babble » blogs » Strollerderby
Strollerderby
Number of Chinese Kids Up for Adoption on the Rise
China has been a traditional starting point for Americans looking to adopt a child from overseas, and there could be no time like the present.
The number of children up for adoption in China is up – the Republic of China that is.
According to a report from the Child Welfare League Foundation, there has been a fifty-five percent hike in parents from Taiwan calling for help in putting up their kids for adoption in the past five years. And almost ninety percent of those parents are complaining of financial hardship that is forcing their hand. In the early months of 2009, there was a full one hundred percent of callers reporting financial difficulties.
Meanwhile the number of Americans opting for adoption both domestically and overseas is declining for the same reason. Coupled with tighter restrictions from the U.S. State Department on agencies handling international adoptions, potential adoptive parents are harder to find.
Something else the U.S. and Taiwan have in common these days: almost a quarter of the kids in the report had teen parents.
More by this author:
Go Back To Strollerderby
6 Comments
[...] http://blogs.babble.com/strollerderby/2009/12/15/number-of-chinese-kids-up-for-adoption-on-the-rise/ [...]
Day 147 – December 17, 2009 Random Article « Hope Starting Now commented on Dec 17 09 at 12:51 pmMirah Riben commented on Dec 16 09 at 12:13 pmThe tone of this post sounds upbeat about this news. More babies. Goody!
It is interesting that it neglects to mention the major point made in the announcement of this increase by Taiwan Child Welfare
“Nearly 90 percent of the parents who phoned the Child Welfare League Foundation to ask about putting their children up for adoption between 2003-2008 did so due to financial problems, foundation spokesman Chen Ya-hui said, citing statistics compiled by the foundation.
“The number of phone calls made to the foundation for this purpose posed a significant 55 percent rise over the past five years, increasing from 495 cases in 2003 to 770 in 2008, according to Chen.
“For the first 10 months of this year, the foundation accepted 511 phone calls on the issue, an average of 1.7 calls daily, the statistics show.
“Eighty-seven percent of those who made the calls did so because of financial difficulties, representing a remarkable surge from 50 percent in January 2008 to 96 percent in September of the same year, with the percentage reaching 100 percent in January, March and June 2009, according to Chen.”
The omission of that crucial part of this story — the tragedy causes families to need to lose their children — very telling.
Finances is also becoming a major reason for domestic placements as well. This is nothing to cheer about.
Reaping the spoils of family destruction and loss puts a vulture-like spin on adoption.
kd commented on Dec 16 09 at 1:14 pmHmm, wonder if they’ll allow gay parents to adopt again now that orphanages are overflowing… interesting that China only recently decided to have more control over what kinds of families deserve relinquished kids, and there are now more and more kids without any parents at all as a result.
Ali commented on Dec 16 09 at 7:24 pmTaiwan is a sovereign nation, not part of the Peoples Republic of China. So are the numbers of children available for adoption up in Taiwan or PR China?
Cedar commented on Dec 17 09 at 1:28 amFinancial coercion is forcing parents to surrender their beloved babies for adoption. This is a tragedy of huge proportions. Why are richer North Americans lining up to exploit and take advantage of this situation? Why aren’t people demanding that Taiwan respect international human rights conventions and provide sufficient financial support to these families such that they do not have to lose their children. The unending emotional damage to a mother who loses her child to adoption is indescribable.
Ibn Zayd commented on Dec 19 09 at 12:40 pmThere is an interesting article up at Monthly Review:
http://www.monthlyreview.org/091214dongping.php
Quoting:
>>As expenditures of the township government increase, the ways to extract money from farmers multiply, now that the agricultural tax has been eliminated. Many township governments use family planning as a way to get money from farmers. In order to get a permit to have a child, farmers have to bribe the village and township government officials. Some township and village leaders sell birth permits to farmers who have money. In some places, local officials even encourage rich farmers to have more children so that they can get “fines” from them. In such a social context, farmers question the political legitimacy of the central government, as well as county and village officials. Another way of making money is the confiscation of land by local and regional officials, who then sell the land at a profit for “development,” without adequately compensating the farmers — thus adding greatly to the rural ferment.”<<This points up the lie that it is a horrid and alien Communist China enforcing family planning laws; it is in fact the local comprador class extracting profit from the peasant/working class. So you have one bourgeois class internal to China helping out the bourgeoisie in the United States obtain babies at a healthy profit. No wonder they protest MORE when the supply dries up.
Add your take:
Note: Babble is a supportive, diverse community. We encourage a range of opinions,
but any unduly hostile comments will be removed.
Comments are delayed up to 15 minutes






Lori Garcia
Joslyn Gray
Amber Doty
Julianna Miner
Monica Bielanko
Sierra Black
Meredith Carroll
Carolyn Castiglia
Sunny Chanel
Madeline Holler
Rebecca Odes
Danielle Smith
Danielle Sullivan
Katherine Stone
The Walt Disney Company supports Babble as a platform dedicated to honest, engaged, informed, intelligent and open conversation about parenting. However, the opinions expressed on this site are those of individual parents/writers and do not reflect the views of Disney. In addition, content provided on this site is for entertainment or informational purposes only and should not be construed as medical advice, diagnosis, treatment, or safety advice.

6