all have side effects.and the vaccines are a form of chemical warfare.the war on drugs=the war on people.the war on terror =the war on people.the food in the stores is poison in a shiny packages.now your doctor is not trying to kill you. but he has been trained by the same people who make the vaccines and the pills.so they have experts tell him what is right and wrong.and we are all fooled.and they get super rich.WAKE UP and change things before its too late.

BILL commented on Jul 14 11 at 4:35 am

Excellent very smart doctors!

Alden commented on Jul 16 11 at 3:40 am

Add your take:

Note: Babble is a supportive, diverse community. We encourage a range of opinions,
but any unduly hostile comments will be removed.


Comments are delayed up to 15 minutes

Most Popular on Facebook

Best of Babble.com


  • Lori Garcia
  • Joslyn Gray
  • Amber Doty
  • Julianna Miner
  • Monica Bielanko
  • Sierra Black
  • Meredith Carroll
  • Carolyn Castiglia
  • Sunny Chanel
  • Madeline Holler
  • Rebecca Odes
  • Danielle Smith
  • Danielle Sullivan
  • Katherine Stone
  • Disney Online Moms & Family Portfolio

    The Walt Disney Company supports Babble as a platform dedicated to honest, engaged, informed, intelligent and open conversation about parenting. However, the opinions expressed on this site are those of individual parents/writers and do not reflect the views of Disney. In addition, content provided on this site is for entertainment or informational purposes only and should not be construed as medical advice, diagnosis, treatment, or safety advice. Click here for additional information. Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Interest-Based Ads

    More in Strollerderby (50 of 11490 articles)