What Will Happen To Michael Jackson’s Kids?
One of the first questions that I thought of upon hearing that Michael Jackson had died was –what will happen to the kids? For an intents and purposes, Michael Jackson was a single parent.
Michael Jackson leaves behind 12-year old Michael Joseph Jackson, Jr., 11-year-old Paris Michael Katherine Jackson, and 7-year-old Prince “Blanket” Michael Jackson II (yeah, no ego in play when naming the kids). The mother of two of his two older children, Debbie Rowe, gave up all her parental rights not once, but twice and she is not in line to take custody. There have been reports that she may get temporary custody until long-term guardians are confirmed. The youngest child “Blanket” was supposedly carried by an anonymous surrogate mother. And there have been some allegations that have arose that the children look absolutely nothing like him but Jackson had publically claimed that he was indeed the father. During his the notorious 2003 interview with Martin Bashir, Jackson stated: “I used a surrogate mother (for Blanket) and my own sperm cells. I had my own sperm cells in my other two children. They are all my children.”
If the biological mothers or Jackson’s family don’t immediately come to take care of the children there’s always their godparents. Mark Lester (the star of Oliver), the godfather of one or two of the children, told MSNBC that he is ready to fulfill his godfatherly duties saying “I’m here for them 24/7, so whatever they need, they’ll get from me.” Also it is reported that Elizabeth Taylor and Macaulay Culkin are godparents to the older children as well. And Michael Jackson just happens to be the godfather to celebrity Nicole Ritchie and to Barry Gibb’s son Michael.
Similar to Michael Jackson’s “ex-wife” Lisa Marie Presley childhood, Jackson’s three children will be growing up in a microscope with the memory of their Dad – a worldwide cultural icon - always haunting them. The children have already had what I’m sure is a surreal existence. Wearing masks when in public, traveling the world, and well…having Michael Jackson as a Dad.
Who do you think the children should go to? Their biological mothers? Michael Jackson’s family? Or to the Godparents?
Below is footage of Jackson and the kids shopping at Ed Hardy:
Related Posts:- Michael Jackson’s Mom Gets the Kids!
- Custody Agreement Reached for Michael Jackson’s Kids
- UPDATE: Who Will Take Care of Michael Jackson’s Kids?
- Breaking: Newspaper Reports Macaulay Culkin is the Father of Michael Jackson’s Son Blanket
- A Jackson Bombshell: Debbie Rowe - “I Want My Kids”
Tags: celebrity, custody, michael jackson, michael jackson children, michael Jackson kids, michael jackson's death, Michael Jackson's kids, Sunny Chanel
51 Comments
[...] custody of MJ’s mother, but for now they’re in LA with a nanny. Strollerderby says that the children’s godparents may step in–”Mark Lester (the star of Oliver), the godfather of one or two of the children, told [...]
اسلوب » Don’t Forget Michael Jackson’s Kids commented on Jun 28 09 at 7:33 amShannon LC Cate commented on Jun 25 09 at 8:41 pmIt is just weird to read “Macaulay Culkin and Elizabeth Taylor together in a sentence like that.
Cheermjm commented on Jun 25 09 at 8:46 pmI feel for these children more then anyone else in his family. They are all adults(age wise anyway)the kids on the other hand need a stable adult in their life. None of the choice look that great. Debbie Rowe gave up these kids. The other people are all stars and have their issues. My fear is that anyone that does come forward to take care of these children will only be in it for the money not for the sake of the kids.
T bone 1 commented on Jun 25 09 at 9:38 pmJust not Uri geller. Please. I think they should go to whoever the kids want to live with, provided they are willing and are fit guardians.
T Hansen commented on Jun 25 09 at 9:40 pmI feel that the main reason that Debbie probably gave up those children, is who can financially fight a celebrity in the court of law…. seriously? I think that now that Michael is gone she should step up and get her kids back, the youngest, whos mother is a surrogate should remain with his siblings. It is hard enough to loose your father much less the only family you have. Some say nothing nice about Michael Jackson, but he was a human too, so dont take that and life for granted… AMEN!
Persia commented on Jun 25 09 at 10:14 pmIf Debbie Rowe sold out her kids not once, but TWICE…she will certainly do it again. The last thing they need is a mom who wants to make some money…
Trix commented on Jun 25 09 at 11:12 pmThat video is crazy. I felt claustrophobic watching it.
mariana commented on Jun 26 09 at 12:58 amthey shoud go with who they know best
Mindy commented on Jun 26 09 at 1:18 amI agree with so many. The kids are the ones to be concerned about. Michael Jackson was and will forever be famous, yet his life is surrounded by real people, real family who cares for him.
They will morn, and ache for Michael. As fans, we can morn as well, but we never “knew” him. We never eat with him, laughed with him, worried over him.
His children will suffer the most. he adored his children. Lived his life in many ways through his children, that was clear. They were with him always. They were everything to him. He would never want them exploited. I hope they can remain safe, and most of all….happy!!
reatey commented on Jun 26 09 at 1:36 amI think Oprah should take the kids
MJ commented on Jun 26 09 at 2:19 amI think they need to be with his family. Since the birth mothers weren’t major parts of their lives, they shouldn’t be forced to go with them. I think the godparents can be a support to them, but I believe they need to be with the Jackson family. Probably Jermaine would be the best choice.
tanya commented on Jun 26 09 at 3:07 amI am at a loss of words, i grew up listening to MJ and have loosely followed his career,i think he was misunderstood, and railroaded many times, MJ was trying to have the childhood he never had, if you look at his level of maturity its really stunted at the 12 year old level. I worry about his children who are orphans, but are dealing with the loss of there father.
Laundry & Children commented on Jun 26 09 at 7:44 amThey should go to someone outside the “fame” circle. Someone able to provide these children with a stable loving home. I have never seen someone like that attached to the circus that was MJ’s life.
Knitty commented on Jun 26 09 at 8:11 amI’m afraid that lots of people are going to be fighting for custody, not because they love the kids but because they hope Michael Jackson still has money somewhere. It could be a huge and ugly fight, too, considering that they clearly aren’t his biological children.
Shana commented on Jun 26 09 at 11:46 amActually Kathy, Jackson died with horrible debt. I think he still owes Sony money. He had no other choice but to give up Neverland. So anyone hoping for a payday in getting the children, will probably ed up sorely disappointed.
Amanda commented on Jun 26 09 at 3:34 pmIf you are implying his biological mothers, plural, that would mean the youngest would be separated from the older two. Too traumatic and cruel to even contemplate. In this case it feels like a loving, stable family unit within the immediate family would be best for the children, and that what should motivate anyone and everyone making what is bound to be a very difficult decision.
Ali commented on Jun 26 09 at 3:56 pmhttp://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/MichaelJackson/story?id=7938599&page=1
I think these kids caught a lucky break. Now they will no longer be the pets of a “heavily addicted to oxycontin” addict and a daily demerol and morphine user. See rich people can buy children whenever they wish. I am curious to see what sort of education the Jackson pets have been given seeing as they never went to school and traveled all the time. What a nightmare they must have been living with the drug addict.
Knitty commented on Jun 26 09 at 6:01 pmTheir father’s death… a lucky break.
That comments says a lot more about you than it does about Mr. Jackson, Ali.
Sunny Odette commented on Jun 26 09 at 7:02 pmMichael Jackson’s children should go to his family or the godparents the children had. Anyone else is in it for the money — even their respective mothers who never wanted them to begin with.
Sunny Odette commented on Jun 26 09 at 7:05 pmThere was never any pedophilia, only a greedy father who wanted money for his family. There was even a recorded conversation where this guy was bragging about his scan on MJJ. The child’s mother maintained all along there was never anything improper between MJJ and her son. The whole first thing was a scam and on the 2005 case, he was acquitted of all accusations. Doctors testified that he was not a pedophile personality, rather that he was a regressed 10-year old person living in an adult’s body.
He was a great musicial and all-around musical talent. The world will never see the likes of his talent again.
feierl commented on Jun 26 09 at 8:56 pmMy friend recommended me a very interesting place *** WealthyFinder.com *** It’s where
wealthy singles looking for someone to enjoy their wealthy lifestyle with.
wendi commented on Jun 27 09 at 1:50 amSurely the ages of the children means the presiding family Judge will give them a large say in with whom they go to live. It would be unkind to split them and if they do not know their mother more than for sporadic visits then to suddenly place them with her would be downright cruel. Children don’t “belong” to parents or anyone and these last years have given children better rights and voices.
Fly Girl in Texas commented on Jun 27 09 at 10:31 amThe kids should go to the Jackson’s family….That’s probably what their father would have wanted for them.
lawdylawdy commented on Jun 27 09 at 9:44 pmfor everyone who says the kids cant be his biological children just because they are fair, get over it. latoya his sister was naturally light skinned and mixed looking, so clearly the jacksons have some white ancestry. if the father is mixed and the mothers are white, then the kids could appear very fair. REMEMBER OJ’s blond daughter!
lawdylawdy commented on Jun 27 09 at 9:46 pmand there is no such thing as a “fight” for custody, the kids go to whoever the father (as sole parent) identified in his will. if he had no will or made no designation, then his parents are next in line. if his parents are deceased, then his grandparents. if his grandparents are unable or deceased, then his siblings. luckily, his parents are alive, so there will be no fight as between the many jackson siblings for custody.
Michael commented on Jun 29 09 at 12:38 amWell, the cat’s out of the bag. Debbie Row has now publically admitted that Michael was not the first two children’s biological father. I believe the timing was a little soon, as many are still mourning the star’s death, but it does answer the burning question that many have been asking for quiet some time now–Is Michael their biological father? In every sense of the word, except for DNA, he was their father–he raised them and took care of them, which is a lot more than some biological fathers out there. Although a little eccentric, he was a wonderful person at heart and a great entertainer! Michael, you will be dearly missed!
Michael commented on Jun 29 09 at 12:41 am*”publicly” admitted…not “publically”. It’s better to correct my own typo before someone else does and makes a big deal about it.
![]()
Michael commented on Jun 29 09 at 12:44 amOk…”quite”…not “quiet”…That’s it, now I’m just embarrasing myself!
If only I could delete past posts!
Michael commented on Jun 29 09 at 12:47 amOk…”quite”…not “quiet”…That’s it, now I’m just embarrassing myself!
If only I could delete past posts!
Camelia commented on Jun 29 09 at 12:08 pmThey should be with his family, Debbi had gave up on them two times
Heather commented on Jun 30 09 at 2:02 amAll you guys, get real — how ignorant are you to believe all this garbage? The truth is that Michael Jackson was a flaming pedophile and there is a long list of kids he bought off, abused and settled millions on, to keep them quiet. Read the court records and learn! The kids are not his biological kids as when he met Debbie Rowe, she was aleady pregnant by another man. Michael made a deal with her to pay her medical bills in exchange for giving him the child. He liked the idea of having kids so he could molest them and, in this way, he wouldn’t be in danger of having to pay off the kids to keep quiet, he wouldln’t be taken to court and having to settle millions on them, as he did with the numerous kids with whom he was caught. The kids are photographed with their hair bleached blond and wearing thick makeup — how do you square that with “good parenting”? You don’t!! What kind of a parent would keep his kids covered up with veils and masks and blankets and drag them around, never let them see the light of day or have playmates and go to school with other kids? No, he kept them near him so they wouldn’t speak to the media and he slept with them and molested them. Read the court records and also the Child Protective records. This will all come out, so don’t be so quick to judge him as a wonderful parent and a great talent. He was just another jiggaboo flapping around on stage — that’s not talent — it’s a good agent and publicity! Learn the difference between talent and crap! Michael Jackson was crap!
asdfhjkasdf commented on Jun 30 09 at 10:24 pmI don’t understand why you people have to criticize him and judge him. i am not saying the writer of this did. i am just saing this to get it out. all the judjing the world did to him is what drove him to death. everyone just needs to leave his stories alone and only to the family.
you will always be loved and remembered michael,
r.i.p.
Angela commented on Jul 01 09 at 3:14 pmDoes anyone know if Michael Jackson’s kids had any kind of schooling?
Someone commented on Jul 06 09 at 3:45 amHeather you reveal how ignorant you are. You should do some more research on those cases against him, and you’ll see that they are full of lies and extortion from the accusers’ side. Read the trial reports from beginning to end. Read about the Arvizo family that accused MJ 2005- They had a history of extortion, with a mother that had tried to make a living out of sueing and accusing celebrities one by one to sueeze money out of them! Plus, a settlement with JC-Penny that got her 137.000 dollars after accusing their security officer of fondling her breats. She has been known to rehearse her children to tell the story that she wants them to tell in each specific case. That’s why MJ was acquitted in 2005. In 1993 the dad of the accuser had planned the whole extortion scheme before any accusation was ever made by the kid. Read up on the cases against and MJ instead of basing your judgement on tabloid bullshit, read up on the backround of the families that made the allegations. They’ve got “extortion” written all over them. Wikipedia covers the stories quite extensively and objectively, including most details that one would need to know to form an educated opinion and judgement. Check out the information at:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1993_child_sexual_abuse_accusations_against_Michael_Jackson
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/People_v._Jackson
Also see:
http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread477059/pg1
Which presents MJ’s defense in the 1993 as it might have been if the case had gone to trial.
Why do you think the accusers settled for the money instead of taking the case to court and convicting MJ? WAKE UP AND THINK. The money is all they wanted from the beginning, because nothing ever happened. And in your research, notice reports like:
“In early August, Evan Chandler (the father of the alleged abused boy Jordan Chandler), a registered dentist, extracted a tooth from his son’s mouth, and was later forced to admit that he used the controversial sedative drug sodium Amytal during the procedure.[1] Under the influence of the drug, Jordan alleged that Jackson had touched his penis. Experts state that THE DRUG SODIUM AMYTAL “MAKES PATIENTS EXRTEMELY SUSCEPTINLE TO SUGGESTIONS”.Dr Lewis Strong, a Los Angeles psychiatrist stated, “You can’t trust it, I never use it in my practice. I have found it to be unreliable. It’s certainly not a truth serum”.
“Police had questioned 30 children who were friends of Jackson, with all denying that the singer was a child molester.”“The police then began an investigation into Evan Chandlers’s prior actions and found that he was $68,400 behind in his child support payments, even though he was well-paid as a dentist.”
And regarding the accusations from the Arviso family in 2005:
“Jackson’s attorney alleged that the charges were made in retaliation by the family after the family members realized that Jackson was not going to continue supporting them financially indefinitely.[9] The family was portrayed during trial as exhibiting a long history of attempting to extort celebrities.”
And back to the first case: The father of the alledly abused kid Jordan Chandler, had been recorded saying in a phone conversation:
“Everything’s going according to a certain plan that isn’t just mine. and if I go through with this, I win big time. There’s no way I lose. I’ve checked that inside out. I will get everything I want, and they will be destroyed forever. June (Jordan’s mother) will lose [custody of the son]. and Michael’s career will be over.” In the same conversation, when asked how this would affect his son, Chandler replied, “That’s irrelevant to me…It will be a massacre if I don’t get what I want. It’s going to be bigger than all us put together…”There’s a lot more where that came from. Too much to include it all here. Do your homework before you pass judgement. Obviously you have not read the trial reports closely from beginning to end, but fixated on the lies in the accusing familys’ testimonies, when making your judgement. YOU READ AND LEARN. There is a good reason why Michael Jackson was acquitted on all charges in 2005! They didn’t have any solid, credible testimony or evidence on him. They didn’t have anything on him, although they tried! … Oh and for Angela: The kids had home schooling, and those close to them have said that they were very intelligent, well-mannered children that loved their father dearly. We saw the circus, whenever he was in public with the kids - because the public made it into a circus. That’s not their fault. Michael never wanted them to be part of that media circus, which is why he veiled or masked them in public, and tried to avoid public attention on his children. Hopefully because of all the masking through the years, only few will be able to recognise these children and perhaps they will be able to live a more normal life. Unless too many photos come up into the media now, during the custody disputes. Anyone close to Michael has said that they had a loving and close relationship with their father. Soon enough the children will come out themselves and tell the truth about their father and their lives. It’s never easy being the child of a celebrity superstar, but I think MJ did everything in his power to give them a normal, happy life, to the extent that it was possible. It could obviously never be completely “normal”, but he loved his children, and I’m convinced that they loved him very much. I wish the best for them.
Someone commented on Jul 06 09 at 4:03 amHEATHER You obviously have no imagination as to what would be the reason to not put them in a public school, and what measures must be taken with celebrity children. The media would be around them all the time at school. They would have no peace, and their classmates would have no peace. Can’t you see that? Extreme conditions call for extreme measures, even in parenting. MJ tried to make the best choices for his children. Veiling and masking them was also a way to hide there identity from the public, so perhaps later on they could live a normal life and go to the supermarket like everyone else without being recognized. This was also a measure taken, ever since there had been many threats of kidnapping made towards Jackson and Debbie. He didn’t want the kids to be recognized. You are thinking like a normal non-celebrity-parent. If MJ was not a celebrity do you think he would have to take those measures? Of course not. Celebrity parenting must necessarily be quite different from regular parenting, because there are other risks involved and totally different circumstances, but the basics are the same. Children in any kind of home (celebrity or non-celebrity) need love, care, PROTECTION, social interaction and education. These children got all of that. Maybe through different means and under different circumstances, and with a greater emphasis on protection - it necessarily had to be so… But they got it. MJ was not your next door neighbour that could freely let his children walk out on the street, now was he?
Someone commented on Jul 06 09 at 4:42 amHEATHER, and where did you get your information that they didn’t have playmates? They had plenty of friends, other kids coming over, cousins etc. to interact with. YOU ARE VERY IGNORANT AND JUDGEMENTAL. Furthermore, you’ve obviously done absolutely no research on court records, although you say yourself “read the court records”. You are just another tabloid junkie that believes whatever story they come up with. What you are stating is false: That “he’s been caught with numerous kids” - The only ones that have said they caught him molesting a child, have been people that tried to sell their stories to the tabloids for 6 digit amounts - Without even going to the police first (so is this really serious, or opportunists looking for a quick way to get rich?) Later they’d had to admit that they never actually saw or witnessed anything. And the children these people were involving in their stories, have said themselves that nothing of the kind had ever happened!! There was only one actual trial of child-molestation, which is the one with the Arviso family mentioned in my previous long comment, where he was acquitted in all charges, because the mom had a history of accusing and trying to sue celebrities, companies etc plus manipulating and rehearsing her children to tell “stories”. Where the hell do you get your information?? I’m sick of these haters and prejudiced tabloid suckers that don’t care to look into the facts and the full story of these cases, and yet claim that Jackson fans are blind sheep that don’t want to face the truth. Most devoted fans have done their research, have done their homework on the accusations because they believe Michael’s defense is to be found in the full truth, the whole truth, with all it’s backround information. You judgemental haters and tabloid suckers don’t care to do any research. You just heard in some magazine or newspaper that for example “numerous kids have come forward” and you eat it raw without doing any research. That’s exactly what they want you to do. That’s why they can pay money-hungry “witnesses” 6-digit amounts for their fabricated stories - Because people like you buy into it and take it all in like blind sheep. It’s fine if you’re not interested in doing the research on someone that you don’t care about, but then don’t pass judgement !!
strader commented on Jul 07 09 at 11:09 amwell 1st off get these kids some help there farther has disrupted there lives already i mean come on making them wear masks in public, this is just one ex sample we can see for sure what else has happened to these kids behind closed doors, and also he was abused by his farther in my opinion he is doing the same thing to his kids just in a different manner. In my opinion again these kids dont need to go to any of these people who say they want them they should go to some body else that has no ties to the family or the estate.
Someone commented on Jul 07 09 at 10:08 pmStrader, you are in no position to make those judgements. You are not a celebrity to know what kind of threats on your children would move you to try to hide their identity to the extent that you can. You never lived his life with all the precautions towards the press and the media that it involves. You are narrow-minded to think that someone who’s been beaten as a child will turn out to be an abuser himself. First of all MJ was whipped as a child. Never sexually molested. I was hit as a child too, and now I´m a kindergarten teacher devoted to supporting the right development of children. Constantly advocating the welfare, happiness and rights of children. I would never dream of hitting a child. Have you ever heard of pattern breakers in the world of psycholgy? Many abused children turn out to be the opposite of what their parents were, and that’s how THEY get back at their parents. That’s how they deal with their emotional baggage, by being everything that their parents were not. From what everyone around MJ has observed, he has become the total opposite of his father. You shouldn’t have such a black/white view on things. There are many factors that come into play in the psychology of a person. Most importantly you DON’T know him at all. I don’t know him either, but listen to everyone who knew him well: He was a wonderful father and an amazing, loving, giving human being. Those that can see beyond the tabloid junk and lies can appreciate that. Who are you to judge? We can only judge him by what those closest to him have to say, and by what we saw in our hearts when he spoke to us, sang for us, danced for us, and smiled for us. That’s what we know and you don’t know anything else beyond that.
Mujer Latina commented on Jul 07 09 at 10:28 pmThese people from the court need to really make sure that these children are biologically related to Debbie Rowe , if they don’t then she should have these children. Michael Jackson’s mother should have these children they are her grandkids.
Mujer Latina commented on Jul 07 09 at 10:29 pmShe is not biologically related to them, then she shouldn’t be with Debbie Rowe.
Mujer Latina commented on Jul 07 09 at 10:30 pmDam I’m drinking too much beer….What I mean is that if Debbie Rowe is not biologically related to these children then I feel she shouldn’t get them. She was just a surrogate mother and she was paid for her services…..
R.I.P. Michael Jackson *PM* commented on Jul 08 09 at 2:40 amPersonally, I think that the kids should not be split up. I mean think about it…they lose their father THEN have to be separated from each other. That would emotionally destroy them. I also think that the best people to father Michael’s children would be: A) Katherine Jackson, B) Janet Jackson, C) Macauley Culkin. I also want to say that I love you Michael and I hope to see you in Heaven. I also want to tell you, Michael, that I know you didn do anything inappropriate to this kids.
Zaina commented on Jul 08 09 at 8:50 pmPrincess Kasia Al Thani is the godmother of Blanket. They wanted to kep it a secret but it leeked to the papers.
Sarah commented on Jul 11 09 at 1:35 pmI have not seen that printed anywhere or seen it anywhere online- is Princess Kasia Al Thani really his Godmother? all the other ones are known-
Deb commented on Jul 18 09 at 3:31 pmI thnk his mother Catherine shld get the kids and Janet, for the mother they never lived with and tht will be hard on those kids. I feel by the way i see it she is really the one for the kids cuz she has always been arnd thm and Janet and Catherine will comfort thm and I believe tht their religion as Jeh’s witnesses will help thm to , in anyway. I also feel they shld ask the kids who they want to go wth cuz they are of age in the courts, and they knw who they want to be wth, why wreck their lives. Michael would want thm to be happy why not let the family be and gve the custody to the mom, Catherine and Janet , the sister. Why break the will too, and why make it hard for the children, give the real mother visiting rights in the order if the kids want to see her, think of the children and hw they feel, the courts are supposed to be for the children why not thnk of the children. the real mother to my understanding got money the last tme for the children and alot of stuff and didnt fight for the kids if I wld of been her I wldnt of cared if Michael had money if I wld of wanted thm I wld hve fought for thm. Nw is to thnk of the kids and who they wnt to be wth and wht they wnt and hw settled in they are wth Michalsmom and sister, Janet.
janaya commented on Jul 18 09 at 11:01 pmi love michael jackson i wish he never i love you mj
D.W commented on Jul 19 09 at 7:54 pmI love m.j he is the best entertainer that ever lived.I know how it feels living with out a father because I had to live with out my daddy.So I hope for the best for Michael Jackson’s kid’s(Prince,Pairs,and Banket).God bless the Jackson’s family!
suushiii commented on Aug 26 09 at 2:45 pmI believe that Prince Paris and Blanket are in good hands. Its really tough and hard for the kids to have gone through this and i am here for them! No one suspected that something like this would happen. What would be better than for the kids to grow up in the loving and caring arms of their fathers own mother! Much love to you all! I gove lots of love and support!
Suushiii
cachae-luh mama commented on Aug 29 09 at 12:39 pmwell first i would like to say im sorry for there lost i was [and] im still a very big fan of michael jachson but hey this is bad and you know it how will they be with such little memories but they will get through and i know it
KC commented on Nov 12 09 at 9:23 pmSomeone is trying to give false publicity to a fake princess as being the godmother of Blanket. How pathetic to use MJ’s death and his children to promote herself. I have met this faux princess and I would gamble that a former hooker is not the godmother. It has been published that the godparents are Diana Ross and his mother and godfather is the child/adult actor in England. I bet Zaina is the faux princess trying to drum up publicity.
tinkie clark commented on Jan 11 10 at 1:22 pmCommentscr cry cry im soooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo soriiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii about your lost he was just the world to me i will never let his legacy die never








