Overinvolved Parents Charged With Child Abuse
I used to babysit for a three-year-old who spent nearly every minute of her life at her mother’s side; she spent her days playing with her mother, napping with her mother, and eventually falling asleep while her mother rubbed her back.
While eating, the little girl often spit out her food, letting it dribble down her chin; rather than telling her not to do this, her mother sat beside her with a napkin while she ate, poised to wipe up regurgitated food. This is only one of many examples of the way the child was encouraged to rely on her mother to do everything for her.
Not surprisingly, this adorable, sweet little girl was terrified to be left with me. She had not spent more than an hour apart from her mom since she was born and she wailed uncontrollably for hours every time I babysat, refusing to eat or talk. Eventually, both the mother and I decided the arrangement was too unbearable for all involved; the mother seemed delighted to return to being her daughter’s sole caretaker. Naturally, I was highly disturbed by this form of parenting, but I never considered that it could be considered a form of child abuse.
If I lived in Italy, I might have thought differently. A mother has been charged with child abuse for being too involved in her twelve-year-old son’s life. The boy’s grandparents, who helped raised him, have also been implicated in a form of helicopter parenting so severe that prosecutors say it constitutes abuse. The mother and grandfather have already been convicted of child abuse, and are appealing the verdict; the grandmother awaits sentencing.
“Luca,” as the boy is known, was reportedly forbidden to play with friends, play sports, or leave the house except to go to school. His teachers say he brought his snacks to school already cut in bite-size portions. According to TIME:
Investigators say the teachers noticed that he was both physically and psychologically stunted from such around-the-clock doting. “He didn’t know how to run. He had the motor skills of a 3-year-old child,” Andrew Marzola, the lawyer representing the boy, told the Milan newspaper Corriere della Sera.
Not only is this case distinct from the average overprotective parent in its extremity, but it’s also complicated by a custody battle. After Luca’s parents divorced, the father says he was not allowed to see his son for nine years. He eventually became so worried about his son’s welfare that he got authorities involved.
But even though Luca’s situation is unusual, this case could set a precedent for teachers and other adults to intervene legally when they suspect a child is being smothered to the point of harm, the same way teachers are required to report any suspicions of physical child abuse. Although I would love to have psychologists or social workers speak to a parent who is overprotective to the point of stunting a child’s growth, I would never advocate removing a child from the care of an overprotective parent. Even in Luca’s case, I do not think that taking the child away from the only parents he has ever known is the solution to his troubling upbringing.
Do you think over-parenting should ever be considered a crime? If so, what should the punishment be?
Photo: TIME
Related Posts:- Guilt Tripping Over Family Dinners
- Spread That Volunteer Love
- Court to decide: who is in vitro baby’s mother?
- Overweight Parents Lose Kids For Being Fat
- More Than Half of Kids Will Someday Get Food Stamps
Tags: child abuse, helicopter parenting, Italy, luca, overinvolved parents, overprotective parents, stunt growth
6 Comments
Lindsay commented on Oct 21 09 at 4:18 pmI think it’s a crime when it prevents a child from developing normally. I know someone who refuses to send her son to school AND refuses to home-school him. He is now 8-years-old, illiterate, and has no communication with anyone outside of their family. I called Child Protective Services on them MANY times, and every time they show up, the boy’s mom shows them a phony curriculum she’s using, and they back off. The boy will probably never be able to attend public school, and if he does, he will most definitely be put in special education JUST because he’s so far behind everyone his age. This means he will probably not go to college and end up living with his psychotic mother for the rest of his life. Is that justice for this little boy?
PlumbLucky commented on Oct 22 09 at 7:25 amThere’s helicoptering (that’s what I call the parents of the local HS-ers who sit at the busstop with their SUV’s idling with their precious naive little babies sitting inside - c’mon, its 60 degrees, it isn’t raining, and you live 10 doors from the stop, whiskey tango foxtrot?) and then there’s abuse, which is what this sounds like it is. A twelve year old with the motor skills of a three year old, with no other reason as to why he would have such stunted skills.
RP commented on Oct 23 09 at 9:28 amIn this case yes. They made a child mentally disabled by their overcare just like a parent can by too little care.
Rosana commented on Oct 23 09 at 11:02 amI agree hanna, separating the child from the only parents he knows will make the trauma worst. I think the parents should be put in probation for a while to make sure the change their ways and if they don’t then charge them with child abuse.
francesbean commented on Oct 23 09 at 4:06 pmI think it’s a shame this child wasn’t taken out of that home earlier. I am usually very leery of CPS getting involved, but this case is absolutely a case of abuse.
mommiedear commented on Oct 24 09 at 9:08 amSeriously! I have issues with this. If we do too much it is bad if we do too little it is worse! Where is the right balance….? As parents don’t we have the right to make the choices ourselves? I think there is too much outside involvement in our parenting and this is a evil we brough upon ourselves because of the crazy few who beat and abuse theor kids! But to be charged with too much parenting? Thats just plain koo-koo in my book. On http://www.truuconfessions.com there are both sides to this story.








