babble » blogs » Strollerderby
Strollerderby
Should Peanuts Be Banned on Airplanes?
According to the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, peanut and tree nut allergies are the leading cause of fatal and near-fatal food allergy reactions in the U.S. That’s a statistic that strikes fear into the hearts of parents of children who suffer from the condition. And because peanuts are as ubiquitous on airplanes as they are in ballparks, many parents are understandably hesitant to board a flight with an allergic child.
The Air Carrier Access Act prohibits discrimination by U.S. and foreign air carriers against those with disabilities. And according to the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT), a person who suffers from severe peanut allergies would fall under that protected category. As such, the DOT is soliciting opinions on how best to deal with the issue of peanuts on airplanes.
Through Cornell University’s Regulation Room, the general population is invited to weigh in on the subject and choose between three proposed solutions or offer a better one:
- An outright ban on airlines serving peanuts and peanut products
- Banning service of peanuts and peanut products only on a flight where a passenger with a peanut allergy requests a peanut-free flight in advance
- Requiring the airline to provide a peanut-free buffer zone around a passenger with a medically-documented severe peanut allergy if the passenger makes a request in advance
Browse through the comments and you will find that peanut allergy debate is a lively one. While a few are of the opinion that such allergies don’t even exist, others wonder why perfume, pets and other allergens aren’t aren’t being addressed as well.
Despite all the press peanut allergies have gotten of late, the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases says that it’s a problem that affects only about 0.6% of the general population. That may not sound like a lot, but because the reactions can be so severe – 80% of people with a peanut allergy have had a reaction that resulted in a breathing problem – it’s an issue that should be taken seriously.
I don’t suffer from a peanut allergy and don’t even know anyone who does. And I really like peanuts. But because the lack of them won’t diminish anyone’s quality of life, I see no reason not to keep them off airplanes. What do you think?
Image: Bludgeoner86/Flickr
More from this author:
Single-Gender Classrooms on the Rise
Fertility Service for Beautiful People
Business Trips Harder on Women
Go Back To Strollerderby
0 Comments
[...] Should Peanuts be Banned on Airplanes? [...]
Should Miminum Wage for Teens be Lowered? | Strollerderby commented on Jun 23 10 at 11:36 am[...] month, the Federal Transportation Department announced it was soliciting comments from the public on a proposal to ban peanuts on airlines. It was an [...]
Friendly Skies Now Safe for Peanuts | Strollerderby commented on Jul 06 10 at 9:31 ambob commented on Jun 23 10 at 10:43 amIs the summary missing some important detail? Is there something about peanuts’ mere existence that threatens allergy sufferers? Does thinking about a peanut bring on anaphylactic shock?
Amy commented on Jun 23 10 at 10:57 amI empathize with parents of children who have severe reactions to peanuts but if we ban them on airplanes, where will it stop? Shall we stop selling them in a grocery store (a can may break open and leave some on the floor) and only have “peanut stores?” A lot of people are extremly allergic to a lot of things – we aren’t going to ban those too are we? It is a medical condition that has to be dealt with on a personal level – we cannot expect everyone to go without peanuts, grass, cockroaches(okay that one would be okay), but you get my point.
PlumbLucky commented on Jun 23 10 at 10:59 am@bob – peanuts are one of the few allergies where inhaling an airborn particle can create a reaction, sometimes a very bad one, even without ingestion. So in theory, yes, its mere existance could in fact harm someone with a severe allergy.
jenny tries too hard commented on Jun 23 10 at 11:00 amBanning them would be wrong. It would probably be smart for some airlines to advertise their peanut-free existence, but really it is up to the allergy-sufferers and/or their parents to check and see if an airline serves peanuts and take their own precautions (like bringing an epi-pen).
bob commented on Jun 23 10 at 11:10 amThanks, PlumbLucky. I’d not heard that before. A quick search Google search I just performed, however, suggests that the risk of a severe reaction from inhalation is quite small:
http://www.netwellness.org/healthtopics/ch/peanut1.cfm
http://www.allergysafecommunities.ca/assets/common_beliefs_faan_2003.pdf
http://www.netwellness.org/question.cfm/42226.htm
Laure68 commented on Jun 23 10 at 11:26 amWell, according to a post that was on Babble yesterday, about 50-100 people die every year of peanut allergies. I don’t know how many of these people died of a reaction on an airplane, but one would assume it would be a very small number. Like Jenny says, some airlines could decide to go peanut-free and advertise this.
Manjari commented on Jun 23 10 at 11:45 amOn the other hand, it’s really no hardship to go without peanuts on a flight. We got pretzels on most of the flights I’ve taken in the last few years.
PlumbLucky commented on Jun 23 10 at 12:00 pm@jenny tries too hard (full disclosure. I carry an Epi-Pen for food allergies, though they aren’t peanuts) my directions from my doc with the Epi-pen are to use and get to ER/Medical care immediately. I do not know if that is a standard order of business with them, but that’s what mine are. A little hard to do in an airplane.
My only reactions in the past ten years have been outside my home when given erroneous information to my questions that should have kept me safe.
I’m not sure whether I agree with banning; I agree that its really not a hardship to go without peanuts, but also that the risk is pretty small (as bob noted).
I also know that saying “need to take their own precautions” is nearly impossible if you don’t have a direct hand in preparations when it comes to food or what will be around you in a certain setting.
Lauren commented on Jun 23 10 at 12:13 pmI have been on 2 flights (both on Jetblue) where it was announced pre-flight that there were passengers with life-threatening nut allergies on board. We were asked not to eat any nut products on the plane and notified they wouldn’t be serving any.
This seemed sensible to me. My husband and i promptly exchanged our just-purchased peanut butter cups for kits kats and were on our way:)
That said, I think there should be notifications about cats/dogs on board. Those near by could make our flight miserable (though not deadly) due to allergies.
Lisa commented on Jun 23 10 at 12:19 pmI am the mother of a severely allergic child who has had to reaction episodes to peanuts – the 1st when he was 2 and the 2nd when he was 3. Both times it was from the smell of peanuts, the 2nd from another child he was sitting beside who had consumed PB 5 hours earlier. Each episode means that subsequent exposures will be more severe, and with even less allergen present. Thank you for this article, as it reminds me to ensure I investigate the airlines policy the next time I fly with my son. The issue with peanut consumption on airplanes is much life cigarette smoke – the air is recycled and my child could breathe in the allergen if someone in another part of the plane is eating them and this could be potentially fatal for him. I do not take my son into bulk food stores for the specific purpose one poster already identified – peanuts are stored in bins that are opened constantly. The grocery store is a potential hazard, should a jar break open with my child in the vicinity and I recently asked our city officials to have the peanut dispensing machines removed from public places with absolutely no trouble at all. I always carry an epipen and hope that I am prepared for any eventuality, but if I was on a long flight and my child was exposed, the epipen itself will not save him. The epipen buys us time to get him to the hospital and we’ve been told we have 10-15 minutes tops. And then he may go into a coma from which he may never arouse. He is 3.5 and deserves to be safe. Banning peanuts from airplanes does not present a hardship to others – allowing them could kill someone. Is it reasonable? Absolutely. I don’t buy the “where does it stop?” argument. You do what is reasonable. It is not reasonable to ban peanut products from grocery stores, but I am confident in my ability to respond appropriately in that eventuality.
diera commented on Jun 23 10 at 12:32 pmI’m actually kind of surprised this is even still an issue. I fly a fair amount and I haven’t seen a peanut on an airplane for *years*. I think the whole idea that ‘peanuts are ubiquitous on airplanes’ might be kind of outdated.
Laure68 commented on Jun 23 10 at 12:38 pm@Manjari – it may not seem like a big deal to remove peanuts from airplanes, but if it becomes regulation, you’d be surprised how high the cost becomes. (Policies in place to assure nothing with peanut products or made in a facility with peanuts, audits, inspections, etc.) That’s why I like the idea of the airlines deciding if they will go peanut-free, and I especially like the way Jet Blue handled the case Lauren spoke of.
PlumbLucky commented on Jun 23 10 at 12:54 pmWhat Lauren said makes the most common sense. If a peanut allergy protects you under the acts listed in the article, it makes sense that you have to be upfront about it when booking. You tell them about your condition, they accommodate it as they’re required to.
goddess commented on Jun 23 10 at 1:53 pmI think the risks outweigh the benefits of peanuts on airlines. As long as they also enact a ban on fragrances too.
KA commented on Jun 23 10 at 2:10 pmThere are a few issues I have with this. I don’t understand why people want big government involved in yet another restriction. Like others have said, it should be up to the airline to choose to go peanut-free. I don’t know where a government ban on peanuts would stop…what’s next? Buses, boats, buildings, restaurants? Also, would a ban include barring passengers from bringing their own peanut products on board? Who’s going to police that? The TSA??? I’m surprised that the writer doesn’t know anyone with a peanut allergy since, according to my kids’ classrooms, there are 1 or more kids with a peanut allergy in each class. This includes my son’s preschool class of 6, where 2 of them have a “peanut allergy.” Not sure how that’s statistically possible when less than 1% of the population is affected by this. This gets to my next point, if the government mandates that a person can declare to the airline that they want a peanut free flight, then every flight is going to be peanut free, because a lot more people “think” they (or their kids) are allergic than actually are. Finally, if peanuts are banned, the peanut industry is going to suffer. I am not normally a fan of taking into consideration the needs of a corporation or industry when it is harming people (like banning smoking vs. the needs of the tobacco companies). However, in this case, I have yet to see the evidence of onboard allergic reactions that would necessitate a government ban be put into place to help cripple an industry.
LogicalMama commented on Jun 23 10 at 4:44 pmAs an adult with tree nut and seed allergies, I’d like to interject here. Aside from the risk of inhalation of peanut residue (which is small, yes), there is a very real concern over the peanut oil that is left on hands and then spread about the cabin of the aircraft. The tables and armrests, the door handles to the bathroom, etc are not cleaned after every flight and can easily transfer to a person with the allergy.
My husband has to wash his face and hands after eating any sort of tree nut and I have found myself feeling quite dizzy and lightheaded just by the smell of sesame oil when a very dear friend of mine continuously breaks out a bag of TJ’s sesame crackers (and this probably wouldn’t be an issue if she herself had to deal with food allergies).
I can’t tell you how many times, I’ve gotten flack from people in an event where I chose to protect myself from an allergen exposure by avoiding a situation (eg: going out to lunch to a place that serves a lot of sesame or nut foods). This attitude never comes from someone that deals with food allergies! It’s more than frustrating and creates an atmosphere of mistrust! If this occurs with people that know and love a person, think of how difficult it is in the world where people think allergies are exaggerated and/or bogus!
LogicalMama commented on Jun 23 10 at 4:54 pmAnd I believe I made my point above based on KA’s comments and his/her need to place parenthesis around PEANUT ALLERGY and THINK. Again, this is a person that obviously isn’t dealing with a food allergy on a more immediate, personal level!
BTW, doctors will tell you that an allergy occurs within 20 to 40 minutes, but I can tell you that my experience was vastly different. I became allergic to tree nuts and seeds just over 20 years ago in my late teens. My initial reactions were mild and progressively got worse as I was exposed more and more. As well, my initial reactions didn’t occur for 8 to 10 HOURS (!!) after my exposure to the allergen, hence I continued eating the culprits until the reactions came closer to the exposure! It took quite a while to narrow it down because it took so long at first, but there is not denying my affliction and no need for parenthesis! I don’t think I have an allergy, I know!
And even if a parent hasn’t confirmed the possibility, why risk it? What is wrong with keeping the exposure to a minimum? Nobody loses out and it shows care and concern and an ability to trust others!
Rosana commented on Jun 24 10 at 9:24 amI truly empathize with parents that have children with severe allergy to peanuts and would not mind at all if they impose a ban on peanuts on a flight because we have an allergic kid or adult. I can always eat them after the plane lands and like the author pointed out my quality of life will not be diminished if I don’t eat them.
Rosana commented on Jun 24 10 at 9:28 amI should have typed “because their is an allergic kid or adult on board”
Beatrice commented on Jun 25 10 at 5:47 pmI just don’t see this as feasible.
Airlines will probably resist this move because while they can easily reassure they don’t serve peanuts, they won’t be able to verify passengers are not bringing their own peanut products on board or have consumed peanuts earlier in the day. There will be huge issues of liability if airlines give a customer a promise of perceived safety, when they truly can not deliver.
If a ban were to go through there will be other issues: stopping the sale of peanut products in airport lounges, having another level of security searches to check for contraband foods, filtering the air in the cabins, cleaning public surfaces, etc.
Add your take:
Note: Babble is a supportive, diverse community. We encourage a range of opinions,
but any unduly hostile comments will be removed.
Comments are delayed up to 15 minutes






Lori Garcia
Joslyn Gray
Amber Doty
Julianna Miner
Monica Bielanko
Sierra Black
Meredith Carroll
Carolyn Castiglia
Sunny Chanel
Madeline Holler
Rebecca Odes
Danielle Smith
Danielle Sullivan
Katherine Stone
The Walt Disney Company supports Babble as a platform dedicated to honest, engaged, informed, intelligent and open conversation about parenting. However, the opinions expressed on this site are those of individual parents/writers and do not reflect the views of Disney. In addition, content provided on this site is for entertainment or informational purposes only and should not be construed as medical advice, diagnosis, treatment, or safety advice.

0