babble » blogs » Strollerderby
Strollerderby
School Prohibits All Food From Home, Requires Kids to Buy Cafeteria Lunch
The Little Village Academy in Chicago takes healthy school lunches very seriously. Like, very seriously.
So seriously, in fact, that in order to ensure the students there are on the right nutritional track, the school tells them what they can eat. And that they can’t bring lunch from home. According to the principal, the point is to ensure a measure of protection for the students.
The policy of requiring kids to buy their lunch in the cafeteria exclusively was created after the principal watched kids bring soda and chips for lunch. According to Chicago Public School policy, the decision to require kids to buy their lunch at school is left to the judgment of each principal.
“Nutrition wise, it is better for the children to eat at the school,” said Principal Elsa Carmona to the Chicago Tribune. “It’s about the nutrition and the excellent quality food that they are able to serve (in the lunchroom). It’s milk versus a Coke. But with allergies and any medical issue, of course, we would make an exception.”
One of the side affects of the requirement, however, is that some kids simply don’t buy or throw away their lunch and go hungry because they think the school food “tastes bad.”
“Some of the kids don’t like the food they give at our school for lunch or breakfast,” said Little Village parent Erica Martinez to the newspaper. “So it would be a good idea if they could bring their lunch so they could at least eat something.”
Besides not all kids being a fan of cafeteria food, not everyone is happy with the control the school has taken over the kids and their eating habits.
“This is such a fundamental infringement on parental responsibility,” said J. Justin Wilson to the newspaper, a senior researcher at the Washington-based Center for Consumer Freedom, which is partially funded by the food industry. “Would the school balk if the parent wanted to prepare a healthier meal?” Wilson said. “This is the perfect illustration of how the government’s one-size-fits-all mandate on nutrition fails time and time again. Some parents may want to pack a gluten-free meal for a child, and others may have no problem with a child enjoying soda.”
This is a tough issue, I think. I’m all for healthy lunches, but the idea that kids are going hungry because they don’t like what they’re being forced to choose from at school doesn’t sit well with me. How is a kid with an empty stomach going to perform socially and academically after lunch? And what about families who don’t qualify for free or reduced-priced meals? A couple of dollars a day can add up quickly for some families who already struggle financially.
On the other hand, I admire that this school is actually doing something concrete to ensure their students eat healthy lunches. But instead of going to such an extreme, perhaps they should just consider banning soda, saturated fats or devil foods like Lunchables. But to require families to spend a set amount of money to feed their children what the school says is healthy seems a little draconian.
Do you think this school is doing a good or bad thing by forbidding brown bags in lieu of supposedly healthy cafeteria lunches?
Image: Creative Commons
Go Back To Strollerderby
19 Comments
[...] Get Kids to Eat Less Junk FoodAOL NewsSchool bans students from bringing homemade lunchesKING5.comSchool Prohibits All Food From Home, Requires Kids to Buy Cafeteria LunchBabble (blog)Huffington Post -Los Angeles Times -UPI.comall 67 news [...]
Nanny State: Chicago School Bans Bagged Lunches to Encourage ?Healthy Eating? – HyperVocal (blog) commented on Apr 12 11 at 1:20 pmgoddess commented on Apr 11 11 at 1:42 pmIs this a public school? Cause I don’t THINK so. They cannot force you to buy food- and if there was no recourse, I would just pick my kids up and feed them at home and bring them back. @@
My youngest refuses to eat cafeteria food.
You know, maybe I’d just force the district to draw up an individual 504 plan. Let it be a medical issue that costs them thousands of dollars and at the end, my kids would STILL eat OUR food. Idiots running the freaking village.
This IS a total infringement of parental authority. And I refuse to reduce myself to the lower standards of others who should be, instead, targeted individually.
Meredith Carroll commented on Apr 11 11 at 1:43 pm@Goddess — Yup, it’s a public school, and parents can give a doctor’s note saying their kids have a medical reason why they must bring their own food.
GP commented on Apr 11 11 at 1:47 pmI know the demographics of this area. In this case, it’s probably a good idea, but I totally see the “my kid/public school/government can’t tell me what to do” side, too.
goddess commented on Apr 11 11 at 1:48 pmUm yeah. Our elementary school charge $2.60 per lunch, and the middle school is $2.85, and the high school is $3.10. For my 2 kids that would be $27.25, and no- my groceries cost enough, and i can prepare their food far less expensively. Those schools better be paying for ALL the kids’ lunches regardless of income.
GP commented on Apr 11 11 at 2:00 pmSadly, these kids are probably given Coke and Cheetos for breakfast and similar processed foods for lunch from “home”…I dunno, the enchiladas shown in the Trib picture look like an appropriate option. The reason the kids throw it away or don’t like it is likely because they are used to eating junk food. Well, maybe they can unlearn that if they get hungry enough.
“This is such a fundamental infringement on parental responsibility,” said J. Justin Wilson, a senior researcher at the Washington-based Center for Consumer Freedom, which is partially funded by the food industry. Well, if the parents were sending their kids to school with healthy foods in the first place–fulfilling their “parental responsibility” they school wouldn’t even go there.
Many of the parents may not even know what’s healthy or appropriate for children to eat. I think opinions have to be formed on a case by case basis in terms of locality and this one doesn’t surprise me at all.
Sara commented on Apr 11 11 at 2:42 pmI’m betting it’s a charter school and charter schools like to make lots of demands on their students and parents.
School food is crap and my daughter eats mostly vegetarian lunches which are far better than the ones that are served at school.
goddess commented on Apr 11 11 at 3:00 pm@GP- my little guy eats homemade-usually made from scratch food- and he’d die before he’d EVER touch an enchillada- or any Mexican food. You should see him chow fresh salad and grilled seafood tho.
GP commented on Apr 11 11 at 3:35 pmGoddess…this is in a Latino neighborhood…I totally get YOUR point, but just sayin’
goddess commented on Apr 11 11 at 3:48 pmSo my kid would be a minority if we lived there? Why should anyone be allowed to force him to eat that? Sorry- fajitas is as far as I go in that kind of food! There’s something in the spices used that I just cannot stomach.
Triplemom commented on Apr 11 11 at 8:00 pmLatino does not equal mexican
GP commented on Apr 11 11 at 9:18 pmIt’s actually a Mexican neighborhood, sorry…was trying to be *more* politically correct. My point is that even though Miss Goddess might think Mexican food is gross, the school was PROBABLY trying to make things the kids would like. Although by now, they’ve probably developed a taste for random American garbage.
GP commented on Apr 11 11 at 9:21 pmI see now after looking it up that Latino means from Latin America…sorry.
Angela commented on Apr 11 11 at 9:25 pmI’m a big believer in healthy food for kids but I also feel that parents should be able to decide what to feed their kids, especially in a public school. Yes it’s sad that some parents send soda and chips to school with their kids but I know plenty of parents who pack healthier lunches than the cafeteria as well. Suppose a parent feels strongly about using all organics or free-range meat? What about a vegetarian child or one who follows a kosher diet? I doubt the school is prepared to accommodate all of those preferences though none of them are medical needs. Or what if you just plain want to give your kid a treat on special occasions and teach them about balance in their diet?
goddess commented on Apr 11 11 at 9:30 pmGP siad:”My point is that even though Miss Goddess might think Mexican food is gross, the school was PROBABLY trying to make things the kids would like. ”
So what? It is still a form of force-feeding and cannot believe anyone supports this.
GP commented on Apr 11 11 at 10:02 pmIt’s not force-feeding. Cut the drama. I bet they have choices among the things they are offering (they would pretty much have to offer something meatless, for example), and people can get a doctor’s note if they really want to get in a huff (can’t handle the “Mexican” spices, for example, yeah sure, whatever). Also, again, this is not the richest, most well-advantaged neighborhood, if you catch my drift, and it is my gut sense that they are, in fact, doing these kids a favor. You may also notice they are wearing uniforms. This is clearly a public school that is trying to raise the bar a little for the kids. I think that these things really depend on the specifics of locality, and you clearly don’t understand this locality. Also, newsflash, when you send your kids to public school, you kind of DO have to deal with “lowest common denominator” administration/decisions. If you want to give your kid a treat, do it at home. Personally, I wouldn’t like this if they did it at my kid’s school, but they wouldn’t because of the demographic here (read=enough parents send their kids to school with appropriate lunches). It’s not something I’m going to fall all over myself to defend, but it’s not an outrage, either.
Trent commented on Apr 14 11 at 6:23 amJustin Wilson’s group, The Center for Consumer Freedom, has taken money from the alcohol industry and campaigns against Mothers Against Drunk Driving. In fact, they even hired a convicted drunk driver (named David Martosko) to do it! See more at http://www.AboutDavidMartosko.com. They’ve also attacked the Centers for Disease Control, the Humane Society and the National Association of High School Principals. They are not a credible source.
Heather commented on May 11 11 at 1:47 pmAt least this school is trying to do something. Sure, they’re maybe not going about it quite the right way, but when trying to solve a problem you must often try multiple solutions.
Jenna commented on Aug 19 11 at 2:15 amI haven’t had a lot of experience with public school lunches that could, under almost any rational, be considered healthy. Healthier than eating only soda and chips? Maybe. I don’t know about this school specifically but when public school lunches are the “healthy” option the bar must be set pretty low.
Add your take:
Note: Babble is a supportive, diverse community. We encourage a range of opinions,
but any unduly hostile comments will be removed.
Comments are delayed up to 15 minutes







Lori Garcia
Joslyn Gray
Amber Doty
Julianna Miner
Monica Bielanko
Sierra Black
Meredith Carroll
Carolyn Castiglia
Sunny Chanel
Madeline Holler
Rebecca Odes
Danielle Smith
Danielle Sullivan
Katherine Stone
The Walt Disney Company supports Babble as a platform dedicated to honest, engaged, informed, intelligent and open conversation about parenting. However, the opinions expressed on this site are those of individual parents/writers and do not reflect the views of Disney. In addition, content provided on this site is for entertainment or informational purposes only and should not be construed as medical advice, diagnosis, treatment, or safety advice.

19