babble » blogs » Strollerderby
Strollerderby
Is Monogamous Marriage Always the Best Path?
A Canadian court is hearing a case on whether or not to strike down the country’s laws against polygamy.
The case has created some strange political bedfellows: Mormons, Muslims and modern polyamorists are weighing in on the side of legalizing plural marriage.
On the opposite side stand some unusual opponents, including a small anthropology school in British Columbia. In a long brief filed with the court, one of their scholars argues that monogamous marriage benefits not only women, but children and men. In fact, he goes so far as to argue that it’s essential to a free and just society.
Really?
The basic argument is that in a society that allows men to have more than one wife, a “free market in women” emerges. Men spend all their time, money and energy competing with each other to get more and more wives.
Men who can’t get any wife are more likely to turn to lives of crime. Men who get wives just want more, and treat the ones they have badly. Pretty soon, society as we know it collapses.
I’m having trouble taking this argument very seriously. We already have a society that allows people to choose not to marry, marry and divorce repeatedly, and live in any arrangement they choose. And we don’t seem to be heading headlong into widespread social collapse, no matter what the pundits on the far right think.
What do you think? Is monogamy essential to a successful society, or just one way of doing things?
Photo: apdk
Go Back To Strollerderby
20 Comments
BlackOrchid commented on Jul 27 10 at 4:23 pmAny woman who doesn’t stand against polygamy – which is nearly always polygyny – is a fool. That’s all there is to it. I wouldn’t blame a man for loving the arrangement. But it stinks on ice for women and children.
JesBelle commented on Jul 27 10 at 5:10 pmPolygamy can suck, so can serial monogamy, or being stuck with someone you don’t love. I’ve been in non-monogamous relationships and some were great and some were not great, but they all ended for the same reasons that monogamous ones do — deceit, ennui, lack of affection, you-name-it. Personally, I think that when society promotes one form of relationship (like, say, heterosexual life-long monogamy) over any other it creates huge unhappiness for anyone unable to meet that ideal.
jenny tries too hard commented on Jul 27 10 at 6:13 pmI think monogamy is the best (though not perfect) way of doing things, and that societies which encourage it will do well…but when it comes to whether a lifestyle should be legal, freedom trumps what’s “best” for women, children or men.
Laure68 commented on Jul 27 10 at 6:31 pmI always wondered what would happen to most of the men in a polygamous society. Like BlackOrchid says, it is nearly always polygyny. Therefore, a few, wealthy men would have lots of wives, the rest of the heterosexual men would have to be celibate?
anon commented on Jul 27 10 at 6:34 pmAs a woman in a nonmonogamous relationship, I must say it’s awesome :D
jenny tries too hard commented on Jul 27 10 at 6:58 pmOne more thought—to give much credence to these scholars’ argument that legalizing polygamy would create a situation in which “loser” men would end up unmarried and criminal (which is silly, anyway, losers and criminals usually seem to have little trouble finding girls with whom to make babies they won’t support), you have to start out with the premise that women in Canada circa 2010 would choose, most of the time, to be one of many wives rather than a one-and-only. The free market for mates works both ways, at least in North America. We’ve never really tested that, as most societies that practice polygamy on a large scale are pretty backwards and have so few social and economic options for women. When you take polygamy away from the other conditions of polygamous societies, like state-sanctioned religious extremism, child marriage, laws preventing women from working, etc. it becomes just another choice, and not a particularly attractive one from a cool financial standpoint (would you rather share a man making $100,000 a year with another woman and her two kids, or have a man making $50,000 devote his money to you and your two shared kids alone)
JeninCanada commented on Jul 27 10 at 7:03 pmMen and women should be free to create any kind of partnership between themselves that they want that is based on mutual affection, respect and consent. The ‘but what about the children?!’ arguement is pretty hollow, as kids can and do adapt to whatever is ‘normal’ for them. Two dads? Two moms? A mom and two dads? Two moms and one dad? It’s ALL good.
Gretchen Powers commented on Jul 27 10 at 11:41 pmactually, it’s NOT “all good”…just because kids can adapt to various situations does make any of those situations ideal or even “good”…or even acceptable
Voice of Reason commented on Jul 28 10 at 12:13 amThis could work out pretty well for me. I already have a man who cooks really well and is an awesome dad, but I could really use someone who’s handy in the garden.
I’m wondering if Bob might consider it…
Morgan commented on Jul 28 10 at 8:33 amI agree. Having multiple male partners for me, a female, would be great. (Note: in real life, I have chosen to remain single). Why do I get the feeling that when people say polygamy, that it implies one male, many females?
Mistress_Scorpio commented on Jul 28 10 at 8:51 am@VOR: Same here. I need a part-time extra husband for yard work and carpentry. Can we set up a husband timeshare?
Voice of Reason commented on Jul 28 10 at 10:59 am@Mistress_Scorpio, absolutely. You can have the first few months to assist with nightfeedings, etc. We’ll need to start by writing an ad. SOH essential.
bettywu commented on Jul 28 10 at 11:30 am“The free market for mates works both ways, at least in North America”
I disagree. Some of the religious sects that are pushing this (Muslim and Mormon specifically) don’t have a great track record on women’s rights to say the least. I doubt seriously that even here, in good old North America, that the very young women who will be picked off will have a lot of choice in the matter.
jenny tries too hard commented on Jul 28 10 at 11:50 amIt’s true that very young women from ultra-religious families will be pressured to marry men with multiple wives, as they are pressured to marry the “right” man now. That’s horrible, but as long as there is legal oversight to make sure that anyone who marries as a singular or plural wife is in fact an adult, that she knows she has a legal choice and that she has police protection and domestic violence shelters available if her family tries to force her into marriage, I think Canada (and one day the US) can handle this freedom. I don’t know how marriage works in Canada, but in the US several states allow children (14-17) to marry with the consent of their parents, and I do think that is wrong, whether for plural marriage or traditional, so I hope if Canada has that loophole, they remove it, so that teenage girls can’t be effectively forced into marriage by their parents. The real problem, so far as I can tell, in Muslim countries (there are no Mormon countries that I know of) is that children are legally sold into marriage—they’re not choosing to become plural wives, so there isn’t a free market for mates; there’s a free market for women who are treated as chattle by the law and society. In Canada some fringe communities may have these attitude toward women, but the law doesn’t.
JEssica commented on Jul 28 10 at 1:56 pmUmmm…sometimes what is best for society should be place above what is best for the individual. And I think this one instance where not legalizing a form marriage is best for our society. I just have to look atplaces where this is allowed (Africa, Middle East, Utah) and see women become little more than objects and the incidence for war, aids, proverty and terrorist activity reaches epidemic highs for me to know this is not acceptable for our country. On on another topic this will also cost taxpayers more money from social security and other tax benefits. And probably raise health insurance cost.
Marj commented on Aug 06 10 at 4:29 pmYour average polyamorous relationship (from what I’ve seen) is nothing like polygamous marriage. Polygamous marriage tends to treat women as second class people, perhaps even more like pets. I don’t think women’s rights are so entrenched that this could work. We need to work harder on making sure young women are not abused, are well-educated and not bartered like property before this could work.
JMW commented on Mar 30 11 at 2:11 pmBeing gay and currently denied the right to marry in the U.S., I am very slow to outright deny another non-traditional group of people that right.
And right now, I don’t see the harm in polyamorous couples being given the right to marry. I’d advise many people against exercising that right because I don’t think most people could handle the complexities of such a relationship. But I still think the right should be there.
At the same time, though, there should be an arrangement in the law that protects women from being treated as property, as has often been the case with polygamy in the past. I’m not sure how exactly the law would go about such a thing, but I’m sure there’s some way. I can indeed see legal polygamous marriage being abused, but that doesn’t mean modern polyamorous couples should be denied the right to protect their relationships with marriage.
(At the same time, though, imagine how much of a nightmare divorce would be! :D)
Mimi Burns Band commented on Mar 30 11 at 2:42 pmI support people getting their lives together as adults and being fully, (more or less), functional. I have yet to meet a highly functioning couple who’ve been married for years and have not had some go about through the possibility of cheating and being with others. It is a choice to stay, it is a choice to get as healthy as possible, it is a choice to commit to one, (or two or four) and share your soul with others. I know at least two women who practice polyandry (one woman and more than one man) and in both cases, the men seem perfectly happy…
Given that sexual maturity level seems to stop at the age of 12 for most people, I encourage people to grow up. Try this website http://www.tantranova.com, they are great friends of mine and they’ve had a show on TV for quite a while which teaches people about the secrets of maturity and being love. That is really what this is all about anyway, being love.
nchan commented on Feb 05 12 at 10:24 pmJust look at countries that allow multiple wives, and you can see how polygamy destroys women.
Mamazee commented on Feb 17 12 at 11:19 pmHere in Canada, the reason people are opposed is *because* of the children of Bountiful (same story with Muslim) – the girls are isolated, do not know their rights, are denied education and forced to work hard. Marriage to some old fart who is 40 years older and already has 16 wives looks like an escape. Meanwhile, the boys are starved, abused and driven out of the community around age 12 , illiterate and ignorant of the world outside the compound. Meanwhile, the cycle of jealousy, insecurity and competition for resources ( both material and emotional) continues with the new child bride. The Bible talks about multiple wives, but none of the stories end well… Ever notice?
Add your take:
Note: Babble is a supportive, diverse community. We encourage a range of opinions,
but any unduly hostile comments will be removed.
Comments are delayed up to 15 minutes






Lori Garcia
Joslyn Gray
Amber Doty
Julianna Miner
Monica Bielanko
Sierra Black
Meredith Carroll
Carolyn Castiglia
Sunny Chanel
Madeline Holler
Rebecca Odes
Danielle Smith
Danielle Sullivan
Katherine Stone
The Walt Disney Company supports Babble as a platform dedicated to honest, engaged, informed, intelligent and open conversation about parenting. However, the opinions expressed on this site are those of individual parents/writers and do not reflect the views of Disney. In addition, content provided on this site is for entertainment or informational purposes only and should not be construed as medical advice, diagnosis, treatment, or safety advice.

20