Strollerderby

“The Aniston Syndrome:” Did You Wait Too Long To Have A Baby?

Posted by paulabernstein on July 19th, 2010 at 2:51 pm

pregnant1 199x300 The Aniston Syndrome: Did You Wait Too Long To Have A Baby?Like many women of our generation (I’m a year older than she is), writer Rachel Lehmann-Haupt, 40, focused on her career during her 20s and 30s and assumed that eventually, she’d find the right guy and have a baby. Things didn’t work out as planned. Now she is wondering why she waited so long.

As part of Babble’s Getting Pregnant special issue, Lehmann-Haupt, author of In Her Own Sweet Time: Unexpected Adventures in Finding Love, Committment and Motherhood, writes about “The Aniston Syndrome” — when career-driven women realize too late that it’s not always easy to get pregnant after 35.

Lehmann-Haupt wonders if our “generation collectively screwed up. Did we in fact buy a false message from our feminist mothers, and focus too much control on ourselves and our bodies in terms of birth control and sexual freedom in our 20s and actually wait too long to have children?” Perhaps we were so consumed with the idea of controlling our own destinies and following our passions that we forgot that we can’t control our fertility.

Lehmann-Haupt is not alone in postponing parenthood in favor f her career. In fact, 43% of the people who participated in Babble’s Getting Pregnant Survey said that they delayed having children in order to focus on their career or for financial reasons.

The author imagines a conversation she would have with herself at age 30:

 I might tell my younger self that there is never a perfect time to have a baby in terms of your life circumstances and not everything has to be perfect. And rather than just living for the moment, I would tell her to deeply consider her future family and how she might want it to look— keeping in mind that it does get harder and harder to get pregnant as you get older. This is different than settling for the less than perfect guy, but I do think that by better balancing your priorities, younger women may choose different kinds of relationships with men.

Instead, around her 37th birthday, after a break-up with a serious boyfriend, Lehmann-Haupt decided to freeze her eggs. At one point, she vowed to choose single motherhood before she turned 40, Lehmann-Haupt later reconsidered. “I cannot bring myself to do it alone without a partner and father. I know very clearly now that I want a good, intimate relationship to be the foundation of my family,” she writes.

The author is now happily dating and has actively dialed back her “high-strung Manhattan life” by moving to a houseboat in Sausalito, California. Sounds like a pretty sweet life to me!

Did you wait too long to have a baby only to find it wasn’t easy to get pregnant? Or did it all work out in the end?

flickr/Flying House Studios

 The Aniston Syndrome: Did You Wait Too Long To Have A Baby?

Go Back To Strollerderby

0 Comments

[...] the controversial part of the equation: some say that the problem is that women are waiting too long to have children and then finding it increasingly difficult without fertility treatments. Dr. Sherman Silber, a [...]

The High Cost of IVF | Strollerderby commented on Jul 23 10 at 10:51 am

Freezing eggs can be a good idea. According to stilltasty.com they may only stay fresh 3-5 weeks in the refrigerator.

bob commented on Jul 19 10 at 3:19 pm

Teehee Bob.

Nope I didnt wait. Growing up my parents never talked to me about college or what I wanted to do after high school. As a result I got pregnant pretty quickly at 20 and have been a stay at home mom ever since.

JZ commented on Jul 19 10 at 4:36 pm

Honestly, I am getting bored with all the fear mongering and the backlash against women having a career and/or a life beyond marriage and children which keeps being peddled in the mainstream media. Why focus on the women who want careers? Why not attack Disney for peddling the notion that every girl wants to be a princess and, subsequently, we should all have unrealistic views of relationships and hold out for Prince Charming? Why not attack the business environment and culture which makes it difficult for a woman to take maternity leave and makes woman feel they will be penalized (in terms of promotions and raises) for getting pregnant? Some women never met “the right guy” (either because they were too picky, they were too busy being with the wrong guy, they were not looking, etc) and now are sad their eggs are approaching their expiration date and they never had children. Some women chose a career over kids and wish they had made other choices. But there are also women who are happy to be childless, women who have kids and wish they had spent more time focussing on their careers, women who ditched any of their hopes and dreams and married the guy they thought was right only to realize he wasn’t, women who only ever wanted to be married and have kids and it still never happened for them and they are fine with it (or not fine with it)–but we never hear about them because that wouldn’t fit the agenda of telling women that they are wrong to think anything but a man and babies will make them happy. Only the most self-centered, narcissistic individual believes they can or should get everything they want in life or doesn’t understand that choosing one option may mean closing the door on others. Should we just raise the next generation of girls to be strong people who can make their own choices, or should we tell them that having hopes and dreams beyond husbands and babies are a big waste of time and that they shouldn’t worry their pretty little heads about it?

alison commented on Jul 19 10 at 5:40 pm

It seems to me that all these articles about career v. Baby have the subtext that the “wrong women” are getting pregnant and the “right women” aren’t. Plenty of kids in the world needing good dedicated parents.

Steelrigged commented on Jul 19 10 at 5:55 pm

Woah, alison, I think you’re reading way too much into this. Babble has written about Disney princesses and about lack of maternity leave. This happens to be a story about women who wished they had thought about their fertility earlier. Nobody is saying they should have skipped having a career or that the “wrong women” are getting pregnant (that’s for steelrigged). I don’t believe in fear mongering either, but I think women need to realize that if they want to get pregnant, they should think about how to get there before they reach 35 or so.
Of course, there are all sorts of women out there in all sorts of situations. Nobody is generalizing here.

paulabernstein commented on Jul 19 10 at 6:05 pm

I’m in my 30s now, so I’ve seen this debate evolve a bit. Since I’ve been old enough to pay attention it seems like the watch words have changed from ‘you can always have babies later’ to ‘well, *maybe* you can have babies later, but not everyone, not always, and you better be careful if you try’. I think that probably the hardest thing is that there is no easy answer, no simple formula, no magic age beyond which fertility becomes hard. It’s different for every woman. Some women may find the clock stops at 35 and others could conceive at 53, and at this point there isn’t any good way to know at 20 which one you are.

MsC commented on Jul 19 10 at 6:29 pm

Like allison, I am seeing a lot of these stories in the media and feel they are framed poorly. What I have been reading is often along the lines of “women have waited too long” or “women should have kids when they are younger”. I think the information should be out there (fertility declines as you age) and then we can make a decision that is best for us. Personally, I would have been a terrible mother in my 20′s. I wasn’t ready at all. I knew there would be a possibility that getting pregnant would be harder for me, but I decided I could accept that and would adopt if I couldn’t have biological children. The personal experiences I had as a single person were amazing and I am glad I did not have to give those things up.

Also, you really don’t know who has waited too long. Often women you think are waiting are just having problems getting pregnant. (I know many women whose fertility problems started in their 20′s.)

Laure68 commented on Jul 19 10 at 7:27 pm

I laugh at the underlying assumption that all these 30something women who are having trouble conceiving would have become pregnant at the drop of a hat if they’d only tried earlier. Maybe they were always fertility-challenged.

Lula commented on Jul 19 10 at 8:31 pm

I hate that this conversation is framed as an issue of individual choice. I’d rather we lived in a society that demonstrated a collective valuing of parenting and children by supporting families with paid medical & family leave, infrastructure like community and family support centers such as existed during the Rosie the Riveter days of WW2, and sane and balanced career expectations for males and females alike. To say that women are making the wrong choice implies that somehow we have a delightful menu to choose from! I opted to get pregnant at the beginning of my career, right after graduate school because I was nearly 30 and knew what was going to happen to my fertility in the next decade. We knew we wanted kids and I knew I don’t have a personality that would cope with infertility very well at all. I got pregnant w/in 3 months and 1 month with my kids, respectively. It is only in hindsight that we know whether or not we are fertile. Waiting had costs I wasn’t willing to take, but I’d never judge another woman for getting a different answer to her equation.

Larissa commented on Jul 19 10 at 8:46 pm

@Larissa – For some of us (at least for me) it was an individual choice. I wasn’t pursuing my career so much as other aspects of my life. Also, in Europe, where there is more support for families, women actually have fewer children than they do in the US. (I’m not sure about the average age of having kids, though.)

I do wish we had more sane career expectations, though. The hours we expect people to work are ridiculous, even for those who do not have kids.

Laure68 commented on Jul 19 10 at 10:27 pm

Have to disagree with Larissa. Parents and children are supported enough with leave and benefits, often to the detriment of others (namely the childfree). What society has failed to see is that money isn’t the solution it’s parents realising the truth about parenting. It’s meant to be a sacrifice, it may well mean not working full-time, it may well mean not having the luxuries of a plasma TV, all the latest gadgets, it DOES mean disciplining your child, it does mean being consistent. THESE are the things that parents are getting wrong and this is how children are being failed, it’s not a financial issue it’s parental greed and lack of willing to make real sacrifices.

Also society still perpetuates the silly “it’s not the same unless it’s your own”. Utter garbage. Scientists have already shown that there can be a stronger bond between adoptive children and their parents than the strongest bond between biological children and their parents.

Mind you, society tells people that having children is just what you do, it’s never presented to us as a choice. And it is a choice, and it’s one you should only make if you truly are willing to make the sacrifices (financial and time-wise) and you shouldn’t make it and then expect the rest of society to bend to you and to make it easier for you.

At the moment my benefits are going to people who go out and buy a better car, a bigger TV, more gadgets than I can afford myself. Clearly they don’t need the child benefits but they take them anyway. All the while those that genuinely need them are losing out because they could have more if those who didn’t need them (a big TV is not an essential item after all) stopped accepting the money.

Lorna commented on Jan 23 11 at 8:18 pm

Add your take:

Note: Babble is a supportive, diverse community. We encourage a range of opinions,
but any unduly hostile comments will be removed.


Comments are delayed up to 15 minutes

Most Popular on Facebook

Best of Babble.com


  • Lori Garcia
  • Joslyn Gray
  • Amber Doty
  • Julianna Miner
  • Monica Bielanko
  • Sierra Black
  • Meredith Carroll
  • Carolyn Castiglia
  • Sunny Chanel
  • Madeline Holler
  • Rebecca Odes
  • Danielle Smith
  • Danielle Sullivan
  • Katherine Stone
  • Disney Online Moms & Family Portfolio

    The Walt Disney Company supports Babble as a platform dedicated to honest, engaged, informed, intelligent and open conversation about parenting. However, the opinions expressed on this site are those of individual parents/writers and do not reflect the views of Disney. In addition, content provided on this site is for entertainment or informational purposes only and should not be construed as medical advice, diagnosis, treatment, or safety advice. Click here for additional information. Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Interest-Based Ads

    More in Strollerderby (50 of 11490 articles)