Bonding With Baby, Perhaps a Little Too Soon
Finding out the sex of your baby — as Jeanne recently pointed out in this post — can be a dicey proposition, for many reasons. But one key one? The sense of attachment we sometimes develop to our kids, even when they’re still in utero.
A reader to the New York Times Motherlode blog, Amanda Goehring, wrote a thoughtful letter to blogger Lisa Belkin about the bond she formed with her unborn daughter. Or rather, the daughter she thought she was having. Times blogger Belkin shared Goehring’s response in its entirety, in which she talks about her despair once she realized — courtesy of an ultrasound a few weeks before her due date — that the little girl named Lucille she believed to be growing inside her was actually a boy.
“I cried all the way home. I cried for two weeks. I tried to will the baby I was carrying to be a girl, to be Lucille. But he had never been Lucille. I realized, to my disorientation, that I had never known my unborn child, hadn’t known the first thing about him. There was a stranger inside of me, a stranger with a penis.”
Now, some people might read that and think she sounds a little melodramatic. But I understand what it feels like to imagine the lives we might lead with our kids even before they start. Like Goehring, I also thought I was having a girl during my first pregnancy. But unlike Goehring — who was told during her 20-week sonogram that her child was definitely female — that notion was quickly proven false early on, so I didn’t spend months looking forward to the fun “girl” things I would do with my daughter once she showed up on planet Earth.
After reading this post and reflecting on my own pregnancy behavior, I initially wondered if it’s healthy for potential parents to spend too much time fantasizing about what our relationships with our children might be like — the flouncy gingham dresses they might wear, or the baseball games they might play in. Gender expectations aside, are we already imposing certain expectations on our children by doing this, before they even have a chance to be born and report for life duty?
After thinking about it more, though, I realized it’s inevitable. Every parent who is expecting a child — carrying one, about to adopt one or anticipating one from a surrogate — can’t help but do a little excited, advance planning. You can’t wait to sit down and watch “The Wizard of Oz” with them one day. You know, for certain, that you’ll want to expose him to music and that, as a result, he’ll become a world renowned pianist.
Of course, none of us know. And all the pre-birth stuff is just a little game we play, one that — in cases like Goehring’s — can sometimes lead to temporary heartbreak when we realize our child is not at all what we imagined. But it’s human nature. We can’t help it.
Envisioning how wonderful our babies will be is the great, pre-parental hope. And finding out how wonderfully different they are than everything we ever dreamed? Well, that’s one of life’s most joyous surprises.
Related Posts:- The Internet Really Can Do Everything, Even Help Deliver Babies
- Blogger Fakes Baby Death
- Police Say Mom Left Daughter On Street Corner
- Duggar Boys Help Save Girl
- Dad and Daughter Busted Over Kidnapping Prank
Tags: Amanda Goehring, expectations for children, gender, in utero, Jen Chaney, Lisa Belkin, motherlode, New York Times, pregnancy, pregnant
3 Comments
michele commented on Jul 05 09 at 10:52 pmI was told from my 6th month until the day my baby was born that I was having a girl. I was a high risk pregnancy (I’m a diabetic) and I had ultrasounds and 3D ultrasounds until I think I swam in that jelly. The day I gave birth, I had an ultrasound that morning. . . yep. Still a girl. Still my Emily.
Yeah. And out came Oliver.
Heartbroken doesn’t even BEGIN to describe my feelings. . . throw a huge amount of guilt in there, too. Guilt because I SHOULD be happy and thrilled to have a healthy baby boy.. but I missed my Emily.
Seven months later, I’m so in love with my Oliver. . . but I still wonder what Emily would have been like.
If we have another child, I don’t want to know what the sex will be. I don’t want to get that attached to a mistake again.
TolaniLucia commented on Jul 06 09 at 1:31 pmI don’t blame a woman one tiny bit for being shocked, angry, sad,or disappointed, upon finding out the gender of the child she was having was in fact not. I was in a funny place due to me being very neurotic and convincing myself that the ultrasound tech was wrong. i feel for any couple who is greeted by this surprise. Later it will not matter but at the time I am sure it blows. Especially if you have done a ton of decorating and shopping.
ChiLaura commented on Jul 06 09 at 3:36 pmOur ultrasound says “boy,” but I want a girl. If the u/s is wrong, I will be pleasantly surprised! =) That said, I’m somewhat glad that we found out now that we’re having a boy (our third boy, btw). I had a fear that if I thought it was a girl and it turned out to be a boy, I would have a terrible reaction in the delivery room for which my husband would never forgive me, and that I might have a hard time bonding. Now that I know that it’s a boy, I’ve dealt with the disappointment, and it’s no big deal. This may be one reason not to find out with future children, though. If the u/s were to say “girl” and it was wrong, it’d be really difficult. My husband always wants to know, but maybe for #4, I’ll be able to convince him that a surprise would be better.








