babble » blogs » Strollerderby
Strollerderby
Andrew Wakefield’s Vaccines-Autism Study: Not Just Bad Science, But Deliberate Fraud, Journal Says
Yesterday, the British Medical Journal reported that Andrew Wakefield — the physician who more than a decade ago spurred the controversy around vaccines and autism with his Lancet study — was part of an “elaborate fraud.”
Wakefield and co-authors published a study in 1998 that linked the measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccine to autism symptoms. Since then, scientists (including Wakefield) have not been able to replicate his findings, most of his co-authors have withdrawn their names from the findings (see the reasons below), and the paper was officially retracted from the Lancet in 2010.
But the paper was enough to scare many parents into opting out of vaccines.
According to CNN, in the UK, vaccination rates dropped to 80 percent by 2004 and measles cases went up sharply after that. In the US, “more measles cases were reported in 2008 than any other year since 1997″ according to the CDC.
Here’s why BMJ says Wakefield’s science wasn’t just bad, it was fraudulent:
Wakefield did not disclose his financial ties and conflict of interest in the original 1998 paper. He was apparently being paid by a law firm that intended to sue vaccine manufacturers — this is why his co-authors eventually stated they wanted their names withdrawn from the study.
Beyond that, of the 12 kids in the study (an incredibly small population sample to start), 5 had symptoms of developmental delays before they received the vaccine, says the editor-in-cheif of BMJ.
It took one poorly-executed and possibly deliberately-fraudulent study to spark the fear around vaccines and autism. And to my mind, autism is a perfect disorder for the anti-vaccine movement, because it’s so genetically complex and may have an environmental component in some cases (even though there is no evidence that vaccines are that environmental factor).
As more reports and findings like this come out, hopefully we’re deflating a harmful public health misconception bit by bit.
Image: flickr
Go Back To Strollerderby
0 Comments
[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by shell spectrum, Roni Geva Orlina and Babble Strollerderby, Heather Turgeon. Heather Turgeon said: autism-vaccine study wasn't just bad science, but deliberate fraud http://fb.me/N7aMk7vz [...]
Tweets that mention Andrew Wakefield, Autism Vaccine Link Wasn't Just Bad Science, But Deliberate Fraud | Strollerderby -- Topsy.com commented on Jan 08 11 at 5:37 am[...] The vaccine-autism story laid to rest (at least for now): Earlier this year, the British Medical Journal took the stance [...]
The Science of Autism: My Top 5 Highlights From the Last Year in Research | Media Information commented on Apr 03 11 at 8:41 amlaura commented on Jan 06 11 at 3:46 pmThe sad thing is, this probably won’t do much to sway certain parents who are convinced vaccines are so dangerous (while they, ironically, rely on them to protect their kids by taking advantage of the kids who do get fully immunized. If Polio were as prevalent today as it was before the vaccine, I doubt these parents would be so brazen with their philosophical belief exemptions). The stupid thing is, they constantly blame “big pharma” for putting profits (which in reality are not that great) before kids’ safety. Meanwhile, the mastermind behind the hysteria did that exact thing. I don’t know what the tipping point be to kill this STUPID anti-vaccine movement, because science and truth hasn’t seemed to do it. I just pray it doesn’t involve the lives of too many innocent children. Not only are they putting kids lives in jeapordy by buying into this nonsense, but they are getting in the way of REAL research about autism and related disorders.
Laure68 commented on Jan 06 11 at 6:16 pm@Laura – I couldn’t agree more! Especially about people complaining about “Big Pharma”. The anti-vaccine movement makes a lot of money, and since they don’t need pesky things like science to back up what they are selling the profits are huge.
Yes, there are some people who will hang onto the idea of a vaccine-autism link no matter how much data piles up against it. In fact, in the LA Times coverage of this, they have a quote from someone saying how Dr. Wakefield keeps getting persecuted for revealing “the truth” about vaccines. argh
Kimberly Hosey (Arizona Writer) commented on Jan 07 11 at 1:13 amThank you for posting this! I just blogged about this (ranted, really), and I do hope this ridiculous, shameful, tragic hoax is being knocked down, albeit bit by bit. A lot of the time the parents who don’t vaccinate are just confused, and maybe influenced/shamed into it by someone else. I’ve gotten through to one of these parents. Just one. But she has three kids, and they’re vaccinated and very healthy. Even having possibly played a very small part in that is nice. Now if we could just gain momentum. Unfortunately we’re not as crazy as, well, the crazies.
Rosana commented on Jan 07 11 at 8:41 amSad and scary. I heard yesterday on NPR news that experts think the only way anti-vaccine parents could understand how important the MMR vaccine is thruough the fear of the disease itself. So, until kids, they know, start dying from measels, they will think how serious it is to vaccinate them.
Another sad part, Wakefield still stands behind his fake findings in the study. It shows that his determination, to believe that the vaccine causes autism, was really the only fact he had to start that anti-vaccine movement.
Cindiego commented on Jan 08 11 at 12:05 pmLet’s remember something that always gets lost in this vaccine issue — the number one way to convince parents that vaccines don’t cause autism would be to figure out what DOES! The number of kids with autism is the main tragedy here, not the relatively small problem of measles, etc. More good science is needed — and more funding — to finally figure out what’s going on. Picking on ant-vax parents may be fun but it is a major distraction. At least their hearts are in the right place.
heatherturgeon commented on Jan 08 11 at 5:20 pmLaura: Thanks for your thoughtful comments – I always appreciate them! It’s really interesting to hear that the pharmaceutical companies don’t make good profits off of vaccines (even if they did, it wouldn’t make me suspicious), it’s just that you’re right, i think a lot of people think evil money is involved.
heatherturgeon commented on Jan 08 11 at 5:29 pmcindiego: thanks for your feedback. I think that’s definitely the point, that the real focus should be on the causes of autism (as the rest of you said too). the vaccine-autism fraud is important because it could impact public health – and already has, with fewer kids being vaccinated.
but it’s really important to appreciate the incredible complexity of the autism spectrum disorders. there is no “autism” – it’s not one condition, and it’s not even one condition with a spectrum of severity. there are likely hundreds of genes involved, with possible environmental + developmental factors woven in too — all in varying combinations for different kids. and researchers are plugging away at the genetic map (see the link i provided in the post for more explanation of the genetics) but it’s going to be a long time until we have a more comprehensive understanding. i guess my point is that university scientists are working on this, but it’s never going to be the “ah ha” moment we’re hoping for. thanks again for writing!
http://www.babble.com/pregnancy/pregnancy-health/genetic-cause-of-autism-Aspergers-PDD/
Liz Ditz commented on Jan 09 11 at 6:02 pmI’m keeping a list of positive responses to the BMJ (Yes Wakefield is a fraud, and here are the implications…) and negative responses (Wakefield’s research IS TOO valid and vaccines cause autism anyway) at A roundup of responses to the BJM & Wakefield’s research was motivated by fraud.
Some observations
1. The positive responses come from a broad range of sites — politically left and right; people who are skeptics/ people who have heretofore (to my knowledge) never commented on vaccines or autism before, and so on. The negative responses are from a predictable set of sites and people.
2. The news coverage in the US has (perhaps inadvertently) perpetrated the idea that all parents of children with autism believe in the vaccine causation myth. It is a complete falsehood. Many parents of children with autism and adults with autism robustly reject the myth.
3. Kev Leitch, whose daughter has intense autism, has a moving post on how Wakefield’s actions have damaged everyone affected by autism
Rosana commented on Jan 10 11 at 11:06 am“The number of kids with autism is the main tragedy here, not the relatively small problem of measles, etc.” The major distraction was the science fraud that Wakefield committed, whick KILLED four babies (to you it might sound like a small number but I wonder if numbers are important to those parents that lost their babies).
That science fraud kept some parents from vaccinating their kids, but the number of non-vaccinated kids could have been higher. That could have turned measles in more than a “relatively small problem”.
I believe it is still very important to discover what causes autism but I also think it is very important that science fraud is not committed again so no more kids DIE from it.
Add your take:
Note: Babble is a supportive, diverse community. We encourage a range of opinions,
but any unduly hostile comments will be removed.
Comments are delayed up to 15 minutes







Lori Garcia
Joslyn Gray
Amber Doty
Julianna Miner
Monica Bielanko
Sierra Black
Meredith Carroll
Carolyn Castiglia
Sunny Chanel
Madeline Holler
Rebecca Odes
Danielle Smith
Danielle Sullivan
Katherine Stone
The Walt Disney Company supports Babble as a platform dedicated to honest, engaged, informed, intelligent and open conversation about parenting. However, the opinions expressed on this site are those of individual parents/writers and do not reflect the views of Disney. In addition, content provided on this site is for entertainment or informational purposes only and should not be construed as medical advice, diagnosis, treatment, or safety advice.

0