babble » blogs » Strollerderby
Strollerderby
Why the Raunchy ‘Glee’ GQ Photos?
Look, I understand sex gets attention and it sells and that, really, there’s nothing wrong with it. But I can’t help it. Photos of the cast of “Glee” in this month’s GQ awaken my inner Tipper Gore.
Why? Because, dang, the “Glee” GQ photos are raunchy, something you’d expect from TVs Sookie Stackhouse or, heck, a couple of airbrushed Real Houswives. Not, you know, two of the (supposed) high school girls (actually, they’re grown-up women) on a show watched by millions — including, perhaps, your own little girls!
It’s GQ, I know, I know. I shouldn’t expect featured females to put on pants or cross their legs in the event they forgot to get dressed. I’m not asking them to sit like a lady when they’re modeling Calvin Klein panties, I swear. (Go here for the rest of the “Glee” GQ photos.) But seriously. The high school girl fantasy feels especially icky when you tuck your future high school girls in every night.
That aside, if now is the time for Glee Gone Wild, what about the rest of the cast? The fat kids? The kid in the wheelchair. Anyone — anyone! — who isn’t skinny, white and beautiful. Part of the charm of “Glee” is that its cast is inclusive. That’s never been the charm of GQ, so sure, it’s really no surprise.
In stark contrast, Cory Monteith totally adheres to the school dress code. What’s up with that?!
More Posts
Separation of Church and State, the First Amendment, and Ding-Dongs Who Try to Run the Country
Tom Bosley, TV Dad, Dies
2 Thoughs on Willow Smith and Whip My Hair
Is This Baby Bump Obscene?
Rutgers Player Paralyzed. Are Some Sports Too Dangerous?
TJ Lavin Injury Reminds us of Dangers in Youth Sports
Remember This New Real Housewives of Beverly Hills Cast Member?
500 Reasons to Ignore the McRib Locator
Photo: GQ.com
Go Back To Strollerderby
13 Comments
pqbon commented on Oct 19 10 at 8:10 pmGlee is not for children. In the last episode two characters were talking about scissoring. Any show which talks about specific sex acts is NOT meant for children.
Meghan commented on Oct 19 10 at 8:24 pmI’d agree that Glee is not intended for children, even though I’m sure many, many teens watch it. But the characters of the show ARE children. And I agree that sends a gross mixed message. These shot were even taken in front of a set of lockers! These photos sexualize the image of teenage girls even if the actual models are adults.
K commented on Oct 19 10 at 8:26 pmNobody is saying it’s for children, pqbon. That doesn’t make it any less disturbing that Finn remains totally clothed in these photos while the ladies can’t keep a pair of pants on to save their lives! guess it probably has to do with Terry Richardson being the photographer.
Madeline Holler commented on Oct 19 10 at 10:24 pmPqbon, Agreed! And yet I hear so many parents who watch it with their kids. But then that’s on them (the parents), not GQ.
pqbon commented on Oct 19 10 at 11:17 pmOK – so if the show isn’t for kids then at what point are the actors allowed to pose for magazines like GQ or even playboy/girl? The actors aren’t even at the end of their teens they are all 20+ adults.
Is the basic point that no woman should be allowed to dress scantily for a magazine like GQ?
Alyssa commented on Oct 20 10 at 1:10 amThe issue shouldn’t be whether the women are “allowed” to dress scantily. Why do these women, ONLY THE WOMEN, run to the chance and, not dress scantily, not do swimsuit shots, but get photographed spread eagle, sucking on a lollipop in her underwear in a high school setting. And you don’t need an ID to buy GQ. You just need legs. And its right on the cover. Sex sex sex. Yes, lets encourage our high school girls to be sexy. Sixteen is a very mature age and they certainly know how to handle themselves sexually at that time.
And since when to teens/kids only watch shows exclusively made for them? This show isn’t on Cinemax at 11pm. Its primetime. About teenagers in a glee club. Everything about this show is marketed toward teenagers, the most profitable demographic there is.
Don’t throw that “the parents” issue into all of this. How could a parent ever compete with the incessant pounding of the media on t.v., radio, magazines…and lets not forget the internet. Lord knows some try, but, jeeze, what good is it if parents talk to their kids about sex, but every other adult in the world just seems so absolutely obsessed with tawdriness that they can’t walk into a c.v.s. without seeing something sexual. Adults need to reevaluate our standards. Sexual freedom is fine, but have we become so liberal that we forgot when its even appropriate? Jokes are appropriate, but probably not at the funeral of a baby. Sex is appropriate, but not when its shoved in our faces through every media all the time and only getting more and more lewd.
Anonimom commented on Oct 20 10 at 6:51 amI completely agree that Glee is not a show for kids. If you think that your kids are old enough to handle the subject matter of Glee, then they probably won’t be shocked by these pictures. Plus, it seems pretty clear that these actors don’t want to get typecast as their Glee characters and that is really what this photo spread is all about.
Manjari commented on Oct 20 10 at 11:45 amIf the photo spread is all about the actors not being typecast as their Glee characters, why are they dressed like “schoolgirls” and standing in front of locker? Seems like the photo shoot is definitely about the characters and not just the actors.
Meghan commented on Oct 20 10 at 12:21 pm“Seems like the photo shoot is definitely about the characters and not just the actors.”
Exactly. The last TV show about teenagers I watched was Veronica Mars (RIP). When the 24 or 25-year-old actress who played the title character appeared in a racy Maxim photoshoot, it was clearly all about her–the actress, not the teenage character she played. It was easy to differentiate the two. But in this photo spread, we have actors modeling sexy pinups of teenagers, but the only the sexy school girls are mostly naked. Finn is not only fully dressed, in multiple layers, but he’s doing things like playing the drums while the girls prance around the school in their underwear. That is clearly the image that these photos are suppose to represent and it’s gross.
Voice of Reason commented on Oct 20 10 at 12:46 pmI love ‘Glee’ but this is a seriously creepy – and a little disturbing – photoshoot. These talented performers (Dianna Agron & Lea Michelle) didn’t need to stoop to this. That lollypop shot? Seriously? Maybe she thought it would look ironic. Of course, it’s impossible to know what photos were taken and not used… maybe Cory Monteith’s semi-nudes just didn’t get used… so the actors didn’t realize how sexist and backwards this would look once published. Who knows? It’s disappointing, regardless.
nina commented on Oct 20 10 at 9:03 pmI think some of the pic where ok, becuase it is a guys magizne but the only pics i had proble with was lea m. pics she barley had any thing on. And dianna at lesy had high skirts and some clothing on and still was sexy at the same time!!
Fred commented on Oct 21 10 at 11:48 amSeriously, you americans need to chill with the morale panic all the time. As soon as sex is a subject everyone screams SOMEONE PLEASE THINK OF THE CHILDREN!! Teach your children about sex instead of hiding it from them, it’s a win for everyone.
Voice of Reason commented on Oct 21 10 at 3:22 pmHey Fred, I’m not American, and I think you are confusing sex with sexism. I’m all in favour of the former but not the latter, which is my problem with this photoshoot.
Add your take:
Note: Babble is a supportive, diverse community. We encourage a range of opinions,
but any unduly hostile comments will be removed.
Comments are delayed up to 15 minutes







Lori Garcia
Joslyn Gray
Amber Doty
Julianna Miner
Monica Bielanko
Sierra Black
Meredith Carroll
Carolyn Castiglia
Sunny Chanel
Madeline Holler
Rebecca Odes
Danielle Smith
Danielle Sullivan
Katherine Stone
The Walt Disney Company supports Babble as a platform dedicated to honest, engaged, informed, intelligent and open conversation about parenting. However, the opinions expressed on this site are those of individual parents/writers and do not reflect the views of Disney. In addition, content provided on this site is for entertainment or informational purposes only and should not be construed as medical advice, diagnosis, treatment, or safety advice.

13