babble » blogs » Strollerderby
Strollerderby
Michelle Obama Lays Into Food Makers
Now this! This is what I was talking about. The missing piece in the First Lady’s — and, really, anyone’s — attempts to do something about children’s health and obesity in the U.S.
Michelle Obama, speaking at a meeting of the Grocery Manufacturers Association yesterday, that food makers need a complete and total overhaul of their business.
Here’s what she said:
“We need you not just to tweak around the edges, but to entirely rethink the products that you’re offering, the information that you provide about these products and how you market those products to our children.”
… “We can build shiny new supermarkets on every block, but we need those supermarkets to actually provide healthy options at prices people can afford,” she said. “And we can insist that our schools serve better food, but we need to actually produce that food. And we can give parents all the information in the world, but they still won’t have time to untangle labels filled with 10-syllable words or do long division with these portion sizes. And that’s really where you come in.”
Yes! Yes, yes, yes.
I’ve long argued that there should be some kind of regulation of the food industry, especially when it comes to marketing directly to children. But we’re a nation that likes to put the burden — the entire burden — of raising kids on the shoulders of the parents and the children themselves.
It’s funny, we’re collectively outraged at what cigarette companies did to entice kids to start smoking. But when you argue it’s a shame Kellogg’s is putting Barbie on a box of Pop-Tarts, more often than not Kellogg’s (and Disney) are defended and those stupid, weak mothers who refuse to say “no” to their kids take all the blame. Personal responsibility! Teach your kids to choose “fruit snacks” over fruit snacks.
And yet. Yet. Really smart people get paid a ton of money to figure out how to get your fruit snack eating kid to pick “fruit snacks” instead. Those smart people are reeeeeeally good at what they do.
Sure, these are just words right now. Obama isn’t a lawmaker and can’t make Kraft do anything. But she’s shining a spotlight on them, stating their role in this and not just focusing on soda (though, Pepsi’s announcement is another good start — as long as they’re not just replacing soda with equally high- and empty-calorie sports drinks and juices). She’s calling them out on some of their tactics, too.
Check it out:
She warned against tricks such as replacing fat with another no-no such as salt or adding a gram of fiber to a product already laden with calories.
“This isn’t about finding creative ways to market products as healthy,” she said. “As you know, it’s about producing products that actually are healthy — products that can help shape the health habits of an entire generation.”
So, yes, Mrs. Obama. Sign me up for your Let’s Move campaign. Now that we’re finally calling out all the big players — parents, schools, government AND food corporations — I’m in.
What about you?
Barbie Pop Tarts Could Undo ‘Let’s Move’
More Posts
Study: Men Better at Diapers, Women at (Ugh) Ironing
Again? Mother Asked to Stop BFing or Leave
Edwards’ Mistress Takes off Pants for Interview
Breast Milk Cheese Angers La Leche Leader
Moms Breaking Up With Friends — Big Deal
CDC Reports Sudden Rise in Home Births
How Kids Slowly Kill a Restaurant
Cruelty In Labor — Sometimes it’s Subtle
Photo: bet.com
Go Back To Strollerderby
13 Comments
[...] Michelle Obama Lays Into Food Makers [...]
What Makes a Better Parent: Your Gut or the Experts? | Strollerderby commented on Mar 17 10 at 2:30 pmPlumbLucky commented on Mar 17 10 at 1:18 pmI hope that this public calling to task is the start of something good!
LogicalMama commented on Mar 17 10 at 7:23 pmLove.Her!!
Laure68 commented on Mar 17 10 at 8:06 pmI totally agree that marketing junk food to children is awful. However, the really good food in the supermarket is the kind with no labels (produce, meats, etc.). When a store called Whole Foods has very little of their floorplan actually dedicated to whole foods, you know there is a problem.
I guess I’m saying that I hope this means making fresh food more affordable and accessible to all, and not just making more packaged food.
PlumbLucky commented on Mar 18 10 at 8:02 amI’m kind of glad I don’t live near a WF, though I do like my Trader Joes (and roughly a third to half of their layout is in fact whole food!). My favorite store though – Detroit’s Eastern Market. Five blocks of what I’m estimating to be 85% fresh food! We go just about every weekend…relatively cheap compared to stores, fresher, and can’t complain about the free cut ups that people hand out to convince you that their produce is superior!
puke commented on Mar 18 10 at 10:18 amThose people are not really that smart. The truly smart people are scientists. I guess I am smarter than the advertisers because I don’t fall prey to their crap. And, let’s face it…people want to eat garbage. Look at all we know about what is in meat…literally chicken meat swirls around in a bath of shit and piss and people still eat it…so, there’s only so much you can do. They can’t even properly regulate the hard stuff like food *safety* and now they’re calling for more regulation of the soft stuff, like advertising. This is not about placing blame. Do yourself a favor and take control of your own life and your own family’s diet.
Eric commented on Mar 18 10 at 10:22 amThe problem with chasing food companies around the block is, that’s exactly what you’ll do. If you start deciding which foods are ok to market to kids and which ones aren’t, you’re creating a ‘food police.’ Companies make food people want to eat, it just sucks that so much of the stuff people eat is bad for them. Unless you change the consumer’s mind, they’ll just eat the worst stuff you ‘let’ food companies sell. Furthermore, you don’t need some ‘super’ store to eat well. Every decent grocery store has fresh produce, fresh meat, good choices, and some people choose to eat pop tarts everyday anyway. Just like morality, you can’t legislate eating.
jenny tries too hard commented on Mar 18 10 at 11:10 amI get the First Lady’s mission; it’s a good one. But, honestly, if you want to reform something in the interest of fighting childhood obesity, start with where the government is already mucking things up. It makes more sense to stop the government subsidy that makes corn syrup so cheap than to harrass the companies that capitalize on that fact. Stop making corn sugar so artificially cheap, they will use it less.
Want to convince parents and kids that brightly colored pop-tarts are NOT for breakfast? For pity’s stupid sake, instead of pestering Kellogg’s about “marketing” to children who don’t have money, stop GIVING them to kids whose parents have no money in the government’s free-and-reduced lunch program.
Yes, I know, she’s not a lawmaker but seriously—the blame-the-businesses attitude gets old REAL quick. At some point, the government has to recognize where it’s fault lies and the consumers have to take some responsibility, too. I usually am all about personal responsibility, but here, I do understand why so many consumers fall for marketing claims. You might be skeptical of pop-tarts and chicken nuggets, but when the government’s nutrition programs hand them out, of course it seems like they must be okay.
puke commented on Mar 18 10 at 12:09 pmI am *always* skeptical of things that are free or given away.
meghan commented on Mar 18 10 at 2:16 pmComments
The correct title is First Lady Obama, not Mrs. Obama. She is the President’s wife, just as his title is President Obama, not just “Obama,” or Mr. Obama. I know it’s a sticking point, but use proper titles, especially when writing in public. I have yet to see Dr. Sears (or any other doctor) addressed as Mr. Sears on this website, or any parenting website.
Eric commented on Mar 18 10 at 8:14 pmRemember when you are broadly removing corn subsidies you are not only doing away with artificially low corn syrup prices, but artificially low beef, pork, chicken, eggs, milk, cereal, alcohol, corn flour, corn oil, and fuel oxygenates. I’d certainly like to change the subsidy system, but a broad base removal would have a wide swath of consequences many of which would be unforseen. I’m about as staunch a conservative as you’ll find, but to eliminate the market corrections that cause shortages I’ll tolerate some subsidies to food, water, and energy producers.
Mistress_Scorpio commented on Mar 20 10 at 7:47 amLate to this discussion, but why not let the free market decide rather than the taxpayers propping up selected food industries?
Eric commented on Mar 21 10 at 1:02 amThe question of selection is a good one to raise. The problem with total free marketry in the case of food is a free market will sometimes make corrections that result in a shortage. Subsidies stabilize the market players so that they are less likely to go out of production for a period of time that would cause such a shortage. This means we don’t starve people every decade or two. The challenge is corn is extremely versatile as indicated by my previous approach. It is also one of the most stable, calorically dense foods you can produce per acre. Versatile, cheap to mass produce, and high yields make it a hard crop to ignore. The system is way out of whack though. It subsidies only about a third of agricultural production, distributes the subsidies poorly, and some programs are even counter productive. The system needs to be overhauled drastically, and I think most subsidies need to be removed.
Add your take:
Note: Babble is a supportive, diverse community. We encourage a range of opinions,
but any unduly hostile comments will be removed.
Comments are delayed up to 15 minutes






Joslyn Gray
Amber Doty
Julianna Miner
Monica Bielanko
Sierra Black
Meredith Carroll
Carolyn Castiglia
Sunny Chanel
Madeline Holler
Wendy Michaels
Rebecca Odes
Danielle Smith
Danielle Sullivan
Katherine Stone
The Walt Disney Company supports Babble as a platform dedicated to honest, engaged, informed, intelligent and open conversation about parenting. However, the opinions expressed on this site are those of individual parents/writers and do not reflect the views of Disney. In addition, content provided on this site is for entertainment or informational purposes only and should not be construed as medical advice, diagnosis, treatment, or safety advice.

13