12-Year-Old Girl Arrested for Sexual Assault
Currently in Texas, there are about 4,000 people on the permanent sex offender registry for crimes they committed as juveniles–in some cases, when they were as young as 10 years-old. The case of a 12-year-old Texan girl who was recently arrested for sexual assault has raised the question of whether it’s ethical to register juveniles as sex offenders.
The girl was playing with four other children–two girls who are 5 and 7, and two boys who are 4 and 5–at her apartment. The kids, who frequently play together, were in the care of the boyfriend of the older girl’s mother. He told them they were being too noisy and asked them to play in another room. All four younger children later reported that the 12-year-old had forced the girls to perform oral sex on the boys. She was subsequently arrested and remains in custody, awaiting a hearing.
The mother of two of the victims–who is also the accused girl’s aunt–has spoken out against the possibility that her niece could be registered as a sex offender. “I think being registered as a child [sex] offender for the rest of her life is going to hinder her from ever doing anything in her life,” she said. “At 12, I think therapy is where they need to be.”
The aunt also pointed out the (not surprising) likelihood that the 12-year-old was molested herself by one of her mother’s ex-boyfriend’s, who has since landed in jail for molesting an 11 year-old.
Experts agree with the aunt’s compassionate stance. According to the Dallas Morning News, experts in juvenile justice “say public registration of juveniles contradicts the purpose of juvenile justice: to give kids a second chance.” I absolutely agree, particularly given that numerous studies have found that the vast majority of juvenile sexual offenders were themselves abused as children. Rather than being punished for life–which only encourages youth to continue the cycle of abuse, since they are already known as sexual offenders in the eyes of the world–these children need intense therapy and loving relationships with adults.
I applaud the 12-year-old’s aunt for her willingness to forgive her children’s abuser, and help her get the treatment she needs. With that attitude, I have no doubt that she is getting her own children the appropriate counseling and treatment they need to process what happened to them, in order to break the chain of abuse.
Would you be equally forgiving if you were in the aunt’s place?
Photo: theonlinecitizen.com
Related Posts:- Most Juvenile Inmates Need Therapy, Not Jail Time
- iPhone Sex Offender Finder
- Do Sex Offenders Belong at Church?
- Pregnant 12-year-old Was Living with Boyfriend
- Grown Children Claim Imprisoned Father Never Actually Molested Them
Tags: arrested, children, girl, juveniles, molestation, sex offender registry, sexual abuse, sexual assault, Texas
14 Comments
Lula commented on Jul 28 09 at 5:54 pmMy question is whether the aunt would have been as forgiving if the 12yo was a boy instead of a girl. A 12yo boy who molests younger children is also likely a victim of sexual abuse, but people seem to give females more of a pass on such things.
At any rate: Yes, I think this girl needs to be noted as a sex offender, even though she is only 12. She also needs all the counseling and intervention all sexual assault survivors deserve, if it is true that she herself was abused (and I will bet serious $$ that she was). The two are not incompatible - all sex offenders should receive rehabilitative therapy in the hope that they will not re-offend in the future. This is especially true for offenders who are discovered as such when they are so young, and who therefore have a better shot at rehabilitation.
patricia commented on Jul 28 09 at 7:30 pmLula, what happens if the rehabilitative therapy is successful in her case, and she never re-offends, yet she is registered as a sex offender for the rest of her life? That seems a bit harsh to me, especially because as a 12 year old who was likely abused, I wonder about her capacity to truly understand that what she did was wrong, at this point.
Maybe she should be on the list but able to have herself removed after some period of time without any additional offenses? Especially for juvenile offenders (of either sex), I would be in favor of this, I think.
Lula commented on Jul 28 09 at 7:48 pmI don’t know how the juvenile justice system works WRT sex offenders, if their records are sealed once they turns 18 as for other crimes. But if one supports sex offender registries in general, I’d think one would support them for juvenile sex offenders as well as adult. If you hire teenage babysitters, wouldn’t you want to know if they’re on record as having sexually abused children? Even if they did so when they were 12 and they’re now 17, I’d think parents would consider it their right to know.
Bec commented on Jul 29 09 at 9:54 amYou’re right, Lula. I was having difficulty figuring out how it could be a positive thing in any way to permanently mar this girls future for some acting out at age 12. Turns out that I, personally, am just against sex offender registries in general. Thanks for helping me figure that out.
Rosana commented on Jul 29 09 at 11:54 amI understand that sex offenders are mostly victims of sex crimes but where does the cycle ends? I am a very compasionate person but I can tell you that I would never justify any sex offense against my kids. People that has been molested have the responsability to look for help and get better (if that is possible) or is the parents responsability to look for help. Even though this girl’s mistake is horrible I do not think her future should be thrown away by putting her on the sex offenders list.
Lula commented on Jul 29 09 at 12:28 pmI have very mixed feelings about sex offender registries myself, but I also have completely un-mixed feelings about child sexual abuse (which is not unexpected for someone who’s a survivor of child sexual abuse). I’m not a huge fan of registries because I think their purpose is primarily punitive instead of protective. But on the other hand, people who sexually abuse children unfortunately have high recidivism rates - they tend to abuse repeatedly, and they tend to become very good at it as they gain more experience with manipulating victims. I don’t know if research shows at approximately what age the average child sex abuser starts abusing - and since such research would have to be done on abusers who’ve actually been caught, it would be focusing on the minority of abusers anyway. But whatever: I don’t think it’s a stretch to assume that a peek into the adolescence of the average adult abuser would show that they didn’t suddenly start abusing at the age of 18 or 21.
12 is young, but it’s the beginning of adolescence. And in terms of child sexual development, the behavior of a 12-year-old who acts out sexually against 4, 5, and 7-year-old children is considered a pretty serious sign of possible future abuse potential. This is why I’m glad this girl was caught abusing the younger children, and why I’m glad she’ll have this criminal offense noted in her record. She needs and deserves intervention and support, and I sincerely hope she can start healing from her own victimization and find a better way to deal with the trauma than to perpetrate it against other children. But *I’ve* never abused anyone as a result of my own sexual abuse history. Lots of survivors don’t. The survivor who does, even in very early adolescence, needs to be helped to take responsibility for both their own healing and their violent actions against others ASAP, before they get worse. And if we as a society have decided that people who are at reasonable risk for sexually abusing children should be watched via sex offender registries or what-have-you, then I think she qualifies as someone who bears watching. What if she DOES sexually assault a younger child again? What if she feels compelled to do so despite therapy and support, and she seeks out jobs as a camp counselor or child-care aide in order to gain access to young children? Do you want to know if your child’s camp counselor or childcare provider has a history of molesting children, or not?
The 4, 5, and 7-year-olds who were victimized by this 12-year-old do not see her as another child, even if we do. Developmentally, the 5-to-8 year age difference here is huge. If this was a 7yo sexual abuse victim acting out with 4- and 5-year-olds, it would not be considered perpetration because 7yos are not developmentally in the same place as 12yos, emotionally or sexually.
Lula commented on Jul 29 09 at 12:55 pmGot cut off there, but end thought: I don’t know that I want juveniles who sexually assault before age 14 to be permanently registered as sex offenders, but I do want their juvenile sexual offense records to be accessible until they’re 18. After that, I’m undecided.
Lula commented on Jul 29 09 at 12:58 pmUnless they’ve repeatedly committed sexual offenses before age 18, of course. Then I’m totally decided - I want to know.
patricia commented on Jul 29 09 at 4:52 pmLula, you make some great and well thought out points. I agree with your conclusions- someone who assaults before 14 should be on a registry until at least 18 (I might go to 21 on that), to be removed if no additional assaults in that time.
My congratulations on overcoming your own abuse history.
Lula commented on Jul 29 09 at 9:17 pmManaging the impact of child sexual abuse is a lifelong process, so don’t congratulate me until I’m dead.
I am doing relatively okay, though, as survivors go. Thanks for your nod, Patricia.
amit agrawal commented on Aug 09 09 at 6:10 amComments
racheal commented on Aug 27 09 at 10:57 amif the girl hangs out with kids of these age usually then she probably see’s them as peers and thought nothing wrong of what she did. She is hitting or already has hit puberty and does not know how to handle the feelings, like i said if she hangs out with kids of this age regularly and see’s them as peers she prob didnt think it was so bad.
BrotherDave commented on Sep 27 09 at 10:32 pmWe Americans have an unnatural phobia against anything sexual that might involve children while knowing full well that all children will have a few experiences related to sex and motivated totally by curiosity.
Such sexual experimentation is and has always been just a harmless part of growing up unless some adults make it into a bug traumatic event by their overaction to children just being children.
I have no earthly idea how this 12 year old girl was even charged with sexual assault. Other that providing some brief instructions and neither giving nor recieving oral sex herself, exactly whom and how did she “assault” anyone?
It would be much more logical to have charged the 4 and 5 year old boys with sexual assault as they were the ones actually physically involved in the act.
What would really have been best would be to sit them all down and give them a sensable lecture about improper behavior and let it go at that.
We should NEVER apply laws to children that were put into the law books with the aim being to control adult preditors.
Kevin commented on Oct 03 09 at 5:37 pmComments I agree with Lula 100%, I am a 19 year old male who was sexually molested at 13 years old, I have met literally “more people who WERE molested that were not as a pre teen or in their early teens”
The sex offender registry does not work at all, nobody uses it to verify the safety of their neighborhood, or to screen day cares or babysitters, but instead it is just clearly a way to embarrass offenders as retaliation. and to force them to move out of the area. Problem is, instead it forces them to provide false information to the authorities and causes them to not be eligable for any decent paying jobs, thus forcing them to work entry level jobs which ironically are mostly filled with our younger workers. Giving them an excuse for why they are surrounded by young boys and girls. SEX OFFENDER REGISTRY SHOULD BE MADE AVAILABLE TO LAW ENFORCEMENT ONLY







