Strollerderby

Vintage Ad Reminds Us Girls Used to Just Be Kids

Posted by madeline holler on January 14th, 2010 at 3:00 pm

vintage lego ad marketing to girls boys 236x300 Vintage Ad Reminds Us Girls Used to Just Be KidsRemember Slinkies? Those coils of steel that walked down stairs alone or in pairs? Just yesterday I was singing about that spring! a spring! a marvelous thing! to my daughter.

When I came to the last line of the jingle, “fun for a girl and a boy,” I thought to myself: dang, what a throw-back concept. A genderless toy. And marketed as such!

We don’t do that anymore, market toys to kids. We market them to girls. Or boys. Rarely both. And that’s ridiculously sad, because it’s 2010 and we’re talking about things like women out-earning their husbands, and in the very recent past envisioned a woman as president of the U.S.

Today over a Feministing, they’re discussing another (formerly) genderless toy, which now appears only to come in pink/purple/pony or blue/green/construction sets: Legos. And everyone’s feeling nostalgic — not necessarily for Legos, but for a time where a little girl in jeans, sneakers and a blue T-shirt could happily show off her primary color creation. In order to sell a product. To girls and boys.

I’ve ranted plenty here about pinking up sports gear, and gender stereotyping and division in toy ads, and though once in awhile there are improvements, it’s still a girl-boy world out there. I like to lay the blame in the lap of marketers, etc., but really, they’re responding to us, people who buy toys.

As Connie Jeske Crane highlighted in her recent Babble feature on Legos, the company turned around its sinking bottom line by, among other strategies, embracing gender stereotypes. Big time. And parents bought it. Big time. And they keep buying them.

It’s not as if the powers-that-be at Legos spend hours in the drawing room brainstorming ways to make little girls feel weak or confined or simply different from little boys. I doubt there’s a company mission to keep boys interested in traditionally male jobs like fire-fighting, construction work and pirate mayhem. But Lego marketers are watching and responding to how people shop for toys. And we’re shopping for toys like a bunch of Mad Men-era cliches.

I admonish and yet I’m guilty of it too. My four-year-old daughter didn’t show a lick of interest in Legos until I brought home said pink/purple/pony cart set. She loved it! And exactly for the girl and pony. She’s been socialized in a world of princesses, like most other girls in this country, so why did I expect otherwise?

But here’s the thing. I’m not about to give up on letting girls be kids. Just look at the Feministing ad. Aren’t you thinking about the cords and sneakers and blue T-shirts you or your sister wore as a little girl? Why is that such a statement — today! What I really would have liked in a Lego kit for my kid (and what I know my daughter would have liked as well) is a set that had girls and boys, dogs and ponies, purple and green, a fire hydrant and a flower cart. If the gender-ized stuff sells, I get that. But why can’t we have one set with both? In pairs? Fun for a girl and a boy? Why do we keep settling for this other stuff?

How do you navigate the pink/blue divide? Quiet toleration? Only vintage on ebay? Are the big bad toy companies at fault or do we parents (and grandparents!) shoulder the blame?

More Posts

‘Baby Einstein’ Creator Sues to Prove TV Not Bad for Kids

Mozart Connected to Baby Weight Gain

No. 1 in C-Sections in the World

Baby Name Trends for 2010

What your MIL is Really Trying to Say

Christmas Copy Cats

Olympian Gives Birth While Lifting Weights

Kids H1N1 Vaccine Recalled

Photo: via Feministing

 Vintage Ad Reminds Us Girls Used to Just Be Kids

Go Back To Strollerderby

10 Comments

I am SOOOOO happy to say that one of the biggest hits from XMas this year at my house is the black and decker tools set my daughters got. At 18mo and 4y/o they both love it. It is orange and black.

pqbon commented on Jan 14 10 at 3:18 pm

Parents are totally to blame. Author – if your 4 year old daughter has been “socialized” into princess culture, you have only yourself to blame for that.

MsFortune commented on Jan 14 10 at 10:15 pm

msfortune, you are way off-base. parents cannot correct for everything their children are exposed to, including social experiences. are you advocating social isolation? if you commented that parents should do more to prevent gender-stereotyping, i would agree, but exclusively blaming mother? please.

daria commented on Jan 14 10 at 10:25 pm

Great article! We have a little girl on her way (any minute now) and have been trying very hard to buy non-gendered clothing for her. Even infant clothes seem to come in either blue or pink, with trains, trucks and dinosaurs for the boys, and flowers, fairies and hearts for the girls. I agree, kids are socialized from birth and as much as they can, parents have to try and provide a balanced, non-gendered approach when dressing kids, buying toys, especially deciding what movies to expose them to (TV too – but we don’t watch TV, so luckily that influence won’t be a huge concern at least until she’s old enough to spend time at others’ houses).

Kate commented on Jan 14 10 at 11:17 pm

I was in the check out lane with my almost 4-year-old daughter recently; she saw a Disney princess figurine and said, “Look, a fairy!” She had no idea how much work her dad and I have put into filling the princess-less cultural vacuum that exists at our house. She plays with Tinkertoys and Legos, plays dress up with my clothes, carries toy tools around to “fix” things, and makes her stuffed animals “meals” in her kitchen. We want her to be well-rounded in a way that most current toy trends don’t support. We’re trying to watch her interests and find toys that will encourage her accordingly, instead of walking down The Pink Aisle and grabbing the sparkliest box.

Jan commented on Jan 15 10 at 12:46 am

I have a boy and a girl. I bought a blue bin, a pink bin, and a green/orange/white expansion set…mixed them all together, distributed them roughly evenly between the two bins, and gave one bin to each. I did give the pink bin to the girl and the blue bin to the boy, but the boy really likes the purple and pink pieces.

Meredith commented on Jan 15 10 at 6:54 am

Comments
I realize this doesn’t speak to the greater issue, but one can buy boxes of Lego basic bricks from lego.com. It comes in all the bright, gender-neutral colours we grew up with. Our 3 year old daughter plays with lego and tinkertoys, we play genderless games with her and her brother and of course, there’s always art and playdough. She recently discovered princesses, which she does confuse with fairies, but hasn’t yet been exposed to Disney Princesses. I’m sure it will come, but I think it’ll be okay. For me the idea is to provide balance and moderation in all things. I don’t love the messages that a lot of these oddly gender-focussed toys send (I mean really, who thinks like that?) but for whatever reason our society seems obsessed with girl/boy stereotypes at the moment. By the next generation, I’m sure the focus will have switched to something else.

In the meantime, I’m sure my incredible parenting will prevent my daughter from believing that all she has to do is sit around waiting for Prince Charming to come along and provide her with a happy life. Right? ;)

Voice of Reason commented on Jan 16 10 at 1:19 am

Gendered TV shows are worse. Dora the Explorer is aimed at younger kids than Diego. So its not surprising that boys like Dora when they are a certain age and girls like Diego at a different age. And yet most Dora toys are pink. Kai Lan is even worse, I swear there isn’t a Kai Lan shirt out there that isn’t pink and with ruffles.

Also my sons both love pink, they want the pink winter boots with the flowers. They want the jewelry. They want to wear purses and dresses (which is really weird because mommy doesn’t wear purses or dresses really at all anymore). I wish I could let them wear dresses out in public, and whatnot. I do let them wear purses and jewelry out in public and we would have bought the pink boots but the ones my 2 year old really wanted weren’t insulated enough.

And my family knows how much my kids love dolls, and nearly all the toys my kids get are presents because we don’t have a lot of extra money. But no one will buy them dolls as presents. I mentioned it to my grandmother, and even though even when her kids were little she and her friends never cared if the girls played with “boy toys” and the boys played with “dolls” she says “I don’t know, you just don’t buy dolls for boys” SIGH.

They did get the girly kai lan lego for Christmas (from mommy and daddy). And mommy and daddy will keep buying dolls and jewelry (even though the toxins scare me).

But somewhere, along the way, my almost 4 year old has decided that “boys like cool things and girls like pretty things” and that makes me sad. Part of the reason he’s not in daycare is the moral lessons that get passed around there (about gender, and germs, etc). He’s 4, he should just be a kid. Is that too much to ask?

mystic_eye commented on Feb 03 10 at 10:57 am

The day little girls started wearing skirts and high heels was the day we brought pedophilia out in full force. My mother dressed me “Like a boy” according to my classmates. Well guess what? I’m happy, In a good relationship and I still do not wear make up. Best of all? I’m happy and not trying to keep up with societies idea of “Fashion standards”. I’m no less than a lady in my slacks, I’m no less attractive without make-up. Let children be children, Stop trying to make them adults before their time. They will have enough prejudice to worry about when they grow up.

Fr0stbite commented on Feb 10 10 at 7:45 pm

Companies exist to make money. Society has allowed companies to exploit children. We, as parents, have the responsibility to protect our children from the widespread exploitation that is the norm today, from TV shows to advertisements to toys. We don’t have cable. Our kids have never seen a commercial. This makes a huge difference. Do they watch TV? Yes, but it’s what we pick, and they’re not marketed to in the middle of it. As for toys, little kids (boys AND girls!) seem to love to dress up in frilly, fun things, and that’s fine by me. Our daughter is 3 and she loves the princess dress up things at pre-school. At our house, though, we don’t have much in the way of Disney princess paraphenalia; we do have dress up items and they seem to be adequate. I strive to find gender-neutral toys, and they are definitely out there – you just have to look. It helps immensely that she has no idea most of that stuff exists, though, because her exposure to advertisements is almost nil. Melissa and Doug make great stuff, from playsets to puzzles; the little people sets are largely gender-neutral; we have balls and doctors kits and toolsets and all that stuff, and none of it is “for girls.” That just doesn’t make much sense to me, especially since her younger sib is a boy. We DO have the power, as parents, to steer our daughters from the princess-obsessed marketing orgy that exists today, and I think we have an absolute responsibility to do so. I was a “girly” kind of girl and still enjoy make-up and dresses and sparkly things, and my daughter looks to be the same way, but she also loves to be a cowgirl, look at bugs, and play with her toolsets, and it’s all good.

karmamama commented on Mar 10 10 at 9:52 pm

Add your take:

Note: Babble is a supportive, diverse community. We encourage a range of opinions,
but any unduly hostile comments will be removed.


Comments are delayed up to 15 minutes

Most Popular on Facebook

Best of Babble.com


  • Joslyn Gray
  • Amber Doty
  • Julianna Miner
  • Monica Bielanko
  • Sierra Black
  • Meredith Carroll
  • Carolyn Castiglia
  • Sunny Chanel
  • Madeline Holler
  • Wendy Michaels
  • Rebecca Odes
  • Danielle Smith
  • Danielle Sullivan
  • Katherine Stone
  • Disney Online Moms & Family Portfolio

    The Walt Disney Company supports Babble as a platform dedicated to honest, engaged, informed, intelligent and open conversation about parenting. However, the opinions expressed on this site are those of individual parents/writers and do not reflect the views of Disney. In addition, content provided on this site is for entertainment or informational purposes only and should not be construed as medical advice, diagnosis, treatment, or safety advice. Click here for additional information. Privacy Policy | Terms of Service

    More in Strollerderby (50 of 10535 articles)