Strollerderby

Babies Remember Moments of Neglect

Posted by sandymaple on August 26th, 2010 at 1:45 pm

baby neglect sm250 Babies Remember Moments of NeglectIn what has got to be the saddest-sounding experiment I’ve heard about in a long time, psychologists at the University of Toronto Scarborough have determined that very young babies remember when they’ve been emotionally deprived – even if that neglect lasts only a few minutes.

The experiment involved thirty 6-month-old babies being deliberately ignored by their parents.  The mother of each baby was told to face her child, who was strapped into a car seat on a table in front of her, and completely disregard any cries for attention. The mothers were instructed to gaze somewhere just above their baby’s heads and to avoid eye contact when the crying started.  In addition, they were told to maintain neutral facial expressions and refrain from cooing, smiling or otherwise trying to comfort their crying babies.

After two minutes of this, the mothers were allowed to play with their babies for two minutes.   Then the experiment was repeated one more time.

After the ignoring and playing phases, the researchers took saliva samples from the babies and tested their hormone levels.  What they found was that the experience increased the levels of the stress hormone cortisol in the babies.  While the fact that a baby would get stressed when being ignored by mom isn’t all that surprising, what happened next is.

Twenty-four hours later, the babies were returned to the testing facilities to have their saliva tested again by the same researchers.  Despite the fact that the experiment was not repeated and they were not subjected to neglect, their cortisol levels were again elevated.  This, say the researchers, demonstrates an “anticipatory stress response.”  In other words, believing that they were about to be treated badly again, the babies became stressed.

The researchers say the levels of cortisol, while still higher than normal, were lower on the second day than on the first.  This indicates that the babies were already adapting and learning to cope with the stress of being neglected.  And according to Clyde Hertzman, director of the Human Early Learning Partnership (HELP) at the University of British Columbia, these findings help explain the biological basis of bonding and attachment.

Most important, it helps us to understand why social and emotional deprivation in the first year of life can have profound long-term impacts on child development and mental health.”

While the researchers say they can’t determine if the memories that triggered the stress response were retained in the mind or the body, the bottom line is that they were retained. And this finding, it would seem, is bound to add some weight to the argument against letting babies cry it out as a method of sleep training.

Image: bbaunach/Flickr

More from this author:

The 7-Year Parenting Itch

Pregnant Women Are Drinking Alcohol

How to Get Out of Bed and Back to School

What Kids Think About Going Back to School

Day Care Costs More Than College?

What Your Child’s Teacher Wants You To Know

Crime and Punishment: Unusual Ways to Make Them Pay

Are You Friends With Your Kids?

Squinty-Eyed Kids Less Popular

1 in 5 Teens has Hearing Loss

Superheroes Bad Role Models for Boys

The Ever-Expanding Schools Supplies List

Jackie Evancho: Ten-Year-Old Opera Singer on America’s Got Talent

 Babies Remember Moments of Neglect

Go Back To Strollerderby

0 Comments

[...] Babies Remember Moments of Neglect [...]

Class Size Research Shows Smaller Isn't Better | Strollerderby commented on Aug 26 10 at 3:01 pm

It’s hard to imagine moms agreeing to participate in this experiment. I guess it’s important research for those who don’t realize that neglect=bad. I know I wouldn’t be able to do that to my baby.

Manjari commented on Aug 26 10 at 2:00 pm

The experiment was not just to let the kids cry, as in another room, it was to let them cry while you stand right there, apparently entirely unmoved — as though something is severely wrong with you.
This is not at all how parents generally do CIO. It’s closer to how they act when they’ve been murdered. See: http://www.slate.com/id/2247889
There’s a good split-screen video of a still-face experiment in that linked story, too.

bob commented on Aug 26 10 at 2:24 pm

Bob, that’s exactly what I was thinking.

Having your mother stand right there ignoring you and avoiding eye contact would be much, much more disturbing than crying for a few minutes at 4:00 am wondering where your midnight feed has disappeared to. Especially if the babies’ normal experience was to have lots of eye contact and physical contact from their mothers.

Voice of Reason commented on Aug 26 10 at 2:52 pm

Yes, because this person you trust to love you and care for you is looking right at you as if NOT caring at all. That’s why I don’t understand how the moms can do it.

Manjari commented on Aug 26 10 at 3:25 pm

Agreed Manjari – it’s hard to comprehend.

Voice of Reason commented on Aug 26 10 at 3:55 pm

I was thinking the same thing. Translating to adult terms, I don’t find it traumatic when my husband isn’t there for a few minutes, even if I need him, but I’d find it very upsetting if he *were* there but totally ignored me asking for help. I think CIO is much more like the first thing (needing/wanting help, mom/dad are not there).

diera commented on Aug 26 10 at 3:58 pm

I agree that it’s “bound to add some weight to the argument against letting babies cry it out” but my first thought was for babies in more serious situations of neglect. I was thinking how this is yet more evidence of a serious need for foster parents who will care for infants. Orphanages, hospitals, day care centers… none are adequate. Infants need primary caregivers. Their emotional development depends on it.

Elaine commented on Aug 27 10 at 12:31 am

I would like to know if the babys saliva was tested before they did the test?

krissy commented on Aug 27 10 at 3:20 am

They remember for a day but do they remember in a week or month? do they remember if mom isn’t there acting like a freak of nature? This study seems very incomplete and the only people who will see it as a mark against CIO are the ones who already uncomfortable with it.

Becca commented on Aug 31 10 at 5:23 pm

Add your take:

Note: Babble is a supportive, diverse community. We encourage a range of opinions,
but any unduly hostile comments will be removed.


Comments are delayed up to 15 minutes

Most Popular on Facebook

Best of Babble.com


  • Lori Garcia
  • Joslyn Gray
  • Amber Doty
  • Julianna Miner
  • Monica Bielanko
  • Sierra Black
  • Meredith Carroll
  • Carolyn Castiglia
  • Sunny Chanel
  • Madeline Holler
  • Rebecca Odes
  • Danielle Smith
  • Danielle Sullivan
  • Katherine Stone
  • Disney Online Moms & Family Portfolio

    The Walt Disney Company supports Babble as a platform dedicated to honest, engaged, informed, intelligent and open conversation about parenting. However, the opinions expressed on this site are those of individual parents/writers and do not reflect the views of Disney. In addition, content provided on this site is for entertainment or informational purposes only and should not be construed as medical advice, diagnosis, treatment, or safety advice. Click here for additional information. Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Interest-Based Ads

    More in Strollerderby (50 of 11490 articles)