babble » blogs » Strollerderby
Strollerderby
Why You Should Buy Your Baby A Plane Seat
Summer travel season is upon us and with sky high airline ticket prices, some parents are happy to be able to save money by holding their infants on their laps.
But experts say parents shouldn’t be thrifty when it comes to their baby’s safety. The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) is urging parents to buy babies their own seats.
I have to agree.
It always seem odd to me that parents who are so uptight when it comes to car seats, seem to think that the same principles don’t apply up in the air. Yes, I realize that it’s statistically more likely that you’ll get into a car accident than a plane crash. But that’s not accounting for turbulence, which can strike at any time and result in serious injuries if not death for lap babies.
My husband and I have always forked over the extra dough for a seat for our daughters. Not only did it help us rest easier about potential accidents, it also helped us (and perhaps fellow passengers) have a more pleasant flight.
According to current rules, babies under 2 can fly for free if they sit on a parents’ lap.
“Saying it’s OK to have lap-held child sends the wrong message to parents. It’s not OK to have a lap-held child in an aircraft,” said Debbie Hersman, chairman of the NTSB told CBS News. “The laws of physics don’t change for babies. They need to be restrained, too.”
The NTSB, along with the Association of Flight Attendants, has been urging the Federal Aviation Administration and airlines to require seats for babies for years.
But many parents would rather save the money on the cost of the additional ticket. Airlines, no doubt, are concerned that the increased cost it will cut down on family travel.
Safety experts say that during unexpected turbulence puts lap-held babies at risk — under those circumstances, babies can easily become projectiles. On its website, the FAA encourages parents to use child safety restraints doesn’t plan to make it a requirement.
The FAA fears parents will opt to drive rather than fly if they are required t buy tickets for their babies. And we all know that flying is more dangerous than flying. But why is a babies’ life any less important than an older kid?
Airlines once offered discount tickets for children under 2, but, unfortunately, that no longer is the case. Still, ultimately, your child’s safety is more important than any amount of money. Right?
Go Back To Strollerderby
36 Comments
[...] or safety belt. I realize that I just wrote about how important it is to strap babies into a seat on an airplane, but a shopping cart doesn’t travel at the same [...]
Beware Shopping Carts | Strollerderby commented on Jun 17 10 at 9:01 amanon commented on Jun 10 10 at 1:03 pmI’m not buying it. I took two transatlantic, long flights once when baby was about 1, the other time, about 2 and it was FINE. I have a very good hold on the child. I can’t imagine him having been strapped into a carseat in the plane seat (or whatever it is people do) for that long of a time. But then, I never hauled him around in one of those baby buckets, either.
paulabernstein commented on Jun 10 10 at 1:11 pmAnon, in most cases, you’ll be fine, but what about when you hit severe turbulence? Would you consider hold a child on your lap in a car?
Jay commented on Jun 10 10 at 1:22 pmI think its a great idea. You shouldnt have to keep them in the entire time but for takeoff/landing and if anything should happen its a good idea.
paulabernstein commented on Jun 10 10 at 1:23 pmAlso, anon, just because you have a seat doesn’t mean your baby has to sit in it the whole time.
Susan B-K commented on Jun 10 10 at 1:26 pmAmen, Paula. This has been a real feather-ruffler for me since I first had a baby 12 years ago. My mother-in-law used to put my husband in a box when he was a baby and they had to go somewhere by car. Sure, it wasn’t a law to strap in a baby and ‘restrain’ him in a carseat back then, but that doesn’t mean it was safe to put babies on a seat or in a box. Like you said, it’s more likely we’ll get into car accidents, but one bout of turbulence (with a short ceiling over the plane’s seats) could result in permanent brain injuries or worse. No amount of savings is worth that to me. And guess what? If you can’t afford to pay for your kids to fly, then maybe you need to re-evaluate if you can afford the vacation at all. I’ve not taken trips with my young children in a couple years because it is too expensive for all of us to fly. We’ve found places a few hours away by car that are kid-friendly and easy to reach by car. Being a parent sometimes means you can’t be selfish.
anon commented on Jun 10 10 at 1:32 pmI really think it is a symptom of over-caution, to be honest. If you say “just because you have a seat doesn’t mean your baby has to sit in it the whole time” then what’s the point? If you can, presumably, prepare and take the time to strap the baby into the seat, you can also prepare and hold fast to your child. In a car, I would be *driving* and therefore not able to hold the child. If it was not illegal to forego carseats, I am not sure I’d be so into them either. Although I do recognize the increased safety issues in driving and especially these days when you have loons texting while driving or even merely speaking on their phones, I could moreso see the safety issues in a car. We could afford the seat but knew we wouldn’t use it anyway, and it was not necessary.
Laure68 commented on Jun 10 10 at 1:46 pm@Susan B-K – being in a car, even in a car seat, is still more dangerous than being in an airplane as a lap child.
People need to do what they think is best, but you shouldn’t think that taking a driving vacation is any safer.
Susan B-K commented on Jun 10 10 at 1:53 pmI know it’s much more dangerous to drive than to fly. I wrote that we took vacations (1 in about 3 years) where we could drive because we couldn’t afford 5 plane tickets.
Amy commented on Jun 10 10 at 1:59 pmI figure that a car seat will protect my infant in a car crash, but in a plane crash it won’t matter.
jenny tries too hard commented on Jun 10 10 at 2:17 pmTo me, turbulence is the main issue. In the veeerrry unlikely event of a plane crash, I doubt the car seat matters much. But I was never so glad to have those “baby buckets” as when we hit some strong turbulence. I got very nervous and I’m honestly not sure if I could’ve held the baby securely enough to keep from bumping hard into the arm of the seat or the seat in front of me, or really from knocking a kid’s head against my own—that hurts!
paulabernstein commented on Jun 10 10 at 2:57 pmIf you’ve ever seen the 1993 movie “Fearless,” you wouldn’t hesitate about buying your baby a plane seat.
Baltimore Mom commented on Jun 10 10 at 3:11 pmThree years ago, a relative died on the West Coast and my husband was out of the country for work. So I had to fly, by myself, with a baby and a toddler. Driving cross country was not an option. I had to buy 2 seats, because having both kids on my lap for a 6 hour flight wasn’t an option either. But I did not buy a seat for my baby. I wore her in a sling the whole time and she was fine. The price the airline wanted to charge me for a third seat was insane, and as it was, people were complete assholes about the one carseat anyway. I can’t imagine how difficult it would have been if I had to deal with two of them.
Sarah commented on Jun 10 10 at 3:17 pmWe haven’t bought our baby a seat in the past because we fly a lot and can’t afford it. However, I did wear a scarf as a seatbelt-like device around both of us. We also brought our car seat all the way to the gate, as if there is extra room on the flight, they will often give you the extra seat for your child. The photo for this article is misleading though, as I have had several friends who have tried to wear their baby in a Moby wrap or similar carrier only to be told that they are not allowed to wear the baby while on the plane.
Laure68 commented on Jun 10 10 at 4:00 pm@Paula – “Fearless” was scary, but it was a work of fiction. The fact is that planes are extremely safe. Yes, there is always a small chance something could happen, but that is true in almost any situation. (You could be pushing your kid in a stroller and a drunk driver could run off the road and hit you, but I don’t think that means people should lock themselves in their homes. Which, btw, is not necessarily safer. I read once that it was much more dangerous to be in your bathroom than on an airplane.)
Anyway, I don’t want to discourage anyone from buying a seat if they feel better about it, but you really shouldn’t judge parents who put their infants on their laps.
@Sarah – what I was told is that you can’t put the baby in the carrier during takeoff and landing, but you can have them in during the other parts of the flight.
Laure68 commented on Jun 10 10 at 4:05 pmbtw, one thing I am having trouble finding is any kind of statistic on how often lap children get injured. The only incidence of injury I can find was in 1989 when, during a crash, parents were told to put their babies on the floor instead of holding them. After the crash, one parent could not find their child and that child died of smoke inhalation. I can’t find another incidence of a child being injured due to not being restrained.
Kikiriki commented on Jun 10 10 at 4:09 pmMost European and Scandinavian planes now have baby seat-belts, which attach to the adult seatbelt and allow for the baby to be tethered to a seat. Babies are required to wear them for take-off and landing, and are encouraged to be buckled in when not moving around, just like anyone who has a seat on the plane. Personally, I found them to be much better than carseats, because it meant I could breastfeed when I needed to and if we hit turbulence nobody was going to go flying anywhere. We have a “Baby B’Air” harness for domestic flights which works the same way, and is actually a bit more secure since it surrounds the whole chest of the baby. If you’re concerned about turbulence/falling asleep/takeoff and landing but don’t or can’t purchase a second seat for your infant, I highly recommend it.
Paula Bernstein commented on Jun 10 10 at 4:38 pmSure, “Fearless” was fictional, but it was based on real situations. This story tells an example of a survivable landing where a lap baby died. Can you imagine the horror of losing your child because you didn’t spring for the seat?
Paula Bernstein commented on Jun 10 10 at 4:40 pmHere is the link to the story I mentioned: http://tinyurl.com/3ytnp9a
Paula Bernstein commented on Jun 10 10 at 4:42 pmAnd here’s a flight attendant’s take on lap babies: http://tinyurl.com/yz38h5s
Baltimore Mom commented on Jun 10 10 at 4:53 pmThe thing is, the seat is only safe if the kid is actually in it. How many doctors advocate nursing on take off and landing to help the baby clear his ears? How many children do you know that would consent to being strapped into a seat for hours on end and never let out? You could be in the aisle on the way down to the bathroom when turbulence hits, so that seat you paid for to put the kid in is zero use. Children under two, even if they have their own seat, still need to be removed from to be changed or fed or entertained. I don’t fly much, but in the instances where the plane hit turbulence it was unexpected and no one was wearing their belt.
BostonMama commented on Jun 10 10 at 6:23 pmWe almost always buy seats for our kids — once I had to fly alone and there was no way I could haul two carseat and kids on to the plane, so the little one was a lap baby — it was pretty miserable.
But, what really irks me is that most of the baby safety devices (baby b’air) or slings are not allowed to be used during take of or landing , when they would be most helpful from a safety perspective. The person who thinks they’ll be able to hold a baby in their arms during severe turbulance is just deluded. Anyway, mine little one is nearly two now, so I won’t have to make the decision anymore.
But, if seats were required for babies and it started to cut into airlines sales to families, maybe they’d start to offer discounts or something? Could happen.
Laure68 commented on Jun 10 10 at 6:26 pmIn one of your links I found the info on the statistics I was looking for.
http://www.faa.gov/passengers/fly_safe/turbulence/
“Each year, approximately 58 people in the United States are injured by turbulence while not wearing their seat belts.
From 1980 through 2008, U.S. air carriers had 234 turbulence accidents*, resulting in 298 serious injuries and three fatalities.”Again, everyone should do what they feel is best. There is certainly nothing wrong with getting yoru child his/her own seat. However, in your original post you said “It always seem odd to me that parents who are so uptight when it comes to car seats, seem to think that the same principles don’t apply up in the air.” These are nowhere near the same things. About 40,000 people a year die in car accidents. According to this link, 3 people have died due to turbulence over the course of 28 years. The risks are nowhere near the same.
Triplemom commented on Jun 10 10 at 8:04 pmDo you know what would really help? If the airline would PROVIDE the child restraint for free(I believe car rentals places should also do it free of charge) I know that for me (and I´m sure I´m not alone) it wasn´t so much about the extra money but about lugging THREE heavy car seats around. When you rent a car or get on a plane the (mandatory) seatbelts are there, you are not required to bring your own, why is it different when it´s a baby?
Emily commented on Jun 10 10 at 11:31 pmI would like to know why I was made to unwrap my infant for takeoff the last time I flew? Having a child wrapped to me (and happily snoozing) while I am strapped to the seat seems like the best of both worlds: secure baby, single seat.
Given that – the plane was empty enough that I was able to utilize an empty seat for his bucket on the way back and I have to say that I enjoyed it. I nursed him on takeoff and when he passed out (it was a late flight) I slipped him into his seat, strapped him in and relaxed. He didn’t stir until I unbuckled him to de-plane. On the way up, however, once he fell asleep he sweated all over both of us and I was just plain uncomfortable.
Our next two flights are cross country and with that comfort in mind, as well as the safety concerns, we’ve purchased a seat for our child.
LindaLou commented on Jun 11 10 at 1:17 amWhen I tried to fly with my son asleep in his sling, they made me take him out and hold him on my lap for takeoff and landing.
e commented on Jun 12 10 at 3:04 amLaure68: Thanks for putting some real research into this, not just trying to drum up fear like the original article!
paulabernstein commented on Jun 12 10 at 9:27 amI didn’t say the risk was as high in the air. I said the same principles apply. I would hate for something tragic to happen and to feel that I could have done something to prevent it. Did you read the story that I posted about the mom whose child shot out of her arm when they hit turbulence? Scary stuff. But, of course, as with any parenting decision — or decision in general — you need to follow your gut and do what makes you feel comfortable.
Cheree commented on Jun 12 10 at 4:47 pmThe chances of turbulence being so terrible that you couldn’t hold your baby is certainly not great, even if there are no stats on it. And it is completely baffling that a baby isn’t allowed to be in a wrap/sling/carrier during take off (i have asked numerous airline workers and no one seems to know why.) And as another note. . . not all of us fly for vacation. I had to fly with my two month old and one year old to a childrens’ hospital. I had to fly again to a great grandparents funeral, although that is obvious a choice, but driving 25 hours wasn’t really feasible.
Baltimore Mom commented on Jun 12 10 at 8:12 pmSo when you fly, do you ever take your child out of the belt? Because as I said before, a child can fly out of a parents arms when the seatbelt light is off and the plane hits turbulence. A child can fly out of their seat if they are just sitting in it, the seatbelt sign is off and they are not strapped in.
I’m with Cheree. For me, paying an extra 600 dollars for a last minute seat for my infant wasn’t feasible, and neither was driving from Baltimore to California. It was either have the lap baby or miss my uncle’s funeral.
Paula Bernstein commented on Jun 12 10 at 8:18 pmWhat would you have done if your child was over 2, Baltimore Mom? And as far as unexpected turbulence, of course it happens, but often, there is warning — that’s when the flight attendants tell everyone to buckle up. So yeah, when the seatbelt sign is on, my infant was buckled up in her seat. Obviously, you do what you gotta do. I’m not saying you’re a bad parent for not buying your infant a seat. We all have our own comfort level.
JEssica commented on Jun 14 10 at 3:59 pmCarseat for planes should be required. Because parents will chose money over the safety of their children and the other passengers on the plane.
Baltimore Mom commented on Jun 14 10 at 10:39 pmIf both kids were over two? I have no idea. Probably had to miss my uncle’s funeral, the man who raised me after my father was killed and my mother took off. There was no way I could have coughed up the money for a third seat.
As far as turbulence, it’s not unexpected if there is a warning. And I’ve never been on a place with turbulence so severe that it would rip my child from my arms. And if the plane is crashing, then everyone’s dead anyway.
bob commented on Jun 17 10 at 2:14 pmThe lap rule is the closest the airline industry will get to a “babies fly free” offer. It’s not about safety, it’s about selling seats to Mom’s and Dads who otherwise couldn’t afford to bring baby while not giving away any seats that can be sold to others. If you can afford it, you buy your kid a seat. If you can’t, you’re unsafe and uncomfortable. Isn’t that pretty much the American way?
Smail commented on Oct 14 10 at 10:18 amIt is unbelievable what ignorance is shown here: The reason for my comment is the following. All the Aircraft manufacturers have to test their seats and certify for 16 G (G loads), give a proof of a flammability test and do a so called wind milling test. I really think that we should not compare a car Child restraint system to an Aircraft child restraint system. It would not pass the dynamic tests. Passenger organizations and Flight attendants should stop this crazy thing. If you really want to take the risk of allowing your baby to take loads above 6 G for more than 2 seconds. In a car you will hit the wall with 55mph and the load will stop. This is not the case in an aircraft. Ask the manufacturers if they are compliant with the Dynamic loads in an aircraft. Ask the manufacturer of the Child restraint for flammability tests that are compliant FAA and EASA. If it is just the fact to ´save money when you buy the device please tell me what is the price of a childs life.
Canuckmom commented on Jan 26 12 at 5:16 pmHaving flown in Europe with young children before I had my own kids, I thought the baby restraints were normal everywhere. When I first flew with my oldest, who was about 18 months, I was shocked that they had no restraints to attach him to me. The stewardess had no idea what I was talking about when I asked for one. I really do think they should be standard, it solves the turbulence issue and the money issue.
Add your take:
Note: Babble is a supportive, diverse community. We encourage a range of opinions,
but any unduly hostile comments will be removed.
Comments are delayed up to 15 minutes






Lori Garcia
Joslyn Gray
Amber Doty
Julianna Miner
Monica Bielanko
Sierra Black
Meredith Carroll
Carolyn Castiglia
Sunny Chanel
Madeline Holler
Rebecca Odes
Danielle Smith
Danielle Sullivan
Katherine Stone
The Walt Disney Company supports Babble as a platform dedicated to honest, engaged, informed, intelligent and open conversation about parenting. However, the opinions expressed on this site are those of individual parents/writers and do not reflect the views of Disney. In addition, content provided on this site is for entertainment or informational purposes only and should not be construed as medical advice, diagnosis, treatment, or safety advice.

36