Strollerderby

Mom Who Dropped Kids at Mall Lived Criminal ‘Justice’ Hell

Posted by madeline holler on May 14th, 2010 at 1:51 pm

bridget kevane bozeman montana 300x225 Mom Who Dropped Kids at Mall Lived Criminal Justice HellLast year, parenting magazine Brain, Child ran the first-person account of  Bridget Kevane, a Bozeman, Mont., mother who was arrested and charged with child neglect.

Her crime, in a nutshell, was bad parenting. But more specifically, local officials didn’t like that she dropped her 12-year-old daughter, the daughter’s 12-year-old friend, and the tweens’ charges, an 8-year-old sibling, a 7-year-old friend and a 3-year-old sibling in a stroller.

Kevane’s punishment for “bad parenting” was nearly as absurd as the case itself, described here at Spike Online. Kevane neither pleaded guilty nor was exonerated by a jury, since a mock-jury organized by Kevane’s lawyer showed how her community in Bozeman would not have been sympathetic to what, at worst, was a lapse of judgment. (You know, being a parent.)

A recap of what happened to Kevane: The plan was for the kids, who had grown up together and were like family, to get some lunch and hang out for a bit, while Bridget Kevane went back home to rest. The girls were not to leave the younger ones unsupervised. But they misjudged and went to try on shirts while the little ones waited in the purse section.

Some employees called mall security. Mall security called the police. The children were herded into a mall office, given candy but not the opportunity to call their mother (right? She was a perpetrator — they were now victims!). Kevane was charged with “violating duty of care,” despite the fact that there are no laws in Montana against dropping one’s children off at the mall. And a long and drawn out attempt to fight the charges began.

There’s so much more to her story, especially about the county prosecutor who seemed to begrudge Kevane her education and her profession as a Latin American Studies professor at the local university. The prosecutor’s statements about Kevane’s “major education,” and the fact that professors weren’t big-picture people because “their heads were always in books.”

So instead of pleading guilty or going to trial, Kevane took a third option, a “deferred prosecution” — no guilt but still a punishment. For Kevane, this meant a year’s probation and meeting with a bail supervisor and going to parenting classes. If she missed or was late one single time, the sentence could be extended. She was required to call her supervisor every Monday precisely at 8 a.m. and leave a message saying these exact words [Spiked online]:

“This is Bridget Kevane, I have committed no new crimes and I am still living in Bozeman.”

She met every other week with her supervisor, whom she describes as hostile. She answered questions about whether she had I left her children alone. Then there were the parenting classes, attended mostly by upper-middle-class, educated new parents who were interested in the details of timeouts. Kevane, a parent for 13 years by then, contributed little for fear it could be used against her.

Not everyone agrees with Kevane’s decision that day in 2007, but, really, does that punishment fit the crime? She spent thousands of dollars to at least get that delayed prosecution. It could have been far worse, jail time and a permanent record. Which, come on, for going with her gut, making a choice informed by her own upbringing and the relative safety of her hometown, was anything more than a warning really warranted?

The bad parent cops are everywhere and are usually limited to anonymous commenting or brazen public scoldings. How could the parents of Bozeman stand for one of their own — a parent just like themselves — to be chewed up in a power-hungry prosecutor’s office. Didn’t they know that someday it could be them? Or maybe even you or me?

More Posts

2 Biggest Mistakes Parents Make with Their Kids’ Teeth

Is It Sometimes Wrong to Keep Preemies Alive?

Two Similar Hospitals, Two Vastly Different C-Section Rates

Raising Rich Kids: 5 Easy Steps

No More Games, Let’s Just Ban Ads to Kids

How ‘Isabella’ Swept the Nation (It Wasn’t Twilight!)

Forcing Parents to Volunteer at School

The 17-Year-Old Toddler

Blogger’s Son Survives; Now a New Reality

Did ‘Babies’ Filmmaker Break the Law?

10 Best, 10 Worst Cities for Moms

Girl Catches Disney’s Grammar Error

Pampers Under Investigation

The Right Age to Start Kindergarten

Baby Name Near Misses

Germans Invent Cuddle Spray

Swedish Docs Stop Circumcisions

When Dad-to-Be Thinks Birth is Nasty

Stop Overpraising. Now.

Banned! No More Happy Meals Toys in Silicon Valley

Beginning of the End of Happy Meals

Photo: abcgo.com

 Mom Who Dropped Kids at Mall Lived Criminal Justice Hell

Go Back To Strollerderby

0 Comments

[...] Mom Who Dropped Kids at Mall Lived Criminal ‘Justice’ Hell [...]

Sleepover and Gay Parents | Strollerderby commented on May 14 10 at 3:01 pm

[...] As anyone who has been through the parenting wars of the past decade knows, one parent’s idea of safe is another parent’s – or government official’s – idea of neglect. Just ask the Montana mom who spent years in child welfare hell after she let her 12 year-old daughte… [...]

Nanny State or Police State? | Strollerderby commented on May 21 10 at 1:04 pm

Actually, when I read her account in Brain, Child, I found her extremely self-righteous. She says she was picked on because of her “major education”. (Never mind that the DA was an attorney, so not exactly uneducated.) Does she really believe a poor woman with no education would have gotten better treatment? The exact opposite usually happens.

You say there is no law against dropping your kids off at the mall, but I’m not sure how old someone needs to be to supervise a 3-year-old. When mall security found them, the oldest child with them was 8.

I know I don’t know the whole story, but since she has decided to make such a huge deal of this, I wouldn’t be surprised if she was particularly rude to everyone dealing with her.

Laure68 commented on May 14 10 at 2:12 pm

I remember reading the original article as well, and I agree that she comes off very ‘oy, these bumpkins’. That said – I think the error is with the teenagers, not the mother. When I was that age, I regularly took care of my younger siblings (similar age differences) without incident. This whole thing should have resulted in a severe grounding, not a legal case.

MsC commented on May 14 10 at 2:21 pm

But this girl was 12, she wasn’t even a teenager. And isn’t it the mother’s responsibility to understand what her kid can handle?

I am not a legal expert, so I can’t judge whether or not this should have happened, but I do think this was ultimately the mother’s fault.

Laure68 commented on May 14 10 at 2:31 pm

I agree with Laure. It drives me bonkers that she claims hostility toward the educated when the people she’s accusing of persecuting her are educated people themselves, and I daresay she’s not the only professor in Bozeman, or even the only parenting one.

I would hope that a parent who dropped off two twelve-year-olds with three young children at a mall would be investigated and have to attend parenting classes. I do think it was an error in judgement, but so are many crimes relating to abuse or neglect of children—the point of the parenting classes is to improve that judgment in the interest of the children’s safety.

jenny tries too hard commented on May 14 10 at 2:40 pm

Her being rude, bitchy or even talking down to people is not illegal. I agree with the comments that the whole situation would have probably been worse if she had not been educated or poor or disadvantaged in anyway, but again being a bitch isn’t illegal.
Regardless of her attitude everything I’ve read states there was no law saying leaving those children in the mall was illegal. Maybe some parents wouldn’t do it and other might, but honestly that’s for each parent to decide. Our current culture of judging a parents actions is getting out of control when people are being arrested for something that wasn’t even illegal in the first place.

NC Mom commented on May 14 10 at 3:22 pm

Personally It seems like simple bad judgment to me. As a 12 year old I was left in charge of a four month old baby and a three year old on a regular basis and it was never an issue. I was there babysitter. Is there an age limit for babysitters now? My daughter is two and she adores my little brother who is 13 I have let him watch her a few times or allowed him to take her to get a snack while we were out its not a big deal. It all depends on the teen or tween left in charge. I have a sixteen year old sister who I would never in a million years allow to babysit my daughter.

LooLoo'sMommy commented on May 14 10 at 3:43 pm

I also read the original story. I feel now, as I did then, that this woman needs to seriously get over herself. This article goes on about her “humiliation,” her “degradation” and how everyone was out to get her and make an example of her. Every bit of her punishment is described as beneath her, making her feel like a criminal. Because she had to make a phone call every Monday and (horrors) be on time to her probation appointments. I guess that was abusive because she was educated, and didn’t everyone know how valuable her time was? I hope she can someday find some peace and the wherewithal to drop it already.

Mistress_Scorpio commented on May 14 10 at 4:23 pm

I think the point is more that NO ONE deserves this treatment – especially for something which is not a crime and was so trivial that Bozeman child services refused to follow up on it. This was a case of a prosecutor with her own agenda who intended to feed on prejudice that had nothing to do with the law or the actual situation. This happens all the time with poor women and no one even questions it. That’s wrong but it doesn’t make what happened to Kevane right. It doesn’t matter whether you think it was a good decision or not. Legally and morally speaking this was a grotesque miscarriage of justice.

Nancy commented on May 14 10 at 6:31 pm

A gross miscarriage of justice this ain’t. All we know of this case has been from her perspective. She got treated like anyone else would have gotten treated, and that seems to be the crux of her outrage.

Mistress_Scorpio commented on May 15 10 at 12:48 am

Some of you need to read her story again. The DA made a point of Kevane’s education and position, which is strange since she herself had an education. You need to understand the defiance of small town people towards people they perceive as more urban. And Laure68: seriously! Anyone who is charged with a serious criminal offense for something clearly not criminal, has the right to be outraged and self righteous. I believe there are some “holier than thou” mothers who wants to feel good about them selves by trashing Kevane. Remember, it can happen to you too.

Mina commented on May 15 10 at 7:16 pm

Nope. It can’t. It manages not to happen to millions of moms every day. Even educated ones. So yeah, not really feeling her pain.

Mistress_Scorpio commented on May 15 10 at 8:48 pm

It seems less like something that “happened to” her, and more like a bad choice she made. I don’t know enough about what the law is regarding this, but it doesn’t seem like she is being made to suffer too much (from the little I know about this).

Manjari commented on May 15 10 at 9:36 pm

I agree with Mina. I read the article when it came out and found her story to be very compelling. We make judgment calls everyday and if you think you could never possibly make a decision that someone else might think is wrong, well, I hope you don’t have to learn the hard way that it’s not true. I’ve seen it happen twice now just with my own friends.

Vegas710 commented on May 16 10 at 12:38 am

I went back and read her essay, but when I read things like this I have trouble taking her seriously.

“She (the city attorney) wanted me to carry that crime with me for the rest of my life, a scarlet A that would symbolically humiliate me, teach me a lesson, and remain etched in my being.”

It just doesn’t seem that her “punishment” came anywhere near this. Like Mistress_Scorpio said, I’m not really feeling her pain.

Laure68 commented on May 16 10 at 11:08 am

Maybe the DA emphasized Kevane’s education because SHE first brought it up, in a don’t-you-think-an-educated-person-like-myself-knows-what’s-best, kind of way….of course, since she’s the one writing the story, she can leave that detail out if she chooses.

The mall security and Macy’s employees that called police saw kids they felt were badly unsupervised, and they couldn’t have had any idea who was responsible for them or what she (or he, for all they knew) did for a living. Because, oh yeah, the adult that should’ve been responsible for them wasn’t being responsible. So it clearly wasn’t a case of someone picking on that professor with her goll-durn book learnin’.

For the record, I don’t think she thought her daughter and the daughter’s friend would leave the kids in one part of the store alone. But they did, and the girls are not old enough to be held accountable, so the adult responsible for them is. The girls were not as responsible as Kevane judged them to be. Thus she made an error in judgment and has to be held accountable. Ditto if one of the kids were shoplifting—it comes down to the adult responsible for them.

jenny tries too hard commented on May 16 10 at 11:33 am

Well, I sure hope I’m not held criminally liable for every error in parenting judgment. Yikes.

Vegas710 commented on May 17 10 at 9:52 am

I didn’t understand the term “judgmental” until I became a parent.

Samantha commented on May 17 10 at 3:49 pm

Add your take:

Note: Babble is a supportive, diverse community. We encourage a range of opinions,
but any unduly hostile comments will be removed.


Comments are delayed up to 15 minutes

Most Popular on Facebook

Best of Babble.com


  • Lori Garcia
  • Joslyn Gray
  • Amber Doty
  • Julianna Miner
  • Monica Bielanko
  • Sierra Black
  • Meredith Carroll
  • Carolyn Castiglia
  • Sunny Chanel
  • Madeline Holler
  • Rebecca Odes
  • Danielle Smith
  • Danielle Sullivan
  • Katherine Stone
  • Disney Online Moms & Family Portfolio

    The Walt Disney Company supports Babble as a platform dedicated to honest, engaged, informed, intelligent and open conversation about parenting. However, the opinions expressed on this site are those of individual parents/writers and do not reflect the views of Disney. In addition, content provided on this site is for entertainment or informational purposes only and should not be construed as medical advice, diagnosis, treatment, or safety advice. Click here for additional information. Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Interest-Based Ads

    More in Strollerderby (50 of 11490 articles)