babble » blogs » Strollerderby
Strollerderby
SIDS Occurs More Frequently in Male Babies
A new study published in the journal Sleep finds that male babies are more likely than female babies to experience Sudden Infant Death Syndrome, despite the fact that boys are easier to wake up than girls in the first weeks of life. Around 2 or 3 months of age, babies of either gender are just as easily roused.
While SIDS has an indeterminate cause, the risk factors include, “placing a child on the stomach to sleep; allowing a baby to sleep in an overheated room; smoking around a baby or while pregnant; co-sleeping with an infant; overdressing an infant and failing to remove soft bedding/toys from a baby’s bed,” according to CBC News.
Researchers are still unsure why boys are more vulnerable to SIDS, though they do have a theory. The authors of the study think that mothers may be placing “restless newborn sons on their stomachs to calm them” before bed. Remember, you should always place a baby to sleep on his/her back.
Image: CJ Foundation for SIDS
Go Back To Strollerderby
0 Comments
Gretchen Powers commented on Aug 04 10 at 7:42 amWow, co-sleeping mentioned among the list of risk factors for SIDS? And, not even at the bottom of the list? That’s just wrong. I wonder what the big thing people have against co-sleeping is. (I know this is “according to CBC News…) Even if you would give that co-sleeping is a risk factor for smothering, it certainly does not appear to be a risk factor for SIDS…http://www.parenting.com/article/Baby/Health/Ask-Dr-Sears-Co-Sleeping-a-SIDS-Danger
Gretchen Powers commented on Aug 04 10 at 7:42 amhttp://www.parenting.com/article/Baby/Health/Ask-Dr-Sears-Co-Sleeping-a-SIDS-Danger
Annie commented on Aug 04 10 at 10:10 amCo-sleeping is only dangerous if done incorrectly (not safe for smokers, obese parents, beds with scrollwork, fluffy bedding, etc.). When done carefully, it is correlated with lower incidence of SIDS.
Manjari commented on Aug 04 10 at 12:16 pmYeah, it bothers me that co-sleeping is listed. It makes people afraid to co-sleep. My mom and other people sort of made me think it would be an unsafe, irresponsible choice. Because of that, we tried the crib thing way too long (did NOT work for my babies), and finally we all got some sleep and peace when we started co-sleeping. We did this on a queen mattress on the floor, no heavy bedding, no smoking or drinking, etc.
PlumbLucky commented on Aug 04 10 at 12:32 pmBugs me as well, kind of like headlines that scream about a “co-sleeping death” go on to say in the article that the parent was drunk, abusing drugs, obese to boot, yada yada yada. Um, no, that’s not a co-sleeping death, thanks. That’s a parent who was too drunk/stoned/whatever to put their child in a safe bed to sleep.
Did I just get lucky and wind up with a back-sleeper son? (Curious, since they allude to this in the article text) Even now, if I am to peek in on him asleep, 10 to 1 odds I will find him face up, arms and legs sprawled, looking vaguely like a “thrown rag doll”. I use that terminology as its how my Mom describes what I looked like as a sleeping child…its a pretty accurate visual!
Em commented on Aug 04 10 at 1:46 pmI’m just amused that you say “male babies” and “female babies” instead of “baby boys” and “baby girls.”
bob commented on Aug 04 10 at 1:50 pmMuch of the advice out there comes in the form of rigid prohibitions or requirements that lack nuance or reasonable exceptions. I think the motive is to provide simple rules apply to most people, in order to maximize health and safety. But that oversimplistic approach is problematic for people that may have good reasons for doing otherwise, and it leads to unnecessary guilt, consternation and crazy people screaming at you on the street.
Take some examples: Everyone should breastfeed for a year. Don’t use slings. Cosleeping is more dangerous than crib. Home care is better than daycare. All drop-side cribs are dangerous. Back to Sleep. Each of those things may be the best advice in aggregate, but there are also many exceptions and caveats that go with them which are often left out, glazed over or forgotten.
Manjari commented on Aug 04 10 at 5:38 pmIt seems weird that there is no recommendation not to use cribs when there are crib deaths. I think it’s partly a cultural thing that Americans think of cribs as the norm.
Rosana commented on Aug 05 10 at 10:05 amThe only risk factor that has always bothered me was putting my babies to sleep on their stomachs. That is why I ended up co-sleeping with both for the first three months. They both hated the basinett (and I tried for weeks to make them sleep in there), so I took them with my to bed so they could sleep on their backs without waking up every 15 minutes. My daughter is now 6 months old and I still bring her to bed with me some nights when she refuses to go back to sleep in her crib.
Amanda commented on Aug 05 10 at 10:53 amI was very well aware and well read up on the subject of the risk of SIDS and the ‘Back to Sleep’ program. Both my kids (age 5.5 and 19 months) although I attempted in vain to have them sleep on their backs both of them ended up tummy sleepers, and what I found interesting is I wasn’t the only one who made that choice. The majority of mothers that I spoke to or have met all had the secret confession of laying their babies to sleep on their stomachs.
Add your take:
Note: Babble is a supportive, diverse community. We encourage a range of opinions,
but any unduly hostile comments will be removed.
Comments are delayed up to 15 minutes






Lori Garcia
Joslyn Gray
Amber Doty
Julianna Miner
Monica Bielanko
Sierra Black
Meredith Carroll
Carolyn Castiglia
Sunny Chanel
Madeline Holler
Rebecca Odes
Danielle Smith
Danielle Sullivan
Katherine Stone
The Walt Disney Company supports Babble as a platform dedicated to honest, engaged, informed, intelligent and open conversation about parenting. However, the opinions expressed on this site are those of individual parents/writers and do not reflect the views of Disney. In addition, content provided on this site is for entertainment or informational purposes only and should not be construed as medical advice, diagnosis, treatment, or safety advice.

0