babble » blogs » Strollerderby
Strollerderby
Is It Sometimes Wrong to Keep Preemies Alive?
That’s the choice countless parents face when a pregnancy suddenly gets difficult and a months-early delivery is imminent.
Technology has greatly increased the survival rate of super premature babies, those born at the 28-week or younger mark and typically weighing much less than 3 lbs. But survival can come at a cost. Babies born so underdeveloped often mean life-long disabilities like blindness, deafness, brain damage and cerebral palsy.
Still, ask the parents whose children made it and it’s not unusual to hear that they made the right choice. One couple, interviewed in the U.K. Daily Mail, said they are still haunted by the fact that they asked doctors to allow their girl, born at 24 weeks and weighing 1 lb. 7 oz., to die peacefully were she to develop a brain hemorrhage (though they allowed for breathing assistance). The girl, Meghan Haley, survived and is a strong and healthy 4-year-old.
Another couple, whose twins Thomas and Alice were born at 24 weeks and 1 and 1/2 pounds each, also say they don’t regret their decision to ask doctors to save the children’s lives at all cost. This despite the fact that the brother and sister both have cerebral palsy, are quadriplegic and blind, among other problems.
For all these happy — or, at least, regret-free — endings, there are those who made a different choice or live with different consequences (unsurprisingly, the Daily Mail didn’t talk to any of them. No doubt, there are likely those who are quite relieved with their choice). Still others take to heart new studies that show all the early medical intervention sets up these kids for a lifelong over-sensitivity to pain — making parents have to weigh quality of life, if the child survives.
Of course, these decisions are personal and should be made without judgment. In the U.S., these decisions are also made with affordability in mind, since the consequences of taking on a severely disabled and extremely ill newborn can be financially devastating.
But still, have we reached a point where live-saving technology is the enemy? Where we’re damned if we do, damned if we don’t? What is the role doctors should play, if any, in these decisions? It’s important to note that 24-weeks-gestation babies don’t have any higher survival rate now than they did 15 years ago. They’re simply living a little longer.
More Posts
Two Similar Hospitals, Two Vastly Different C-Section Rates
Raising Rich Kids: 5 Easy Steps
No More Games, Let’s Just Ban Ads to Kids
How ‘Isabella’ Swept the Nation (It Wasn’t Twilight!)
Forcing Parents to Volunteer at School
Blogger’s Son Survives; Now a New Reality
Did ‘Babies’ Filmmaker Break the Law?
10 Best, 10 Worst Cities for Moms
Girl Catches Disney’s Grammar Error
The Right Age to Start Kindergarten
Swedish Docs Stop Circumcisions
When Dad-to-Be Thinks Birth is Nasty
Banned! No More Happy Meals Toys in Silicon Valley
Beginning of the End of Happy Meals
One Year After H1N1 Panic, a Mother Lives With Regret
Photo: Daily Mail
Go Back To Strollerderby
0 Comments
[...] Is It Sometimes Wrong to Keep Preemies Alive? [...]
2 Biggest Mistakes Parents Make With Their Kids' Teeth | Strollerderby commented on May 13 10 at 5:02 pmChiLaura commented on May 13 10 at 4:20 pmThis is a fascinating topic. (I recently read “The Lazarus Child” by John Lantos, which talks this same topic.) I’m absolutely pro-life in all situations regarding the baby’s health (e.g. I don’t think that Downs or other disabled babies should ever be aborted); I’m also fairly skeptical about “quality of life” reasoning. That said, I don’t know what kind of obligation (such a tricky word to use) “we” have to such early preemies. The amount of money that goes into caring for them is crazy. I wonder if the ends really justify the means, and I’m not talking about money so much as just the days, weeks, months spent in the NICU and in therapies afterward. It sounds so cruel to say “Some babies just weren’t meant to live” — and I don’t know to what extent I’d even argue that that idea applies here. I mean, babies are people too! I know that in my situation, if I had a preemie who was born so early, it wouldn’t just be my and my husband’s problem, but we’d also have to consider the 3 kids that we already have — I can’t imagine how this would affect them, if Mom and/or Dad were practically living in the NICU for months. At the same time, how could I watch my own child die when conceivably the technology exists to save her?
I do think that this has parallels in end-of-life issues too, though they’re not quite the same. How far is too far and invasive when trying to extend someone’s life? How much does/should cost factor into the decision? I do sometimes think that there is a place for just recognizing that death is a part of life, whether in old age or infancy, but, really, I hope that I never have to face this.
jenny tries too hard commented on May 13 10 at 4:58 pmFirst of all, the choice is death or *potential* disability. You took pains to point out that 24weekers aren’t surviving at higher rates, but didn’t quote how many of those who do survive have severe disabilities, which would’ve been quite relevant.
Many many many micropreemies live without disability. I have a 14-year-old sister who was born 1lb, 14oz and she’s frighteningly normal. She’s healthy and bright and you know what? The three months in which my mother did live in the NICU were pretty hard on me and my brothers, but totally worth it. I don’t think, if she had decided that she just couldn’t handle that, that we would suffer to much, that I would be able trust her to be there if I needed something as intense. And honestly, wouldn’t you practically live in the hospital if your 5-or-6-or-17-year-old child, or any child who wasn’t a newborn, was hurt in a car wreck or some other trauma? Is the trauma of preterm labor or preeclampsia somehow different from cancer or car accidents? Or is it just easier to make such a decision about someone whom you’ve just met, rather than someone who has a favorite color and a voice and a name?
Everywhere, these decisions are made with costs in mind, and in fact the UK has a policy about how long an infant must’ve gestated before he or she is even entitled to care of any kind. In the US, if the parents consent to care, the doctors must provide it, regardless of cost as it is emergency, lifesaving care. Parents and insurers are billed later, and charities, Medicaid and Medicare (if the child is disabled) often come up with much of it.
Human beings are our most valuable resource. Check out the work of not-particularly-religious economist Julian Simon for support of this. And remember that so many things that people live through routinely were once thought to be hopeless.
Also, I am a funeral director, and recognize wholeheartedly that death is a part of life, often a beautiful, peaceful, welcome part. But to not even try to save the smallest, most helpless people, because life may be hard for them, is cowardly and diabolical.
Rant over—not calling anyone else diabolical, just the culture that holds death to be preferable to a life with special needs. Probably don’t mean to sound as ranty as I do, and I don’t take issue with your post, ChiLaura.
Ri-chan commented on May 13 10 at 6:53 pmI couldn’t imagine letting my baby die, no matter the cost or the possible future problems. I would rather my family and I lived in poverty with a live baby than lived to have an exceedingly easy and wealthy life having let my child die.
Mistress_Scorpio commented on May 13 10 at 7:43 pmChiLaura, I am in full agreement with your last statement. I would never want to be in the position of having to make this decision. Jenny, you didn’t sound ranty… you made good points. But I think it is rare that a parent would decide not to save a child, and I would be unwilling to judge the position that someone would be in to have to make that painful decision.
ChiLaura commented on May 14 10 at 6:06 pmjenny, thanks for your post. Maybe what I should say, which is much more my point is that this is the sort of situation on which I have no real strong opinion. If a family chose not to hook at 24-wk baby up to machines and let him die instead, I really don’t think that I would judge that family. In my mind, I compare it with a terminl disease the symptoms of which can only be treated by some horrible therapy: I wouldn’t judge an individual who would rather die sooner and not go thru the therapy. It’s much more the degree of invasiveness that I have in mind than anything else, and I’m certainly not saying that a child shouldn’t be saved just because they might have special needs. (FWIW, I’m someone who thinks that terminally sick fetuses — e.g. Trisomy 18– should be carried to term rather than aborted.) Sometimes it seems that medical interventions take place “just because” we have the technology without thought to the larger context.
The caveats are: 1) that it may very well be that my religious faith allows me a greater peace about letting a child die than some others (though, lordy, that sounds sick even as I write it, doesn’t it? I jus mean that I believe in the afterlife and that even a child who dies so soon is still meaningful and blessed); and 2) that I really don’t know that I could watch my 24 weeks’ baby die. At that point in my pregnancy, I’ve suffered for that baby, named that baby, and started imagining that baby, and I don’t know how well I’d be able to let go of that, whatever I may say now. Again, I hope to God that I never, ever have to deal with this.
Wendy commented on Aug 09 10 at 1:55 pmComments I was a very low weight preemie. My mum, and other life circumstances forced me to be among spastic folk; and, other officially handicapped folk. I’m disabled; was molested by my ‘foster’ father; have been homeless internationally; harmed by a certain [via certain authorities-groups]; am NOT in the countries which I want to be in, nor in my inheritance…..I’ve been mistreated as handicapped; and, lived in horrid slums in NYC. It’s cruel to keep alive ‘micro-preemies”. Too many preemies have Cerebral Palsy. I should have 2 other Citizenships. The neighborhood’s too noisy, and too much Spanish, Arabic, Kreyol, Bambara languages; too much LOUD music, [inc. "Mister Softee"]. I’ve been forced to be among many handicapped folk in several countries. Too many children are ‘warehoused.’ I’ve been around children so handicapped that my pet birds seem to have more mind-power; one pet bird ‘talks’. Don’t be a Right-to-Lifer. Been around almost-geniuses, and twins, and triplets , [humans] also.
Add your take:
Note: Babble is a supportive, diverse community. We encourage a range of opinions,
but any unduly hostile comments will be removed.
Comments are delayed up to 15 minutes







Lori Garcia
Joslyn Gray
Amber Doty
Julianna Miner
Monica Bielanko
Sierra Black
Meredith Carroll
Carolyn Castiglia
Sunny Chanel
Madeline Holler
Rebecca Odes
Danielle Smith
Danielle Sullivan
Katherine Stone
The Walt Disney Company supports Babble as a platform dedicated to honest, engaged, informed, intelligent and open conversation about parenting. However, the opinions expressed on this site are those of individual parents/writers and do not reflect the views of Disney. In addition, content provided on this site is for entertainment or informational purposes only and should not be construed as medical advice, diagnosis, treatment, or safety advice.

0