babble » blogs » Strollerderby
Strollerderby
Some Dancing Classes Are Not for Kids. One Magazine Disagrees
Kids are cute. They’re sweet. They’re fun! They soften the harsh edges of adult life (see: Sandra Bullock). Kids are offered up as a way of making kooky adults seem normal, legitimate, just like the rest of us (I’m thinking the Palin clan, circa 2008).
But wide-eyed innocence isn’t for everything. There are certain sectors — certain industries — where the presence of a little kid feels desperate, if not downright wrong.
I offer you a case in point:
a 2-year-old pictured in a pole dancing magazine, “Pole Spin: The International Pole Dance Fitness & Lifestyle Magazine.” According to the cover, she’s “the world’s youngest pole dancer!”
Jezebel’s Dodai Stewart put together a slide show of the endearing pole-dancin’ family features. There’s “A Family That Poles Together Stays Together,” with four teens, age 13 to 18, working the bar in various positions. Molly the Rebel, whose upside down pole dancing shots are juxtaposed with one of her twirling in a modest sundress. She’s 14. There’s 6-year-old Mr. Luis, who teaches other kids pole-dancing moves. And the aforementioned 2-year-old, Kayne Benford, whose first word was “pole.”
As Stewart points out, the second issue of the new title is filled with defenses of pole-dancing. It’s a sport, not just for strippers, other people do unseemly acts that don’t involved metal poles bolted to the floor. What’s the big deal? Why can’t you just accept me for who I am?
In my mind though: why all the mirrors? Why the candelabra, dark-lit rooms and thumpy music? Why, if pole-dancing has moved so far from its gentlemen’s club roots, do its athletes work out in their underwear?
I don’t want to ruin anyone’s fun. Good for you for getting kids moving! But a stripper’s pole is pretty loaded with history. Couldn’t a kid get the same strong arms and ripped abs on, say, a jungle gym?
Go Back To Strollerderby
7 Comments
Gretta commented on Jan 21 11 at 4:54 pmI agree with you, Madeline.
I am categorically opposed to kids (and by kid I mean anyone under 18) performing choreography/moves that are sexually suggestive (dance routines, cheer routines, music videos, etc.).
I’m all for creative expression and exercise, but why on earth would you want your child to be “the world’s youngest pole dancer”? I think that’s creepy.
Meagan commented on Jan 21 11 at 6:20 pmMeh. Most dancing is oversexualized, but not too many parents would think twice about enrolling their kid in ballet. Those dancers in their “underwear” aren’t wearing any less clothing than a typical middle school dance team. Is that a problem in itself? Obviously. But since the kids participating in pole dancing here seem to be far more appropriately dressed than their school sponsered counterparts, I don’t see the harm. In this country we associate pole dancing with stripping, but in some other cultures (I think China?) it’s just a sport.
Lucky commented on Jan 24 11 at 7:06 pmI’ve long though pole dancing is beautiful and deserving of respect. I’m not sure I’m convinced it’s come far enough to encourage your kids to do it. But I agree that many “cheerleading” moves are based more in exhibitionism than in technique and discipline.
krae commented on Jan 25 11 at 12:01 pmJust to keep things straight… less is more when dancing on an apparatus such as a pole. Skin contact with the pole is needed to do some of the intense acrobatic moves without falling. Wearing garments appropriate to the sport or mode of dancing you are drawn to is key to being able to succeed. Would you tell a bicylist to lose the skin tight shorts and instead wear a baggy clothes? Not likely to happen… besides the dangers of getting your bell bottoms caught in the chain the extra drag will also slow you down. Taking the pole out of the dark smoky room where women are objectified and sexualized, most often by men, and into the brightly lit studio of dance studios and fitness rooms is the most liberating thing that could happen to dancers. Why should we be stigmatized for wanting to own something we started? I say go with whatever form of dance works for you. There are plenty of dance forms that are socially acceptable that were once taboo… Would any one question the artistry of Cirque du Soleil? Ribbon dancing, hoop dancing, they all share common roots as the pole yet they are glorified and held with high regard. Belly dancing is also sexually suggestive if you want to take it there but honestly, so is any way the female form naturally moves. We are curvey, delicious, and move in ways that men do not… but, this doesn’t mean it’s bad. Owning the pole is not just about strippers in clubs, it’s about owning our feminine… owning our power. If this scares you, I beg you to look deeper and try to liberate that part of the brain that has let culture shame women who want to dance and explore feminine movement.
krae commented on Jan 25 11 at 12:16 pmCulturally there are plenty of people using Poles as a means to fitness… just look at this! This is a boy and he looks young. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lRXzbPzGwZA
Michelle commented on Jun 29 11 at 11:29 amThe only reason this form of “dance” is equated with the feminine is because men have used it for years as a form of sexual exploitation of women. Had this form of “expression” not been directly related to stripping, there wouldn’t be anything sexual about dancing on a pole. In fact, on it’s own, it would be pretty silly. The pole, you see, is the fantasy stand-in for the men who are watching the dance. You don’t “own” anything here – you’ve just decided to buy into the idea of female sexuality that men have sold you.
Geneva commented on Jan 02 12 at 7:06 pmThere is a certain stigma associated with pole dancing. If my 5yr old niece was pole dancing I would be humiliated to say that! I am a dancer and I do know that pole dancing itself is an art form. It does take some strength and practice. I do think it is okay for kids to learn to dance with a pole, but not in the stripper way we think of when we think of pole dancing. It should be called something else when taught to kids just because it implies sexiness, which isn’t necessarily the truth! It is only because we hear “pole dancing” and automatically think “stripper.” And yes, I do believe the lack of clothes might be a little helpful in learning the art form. But think athletic top and athletic biker shorts if you understand what I mean. Not panties and bra. And learn in a well lit studio, not a smoky bar! And also the mirrors I’m sure are for the students to learn from. They are supposed to look in them to see if their body is in the right position. Just like the mirrors in any dance studio. :-)
Add your take:
Note: Babble is a supportive, diverse community. We encourage a range of opinions,
but any unduly hostile comments will be removed.
Comments are delayed up to 15 minutes







Lori Garcia
Joslyn Gray
Amber Doty
Julianna Miner
Monica Bielanko
Sierra Black
Meredith Carroll
Carolyn Castiglia
Sunny Chanel
Madeline Holler
Rebecca Odes
Danielle Smith
Danielle Sullivan
Katherine Stone
The Walt Disney Company supports Babble as a platform dedicated to honest, engaged, informed, intelligent and open conversation about parenting. However, the opinions expressed on this site are those of individual parents/writers and do not reflect the views of Disney. In addition, content provided on this site is for entertainment or informational purposes only and should not be construed as medical advice, diagnosis, treatment, or safety advice.

7