Kids Forbidden to Bike or Walk to School

Posted by Miriam Axel-Lute on June 26th, 2009 at 5:00 pm

kidonbike Kids Forbidden to Bike or Walk to SchoolHere’s a rich one for our desperate-to-get-the-kids-more-exercise society: In the upstate New York town of Saratoga Springs, children at some schools aren’t allowed to bike or walk to school. In fact, when one student rode to school, with his mother, on a bike path, his bike was confiscated (the rule had never been publicized).

The principal goes on at some length rationalizing the rule. Mostly he’s scared of traffic and stranger abductions.

‘If anything happened, it would weigh on me for the rest of my life,” he said.

It’s easy to fume about the stupidity of this rule—how the cars are what make traffic dangerous and so are the ones that are constrained, and how the whole “stranger danger” thing is overblown (not non-existent, overblown), and in any case, how getting people out of cars and onto bikes and their feet in greater numbers is a (partial) answer to both.

But I keep coming back to that quote of the principal’s and thinking about how it’s a symptom of something larger, not a freakish anomaly. Everywhere I turn, I seem to find choices that are bad in the long term being made—and even worse, being foisted upon others who would have chosen differently—in the name of avoiding ever feeling responsible for having taken a risk.

In this mindset, the ultimate goal is not actually the best outcome possible or even the most reduced risk—it is the absolute avoidance of those risks that can’t be passed off on someone else or accepted by society at large as “something that just happens.”

This mindset is at work every time anything fun and active and educational is canceled for “liability” reasons: swimming outside the ropes in a lake; playing on a school field after school is closed; doing real chemistry experiments. It’s the reason we can drive on the highway with an infant in a car seat (car accidents just happen, you know, like tornadoes), but not let a 10-year-old bike to school. That “if anything happened . . .” phrase comes up in arguments against home birth and cosleeping all the time, with nary an indication that the possible negative effects of the opposite choices might weigh on anyone equally.

Does that principal stay up at night worrying about the children who are getting asthma from unnecessary exposure to school-bus exhaust? The ones getting what used to be called “adult-onset” diabetes as children because they sit on their rumps all day? The ones with a stunted sense of independence because they’ve never ever gone anywhere under their own steam? The one in 50 children who experience major depression? The ones injured by cars on their way to school (one of the most common ways for children to get hurt is dashing across the street after a parent drops them off at school)?

He should, because he has a policy that increases those dangers.

Would he be directly and solely responsible for each individual instance of those problems? Of course not. Just like he wouldn’t be directly responsible for the purported accidents or abductions he fears for students on bikes or feet.

Thing is, his job is not to make risk go away. It’s to make policies that generate the best results for his students over a wide range of scenarios, and leave things that are not his business to parents or the students themselves to weigh. (Though I cringe at the idea, he could even get them to sign a waiver if his faint heart can’t take it.)

I understand it. Risk is scary, and living with yourself when a risk went wrong is very hard. Many people make different choices about what risks are acceptable to them and which ones aren’t, which is fine—if they’re not making those choices for other people.

But trying to insulate ourselves and our children from all responsibility for judicious risk-taking makes our world more dangerous, less healthy, and significantly less free.

Photo CC richardmasoner.

More by this author:

pixelstats trackingpixel

Related Posts:
Ԫ

11 Comments

[...] Kids Forbidden to Bike or Walk to School [...]

Survey Time: What Happened to Your Sex Life After Kids? | Strollerderby commented on Jun 30 09 at 4:15 pm

[...] productive sort of thinking that leads to things like schools banning bikes or walking to school Kids Forbidden to Bike or Walk to School | Strollerderby __________________ The problem here is with "…lukewarm conceptually confused theology [...]

People living in countries with gun control - please chime in - Christian Forums commented on Jul 03 09 at 2:06 am

[...] Kids Forbidden to Bike or Walk to School [...]

Are Children’s Book Authors All Vegetarians? | Strollerderby commented on Jul 27 09 at 1:00 pm

I’m feeling my age as I want to rant about walking 4 miles to elementary school every day growing up, and all by myself no less! No one wants to have anything bad happen to anyone these days, so I guess I’ll just bubble wrap my own kids and never let them out of the house again. There…..everyone feel better?!

http://www.MyToyKitchen.com
Best Selection of Toy Kitchens on the Web!

Toy Kitchen commented on Jun 26 09 at 5:12 pm

the problem is, people sue if their kid gets hurt but not if their kid gets adult onset diabetes. People need to start suing over adult onset diabetes.

carefree childhood commented on Jun 27 09 at 12:40 pm

How can the school dictate what kids do off of school property? Since I am sure the whole walking or biking to school things involves being off school property. This rule will surely bite them in the ass.

Shana commented on Jun 27 09 at 7:43 pm

Shana - my HS declared it had the right to punish you if you were caught smoking off school property outside of school hours (it was in the student conduct code that we, and our parents, had no choice but to sign). But that actually made more sense than this (as it banned doing something illegal - smoking underage is illegal)…he was with his mother for crying out loud!

PlumbLucky commented on Jun 28 09 at 11:22 am

Diabetes has a genetic component - Type 2 as well as Type 1. Who do you suggest we sue for developing this disease? Our parents?

leahsmom commented on Jun 29 09 at 9:28 am

Or maybe, people could try to be just a little bit less litigious and just stop suing over stupid stuff.

Bec commented on Jun 29 09 at 10:31 am

PlumbLucky, my high school had the same policy. Which made sense, but you are right it was for illegal stuff. Both my middle school and high school had a ridiculous rule against hats, even in the winter! To say the least a lot of my friends and I ended having hats confiscated throughout the winter. In my middle school, we weren’t allowed cameras on the last day of school. I have no idea what that was about.

Shana commented on Jun 29 09 at 10:31 am

I’ve been to Saratoga Springs, and even played at the elementry school playground with my kids. The town has sidewalks and pedestrian paths, and if that isn’t a safe community for kids to walk/bike to school, I don’t know what is! Anyway, the school does not act “in loco parentis” until the kids enter the doors, so it really isn’t the Principal’s concern how they get there, as long as they do.

Katie commented on Aug 01 09 at 3:25 am

Add a Comment



Quick Search



About This Blog
Updated more than twelve times daily by the wittiest parents in the blogosphere, Strollerderby provides a scroll of breaking news, spot-on reviews of entertainment and products, and irreverent discussions of hot topics.

Send tips to strollerderby@babble.com

Click here to read about our bloggers.


Babble BlogS