babble » blogs » Strollerderby
Strollerderby
U.N. Wants to Teach 5-Year-Olds About Masturbation
Pull out the toys and get your lotion ready! The United Nations has a new report out suggesting kids as young as five need to be taught about masturbation.
Officially it’s UNESCO, the United Nations Economic, Social and Cultural Organization which issued the report meant to encourage sex education for kids. Not suprisingly, social conservatives are up in arms.
One group is accusing the U.N. of promoting abortion and devaluing “traditional” marriage. Yawn.
Now back to the exciting stuff. The report, titled International Guidelines on Sexuality Education, suggests kids ages five through eight should learn that:
- Most children are curious about their bodies
- It is natural to explore and touch parts of one’s own body
- Bodies can feel good when touched
- Touching and rubbing one’s genitals is called masturbation
- Some people masturbate and some do not
- Masturbation is not harmful, but should be done in private
For kids ages nine through twelve, they move on to:
- Human beings are born with the capacity of enjoying their sexuality
- Masturbation is often a person’s first experience of sexual pleasure
- Many boys and girls begin to masturbate during puberty
- Masturbation does not cause physical or emotional harm
- People in long-term relationships may still masturbate
- Most young people are curious about sexuality and have many questions
- It is acceptable to talk and ask questions about sexuality
- Definitions of sex, sexuality, gender, gender role, gender identity, and sexual orientation
- Cultural and gender role stereotypes affect sexual behaviour
- Importance of talking with trusted adult about sexuality
The topics get more in-depth as kids age, and masturbation is hardly the only topic explored – there’s everything from gender equality to “body rights.” And when read in context, it doesn’t sound nearly as exciting – or damning. Young kids masturbate – they touch, it feels good, they keep going. And doctors, by and large, advise parents to let it go. Teach them not to do it in public, perhaps, because it could lead to lewdness charges down the line, but they’re not doing anything WRONG.
By and large, the UNESCO plan puts sexuality in context in the human life cycle. Rather than encouraging it, the idea is to open up a conversation that lets children know something feeling good isn’t sin coursing through their veins (yes, I was raised Catholic, we heard that many a time).
Masturbation is against certain religions (hello, repressed Catholic here), but it’s not going to get kids pregnant or keep them from later on finding a partner and getting married. Is it so bad that a five-year-old may not be terrified when he figures out the seatbelt brushing against his manhood doesn’t feel half bad?
Go Back To Strollerderby
0 Comments
Lorraine commented on Aug 27 09 at 9:42 amI’m pretty liberal, but I really don’t think 5-year-olds need to learn about this …
Amanda B commented on Aug 27 09 at 10:11 amSeriously, this is what some UN agency is spending its time on?
LolaLane commented on Aug 27 09 at 10:33 amI think this is an important facet of childhood sex-ed. My boys, aged 4 & 5 know that they aren’t in trouble when I tell them it’s ok to touch their penises, but to do it in the bathroom or when they’re otherwise alone. I have tried very hard not to shame them or repress them because yes, it is damaging to their sexuality later and the last thing I want is to start their sexual lives with a bunch of hang-ups. Anyone see “Meet the Fockers” the “Meet the Parents” sequel? Ben Stiller’s open-about-everything parents are pretty much an older version of me and hubby. Why start things off with sex-negative messages? Life’s too short.
Mary commented on Aug 27 09 at 12:41 pmI was raised Catholic and I still am. I don’t know why it is considered politically correct to be tolerant of some religions and not of others. You may have had some bad experiences with the Catholic Church, but I can tell you that the teachings of the Catholic Church on this topic are not oppressive or unreasonable. Our sexuality is considered to be a gift and ought to be used in the context for which it was given. That context is a faithful marital relationship, where it expresses love and often results in the conception of a child. Masturbation is an excess. It’s like gorging yourself with chocolate between meals just because you can. Of course that is not a very strong example because it is not of the same moral magnitude, and we’ve all done it; but I think we can all agree that it is not a very good practice. Children ought to learn about sexuality in the home where the parents can decide what is appropriate. It is not the role of the state, especially when it shows a blatant disregard for the religious beliefs of the parents (and Catholicism is not the only religion that believes masturbation is wrong.) In regard to your point about making a child feel guilty- of course that would be inappropriate and counter-productive. It IS natural for a child to do something that feels good. It’s possible to quietly discourage the habit without making a big deal about it. The child shouldn’t be forced into the view that sex is dirty. That would be wrong, and the Catholic Church has never held that view. Children have many habits that can be discouraged without giving them a pathological fear of the thing they should avoid. Take the chocolate example. A child, when he or she is old enough, can be told that there is a time and a place for that kind of activity. Making it a free-for-all cheapens it.
Lula commented on Aug 27 09 at 1:10 pmI don’t think we can all agree at all, Mary. Masturbation is great! Masturbation is 100% free from risk of infections and pregnancy, is a great outlet for sexual tension, and helps people figure out what kind of stimulation feels good to them. Most of us will find all of the above useful while navigating pre-marital sexual relationships and experiences, but those who want to keep partnered sexuality within the confines of marriage will also find them useful.
Feel free not to masturbate, and feel free to teach your children (if you have any) what your religion says about masturbation. But the International Guidelines for Sexuality Education are an enormous boon to public health, particularly to the various fields connected with sexual health promotion. They’re medically accurate, which is what such guidelines are supposed to be. They don’t prevent anyone from tossing religion into their own home training, but they do serve to educate healthcare, social service, and education professionals who are responsible for providing medically accurate sexual health information to the public.
jeannesager commented on Aug 27 09 at 1:20 pmMary – I don’t really feel that I’m intolerant of Catholicism so much as critical of the way it approaches sexuality. We were taught, plain and simple, that masturbation was dirty.
But what about is really so bad? You admit that it’s natural for kids to do something that feels good and that they shouldn’t learn sexuality is dirty. So what good does it do to discourage them from exploring it in a healthy, safe way?
Masturbation is actually a great means to keep kids from engaging in risky behaviors – because they release some of the natural pent-up sexual tension of those hormonal years. It can even help with the very Catholic practice of preventing pre-marital sex (something I can respect, if that’s your choice).
Tom commented on Aug 27 09 at 3:19 pmSex-positive messages at a very young age…for boys AND girls…woo! I’m shocked how many people (and women especially, who are more repressed by state and religion alike in matters of sexuality) are not totally in favor of this.
Too young for this kind of education, you say? Do you have children this young? Are you completely in denial about the fact they are touching and rubbing themselves, perhaps as you read this? Little kids are TOTALLY aware of the fact it feels neat…lets try to keep the pleasure of it guilt free…I think the world may become a better place in a generation or so as a result!
Stella commented on Aug 27 09 at 3:20 pmI’m liberal too but not sure how to react teaching my kids at age 5 about this. First, we need to teach the lesson that masturbation is not a bad thing before we go into how to do it! Wasn’t there an Oprah episode on this recently?
I personally like the suggestion portion…this must have been written by academics!
Lula commented on Aug 27 09 at 4:00 pmPeople, no one is talking about “teaching children how to masturbate”! All the Guidelines are saying is that it would be great to tell kids that a) everyone does it, and b) it won’t make you blind, crazy, or infertile like a lot of people still think.
Mary commented on Aug 27 09 at 4:01 pmMasturbation conflicts with the purpose of sexuality. Sexual intercourse is the ultimate expression of love for another. It represents total self-giving. This is why it only has a place in the marital relationship, where spouses have vowed their lives to one another. It is a physical expression of the vows that were taken. Masturbation, on the other hand, is for the doer’s pleasure alone and so it doesn’t reflect the Church’s view of sex as a sacred and beautiful act of self-giving.
Mary commented on Aug 27 09 at 4:03 pmBy the way, I don’t look upon this as repression. Being in charge of your own body (controlling your physical impulses) is freedom. Being controlled by your body is not.
Mistress_Scorpio commented on Aug 27 09 at 5:42 pmHey, diddle diddle indeed! Kudos to the guidelines, boo to the repressed.
Lula commented on Aug 27 09 at 7:24 pmIf that’s the *positive* spin on what the Catholic Church thinks about the sum total of human sexuality, I am so freakin’ glad I’m not Catholic.
Nichole commented on Aug 27 09 at 9:29 pmI started masturbating at age 8, and no one ever told me about it. I just figured out that it felt good. I think it would’ve saved a lot of confusion if I had been taught about it before that.
mamazee commented on Aug 27 09 at 11:32 pmThese messages are basically good ones,but the UN deciding when is the best time to share them, is not a good idea. Ever studied Piaget? Some messages will be best shared early with little ones (i.e. modesty!), then there is a latency period, where children don’t want to hear anything (and hopefully they already have heard most of what they need) – then puberty hits and they are ready to hear more, interested. I think we can offend a child’s natural modesty by forcing them to listen to stuff like this when they don’t want to think about it. And no class of 10 year olds is going to be all at the exact same place. I want my children to learn about their body and about sex from me, because i know them best and can interpret their comfort levels. Yeah, sometimes my older children get embarassed – but i’d rather they hear stuff from me than from other kids, or that they are shaken from ignorance and innocence by someone’s wrong actions. this is the world we live in.
MoreAnon commented on Aug 28 09 at 1:45 amI am not Catholic, and I think it’s fine for people to masturbate if they wish (though hopefully not in public) but I think discussing actual masturbation is a bit premature for kindergarteners. Kids don’t really want too detailed information early on — it is generally more than they can handle. For the typical 5 yo, it’s enough to tell them that it’s fine for them to touch themselves if they want to, but don’t do it in public and don’t do it *with* anyone else at this age. That’s plenty of info for that age.
Michelle commented on Aug 28 09 at 9:06 amIts not discussing masturbation, its letting your young children understand their body. We hate to admit but our littles ones masturbate. My 3yro daughter does it mostly when she is tired. I gently tell her that its ok but she should go to her room or another private place. And it certainly is good way to talk to children about how others should not touch them the way they touch themselves. Its unsettling to think of our children masturbating but it is perfectly normal part of growing up and we should not be so scared to talk aobut it. You hear these horror stories about middleschooler involved in unhealthy sexual behavior. So maybe we gradually start the discussion earlier than our tweens and teens will be better equipped to make the right decisions.
Lula commented on Aug 28 09 at 11:20 amLet’s look again at what’s recommended discussion for children aged 5-8:
* Most children are curious about their bodies
* It is natural to explore and touch parts of one’s own body
* Bodies can feel good when touched
* Touching and rubbing one’s genitals is called masturbation
* Some people masturbate and some do not
* Masturbation is not harmful, but should be done in privateCovers the basics of a) it’s OK to touch your own body, including your penis/vulva, b) “masturbation” is the name for that activity, c) it’s normal for masturbation to feel good, and therefore normal for kids to want to do it, and d) masturbation is a private thing, so you do it with yourself and in a private place. That’s like a 3-minute conversation tops, once adults can bring themselves to say the word “masturbation”. No instruction manuals, no detailed information on how to masturbate, and certainly no imposition of adult sexuality on children – just “Hey, what you’re doing has a name. It’s normal to masturbate, so go enjoy yourself in private.”
I’m beginning to fear that a lot more adults have sexual proclivities towards children than previously suspected, if so many people are visualizing UNESCO-trained grownups whipping out porn films or unzipping their own trousers/lifting their own skirts in order to deliver a basic “Masturbation is normal, won’t hurt you, and should be done in private” message to children (or, more likely, to medical and education professionals who work with children and parents). I’ve been teaching comprehensive sex ed across the lifespan for a long time now, and that’s simply not what we’re about. Trust me on that one, OK?
300baud commented on Aug 28 09 at 2:08 pmMary, you make a lot of assumptions (and state them as hard fact) which may be true for you, but are not true universally. Where the article contradicts your assumptions, you seem to accuse it of being “intolerant”. I think that is quite unfair.
For example, “Sexual intercourse is the ultimate expression of love for another.” Many people would consider this a very naive statement. Others would consider it very shallow. I see it as hyperbole. Personally, I would think death would be a much greater expression of love. People die for loved ones every day, after all.
“It represents total self-giving.” Another assumption, the non-universality of which should be very obvious.
“This is why it only has a place in the marital relationship, where spouses have vowed their lives to one another.” Does not logically follow from the preceding assumptions. Rather, “The Church also claims that it only has a place in…”
And so on in likewise fashion for almost every word you wrote.
Lula commented on Aug 29 09 at 10:49 amMamazee, I just caught your line here: “These messages are basically good ones,but the UN deciding when is the best time to share them, is not a good idea.” The UN’s age guideline is consistent with current child-development theory, which has come a long way since Piaget. It’s a science-based, best-practice guideline. It kicks ass.
Mary commented on Aug 29 09 at 1:41 pm300baud, I agree that dying for someone would be the ultimate act of love. I should have said that sexual intercourse is an expression of self-giving. That is, it isn’t literally giving yourself as dying would be, but it represents the self-gift found in the marriage vows. In marriage the spouses are vowed totally to one another, and so an act that reflects this has no place where the two people involved have not really given themselves to one another in marriage. This is what i believe and I do not find it oppressive. I think it is refreshing to look upon sex as having a higher purpose. That doesn’t mean that it cannot be enjoyed or done frequently. However, I think if people looked upon sex (and their bodies) with the respect that they deserve, instead of using them merely for self-gratification or using sex as a marketing ploy, we would have fewer of the problems that are rampant in our society. Feel free to disagree, as I know many do, but I state my views as hard fact because I believe them to be hard fact. Others have stated the opposite view of masturbation as hard fact without apology.
Michael commented on Sep 03 09 at 10:52 pmPersonaly i dont think theres anything really wrong wiht this but maybe they should find out about this at 6-7 not 4-5. I think that it is actualy smart to do this because kids this way find out to do this in private and it is not okay to do this in public insted of finding out the hard way and have their parents tell them who almost always put it off. Having learn this will help parents alittle more and i know what this person means about most Catholic. I am 15 and Catholic and i have seen how some Catholic parents or grandparents who are way to religious actualy beat their 4 or 5 year old for accidently masterbating and not telling them why they beat them. I even read of one man who beat his child for accidently landing on a unicorn plush he got her for her birthday the day before and burned it after she accidently fell on the horn with her privet and have it accidently rub against it were she started rubbing against it more and when he saw her he burned the unicorn in front of her and beat her for 2 hours straight and end up not telling her why he beat her. I personaly think this has to stop.
Michael commented on Sep 03 09 at 11:20 pmAlso i forgot to mention that i actualy had started masterbating around 6-7 years old and I decided to not have sex until i was married when i was 13 or 14 when i was taking sex-ed in health because i wanted to wait adn know that i love the person i decide to marry for her and not for sex.
Add your take:
Note: Babble is a supportive, diverse community. We encourage a range of opinions,
but any unduly hostile comments will be removed.
Comments are delayed up to 15 minutes






Joslyn Gray
Amber Doty
Julianna Miner
Monica Bielanko
Sierra Black
Meredith Carroll
Carolyn Castiglia
Sunny Chanel
Madeline Holler
Wendy Michaels
Rebecca Odes
Danielle Smith
Danielle Sullivan
Katherine Stone
The Walt Disney Company supports Babble as a platform dedicated to honest, engaged, informed, intelligent and open conversation about parenting. However, the opinions expressed on this site are those of individual parents/writers and do not reflect the views of Disney. In addition, content provided on this site is for entertainment or informational purposes only and should not be construed as medical advice, diagnosis, treatment, or safety advice.

0