Michael Jackson: Pedophile or Attachment Parent?

Posted by Shannon LC Cate on June 30th, 2009 at 3:45 pm

187001ADuring the past week I’ve heard and read countless references to Michael Jackson’s supposed pedophilia.  Everything from throw-away wisecracks and bad jokes to mean-spirited claims to being glad he is dead due to his abuse of children have been popping up everywhere, it seems.

Now, I’m not a big Michael Jackson fan, though I grew up in the 80’s, as surrounded by his music as any other kid.  I’m also not interested in defending his parenting choices–from conception to daily life–though I’ll admit I think keeping his children’s faces out of the media is admirable by comparison to most celebrity parents.  But I am troubled by this constant stream of assumptions that Jackson was a sexual abuser of children, just because he had kids sleep over at his house–and yes, even in his bed.

A few years ago, Martin Bashir’s documentary was supposed to be damning evidence that Michael Jackson’s interest in children was inappropriate.  But I have to tell you that when I watched it, especially the part specifically addressing Jackson’s sleepovers, I was underwhelmed.  What Jackson says doesn’t strike me as a far cry from what many attachment parenting devotees claim about sleep sharing and making children’s needs for bonding and security a priority.  For example, Jackson tears up as he passionately tells Bashir:

“People don’t even eat with their fathers anymore or their mothers…They want love, they want to be touched, they want to be held… The family bond has been broken…it’s destroying our world.  We need to bond again.”

Sounds perfectly reasonable to me.  And I’m not even a co-sleeping mom.  Later, Bashir tries to get Jackson to see how abnormal adults and children sleeping together is, but Michael isn’t buying.  “You don’t sleep with your kids?”  he asks.  And personally I find Bashir’s response far less believable than anything Jackson has told him: “No! I would never dream of sleeping with my kids” he emphatically insists.  As a parent, I find that really hard to believe.

But even the question of kids sleeping with adults other than their parents isn’t a big stumper for me.  As I said, we’re not a co-sleeping family (99% of the time), but we have friends who are.  If my kids were to have sleep-overs with such friends, I’d be neither shocked nor horrified to hear my kids snuggled down with their friends and their parents.  I’ve done overnight child care for others and slept with those children–who were undoubtedly more in need of comfort with their parents away for the night.

But I suppose Jackson is right when he says “People always have a judgment about anything you do…  Everything is strange to somebody.”

Strange is all well and good.  We’re all entitled to our own sense of the normal and our own decisions about what’s best for our kids.  But to call someone a pedophile is hostile and inappropriate–especially when he was never found guilty of any such thing and is now beyond defending himself.

But that’s just my opinion.  Watch this piece of the Bashir interview and tell me what you see:

See Also:

MJ, Alleged Pedophile: A New Angle

pixelstats trackingpixel

Related Posts:
Ԫ

56 Comments

[...] Michael Jackson: Pedophile or Attachment Parent? | Strollerderby [...]

New baby? Don’t forget your partner. | Parenting Help in Iowa commented on Jul 01 09 at 8:58 pm

Well said!

Lindsay commented on Jun 30 09 at 4:19 pm

Posted this link in another thread. I felt the same way you did, until I considered this other perspective. http://www.racialicious.com/2009/06/29/michael-jackson-is-dead/#more-2562

Mistress_Scorpio commented on Jun 30 09 at 4:22 pm

Sleeping with your own children is very, very different than sleeping with someone else’s children, in my opinion. And, I would *not* be on-board with my daughter sleeping in a bed with friends’ parents, co-sleeping or not. I co-sleep now, to some extent, with my 2 year old, but by the time she is old enough to go to sleepovers, I expect that practice will come to an end. Even so, it’s a different vibe between parents and their own children. Michael’s comments about love and bonding may be earnest and honest, but many pedophiles might have their crimes stems from the same feelings. Acting wrongly on justifiable feelings is still wrong.

GP commented on Jun 30 09 at 4:58 pm

I was 16 when “Thriller” came out. I loved him. But I wouldn’t let my children within a mile of that man (when he was alive). I agree completely with GP. And the fact that this supposed smart man could not figure out that actually admitting to sleeping with children was wrong creeps me out on so many levels.

Sheri commented on Jun 30 09 at 5:56 pm

Yu’re kidding, right? You would let your son sleep with another kids dad and mom? You know men get erections during the night, right? You know that most kdis are molested by someone they know and trust, right? You need to grow up. Many, many people over the years have spoke out against that man. Many did not ask for a penny or turned him down. They just wanted justice. They did not get it. I cant believe that even now people like you want to let that pedophile off the hook.

Ali commented on Jun 30 09 at 7:19 pm

Yeah, I don’t want my kids sleeping in a bed with other adults, no matter who it is.

Brett Singer commented on Jun 30 09 at 7:22 pm

If some good friends of mine were taking care of my kids over night and my kids crawled into bed with them for comfort it wouldn’t trouble me in the tiniest degree. But I grew up in a house where we all had to share our beds when the relatives came to visit because there was no such thing as a guest room. Sharing beds with friends and extended family was pretty normal in my house. And we were not “co-sleepers.”

Shannon LC Cate commented on Jun 30 09 at 7:29 pm

Oh, Shannon, I think it’s time to yell it! Yell it with me! “YOU! ARE! NOT! SLEEPING! WITH! MY! GODDAMN! DAUGHTER!”

marthalucille commented on Jun 30 09 at 7:40 pm

When I watched the Bashir documentary, the thing that jumped out at me when Jackson “teared up” over broken family bonds was that this was coming from someone who intentionally excluded his childrens’ mothers from being a part of their lives.

lauren commented on Jun 30 09 at 8:05 pm

Agreed, Lauren. I thought about that too. But on the other hand, his kids were born via surrogacy to women who had no intention of playing a role in the children’s lives. I’ve been beaten up here by readers insisting that surrogates aren’t mothers (I think they are). I don’t much hold with creating children to have built-in alienation from their genetic progenitors, which is why I say above I wouldn’t defend his conception choices. But plenty of people who consider themselves “normal” vis a vis someone like Michael Jackson also intentionally exclude surrogates, gamete donors and birth family from their children’s lives–and still, no doubt see themselves as having strong, loving family bonds.

Shannon LC Cate commented on Jun 30 09 at 8:15 pm

I don’t know. Is is child abuse to shower with your 2 year old? How about your 10 year old? How about your friend’s 10 year old? There are blurry lines between sexual abuse and some parenting practices, some of which are admittedly cultural. However, it is naive to pretend these lines don’t exist when child abuse is such a common phenomenon. Personally, I wish I could still enjoy MJ’s music, but for me settled out of court doesn’t mean totally innocent. I really wish I felt differently about it, because I miss the music, but listening to his music makes me sad, not happy.

Marj commented on Jun 30 09 at 8:19 pm

when my son was younger, the prerequisite for him to sleep over at someone else’s house was that he would be allowed in their bed, and they would feel comfortable with it. we were a co-sleeping family, and my son was pretty high needs at night, and i knew he would need to sleep with another adult if he was going to make it through the night without us. my feeling is that if you don’t trust adult friends to sleep in the same bed with your kids, why on earth would you trust them with your kid sleeping one room away? which is not to say that i would have trusted my kids to spend the night in michael jackson’s bed — i would have needed to judge that by knowing him personally, which obviously i did not. but if i did not trust him with my kids in his bed, i sure as hell wouldn’t have trusted him with my kids down the hall. and if i *did* trust him with the kids down the hall, i would be equally fine with them in his bed.

marta commented on Jun 30 09 at 8:38 pm

“if i did not trust him with my kids in his bed, i sure as hell wouldn’t have trusted him with my kids down the hall”

What Marta said. Exactly. And I might or might not let my kids sleep over with MJ. Again what Marta said–it would depend on him, not on the sleeping arrangements per se. And I didn’t know him, so I don’t know.

Shannon LC Cate commented on Jun 30 09 at 8:49 pm

Good point, Marta. I have no idea what really went on with MJ and any children he spent time with, but on the general question of bed sharing, I would be ok with it under some circumstances. If my kids sleep at my parents house without us, my mother usually ends up comforting them by sleeping in bed between them. Of course, she’s their grandmother, but I would want any of my close friends to do the same if they cried at night. My kids are not yet three, and I don’t know if I would feel the same way when they are twelve. Still, it doesn’t seem out of the realm of possibility that someone could think a child who has been through a lot could benefit from the safety and security of sleeping with an adult.

Manjari commented on Jun 30 09 at 9:19 pm

Sorry, I think it is odd and inappropriate for a kid old enough to sleep over at a friend’s to need to sleep with an adult. There is a difference between parents and other adults that I believe is huge. Adults aren’t interchangeable. Perhaps this sense of interchangeability of adults is resulting from the preponderance of daycare babies and the whole “it takes a village” concept. Not for me. Parents are special. Above and beyond just another “trusted” adult.

GP commented on Jun 30 09 at 10:29 pm

“I cant believe that even now people like you want to let that pedophile off the hook.” Even now? You mean now that he’s DEAD? Really Ali, give it a rest. The man is gone and it’s between him and his maker now.

Knitty commented on Jun 30 09 at 10:35 pm

The Bible says “the wages of sin are death.” I would say MJ’s sins are paid. The Christian thing to do would be to forgive, right? At any rate, I am personally not sure if he was a pedophile or not. I don’t think a child needs to share a bed with anyone other than their parents, to a certain age and then maybe another child.

Mistress_Scorpio commented on Jul 01 09 at 8:23 am

I think he did *something*. I don’t personally believe he did what he was accused of, but who knows. He definitely slept in the same bed with other people’s children, which is at best strange. That never would have happened without those kids’ parents allowing it to happen.

Brett Singer commented on Jul 01 09 at 10:21 am

I haven’t seen this abundance of stories regarding Michaels alleged pedophillia. In fact, it seems to me that the press is making him out to be St. Michael. I would be suspicious of the motives of any grown man who would share his bed with children who are not his own. My son who is 11, often sleeps in my bed, but I can assure you, he would not have slept in Michael Jackson’s. Whether Michael Jackson was a pedophille, I cannot say. However, such things as the constant reshaping of his face, to the false high speaking voice (it had to be an affectation), to naming his home Neverland, indicate a troubled mind. All that, taken in consideration with his proclivity for sleepovers with prepubescent boys makes it seem much more likely to me that he was an abuser than that he was not.

A Father commented on Jul 01 09 at 10:49 am

I think it would be very strange and inappropriate for a child to sleep in the same bed as their friend’s parents under most circumstances. Frankly, I don’t like the idea of kids going on sleep-overs, and have to believe that most co-sleeping families would feel the same way. Attachment parenting is supposed to happen within a family unit, isn’t that the whole point? I agree 100% with the commenter who suggests that a child who still needs physical comfort to sleep through the night is not ready to go on a sleep-over outside of his/her home.

As for whether or not he was guilty of molesting children, I don’t know. But Maureen Orth’s coverage of the trial in Vanity Fair included some very damning evidence that I am reluctant to dismiss. http://www.vanityfair.com/fame/features/2005/07/orth200507

Elise commented on Jul 01 09 at 1:39 pm

If I did not do anything wrong with a child, I would fight it rather than paying them millions of dollars to drop everything. This just shows me that he was guilty the first time. The second time they probably thought they would also get their payday. Unfortunately they could not prove the obvious. Michael Jackson, although being a great talent, was a sick and twisted human being. Wake up people!!!!!!!!!

DEREK commented on Jul 06 09 at 12:20 am

‘Co-sleeping’ is the most disturbing term I’ve seen since ‘Baby’s Momma’(not to mention the worst thing you could do as a parent if you are truly interested in raising a strong, independent human being). Proper Human behavior will not be re-defined by the twisted left liberal. I as a parent I did not whip with a belt, as my father did– but I recently thanked him for doing so cuz I eat all that is put in front of me, treat my woman as a gift and say ‘thankyou’ and ‘please’ when appropriate. I also learned to never back down from anybody that threatens these values.I am also a devout atheist. Amen

James Reising commented on Jul 06 09 at 5:43 pm

An analogy: Every weekend a suburban woman goes to a street corner known to be frequented by prostitutes. She gets picked up by cruising men who drive her to nearby motels. Before they return her to the same street corner, they give her money. She tells people that she never has sex with the men. Never touches them. Never blows them. Never lets them put their hands on her. She just talks to them. They simply drive around. She feels compassion for the men. They’re lonely. She tells them about Jesus. She wants to help them. She doesn’t understand why all those around her suspect she’s a whore.

Jackson engaged in equally outrageous (and suspicion generating) actions—many of them characteristic of pedophiles—and then he is shocked—shocked!—that people might suspect that he is, well, a pedophile. And the power disparity between Jackson and the children who visited his bedroom for “sleep-overs” is enormous. A wealthy man in his forties was bringing children unrelated to him into his bedroom alone overnight. A person needs to absorb the import of that before suggesting that the suspicion directed toward Jackson is unreasonable and based on animus.

Furthermore, to treat pedophile-suspicion directed toward Michael Jackson as a form of persecution is to tell people it is wrong to speak plainly about what is evident. Jackson lived his life in ways characteristic of a pedophile. It doesn’t mean that he was one. It means that there is a real probability that he was one. No adult male gets to bring unrelated children into his bedroom alone overnight without suspicion being rendered by other adults. It would be a monstrous dereliction of duty toward the children involved not to cast that suspicion. And it would be Orwellian not to speak to others plainly about it.

I understand “innocent until proven guilty.” But I sure the hell wouldn’t have had him anywhere near my children. And the children that he did bring around him were oftentimes hugely vulnerable (cancer patients; boys of poor single mothers). An adult single male obsessed with Peter Pan and decorating his bedroom with children’s toys was bringing kids into his bedroom for “sleep-overs.” That should set off five alarm predator worries in any sane parent who is not stupid or tempted by greed. And Jackson showed zero evidence of having any serious impulse control. The older I get, the less patience I have for bullshitters. Michael Jackson was, in my view, a huge bullshitter who got away with spectacular amounts of bullshit. It’s like Rush Limbaugh, G. Beck, and Jimmy Swaggart. Everyday, bullshitters look at their bank accounts and say, “How stupid people are!” This, in my view, was what Jackson was doing. He was using his fame and wealth and “mystery power” to get away with things. It’s an old game. If you dress like a glitzy version of Captain Crunch (as Chris Rock noted that Jackson did), or put on the clothing of a priest, or have money, then you can cast spells on people and get away with stuff.

A concerned parent commented on Jul 07 09 at 8:38 am

Well what do you expect him to say? It’s absolutely expectable that he would defend himself and come up with all that crap about honest love and children in need to be “touched”. I guess most of pedos would tell you that. I am parent and I tell you: NOONE in earth would be alloud to spend a night in same bed with my children except for my wife!!!
I can show love and care to other children in many ways ( give them a nice word, making cookies etc) without sharing a bed with them.

moris commented on Jul 07 09 at 9:40 pm

Shannon,
You must be kidding me. Michael Jackson comes off as a card carrying member of NAMBLA who’s trying to justify his contact with young boys.
And you say you are a parent. Scary how can people be so naive.

USA1968 commented on Jul 07 09 at 11:46 pm

i think micheal was clueless, lonely and wrong about co-sleeping. I however don’t believe he was a pedophile. he was clueless.

psychic commented on Jul 08 09 at 3:20 am

sorry, i meant not a pedophile…or atleast he didin’t believe he was, he was clueless.

psychic commented on Jul 08 09 at 3:24 am

I would give you $27 million to sleep with your young son………..

Tiny Tim commented on Jul 08 09 at 9:36 am

There’s a huge difference between sharing a bed and moving in with a child and his mother, and living in that child’s room for many months. I wanted so much to believe MJ was innocent but a lot of reading lately has made it abundantly clear that he wasn’t. I started here: http://www.vanityfair.com/online/politics/2009/06/michael-jackson-is-gone-but-the-sad-facts-remain.html

Sarah commented on Jul 08 09 at 2:52 pm

I was and still am a huge fan of Michael Jackson’s music. However, I can distinguish between his musical talents, and his mental health disorders. Michael Jackson suffered from what is known in the mental health world as Major Depressive Disorder. That was his primary disorder. He also suffered from many personality disorders, including: Body Dismirophic disorder, Anorexia Disorder, Gender Identity Disorder, Impluse Disorder, Anxiety Disorder, Somatic Disorder, pain disorder, and of course Pedophila. Michael Jackson settled a court case for over 20 million dolars because of his doccumented relationship with Jordi Chandler-a 14 year old boy. You can go on youtube and watch Michael bouncing the boy on his lap at the music awards. Neverland was all about luring little children over to Michael’s home. I don’t care what anyone says, it’s not okay from a grown man to sleep with little children. You can watch any number of doccumentaries on Jackson’s explotation of children: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LA3BlG8Xxaw

Francis commented on Jul 10 09 at 11:59 pm

It is still strange that he would sleep with children that are not his own! I am sorry but I don’t care how long I know you, I will not leave you alone in bed with my child, man or woman. It is our duty as parents to protect our children no matter what and this behavior is just strange. I saw the same interview in it’s entirety and I can tell you I do not feel the same way at all. I do think that he was a very talented person and no doubt an awesome musician. Now he can truly rest in peace. May his children be taken care of by someone that truly loves them.

Carolina commented on Jul 12 09 at 1:04 pm

ok all of yall need to listen to yourself. Michael Jackson was a good man. But any parent with common sense wouldnot let there child sleepover any GROWN MAN house. They are the ignorant folks. I no if my child would come up to me and say they are sleeping over Prince house I would tell them no cus he is a grown man!!

strong commented on Jul 15 09 at 3:44 pm

One key thing you’re forgetting. A box full of books and magazines were found at the bottom of Michael Jackson’s bed when the search warrent search was enacted prior to his trial. When you tie in him bringing boys into his bed with these books and magazines present, publications that were found upon examination to find both Jackson and several of the boy’s fingerprints prints present in them, there is nothing innocent about this.

Jeff commented on Jul 16 09 at 5:08 pm

And these books had pictures of naked boys

Jeff commented on Jul 16 09 at 5:20 pm

Co-sleeping is not new (the term is, but not the concept). I grew up where we all slept together to conserve heat (only one room was barely heated, so cuddling was required to stay warm enough to sleep during winter nights). In addition, when we were at grandparents or other relatives homes we shared beds with them (even as a teenage girl - nothing ever happened sleeping with dad or grandma). When the power went out and the neighbor boy’s parents weren’t home he even joined us once (without issues — he was a couple years older than me… only issue was we started arguing about who would have to run out to the garage to start the car [for heat] when even body heat stopped keeping us warm enough).
As an adult I still prefer to cuddle– really, who doesn’t when it isn’t too warm?

Cuddling != sex (nudity doesn’t either… I wish people would grow up).

Not having children and doing that isn’t good though due

GetReal commented on Jul 20 09 at 8:00 pm

I’ve heard it is not a good thing to speak bad of the dead. That might be why some media do what they do. One thing that annoys me is that there is mental aspect, the psychology of Michael Jackson, that is not being explored. He was a man that grew up performing and spent his school years being taught by tutors. This “weird” fascination with children and youth has to do with a lost childhood and maybe the forced into sexual roles (i.e. heartthrob, having is masculinity questioned) when he was ready to play or become them. Nostalgia for a life that never was, one that he could then create with Neverland Ranch.

Children that he was probably around the most were his siblings, performers as well. I think he is socially stunted. As an adult he lived in his own world where he made is own rules, he’s less likely to understand or take the advice of those around him. He just doesn’t get it, he smart but when it comes to societal rules he doesn’t get it. He saw himself as a kid, those children around him saw that also, they felt comfortable with him because they seemed equal. It’s easy to conclude pedophilia also, but his logic is working against him. Children are innocent, but as they age into adulthood the characteristic innocence is dropped. The bed is seen as a place where sleep AND sex occur. Some people would conclude that children are not allowed in this place when adults are present. Sex and innocence cannot coexist.

I am at odds with this possible dual personality. I’ve dealt with similar problems (non of which have anything to do with pedophilia) as Michael. It’s hard seeing someone you identify with in a negative way, but I think some of the concepts I’ve discussed should definitely be explored. I would fairly say that him being a pedophile is not concrete label for him. We just see the surface, something is underneath and it may be a different kind of dark, something that could easily not be pedophilia.

Jackie commented on Jul 21 09 at 4:35 am

Comments
It amazes me how far people will go to deny that MJ was a pedophile. He had no interest in grown women or men, surrounded himself with prepubescent boys (not girls) and many, many, MANY people have witnessed his behavior of pedophilia (showering w/ boys naked, in a sleeping back with no underwear with boys). As much as we don’t want to believe it, I think it is ignorant to deny it. We are all mourning a young boy and young man, forgetting that we really had not seen or heard from him in a dozen years musically. But there are reports of his sexual interest in prepubescent boys going as far back as his “Off the Wall” days circa 1980. It is what it is, and he was what he was. And we all, sadly, know it, even if we hate it.

earlybird commented on Jul 26 09 at 10:25 pm

I read that when Michael was a child, because his father was so unloving and his work load so copious, that the only comfort he felt was when he and his brothers would play and bunk together in their hotel rooms when they were on the road - that to him was normal. He was apparently very depressed as a little boy, according to what people have said about him, and that little spark of love and comfort that got from being together with his siblings was more important than anything in the world.

I recently was so tired of hearing people coming up with contradictory quotes about his 2005 trial that I read the complete transcripts over the weekend (with evidence list) and find that what most people believe to be fact is not correct. He actually was in possession of regular old penthouse and other girlie mags (not naked kid photos) or other things that people say. In fact, the evidence against MJ was so poor it’s hard to understand why the case was brought to court at all other than over zealous prosecuting. I think all will become clear as far the accusers are concerned in the next few years.

And I have first hand knowledge that he actually dated women quite a bit back in the 1980’s, visited the Playboy Mansion on occasion, was a guest quite often of the playboy hotel in Miami - there is video to prove it.

carrie commented on Jul 27 09 at 2:34 pm

Comments
I have had other people’s children sleep with me on occasion. I had a friend who was drunk half the time and could or did not want to care for her own kids. They stayed with me countless times. My husband had just died and the children and I bonded very closely. They continually asked if they could sleep in my room with me and my cocker spaniel. Just because you are in the same bed has nothing to do with sex or molestation. I agree whole heartly with Michael on this one. We all need to be loved and have someone we can trust. Take the sex and violence out of the mmovies and off TV and maybe just maybe we can clean some of these flithy minded people up. Sex is everywhere, everyday so people assume that is the way everyone acts towards others and that is not the case. There are still wonderful people out there with good intentions (as I think was the case with Michael) unforunately there are a few (especially the media and some high powered attorney’s with dollar signs in their eyes) that ruin it for the common good spirited person. Love is far greater than hate and maybe someday this country will move back in that direction, If we don’t this contry is doomed to fail just like the rest of the great nations of the world.

Karen commented on Aug 19 09 at 10:10 am

Beautiful blog. Michael has been portrayed so unfairly. Michael is right about children and parents not eating together and about love and affection. I think parents spend too much time working to buy things instead of spending time with their children. I, too, think the comments expressing joy at his passing are disgusting. Why do people still feel the need to berate someone who has gone?

Thank you.

Me commented on Sep 03 09 at 5:10 am

The argument about an innocent Michael should have fought the first charges instead of paying, but if I were the parent of Jordan Chandler, I would’ve rather seen my son’s abuser go to jail than accept the money. I do believe Mike’s insurance company paid the settlement.

Me commented on Sep 03 09 at 5:16 am

Good point! Since Michael Jackson’s death, I’ve tried to really look into the facts of the cases filed against him, and the more I look into them, the more it seems that he was a victim of 1) people who wanted to cash in on him, for the most part, and 2) members of the media, who either deliberately omitted details that pointed to his innocence, or were lazy and assumed things without doing their homework. Today I found a site that talks about both cases. It is definitely pro-Jackson, but if people go through it objectively & with an open mind, they will at least see another side to the story. One page is particularly interesting as it separates the facts of the 1993 case from what the majority of us believe we know about it. Here is the URL in case anyone is interested: http://mjjr.net/content/mjcase/settlement.html

Gail commented on Sep 26 09 at 1:35 pm

SHUT UP. Look, He didnt do anything. You can’t judge somebody unless you personally know them. ANNND YOU NEED TO GET UR FACTS STRAIGHT.THOSE ALLIGATIONS WERE FALSE. IF YOU HAVE NEGATIVE THOUGHTS PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE KEEP THEM TO URSELF AND URSELF ONLY THANK YOU AVE A NICE DAY. He deserves better then to be treated like some criminal and when you meet him and what he tells YOU is what You canl post.!!

Billie and Jean commented on Sep 30 09 at 6:17 pm

All you ignorant fools should actually research the cases before passing judgment or else say you don’t know if he’s guilty or not because you don’t know the evidence. There is no evidence that Michael Jackson ever molested anyone other than the words of proven and admitted liars who couldn’t keep their lies straight under oath. If they had evidence in 1993, Sneddon would have arrested Michael Jackson and charged him with child molestation, instead the police investigation went on for more than a year and no charges were ever brought. Jackson was found not guilty in 2005 because he was NOT GUILTY. The prosecution presented NO evidence to support Gavin Arvizo’s claims that Michael Jackson molested him. Instead all the evidence, even the prosecution’s ‘evidence’ pointed to the fact that Gavin and his family were a bunch con-artists trying to pull the biggest con of their careers with the help of the mainstream media. People like to claim Michael Jackson was a pedophile based on these idiotic lines of reasoning.
1. “He’s spends time with kids instead of women, therefore he is a child molester”. If so how come all the kids he spends time with aren’t accusing him? How come all the victims that exist in your imaginations never come forward with allegations. He’s had thousands of kids at Neverland over the years, and only three accusers, all whose parents happen to be con-artists chasing after money.
2. “He paid them off so he’s guilty.” Do you know the difference between a civil case and criminal case. WTF is something as serious as child molestation doing in civil court instead of criminal court. If you think someone molested your kid you go straight to the cops, you don’t call your lawyer and file a lawsuit and then refuse to cooperate with the police once you get a settlement. Explain to me where in the settlement http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/0616041jacko1.html does it say the money is contingent upon the accusers failure to cooperate with the police. It was the Chandler’s decision and theirs alone to run after taking the money. If you bother to read it (I know its to difficult for idiots) you’d notice MJ claimed he’s innocent in the settlement and accuser and his lawyers agreed to sign it. By this idiotic logic, Janet Arvizo and her children were telling the truth when they claimed that a JC Penny’s security guard beat and sexually abused her because JC Penny settled with her for more than 100,000. Please.
3. “He had money so he beat the rap.” Martha Stewart, Paris Hilton, Chris Brown, Madoff, etc. I guess did not have enough money to beat the rap. Michael Jackson’s trial was one of the most expensive trial in U.S. History. It cost taxpayers 2.7 million dollars. http://news.softpedia.com/news/Michael-Jackson-s-Trial-Costs-2-7-million-5327.shtml Sneddon had been chasing after Michael Jackson for 12 years and he still could not find any evidence or credible witnesses, despite ransacking Neverland twice with 70 police officers, setting up a hotline for alleged victims to come forward, and traveling around the world looking for victims.
4. “OJ Simpson got away with it, so Michael Jackson got away with it too.” People who think OJ is guilty can point to evidence, something that MJ haters have a hard time doing. By that same logic, Charles Manson is also innocent because some people are wrongfully convicted. Therefore, we should release all convicted criminals from prison.
5. “He sleeps with boys.” This is not illegal. If you want to use this as proof of his guilt, then at a minimum the boys he’s sleeping with have to be the ones accusing him, NOT you. This didn‘t happen in the Michael Jackson case, contrary to popular belief. Gavin Arvizo the boy accusing him in 2005 never slept in bed with Michael Jackson, according to the Martin Bashir interview and witnesses at the trial. He slept in the guest room with his family. Macaulay Culkin, Wade Robson, and Bert Lewis, all testified they slept with Jackson in the early 90s and nothing happened. Do you know better than them what happened to them? Jordie Chandler (the boy got the settlement in the early 90s) skipped the country so he wouldn’t have to testify in the 2005 case. Gee, I wonder why?
6. “There was ‘lurid’ testimony. ‘Little boys never lie’. When a child speaks we should believe them…” I can give lurid testimony about you too. I wonder if that makes it true. Here’s one of my favorites from you tube. On the witch hunt for victims Diane Diamond comes across a boy who could give ‘lurid testimony’ that Michael Jackson molested him and details of his time at Neverland. She believed him and wasted months trying to corroborate his story and even gets the police involved. Turned out this kids a liar who’d never even met Michael Jackson. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M3GbPkR-ne4

the truth commented on Oct 05 09 at 2:44 am

Also if you think he’s guilty read the ‘The Michael Jackson Conspiracy’ by Aphrodite Jones for the 2005 case and ‘Redemption’ by Geraldine Hughes. If you have time to kill, read Diane Dimond’s ‘Be Careful Who you love’ in conjunction with Aphrodite Jone’s book. You’d see how pathetic she is in her attempt to paint Michael Jackson as a pedophile. One of my friends read only her book and came to the conclusion that Jackson was INNOCENT. Aphrodite Jones uses court transcripts to prove her case, Dimond focuses only on’lurid’ testimony given by proven and admitted liars and spends most of her book doing mental gynastics and proposing conspiracy theories to explain how these people could actually be telling the truth. Michael Jackson haters who insist that he’s a pedophile are even more delusional than his most devouted fans who think that he’s a saint.

the truth commented on Oct 05 09 at 2:55 am

I can’t believe that some people actually think it’s okay for children to sleep in the same bed as non-relative adults! I have ALWAYS allowed my OWN kids to sleep in the bed with me when they wished to, but no WAY would I feel comfortable with a strange kid in my bed or my kid in another adult’s bed! It’s not just a question of potential sexual molestation (although this is the most serious aspect) but also just the fact of it being unseemly, even unhygienic! Adults have sex in their beds, fart in their beds, etc (sorry to be graphic, but it’s true!) and it’s one thing to share these germs with your own kin, but with strangers?? I simply can not IMAGINE my husband, in his boxer shorts, settling down for bed at night with the 6 year-old daughter of the next door neighbour in his bed! Not only would it repulse him for personal reasons, but I’m sure he would be terrified, as any sane man would be, of the potential accusations that could be thrown his way as a result! Furthermore, I would be a nervous WRECK if I thought my kids were curling up in bed at night with some other kid’s parents, especially someone’s father! I KNOW I don’t molest children, but how can I be sure about anyone else? One poster said that if you don’t trust your kid to sleep over in the same bed with the adults at someone’s house, then how can you trust them sleeping down the hall? Well, my answer to that is simply that if a child is down the hall, an adult, if in fact they are a predator, has to at least risk waking up the other residents of the house in order to get to your child, whereas, if they are already in BED with your child, they can molest them without waking anyone up - even the victim! Furthermore, as someone else pointed out, men develop erections during the night, so would you really want to risk your child rubbing up against some strange guy’s erection, even if his intention WASN’T to molest them? Frankly, the whole thing is RIDICULOUS! There is an enormous difference between adults sleeping with their own offspring and sleeping with the children of strangers, and anyone who can’t see this is living in ga-ga land! As to Michael Jackson - same rules apply to him. If he wanted to sleep with/comfort his own children at night that’s fine, but with a huge ranch packed with amenities and guest-rooms, there’s really no reason on earth why he needed to share his bed with other people’s children!

Sarah commented on Nov 11 09 at 11:03 am

Two seperate issues here.
First. Yes, Michael Jackson was unusual in that he was more comfortable with children than adults and in his inability to see why other people would be upset and suspicious of children sleeping over in his room. He was childlike in his behavior when around children (and some adults). He was a grown man who liked childish activities. That may make some uncomfortable, it may creep some people out. But, none of the above traits are typical of pedophiles. Whether you think his behavior is strange or not, it is a seperate issue from the accusation of being a child molestor.
He was proven innocent of the charges in 2005. The DA put out ads to find more children to testify. With the thousands of children that had been to Neverland, they could find no other credible accusers. The child and his family in 1993 lieft the country so they wouldn’t have to testify in court. You can believe what you want about Michael Jackson, but I hate to see people use the fact that he was childlike to prove he was a pedophile. It is illogical and unfair.

Rose commented on Nov 14 09 at 10:17 pm

People need to do their research before calling MJ a paedophile. People are so ignorant. He was innocent and the victim of two greedy families who craved fame and fortune and were too lazy to work for a living. As above read redemption by geraldine hughes, read conspiracy by aphrodite jones and mary fischer article for GQ magazine for a start. I hope none of the haters on here get accused of such crimes.

Jan commented on Dec 18 09 at 1:36 pm

The haters need to look at these then apologise:
explosivemuzik.com/2009/07/01/video-michael-jackson-the-footage-you-were-never-meant-to-see/
site2.mjeol.com/video/video-2005-mesereau-had-witnesses-ready-to-testify-against-chandler.html
newswithviews.com/Tong/dean117
The Untold Story of Neverland dvd by Larry Nimmer.

Jan commented on Dec 18 09 at 1:41 pm

ITS A DISGRACE MICHAEL IS TOTALLY INNOCENT HOW MANY TIMES DOES IT HAVE TO PROVED LEAVE HIM ALONE IT WAS ALL ABOUT MONEY AND DESTROYONG MICHAEL IT DID NOT WORK AND HATERS NEED TO LOOK AT THEMSELVES AND ASK WHAT GOOD HAVE THEY DONE FOR THIS WORLD MICHAEL GAVE EVERYTHING

TRUE-TO -YOU commented on Dec 18 09 at 2:01 pm

Ignorant people cannot be told they are ignorant. It is a shame that individuals who are uneducated, undereducated or just plain ingorant in any aspect of Michael Jackson’s life would classify and categorize him as a monster. Quite the opposite. People are fed media lies and half truths- of course there is always the other half of this which is the supportive side that conveniently becomes overlooked or deleted from media journalism. If you really knew Michael Jackson, then you would know that he is not designed for malicious intent. The media craves to sabatoge Michael Jackson because of their envy and jealousy- “Who is going to get the story first”- With the same story, various tabloid and other media outlets graduate the story begin embellishing facts into something so outlandish, it doesn’t even qualify for reading material. If Michael did not open his home and wallet for the children and for the needy, he would certainly be labeled selfish and greedy. But when he did open his home for the same children, he was immediately stamped a child molester and a “creep”. Those are the media’s words- a genuine reflection of what they must think of themselves.
I H U M J

MourningMJ commented on Dec 18 09 at 2:12 pm

WTF DID YOU KNOW HIM PERSONALY HE DIDNT DO ANYTHINK GET YOUR FACTS STRAIGHT THEY WHERE FALSE ALLEGATIONS HE WAS FOUND INNOCENT BECOUSE HE WAS INNOCENT THEY JUST ALL WANTED MONEY THE ROOT OF ALL EVIL AND MAKES PPLS LIFES DESTROYED AS MJS WAS BY THIS FILTH ALL LIES HE IS A KIND CARING LOVING SWEET MAN WHO CARED FOR EVERYBODY HE NEVER USED HATE AS A WEAPON HE WAS RESPECTFULL NOT LIKE THE MEDIA AND YOU SO CALLED FANS MICHAEL I L.O.V.E. YOU MOST YOUR REAL FANS ALWAYS KNEW YOU WHERE INNOCENT YOU ARE THE KING OF KIND

TAY commented on Dec 18 09 at 2:13 pm

Even after his death people keep saying bad things about MIchael. I don’t hear anyone blaming the parents of the children who slept in his bed.These parents trusted him because they knew he would never hurt them. Everything happened with their full consent, even those TWO whose parents afterwards brought MJ down for $$$$ reasons only. Please, people, read the transcripts af the trials. Since you all go to the trouble of posting bad talk, that would be useful and educating for a change. And also look up the definition of a pedophile before you use the word. A pedophile is a predator out for his sexual needs ONLY. He wouldn’nt wait for 2 to 3 years (tha’t how long MJ knew the 2 accusers) to finally abuse a child. Michael had lots of chances if he wanted. And what about the boys that testified “FOR” him in 1993 1nd in 2003?. All these boys grew up and remained friends with him till the end, they and their entire family. These grownup boys were on Larry KIng and on their blogs speaking only good of him. Some of them were at his Memorial and even at his funeral. Please get your facts right!!

kathy 40 commented on Dec 18 09 at 3:30 pm

you people are so ignorant dont believe everythink you read michael is and always was innocent he never judged people you are as bad AS the media stop trippin on michael give him a break michael your the bomb L.OV.E. U MOSTEST

TAY commented on Dec 18 09 at 3:35 pm

All Michael ever tried to do was help people. Criminals wouldn’t have helped people as much as he has. If anyone can not see Michael’s beautiful heart then they have been brainwashed by the media for way too long. Learn to think for yourself or nothing can help you!!

Maura commented on Dec 18 09 at 8:07 pm

Add a Comment



Quick Search



About This Blog
Updated more than twelve times daily by the wittiest parents in the blogosphere, Strollerderby provides a scroll of breaking news, spot-on reviews of entertainment and products, and irreverent discussions of hot topics.

Send tips to strollerderby@babble.com

Click here to read about our bloggers.


Babble BlogS