Strollerderby

Paul Ryan’s State of the Union Response Is Ridiculous

Posted by carolyncastiglia on January 26th, 2011 at 2:21 pm
paul ryan 199x300 Paul Ryan’s State of the Union Response Is Ridiculous

Paul Ryan purported to speak for all parents in his response to the State of the Union.

Last night, in the official GOP response to President Obama’s State of the Union address, Republican rising star Paul Ryan, chair of the House Budget Committee, called the government deficit “one of my greatest concerns as a parent,” adding, “I know many of you feel the same way.”  That couldn’t be more hilarious to me, because as I was sitting in the living room of some friends who are also parents, pre-gaming the SOTU with an episode of Hardball with Chris Matthews, I literally said to them, “I am so sick and tired of hearing Republicans say ‘What the people really want to talk about is the deficit.  What the people really care about is the deficit.’ ”

First of all, how it is that any politician has the audacity to speak for “the American people” is beyond me.  Unless you’re the President of the United States, you should probably stick to representing the people of the state you were elected to represent.  There’s no way that people in New York feel the same way about the economy (and any other political issue) that people in Montana and Florida and Idaho do.  Each state has its own economy and therefore its own economic issues, and each state has its own cultural climate as well.  Often, the cultural climate is divided within a state, pitting the ideologies of urban and rural residents against one another.

That being said, one thing I feel for certain, being a lefty urban-dweller who was raised by rural righties, with the exception of politicians, no parent in this great country of ours goes to bed at night worrying about the deficit.  Not a single one.

Sure, people across the country of every color and every socioeconomic strata go to bed worrying about money.  How much money they have, how much money their kids will have, but I guarantee you, none of them tie their personal finances to the size of our government debt.  If they did, they wouldn’t have sat idly by while George W. Bush blew the budget surplus created during Bill Clinton’s tenure.  I can only assume Ryan is talking about GWB’s leadership when he says:

Millions of families have fallen on hard times, not because of our ideals of free enterprise, but because our leaders failed to live up to those ideals.  Because of poor decisions made in Washington and Wall Street that caused a financial crisis, squandered our savings, broke our trust and crippled our economy.  Today a similar kind of irresponsibility threatens not only our livelihoods, but our way of life.

Today a similar kind of irresponsibility threatens not only our livelihoods, but our way of life?  What exactly do you mean, sir?  I don’t know, because you didn’t go on to describe that “similar kind of irresponsibility” in any sort of detail.  But that brings me to my next point.  As I watched Hardball last night, something Chris Matthews – a known liberal – said really struck me.  I’m paraphrasing here, but he said something to the effect of, “When I was a kid, we didn’t spend money on extras.  There was no nightclubbing.  My mother and father saved money for things like education.”  A spendy-spendy, left-wing, hike-up-your-taxes-so-we-can-all-party-at-a-gay-wedding Dem said that, guys!  You know who I didn’t hear say that?  Paul Ryan.  Or Michele Bachmann.  Or any other Republican.  In fact, I haven’t really heard anyone except the brilliant comedian Louis C.K. say, ostensibly, maybe this recession is a good thing.  I mean, come on, we’re crying about hard times, but unless you’ve lost your house, has your lifestyle really diminished that much?  (And if you’ve lost your house, how is it that you have an Internet connection to be reading Babble right now?)  Make no mistake, I am in no way suggesting that a high rate of unemployment and/or foreclosure is acceptable because it absolutely is not.  But I think most people with a roof over their head are sort of unfazed by this recession.  Why?  Because as my mother put it, “The economy in Central New York has always been recession-level, so this is nothing new for us.”

I think what “the American people” are worried about is not the government deficit, but the deficit they themselves feel.  What “the American people” are dreaming about at night is closing the enormous gap between the rich and the poor in this country.  My mother has mentioned to me numerous times that she doesn’t want to be rich, she only wants to be able to get by without worry.  In other words, she wants to live a comfortable middle class existence, aka The American Dream.  Is that greedy?  I don’t think so.  But it does make me think, as much as I felt encouraged by the belt-tightening Chris Matthews was advocating last night, inspired in my own life to be thrifty, less wasteful and more industrious (cause God knows I love a challenge!), I wonder now, why aren’t we asking the same thing of the rich?  Why is it that the same politicians who preach about lowering the deficit refuse to ask the extremely wealthy in this country to pay their fair share?

The only deficit I ever think of when I go to sleep at night is the one I created for myself trying to live a lifestyle I couldn’t really afford.  And that’s what being American is really all about.  Keeping up with the Joneses.  Now that we’ve hit a recession, some sense of financial sanity has been restored, and we’re all looking for advice from our leaders about how to get back on track.  Thank God for Suze Orman, because she seems to be the only person on TV who knows what she’s talking about.  That’s one non-partisan leader who truly puts her money where her mouth is.  Maybe she should run the Treasury, girlfriend.

Photo: Paul Ryan Official Site

 Paul Ryan’s State of the Union Response Is Ridiculous

Go Back To Strollerderby

0 Comments

Great article. Here, here!

Lin commented on Jan 26 11 at 2:47 pm

Agreed, I love reading your articles! So insightful. :-)

Lindsay Q. commented on Jan 26 11 at 2:51 pm

Thanks so much!

carolyncastiglia commented on Jan 26 11 at 2:54 pm

“What “the American people” are dreaming about at night is closing the enormous gap between the rich and the poor in this country. My mother has mentioned to me numerous times that she doesn’t want to be rich, she only wants to be able to get by without worry…why aren’t we asking the same thing of the rich? Why is it that the same politicians who preach about lowering the deficit refuse to ask the extremely wealthy in this country to pay their fair share?”

More liberal bullshit. You’re talking about two different things. Not being rich, and being able to get by without worry? Fine. That is the American dream (assuming that we agree that we are earning our money in a decent-paying job, not relying on gov’t aid). But “closing the gap between rich and poor,” and “asking the wealthy to pay their fair share”? The top 1% of earners pay 28.1% of fed taxes; the top 5% pay 44.3% of fed taxes; the top 10% pay 55%; and the top 20% pay 68.9% of all federal taxes! (CBO 2010 figures for 2007.) This doesn’t even include state and local taxes, or charitable giving. The only people that tax rates are unfair to is, well, the rich. You’re not concerned about “fair”; if you were, you’d advocate a flat tax, or a consumption tax. Instead, you and most liberals are, as far as I can tell, jealous of people who have money, and you want it. Simple.

ChiLaura commented on Jan 26 11 at 3:20 pm

Chilaura; “Fair” is a four letter word that starts with “F”. Left or not, we are realistic adults. However, if you work for a living, it is only proper, based on the promises of our society, that you have a route to self improvement. That the right does not understand. I am currently at the mercy of the state. I took more responsibility and put more skill forward, than most people can get their minds around. Was this a leftist government plot? NO! It was corporate embezzlement of my pension. Deferred compensation, I earned. They regularly dump their responsibilities on the back of taxpayers and take bonuses. That is what deregulation does. They can count on Republican bailouts when they destroy their industries. The true party of big government that never lowers taxes without a take back somewhere else, usually in unfunded mandates. The party of using the government for concentration of wealth. The party that rejects Darwin as a scientific possibility, and embraces survival of the fittest as socio-economic policy. The party that pledges allegiance to the flag of the multinational corporation, made in China. I pledge allegiance to my country, my nation, my people. I do not want your money, nor do anyone who embraces a non-right viewpoint. We believe in equal opportunity, not spread the wealth. We want to be paid for our efforts. We are against eminent domain tearing down our small businesses for Wal Mart. We are pro life, concerned for children. So we are against sweat shops and when a child arrives in this world, we want to take care of them, not make them the largest group joining the numbers of homeless. The top 1% think a tough day is a day without golf. We give them tax breaks on their yachts. Subsidize yachts, all they have to do is take “clients” on board, it is a write off. Keep supporting this warped viewpoint of capitalism and ignore the system that built this country. You will see how the system really works. You will be fired, laid off, possibly homeless. This is the reverse of capitalism, not socialism, but a complete ignorance of Adam Smith and Hamilton you are proposing.

Guy Bennett commented on Jan 26 11 at 4:02 pm

Yeah, his response was silly.

Manjari commented on Jan 26 11 at 8:01 pm

It was about a month ago that these same Republicans were ready to let the Bush tax cuts expire for all Americans if the richest 1% weren’t able to keep their tax cuts as well. The deficit didn’t matter so much a month ago.
I will say that the Republicans are brilliant in getting the hordes of middle and lower class to fight the battles of the filthy rich for them.

And ChiLaura, I would prefer a flat tax no only on all Americans but on all corporations and any of their transactions in the United States.

Mistress_Scorpio commented on Jan 26 11 at 8:27 pm

M_S said, “I will say that the Republicans are brilliant in getting the hordes of middle and lower class to fight the battles of the filthy rich for them.”

What matters to me and my family, and to a lot of my friends and their families, is the control that the gov’t has over the money that we earn. We care about where our taxes are going, how high they are, and the choices that we have as consumers. I want to keep more of the money that we earn to do as we wish with it. This has nothing to do with how rich the rich are (though, yes, I think that they are more likely to invest their money if they’re not worried about crazy tax rates, but that’s beside the point here). You’re essentially calling me a dupe because I’m “fighting the battle for the wealthy,” and that is demeaning. We have different ideas about how our money should be used, apparently, but that doesn’t mean that I’m a stooge for the rich. Or, if you want to call me that, at least allow me to call you a stooge for the government and those who love identity politics? One good caricature deserves another?

ChiLaura commented on Jan 26 11 at 10:03 pm

For the record ChiLaura, you’re the one who called the authors’ opinion “more liberal bullshit”. I don’t think you have the moral high ground in regard to personal attacks. Particularly since you quoted, (and therefore insulted), the author directly and M_S was making a point that may or may not apply to you.

Fuchiafinn commented on Jan 26 11 at 11:55 pm

ChiLaura, federal taxes are at the lowest rated for the wealthy in twenty years. I’m not buying the line that the way to more jobs is to cut the taxes if the rich because job growth stagnated over the past decade the majority of which the Bush tax cuts were in play. The debt wasn’t a twinkle in the Republicans eyes until the moment Obama got elected. What significant cuts have the Republicans proposed? One percent of the federal budget. If you are advocating against your own best interests then that should be discomfiting, but if you can tell me how your interests are better served by the architects of this crisis, no insult should be taken, don’t you agree?

Mistress_Scorpio commented on Jan 27 11 at 5:02 am

Overkill. The President sounded stupid enough on his own that no response was really necessary. My “Sputnik moment” came in 2008 when I realized that the American people were actually naive enough to elect a radical socialist.

BABS commented on Jan 27 11 at 1:30 pm

This post is what is ridiculous. Please stick to topics you can actually understand. Obviously the national debt problem is way over your head. Politics isn’t your forte, apparently.

Amanda commented on Jan 27 11 at 2:34 pm

Chilaura; One thing you are spot on is the taxes. Both parties love the income tax code, and that is the big problem. Ever since our country adopted that, it is the hiding place for all big government favors and graft. We will never have any open dialog on government so long as we have that system. There are no real tax cuts, or budget under this system. Neither party wants to rid themselves of this smoke and mirrors hiding place. Our forefathers made it unconstitutional and somehow our grandparents were talked into this insane system. My grandfather referred to it as the “destruction of our country.” It is also one of the ten planks of the “Communist Manifesto”. Of course we adopted all ten planks early in the last century. Central Bank, control of transport, education, communications and property tax. Not to mention seizure of personal property. It is what I find so ironic about Obama being accused of being socialist. We lost that battle before Marx was even born.

Guy Bennett commented on Jan 27 11 at 2:48 pm

If left up to me, I would
1. Raise taxes for for all income levels
2. Only the disabled would be allowed to use Social Security and/or Medicare
3. Cut spending
4. Eliminate tax breaks
5. Tax non-profit entities
6. Cut taxes on businesses
I do worry about the deficit and I worry about unemployment. But if I have to chose which I am more concerned about unemployment.

JEssica commented on Jan 27 11 at 3:04 pm

*But if I have to choose, I am more concerned about umemployment.

JEssica commented on Jan 27 11 at 3:05 pm

Thank you, Mistress Scorpio!

LogicalMama commented on Jan 27 11 at 3:34 pm

Amanda; What part of Obama’s agenda to destroy the US economy do you not understand. The national debt is part of that agenda. Obviously reality isn’t your forte. Stick to hurling insults instead. Fact, Obama has surrounded himself with radicals that buy into his vision of fundamentally transforming into a socialist state that redistributes the wealth. The only way to accomplish this is to bring down the current system and force people to be totally dependent on the government. Driving up the national debt is one way of accomplishing that objective. Try listening to what this man actually says when its not scripted.

BABS commented on Jan 27 11 at 4:32 pm

Babs – My response was to the original artilce, not what you wrote. Sorry if I didn’t make that clear.

Amanda commented on Jan 27 11 at 5:29 pm

BABS, you wouldn’t happen to be Michelle Bachmann, would you?

Mistress_Scorpio commented on Jan 27 11 at 7:52 pm

@BABS–I can’t take you seriously if you keep using the word forte.

JBoogie commented on Jan 27 11 at 7:57 pm

Paul Ryan, where did you go to school? Do you know how to spell Economics? Or what you know about credit creation or fair taxation? such a ridiculous response with no advise on how to close gap between rich and poor, you are causing America to lose its place in world.

ROBERTCONFIDENT commented on Jan 27 11 at 10:04 pm

Add your take:

Note: Babble is a supportive, diverse community. We encourage a range of opinions,
but any unduly hostile comments will be removed.


Comments are delayed up to 15 minutes

Most Popular on Facebook

Best of Babble.com


  • Lori Garcia
  • Joslyn Gray
  • Amber Doty
  • Julianna Miner
  • Monica Bielanko
  • Sierra Black
  • Meredith Carroll
  • Carolyn Castiglia
  • Sunny Chanel
  • Madeline Holler
  • Rebecca Odes
  • Danielle Smith
  • Danielle Sullivan
  • Katherine Stone
  • Disney Online Moms & Family Portfolio

    The Walt Disney Company supports Babble as a platform dedicated to honest, engaged, informed, intelligent and open conversation about parenting. However, the opinions expressed on this site are those of individual parents/writers and do not reflect the views of Disney. In addition, content provided on this site is for entertainment or informational purposes only and should not be construed as medical advice, diagnosis, treatment, or safety advice. Click here for additional information. Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Interest-Based Ads

    More in Strollerderby (50 of 11490 articles)