babble » blogs » Strollerderby
Strollerderby
Controversial Cheerleader Article and Pictures Delay Release of High School Yearbook

School officials are delaying the release of 600 out of 1,000 yearbooks because of an offensive article and pictures
How much editorial control should a high school yearbook editor wield? Most will probably never know the scope of their influence, considering that senior photos and candid snapshots of the soccer team are considered pretty G-rated material.
But what happens when the material is more racy, and the subjects of some photos are actually offended at how they’ll be seen in perpetuity to their schoolmates?
Cheerleaders at River City High School in West Sacramento, Calif., are upset at an article about them in this year’s yearbook. Titled, “Who Wears Short Shorts,” they’re described as showing “more leg than Daisy Duke” and as being “dolled up in micromini [sic] uniforms” while “strolling down halls” with “blatant disregard” for the school’s dress code. One picture accompanying the article shows the cheer squad with their skirts up high while in action mode, while another shows just a digitally altered photos of some of the girls’ legs.
The cheerleaders are upset and angry at their depiction, particularly since they say they didn’t even choose the uniforms they’re ridiculed for wearing. Their parents are equally upset that the school would allow such an article to be printed.
Staff at the school gave parents copies of the education code, which shows that state law allows for the language. A Supreme Court ruling in the late ‘80s ruled that educators aren’t allowed to exercise editorial control over the “style and content of student speech in school-sponsored expressive activities so long as their actions are reasonably related to legitimate pedagogical concerns.”
Since the article didn’t constitute libel, school officials can only encourage the editor to “make the right decision”.
The 16-year-old who wrote the article released a statement:
“I deeply regret submitting this page to my adviser, as well as letting it be published. I made an editorial mistake and I apologize for any pain that I may have caused. I did not mean for this spread to be malicious or maleconent [sic] in any way. This page was not an attack on the cheerleaders; it was not out of spite. While I did try out for the team in 2009, I carry no resentment towards the cheerleaders or their families. We [the yearbook staff] are currently taking steps to make amends. Again, I apologize for any hurt that I may have caused.”
Out of the 1,000 yearbooks printed, school officials are holding onto the 600 that have not yet been distributed until the article is revised.
It sounds to me like the problem is that there was not a solid faculty adviser in place who would have prevented the article from being published in the first place. The article’s author, or the yearbook’s editor, clearly didn’t have the maturity to know that it was an inappropriate article to print. I feel bad for the cheerleaders and think they have every right to be upset.
This isn’t a First Amendment issue; this is an issue of maturity.
Do you think the right course of action is being taken?
Image + Source: ABC News 10
Follow Meredith Carroll on Twitter.
Free Speech or Blatant Bullying? How to Deal with Bullies
Related Posts :
Go Back To Strollerderby
22 Comments
[...] school is refusing to hand out 600-some copies of the books until she re-writes the article, …Controversial Cheerleader Article and Pictures Delay Release of High School …Babble (blog)all 3 news [...]
Yearbook Scandals Make Teachers Look Stupid – The Stir (blog) | Dish Network Fox Sports commented on Jun 01 11 at 11:58 pm[...] legs sparks outrageDailyIndia.comYearbook Scandals Make Teachers Look StupidThe Stir (blog)Controversial Cheerleader Article and Pictures Delay Release of High School …Babble (blog)all 10 news [...]
School Pulls Yearbook Article That Mocks Cheerleaders’ Uniforms – ABC News | Dish Network Fox Sports commented on Jun 02 11 at 7:59 pmgoddess commented on Jun 01 11 at 6:08 pmThe article may have been immature, but I don’t feel sorry for anyone who joins a team KNOWING the uniform shows a lot of skin that some people may object to seeing.
TJDestry commented on Jun 02 11 at 11:05 amI haven’t seen the article, only read a summary of its contents, so, of course, I couldn’t possibly make an intelligent comment about whether it is appropriate. They could have legitimately described a losing season and thus “offended” the football team and it wouldn’t be bad journalism.
Unless you’ve read the entire article and seen all the pictures, hopefully in context with the other content in the yearbook, you really can’t make responsible comments about it.
LovingMom commented on Jun 03 11 at 8:01 pmI understand for the most part why the cheerleaders wear such short short/spanks, but have never understood how the schools explain the uniforms during the school days. The squad at my daughter’s school wear their uniforms any day they wish too and obviously it does NOT fit the dress code that every other student is forced to adhere to. And the squad does not wear them for school spirit (most of these girls spend their days making out in the parking lots with boyfriends or hanging around the bathrooms, not representing the school while wearing their uniforms), so what is the point? These uniforms should be worn during the games, AFTER school. Its ridiculous that some are expected to follow the dress code, but not all students.
Lalala commented on Jun 03 11 at 10:01 pmSo.. Why is no one mad that schools are dressing up your daughters in ‘uniforms’ designed to show off their bodies to large crowds? The fact that this student was able to get panty-shots of these girls means that anyone else at these events was able to do the same.
nicole commented on Jun 04 11 at 1:44 amWell maybe if the cheerleader’s outfits weren’t soo revealing no one would make such statements. Many cheerleaders at high schools are allowed to wear skimpy shorts during school hours as well…can you say hypocritically anyone? Oh no we can’t see that bra strap, but cheerleader booty shorts are okay? Who picked out these outfits anyways? You don’t see other female school sports teams displaying such limited clothes during school hours. I agree with previous comments as well WHERE ARE THE REASONABLE PARENTS? You are not training your teens to work the poles! Many competitive cheer-leading teams don’t have outfits that short!
Elisabeth commented on Jun 04 11 at 2:27 amHigh school yearbooks have nothing to do with “journalism”, and this issue really isn’t about the cheerleaders or their uniforms. Its about whether or not its appropriate to publish a rant intended to humiliate a group or person in what is supposed to be a keepsake. A newscaster in Sacramento said it best, “You shouldn’t have to open your yearbook and feel embarrassed or hurt.”
jennifer childers commented on Jun 04 11 at 10:10 amStick to your guns Meredith!
As a writer you owe truth to your readers. I see two crotches in the picture and so will cry baby’s grand kids when they look at the photo.
You are entitled to your opinion and you were only stating a fact. I don’t think you should have apologized for it, but you stayed classy and told whiner you didn’t want to hurt her feelings.
Stay strong, state the truth, and be a fearless writer.
Jen
Bones commented on Jun 04 11 at 12:00 pm“It sounds to me like the problem is that there was not a solid faculty adviser in place who would have prevented the article from being published in the first place. The article’s author, or the yearbook’s editor, clearly didn’t have the maturity to know that it was an inappropriate article to print. I feel bad for the cheerleaders and think they have every right to be upset.”
The author of this article must have someone on the cheerleading squad. Because it appears that the school is holding double standards. They say skirts and shorts have to be a certain length in order to wear them to school or school events; which includes football, soccer, and basketball games. Reasoning they say is that it is inappropriate and misrepresents the school. So the child is ask to leave the school or the school event and come back wearing something more acceptable. However, these cheerleaders can wear short skirts in front of the whole school body and community clearly breaking school rules and receive no punishment. How is that not inappropriate and misrepresents the school. Or maybe it perfectly represents the school, that looks are more important than education.
To the girls, first if you did no wrong, who cares what anyone else says. Grow some thick skin quit crying, and running to mommy because the world is much harsher outside of High School. Also if you don’t want the world to think your trash then don’t dress like it. (The skirts are to short, I am sure the boys and the men are not watching your routine) To me people who wear clothing like that are only making up for areas that lack in, maybe they are lacking in actual cheerleading skills therefore making it up by showing old men their skin. And last if you break the rule expect to be called out on it. Yeah the yearbook might have been a harsh way to go but I bet next time the leader of your group is picking out your uniforms they will not forget this. To try to be the solution and not the problem. I give the student who made this page credit. It takes courage to say and do what he/she did.
So what’s the problem people like the leaders at the school and writer of this article who promote breaking the rules and getting away with it. You are the cancer of our society.
Damon Mosely commented on Jun 04 11 at 2:46 pmPretty obvious that the yearbook editor is either really ugly or a lesbian. Nobody with a shred of self-esteem or sexual identity would care if the cheerleaders liked to work what they got. Grow up!
RevSpinnaker commented on Jun 04 11 at 9:10 pmWhile I don’t think the criticism of cheerleading was appropriate for a year book, as opposed to a school newspaper, I do share concerns for the obsession with sports in school. Scantily clad girls gyrating and preening to the preformance of male acts of violence seems a lot like the rectal display of female mountain goats for the males bashing their big-horned heads together. Pagentized rectal display, but pretty much the same thing nonetheless. If women really want to stop violence in men & boys, maybe they should turn around and take a look at what they’re shaking their butts at. And what does any of it have to do with learning? Or better yet, we need to reconsider what our educational priorities are.
kmpiet commented on Jun 05 11 at 10:32 amAfter reading the article on the yearbook comments, why are students and parents so offended when the yearbook staff wrote the truth???? How can the students actually diplomatically cover up (pardon the pun) when the picture is obvious? I agree with the previously posts that I wonder why men and boys are so violent (and possesive) when this type of display calls attention to the female anatomy in very suggestive poses and so scantily attired. The yearbook editor in fact actually stated the uniforms are in violation of school policy. This cheerleading squad leader or whoever is responsible for these uniforms needs to look at the image it projects to not only future generations (these are memory books) and to whoever is viewing these pictures.
Meredith Carroll commented on Jun 05 11 at 11:00 amWhether or not the uniforms are too short or violate the school’s dress code is not the issue. Is a yearbook really the place to write a mean-spirited article about anyone in the school? Clearly the answer is no since the person who wrote the article issued an apology and the yearbook editor reprinted the article to something less offensive.
Marissa commented on Jun 05 11 at 11:21 amDoes the truth hurt to read in print? Why ARE cheerleaders in primary and secondary school allowed to wear such revealing attire, from short skirts to low-cut, cleavage baring tops as they gyrate and bend over provocatively for a crowd?
John Evans commented on Jun 05 11 at 2:22 pmI have to chime in here. I agree that cheerleaders have been given a status that should never exist in a school. No student should be above the rules. However, the school should be responsible for one) ordering more modest uniforms; and two) setting up standards for when the uniforms may be worn. They are uniforms. The band probably doesn’t wear their uniforms to class, so why can cheerleaders, especially if the uniform violates the school’s dress code?
As far as the editor making an apology…Well let’s be honest. It is very likely that if he/she was basically forced to do so. I’d be willing to bet that they were told that if they didn’t apologize, they would not only be removed from the editor’s position, but the paper entirely. It’s also possible that they were threatened with suspension or expulsion. If they had the courage to write it in the first place, I highly doubt they would have apologized without extreme pressure to do so.
kaitlyn commented on Jun 05 11 at 3:32 pmComing from a highschool and (currently) a university yearbook staff, I don’t see any problem in the editor’s decisions on the cheerleading article. Why should something that is TRUE be considered “inappropriate” just because is it printed in a school’s publication?
And as for the writer of this article, Meredith Carrol, don’t you find it a bit hypocritical that you would chastise a highschool yearbook editor’s decisions when you yourself dub your own article “strollerderby” ? And as for journalistic ethics, which is the issue you are writing about, is it even right for you to be questioning the maturity level of the school’s yearbook editor in your writing?
The editor only apologized for the article because the “scandal” gained national attention. For what reason even? I doubt if the issue gained little to no attention, she would not apologize for her actions.
I commend the highschool yearbook’s editor! The truth hurts, honeys.
I would love to get my hands on a copy of one of those books… that’s sentimental value right there…
Mandy commented on Jun 08 11 at 10:35 pmThe issue here is whether or not is appropriate for someone to ridicule a group of people in a yearbook. However, the conversation seems to have taken a turn. Many people here seem to think that the cheerleaders deserve it because they wear something inappropriate. However how about the volleyball, wrestling or swimming uniforms for that matter. These are all WAY more skimpy and revealing. Cheerleading is a sport and the uniform is designed to allow for tumbling and stunting.
Cheryl commented on Jun 09 11 at 1:13 amMandy, I completely agree with the comparable uniform statement… however. As a former high school cheerleader, we had to wear leggings under our skirts during school hours. Why? Because although the uniforms maybe as skimpy as the wrestling, volleyball, gymnastic uniforms, those students are not allowed to go through the halls, class to class in them. Cheerleaders should wear them at the game, assemblies and competitions, not during school hours. If they do wear them, there’s nothing wrong with athletic shorts or leggings underneath the skirt to make it more appropriate and fit the dress codes of the schools.
k8 commented on Jun 12 11 at 7:55 pmI honestly don’t know why schools allow such skimpy uniforms in the first place. They are completely inappropriate. Boys on cheerleading squads aren’t forced to dress like streetwalkers, so why are the girls?
Teresa commented on Jan 10 12 at 12:03 pmField hockey uniforms? Tennis uniforms? Gymnastics? Dance Team? Wrestling uniforms where you can see everyone’s junk? Please people! Cheerleaders are not the only one with short skirts for uniforms. The writer of the yearbook is being a total hater, and obviously jealous that she did not make the cheerleading team. Can you imagine if someone wrote a stereotyping yearbook article on the fat ugly band geeks with an unflattering picture of the homely colorguard girls in their awkward leotards? There would be outrage.
Tamara commented on May 21 12 at 3:44 pm“The cheerleaders are upset and angry at their depiction, particularly since they say they didn’t even choose the uniforms they’re ridiculed for wearing.”
0_o
Oookay…
So they were forced to join the squad. Then they were forced to wear the uniforms. Aaand they cannot think for themselves, otherwise they would have been capable of petitioning for more modest outfits or hmm… maybe just not join the team and wear the uniform because of lack of morals and immodesty.Also seen/heard this with girls playing tennis and volleyball.
Add your take:
Note: Babble is a supportive, diverse community. We encourage a range of opinions,
but any unduly hostile comments will be removed.
Comments are delayed up to 15 minutes






Lori Garcia
Joslyn Gray
Amber Doty
Julianna Miner
Monica Bielanko
Sierra Black
Meredith Carroll
Carolyn Castiglia
Sunny Chanel
Madeline Holler
Rebecca Odes
Danielle Smith
Danielle Sullivan
Katherine Stone
The Walt Disney Company supports Babble as a platform dedicated to honest, engaged, informed, intelligent and open conversation about parenting. However, the opinions expressed on this site are those of individual parents/writers and do not reflect the views of Disney. In addition, content provided on this site is for entertainment or informational purposes only and should not be construed as medical advice, diagnosis, treatment, or safety advice.

22