Strollerderby

‘Let’s Move’ Ignores Influence of Advertisers

Posted by madeline holler on March 1st, 2010 at 11:00 am

barbie pop tarts kellogg 300x266 Lets Move Ignores Influence of AdvertisersThe First Lady’s “Let’s Move” campaign, which focuses on nutrition and exercise education, and access to good, affordable food, is a start to improving all children’s lives — not just the fat ones. Her program promises to institutionalize what some parents, educators and community activists have been trying to do for years, which is offer something besides crap to kids and people with limited resources.

Having more and nutritious options, though, won’t be enough, especially when baby carrots and ranch have to compete with super sugary, super salty, super fatty processed foods that feature a child’s favorite cartoon character, TV show or sports franchise. Cinderella — that small-boned beauty — knows the key to true hapiness is a bag of chewy “fruit” snacks.

If you’re sick of steering the kids away from cereals featuring SpongeBob or Barbie or Transformers, get ready to hunker down for more.

Reseachers at Yale’s Rudd Center for Food Policy found that, in large supermarkets, the number of food products cross-promoted with entertaiment exploded between 2006 and 2008. In just those three years, the number of cross-promoted products increased 78 percent.

You probably won’t be surprised that only 18 percent of those products met any kind of nutrition standards for food sold to kids and yet, clearly, that’s the customer they’re going after. More celebrities, movies, cartoons and sports are showing up on packages in the food aisles and less and less of what they’re promoting bears any resemblance to actual food. Which is a pretty mixed message for kids. American Idol, good/American Idol fruit punch, bad.

And this is where I wish the First Lady would have gone with “Let’s Move.” Because her program puts most of the focus on personal responsibility — important to be sure, but it’s not everything. There’s no call for corporate responsibility; there’s no urging lawmakers to create restrictions.

Really smart people get paid lots and lots of money to come up with foods that appeal to kids — and selling strategies that convince parents to buy it. Remember: only 18 percent of it gets the kids any bang for the calories ingested.

And this is pretty rich: the Yale study found that 65 percent of products bearing the cross-promotions were from companies that had signed a pledge to limit marketing to children. The difference? They pledged to limit TV ads (in other words, they found a loophole in their beneficence).

“The marketing of foods with low nutritional value to children in grocery stores should raise as much concern as it does on television or the Internet,” said Jennifer L. Harris, PhD, Director of Marketing Initiatives at the Rudd Center. “Foods with promotions targeted at children contained significantly more sugar than foods targeted at other age groups, and companies who have pledged to reduce unhealthy marketing to kids are the biggest offenders.”

It’s never a good time to be a fat kid in America; overweight people have always been easy target of jokes, difficult to dress, and at the mercy of judgmental relatives. Now they’re the reason health insurance is expensive, they’ll break their parents’ hearts by dying first, they’re burdened with the pressure of making the president’s wife look good.

Until the everyone catches up with Salon’s Kate Harding — who brushes off obesity hysteria with pretty compelling facts and worries “Let’s Move” will hurt who it is supposed to help — childhood obesity will remain public enemy No. 1. Like any weight loss battle, dramatic results won’t be typical. They also won’t be possible if we continue to allow marketers such direct and unregulated access to kids. Barbie Pop Tarts? Really?

More Posts

Cruelty In Labor — Sometimes it’s Subtle

C-Section? Request Stitches, Not Staples

Older Moms, Trophy Wife Couples, Bigger Autism Risks

Shouldn’t Dozens of Kids Be Enough?

Yet Another Pregnant Man

Math = Fun. Kids Should Know!

Photo: mog.com

 Lets Move Ignores Influence of Advertisers

Go Back To Strollerderby

23 Comments

[...] children to eat more, mothers who smoked during pregnancy, allowing children to have sugary drinks, fast food and televisions in their rooms, rapid weight gain in very young infants, starting solid food before [...]

Odds of obesity stacked against minority kids even before birth | Strollerderby commented on Mar 01 10 at 1:04 pm

[...] this! This is what I was talking about. The missing piece in the First Lady’s — and, really, anyone’s — attempts [...]

Michelle Obama Finally Goes After Food Makers | Strollerderby commented on Mar 17 10 at 1:05 pm

A corporation’s job is to sell things. A parent’s job is to raise kids. There aren’t many 8-year-olds with jobs, so I don’t think I’m going out on a limb to say that the kids aren’t buying the food.

It is up to the parents to say “No” to their kids. It is ridiculous to blame Pop Tarts, Kraft Mac N’ Cheese, or Frito Lay for a child being fat. Parents are buying the food. Parents are serving the food. Parents need to take the responsibility. Our food budget is limited, but a bag of apples and a box of “fruit” snacks cost about the same in my grocery store. As the parent, I tell my kids to not even put the Curious George Fruit Gummies in the cart, because I already bought oranges.

I agree that there need to be options for parents to buy healthy food, especially in poorer neighborhoods. However, then it is up to the parents to buy the healthy option. The “fruit” snack malitia has never forced anyone to buy anything.

Anonimon commented on Mar 01 10 at 11:46 am

While I agree that it’s super f-d up to market to kids, period, I definitely think that parents need to put their thinking caps on instead of buying whatever jr. saw on tv. I watched tv growing up, but had no sugar cereals, no snack foods beyond saltines and graham crackers, and only drank soda at birthday parties. My mom was not about to let gross food into her kids bellies, and we knew better than to ask for that crap. She made her own fruit leather, etc. and she was by no means a granola hippy or anything. She did happen to be a college graduate, which may make some difference, but really she just made a choice that the barage of packaged sugary “food” that she ate as a kid with a working mom was not what she wanted for her kids. Come on parents, if your kids are fat it truly is your fault. Sorry, but you need to cut the sugar and fat and make them play outside instead of being tv addicts. Their health and grades will thank you!

kat commented on Mar 01 10 at 12:19 pm

I dont understand why anyone feeds their children pop-tarts….cartoon printed or otherwise…but I know mom’s who do. Regularly. For breakfast. Somehow, I think the marketing is working. Their kids are NOT fat, so I think perhaps they think their kids are not at risk from eating junk food….I dont know. But, I do know that marketing to kids creates a whiney desire in kids to eat this stuff, and busy parents who do not take the time to care about good nutrition give in to what their children “will eat” and feed them “what they like”….and that just might be a barbie pop tart. (Oh, and BTW moms, subbing artificial sweetners for sugary junk food is not a better choice. Try an apple.)

cheri commented on Mar 01 10 at 1:38 pm

They give pop tarts as part of the school lunch program here. Nice huh?

My child wouldn’t ask for a barbie pop tart because she knows that I wouldn’t buy it for her. Same with the florescent trix yogurt (also served as part of the breakfast program). I get complaining about marketing to teens who have their own money but no pre-shcooler can buy poptarts themselves.

Sara commented on Mar 01 10 at 2:28 pm

My kid is only 2.5 and I am already teaching her about food politics. She pointed to a McDonalds when we were in the car the other day and asked “What is that, mommy?” I told her it is a bad place we won’t go because they kill animals to make food and that the food makes people fat and ugly. Simplistic terms at this age, yes, but, at the core, truthful to us. We just tell our kid there are some things that we don’t eat. We set ourselves apart from the mainstream. We are extra fit and extra healthy. We do eat fun, whole foods…gelato, baked fries, home-baked good, cookies…we are not health food nuts, but we do have standards. I don’t expect mainstream society to uphold my high standards. Mainstream society is composed of 5’4 women who weigh 163 lbs. (Just to use an example…there are fat men, too, but that’s the statistic I am most familiar with). I want better for my family.

GP commented on Mar 01 10 at 3:02 pm

Maybe nip it in the bud, too, by not allowing TV with commercials. I’m not anti *viewing* but we stick with DVDs and recorded material…no commercials. I don’t buy my kid every single Dora toy in the shop, so why would I buy her Dora food? (Although the Dora Yoplait yogurts have the same amount of sugar as Stonyfield Farms and I allow one per day).

GP commented on Mar 01 10 at 3:06 pm

Although, I am no big fan of the food companies, either, I have to say and Ms. Holler has a point with this post!

GP commented on Mar 01 10 at 9:03 pm

Some people are ugly on the outside and others are far uglier in their words and attitudes.

Mistress_Scorpio commented on Mar 01 10 at 11:09 pm

Whatever, Scorp. I just read Kate Harding’s Salon piece, though, and it is quite good, I agree. I think people also need to look at the emotional and psychological reasons why we stuff our faces full of crap (speaking as someone who went through periods of doing this, but has learned how to stop). Her points about sleep, alluding to stress in teens (and even emotional stress in younger ones) are very interesting and important…

GP commented on Mar 02 10 at 6:47 am

An article from a local news source yesterday, stated that the average nationwide school program has less than $1.00 per student to provide the children with lunch. You can’t buy much quality food at that rate, even with their discounts. If the ‘pop tart’ breakfast is combined with the school lunch diet, our children are eating garbage for at least 2/3′s of the day. Can you think of an evening meal that would make up for that?

BLUSTER commented on Mar 02 10 at 8:00 am

The sheer number of commercials make me wonder if Tivo or DVR is worth it. (Can you actually FF through commericals with those things?)

The most plain answer to this that I’ve found was in the Kids’ Version of Eat This, Not That: If its marketed to kids, most likely its crap. Double check the nutrition information, and do not believe the hype – Pop Tarts are a “good source” of a couple of vitamins but to be a “good source” it only has to contain 10% the RDA, and gives NO consideration to the rest of the crap it may contain.

PlumbLucky commented on Mar 02 10 at 8:04 am

ANyone who lets their kid eat the school lunches is either in a coma or destitute and gets the lunch for free. It is a shame, what they serve, and honestly, you could piece together a healthy lunch even if you’re pretty poor, to the point that it would be worth it for your kid to not have to eat that GARBAGE.

GP commented on Mar 02 10 at 8:16 am

GP, my kids are three, and they also don’t know what McDonald’s is. I am very careful about what my family eats, and we are a healthy family. From reading your other comments, it seems like we’ve made a lot of the same choices, staying with the kids full time, breastfeeding, being aware of where food our food comes from, not letting them watch commercials, etc. It seems like we have so much in common. The difference is, I don’t feel the need to wear my choices like a badge and put down everyone who chooses differently. There are so many ways to be a good parent, and even if you are convinced that your way is the BEST way, it seems odd that you are so bent on making everyone else feel bad. It’s important to be healthy and fit, but isn’t it also important to be decent to other people? The way you mention women who are 5’4″ and 163 pounds…. well, it just comes off as obnoxious.

About the post, I agree with all the comments here, it’s up to parents to feed their kids well and avoid the crap. The corporations who peddle that garbage to kids wouldn’t make it if people didn’t buy it. So maybe awareness is necessary, but I’m not sure that’s the companies’ responsibility.

Manjari commented on Mar 02 10 at 8:54 am

Sorry, it’s just hyperbole…you’re sort of right. It seems like people wear their liberalism and their desire for someone else to help them and someone else to blame for their problems as a bit of a “badge” too. It may have been on the obnoxious side to mention the height/weight, but having been on both sides of the equation, I do know that most of the time when people are overweight it is really just because they are shoveling too much crap into their mouths indiscriminately. 40 years ago, the average weight was much lower, now I know that is partly because of the food companies and the blowing up of portions, but it just seems like on so many levels, people have gotten lazier and stupider over time and are wanting more and more for someone (or something) else to do the hard work for them, so I grow a little weary of that. My problem, though…and I should def try and be less obnoxious.

GP commented on Mar 02 10 at 9:00 am

And I don’t set out to make people feel bad, it does seems like internet chats/lists with women require so much ridiculous sensitivity so as not to hurt anyone’s feelings…I’m sure if someone is 5’4″ and weights 163 lbs, they realize they need to do something about it…so I was just saying that people need to aspire to be better than “average” because the average is pretty unhealthy. We are all works in progress, though…so, again, sorry if it was mean.

GP commented on Mar 02 10 at 9:03 am

I think Michelle Obama’s focus on parental control and not on corporate changes is entirely appropriate. It is inappropriate for the First Lady (or First Husband, should that ever come to pass) to attempt law changes. The president can get into brawls about laws and legislation, but the first consort should focus on supporting the president, and providing a good example.

Marj commented on Mar 02 10 at 10:34 am

Honestly, I think reforming government programs that contribute to obesity and ill health ought to be first priority. Lots of parents are savvy enough to get that Kraft Foods and General Mills are there to make a profit, not promote wellness, but they get bad information from government programs that ARE ostensibly there to promote wellness. WIC doesn’t distinguish between wholesome, all-natural oatmeal and “enriched” fake-food Rice Krispies—they’re both simply listed as “grains” and both can be purchased on the vouchers. Youngish parents who have grown up with school “nutrition” programs have come away thinking that huge portions and crap food have the government’s stamp of approval because, well, it kind of does.

I personally think that a good deal of the obesity epidemic is due to government intervention like those examples…and corn subsidies…and a few other things. I would rather the government step back most of the time, but I think so much damage has been done here that the government does need to step in and clean up the mess already made. But, aside from outright fraud in advertising, the government ought to leave McDonalds and Kellogs alone.

jenny tries too hard commented on Mar 02 10 at 10:46 am

When I pass a “health” food store, I tell my kids, “That is where arrogant people go to get ripped off buying overpriced stuff to feed their egos.”

Anonimon commented on Mar 02 10 at 11:20 am

jenny’s points are spot-on
Anonimom–funny, yes…healthy foods can be easily found and purchased at most grocery stores…and need not cost very much at all

GP commented on Mar 02 10 at 11:32 am

@Jenny: I agree, especially on the corn subsidy business.
@Anonimon: I LOL’d!

Mistress_Scorpio commented on Mar 02 10 at 12:37 pm

Comments
When my first two kids were little and I did family day care at home, my husband watched the kids while I went grocery shopping – often with another Mom and we had a couple hours of grown-up time. No kids in the store = easier to only buy healthy, with no tears! But when my third was born and I had to take an “outside” job, I took the kids shopping with me – partly because I didn’t see as much of them and missed them when I was at work – but that exposed them to the “wonders” of kid food! Shopping became more stressful as I tried to negotiate – reading labels to find the least sugary cereal and agreeing to Sugar Crisp – but no cookies, etc.

Priscilla commented on Mar 11 10 at 11:46 am

Add your take:

Note: Babble is a supportive, diverse community. We encourage a range of opinions,
but any unduly hostile comments will be removed.


Comments are delayed up to 15 minutes

Most Popular on Facebook

Best of Babble.com


  • Lori Garcia
  • Joslyn Gray
  • Amber Doty
  • Julianna Miner
  • Monica Bielanko
  • Sierra Black
  • Meredith Carroll
  • Carolyn Castiglia
  • Sunny Chanel
  • Madeline Holler
  • Rebecca Odes
  • Danielle Smith
  • Danielle Sullivan
  • Katherine Stone
  • Disney Online Moms & Family Portfolio

    The Walt Disney Company supports Babble as a platform dedicated to honest, engaged, informed, intelligent and open conversation about parenting. However, the opinions expressed on this site are those of individual parents/writers and do not reflect the views of Disney. In addition, content provided on this site is for entertainment or informational purposes only and should not be construed as medical advice, diagnosis, treatment, or safety advice. Click here for additional information. Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Interest-Based Ads

    More in Strollerderby (50 of 11490 articles)