babble » blogs » Strollerderby
Strollerderby
14-Pound Baby Born in California: Is This a State Record?
This is a record most mother’s would not want to break – giving birth not just to the biggest baby in your town, but your entire state. But that’s just what kind of record it appears a Monterey county, California couple have done. They made a baby, a really really really big baby. Their son Matthew Andrew Maldanado was born this past Monday weighing in at a stunning 14 pounds, 3.6 ounces and it looks like this may be the biggest baby born in California, ever.
Baby Matthew beat out baby Richard Walker Sault who was born back in 2008 and came in at 14 Pounds, 2 ounces. And it was a tough go for Matthew’s mom, Emily. She was in labor for two days when the doctors finally decided to do a C-section. Emily was stunned, saying, “they took him out and the doctor started saying damn, so they put him on the scale, 14 pounds, 3.6 ounces.”
This is reportedly just a record for California. The Guinness Book of World Records has the record holder being a woman who gave birth to a 23 pound, 12 ounce baby in 1879. And then there was the Indonesian woman who had the 19-pound baby not that long ago.
But giving birth to a 14-pound baby, even if it isn’t the world’s largest, still is pretty incredible!
Baby Health: Is Vitamin-D Supplementation Necessary?
Go Back To Strollerderby
13 Comments
[...] A woman in California just broke a state record by giving birth to a 14-pound baby. [...]
New Links on the Block | Rockabye Baby! commented on May 18 11 at 1:14 pmSara commented on May 12 11 at 5:31 pmIt’s not incredible. It’s depressing. Why didn’t this woman have pre-natal care?
Jessy commented on May 12 11 at 5:37 pmI hope she did have prenatal care. Lack of prenatal care usually ends up in a baby being LESS than the average weight of an 8 pound newborn. My 2nd child was over 10 pounds and I had excelent prenatal care and a 2 1/2 hour natural vaginal birth. The bigger the baby usually means shes actually had prenatal care…. unless she was only eating fast food for the past 9 months.
Julia commented on May 12 11 at 6:45 pmUsually, a larger baby means that the mother had gestational diabetes, probably uncontrolled. If you are diagnosed with gestational diabetes during your prenatal testing (usually 24 to 28 weeks), then the doctor monitors you more closely (i.e. more visits), and you are encouraged to follow a special diet in order to keep the diabetes under control- if that does not work, then you are medicated. If the diabetes is not well controlled, the baby is often excessively large and this, of course, causes problems for both mother and baby. Larger babies also struggle with weight issues more often as they get older. This little guy is sweet, and hopefully he will be encouraged to live a happy, healthy life.
Lucy commented on May 12 11 at 7:06 pmI think she had prenatal care. I suspect maybe she’s diabetic and diabetic Mom have big babies. My sister’s mother-in-law was not diabetic, was indeed very healthy and had good prenatal care and gave birth over 60 years ago to three sons. In order of birth they were 8lb 7oz, 10lb 13oz and 12lb even. All were healthy and are still alive today. They don’t say how long the baby is. The three boys were 22-23 inches.
Mom of 4 Boys commented on May 12 11 at 7:20 pmPeople should not assume that she lacked pre-natal care. I had big babies and had the best prenatal care. Usually smaller babies are the results of lack of care
Kikiriki commented on May 12 11 at 7:28 pmA bigger baby could also mean that the mom suffered from undiagnosed or untreated gestational diabetes, which can result in very large babies. Hopefully it’s not that, because untreated gestational diabetes is harmful both for the mother AND for the baby.
Sara commented on May 12 11 at 11:45 pmCongrats to Mom! Hope all is going well with your new one!
Also, reading some previous comments…
Having a small or large baby, or putting Mom putting on little or alot of weight, usually has little to do with the food that the Mom was consuming. Also, it doesn’t usually determine how much care they received.
I had PLENTY of prenatal care and gained 100+ lbs during my pregnancy. People laugh when I say that…how many babies did you have?…did you eat bonbons all day?…didn’t you exercise at all while pregnant?…
Um, yeah. My kidneys shut down and my liver had begun shutting down. I almost died. My baby was 3lbs at birth. His twin died at 14 weeks.
Pamela commented on May 13 11 at 5:41 pmHi and Congrats, But this is not the largest baby born in CA. My youngest sister born in 1973 made The Jet Magazine and The Los Angeles Times. She tipped the scales at 14.5 1/2 oz. My mother had gestational Diabetes and was hospitalized the last 4 months of the pregnancy. She was born the end of July. In the papers August 2nd I believe. Kaiser In Hollywood holds these records. She delivered Natural cause they had no Idea of what to expect back then. My mom was a 5’4 medium framed woman. By the grace of God all went just about well.
Raenna commented on May 15 11 at 6:13 pmJust because a Mother doesn’t have a huge baby, doesn’t mean she didn’t have prenatal care. On the average most babies are 6.5 to 8.5 pounds, Sorry, just hate the little comments about if you don’t have a huge baby you weren’t doing something right or you didn’t have proper prenatal care. There are many factors, that go with this, size of the Mother, and if she ate healthy or fattening etc etc… Sorry but having a exceptionally big baby cannot be healthy for the Mother nor the baby!!!!!
Aileen commented on May 15 11 at 6:23 pmWow! Way to go to this mom! And just read previous comments… I am a smaller built woman and so are the rest of my family. It’s just in our genes to be small people. I ate well, I exercised carefully, and I had excellent prenatal care throughout my pregnancy with my children. They were both born full-term and they were also both around 5-6 pounds, happy and healthy.. Smaller babies do not necessarily mean mothers lacked marvelous prenatal care. Sure it helps a lot, but it’s not the only reason that determines the size of babies.
suzanne singer commented on May 15 11 at 6:40 pmI had excellent prenatal care and did not have gestational diabetes and had a 10lb 1oz healthy baby boy born on his due date. I am 5′ 7″ and weighted 127 when I got pregnant. I also gained 30lbs during my pregnancy. My son, now 11 is in the 50 percentile for height and weight and in perfect health. If anything, he is on the slender side.
Babies are all different, moms are all different.
Raenna commented on May 15 11 at 6:52 pmJust because a Mother doesn’t have a huge baby, doesn’t mean she didn’t have prenatal care. On the average most babies are 6.5 to 8.5 pounds, Sorry, just dislike tremendously the little comments about if you don’t have a huge baby you weren’t doing something right or you didn’t have proper prenatal care. There are many factors, that go with this, size of the Mother, and if she ate healthy or fattening etc etc… Sorry but having a exceptionally big baby cannot be healthy for the Mother nor the baby!!!!!
Add your take:
Note: Babble is a supportive, diverse community. We encourage a range of opinions,
but any unduly hostile comments will be removed.
Comments are delayed up to 15 minutes







Lori Garcia
Joslyn Gray
Amber Doty
Julianna Miner
Monica Bielanko
Sierra Black
Meredith Carroll
Carolyn Castiglia
Sunny Chanel
Madeline Holler
Rebecca Odes
Danielle Smith
Danielle Sullivan
Katherine Stone
The Walt Disney Company supports Babble as a platform dedicated to honest, engaged, informed, intelligent and open conversation about parenting. However, the opinions expressed on this site are those of individual parents/writers and do not reflect the views of Disney. In addition, content provided on this site is for entertainment or informational purposes only and should not be construed as medical advice, diagnosis, treatment, or safety advice.

13