A Jackson Bombshell: Debbie Rowe - “I Want My Kids”
There has been much speculation about if Debbie Rowe will try to fight for custody of the two children she had on behalf of Michael Jackson. Now word is coming straight from the source – Debbie Rowe herself. Rowe told KNBC in an exclusive 90-minute phone interview that “I want my children.”
There has been speculation that Rowe was not actually the biological mother. Addressing this Rowe said she will submit to any and all testing such as a DNA test to prove that she is in fact the mother to Jackson’s two older children. Although Rowe is supposedly only the mother to two of the three children, she is concerned about splitting up the trio.
Also in the conversation she said that she would seek a restraining order to keep Joe Jackson, Michael Jackson not-so-beloved father, away from the children.
Related Posts:
Michael Jackson is the Real Dad: Proof
Michael Jackson’s Baby Daddy Revealed
Debbie Rowe Was Just a Surogate
Related Posts:- No Joe! Debbie Rowe & Michael’s Mom Make A Secret Deal
- Michael Jackson News - Debbie Rowe Was Just a Surrogate!
- UPDATE: Who Will Take Care of Michael Jackson’s Kids?
- Mother of Jackson’s Kids Says He’s Not the Father
- Michael Jackson’s Baby Daddy Revealed!
Tags: custosy, Debbie Rowe, Debbie Rowe wants kids, michael jackson, Michael Jackson's kids
11 Comments
[...] [...]
Michael Jackson Custody Battle: Debbie Rowe & Katherine Jackson Have Secret Meeting | Strollerderby commented on Jul 13 09 at 1:27 pmSouthernGurl commented on Jul 02 09 at 2:37 pmDebbie is such a money-hungry, selfish bitch.
Mistress_Scorpio commented on Jul 02 09 at 4:29 pmLets see, gave up parental rights for a pile of money, not once, but twice. Yeah, I can see how Debbie Rowe would be a much better choice as parent. Way to pick over the corpse. Joe Jackson should be kept away from those kids, but so should Rowe.
Knitty commented on Jul 02 09 at 5:15 pmI’d rather see Miss Rowe with the kids than the man who used and abused Michael Jackson or the woman who stood by and allowed it to happen.
Regardless of who is awarded custody, I’d hate to see those kids split up.
Mistress_Scorpio commented on Jul 02 09 at 6:17 pmKatherine Jackson hasn’t lived with Joe Jackson for over a decade.
Brett Singer commented on Jul 02 09 at 9:41 pmDoesn’t she have certain rights as the biological mother? Or does the will trump that?
Mistress_Scorpio commented on Jul 02 09 at 11:05 pmShe recieved money to relinquish her parental rights. I don’t know how she goes about reversing that and also getting rights to a child that is not hers biologically to boot.
debbie m commented on Jul 03 09 at 10:01 amif debbie rowe who gave up her rights to those children for money gets custody then there truly is no justice. michaels wishes should be honored. debbie rowe excepted money for those children i dont even consider her their mother. she is a money hungry, pathetic excuse for a humaqn being. for gods even the blind can see they are better off with the family they have only known, their grandmother, nanny, and ms ross. lets try debbie as hard as it may be since dollar signs are in your eyes to do what is best for these children. let michaels wishes be honored.
Knitty commented on Jul 03 09 at 10:56 amThe will doesn’t trump anything, Brett. Children are not objects and can not be willed to anyone. A judge will look at all the options and decide where the kids go based on the best interests of the child. He’s got one hell of a task in front of him, because I don’t think a nearly 90-year-old or the woman who sold them are especially great choices. My take? The older two will go to Debbie Rowe unless someone is able to prove that she’s an unfit parent (and no, “she sold them” won’t be a legal argument against her. Legally you can’t sell people, including children, so whatever arrangement she and MJ made, it didn’t involve cash for kids.) Morally, I agree, it’s a big problem.
JOE commented on Jul 05 09 at 10:35 pmIs Debbie Rowe a lesbian?
Louise commented on Jul 06 09 at 1:04 amI don’t see that Michael offering millions of dollars to buy/get custody is any less a low act by a parent than Debbie Rowe taking the money. What sort of a ‘father’ would do that? Why should his wishes be honored? Debbie Rowe shouldn’t get custody because she has proven to be an unfit parent by allowing a probably pedophile contact with her children in the first place. But Michael Jackson with his baby dangling and “all the rest” and his family aren’t necessarily any better.
