Strollerderby

Good Food Shouldn’t Be a Mommy War – It Should be a Focus of Mommy Activism

Posted by shannon lc cate on June 22nd, 2009 at 2:00 pm

img 0837 300x300 Good Food Shouldnt Be a Mommy War   It Should be a Focus of Mommy ActivismI have long felt that the organic/conventional food “debate” among moms is nothing but a smokescreen of corporate power to divide and conquer us–all at our children’s expense.

Last night, for our (sixth!) anniversary date, my partner and I went to see Food Inc. and it gave me that much more evidence for my theory.  It also gave my partner a more concrete sense of why I will argue to cut the cable television, cut the dining out, cut the new clothes purchases, cut the parking space rental…you getting the idea?…cut anything in our budget before we cut into my grocery allotment.

Mind you, I don’t think it’s impossible to eat well on a tight budget, a belief recently bolstered by this article in Salon about a couple who ate sustainable, organic, local and ethical (SOLE) for a month on a food stamp budget, in greater New York City.

But even if eating well costs more, it’s the kind of thing I consider non-negotiable, the way I consider regular well-child doctor visits non-negotiable.  And if our family budget is tighter these days, we do have health insurance, and we aren’t reduced to food stamps, so it’s not something we have to negotiate anyway.

And yet, I am well aware that for some people, good food does have to take a backseat to things like rent or medicine.  So the children of the poor are the ones at highest risk for health complications that result from a bad diet–things like Type 2 Diabetes, food-born pathogens, and the increased cancer rates that are documented in children who rarely eat produce that has not been treated with pesticides.

This is not a matter of morals.  The poor have been accused of moral inferiority from time immemorial, but again, this is a smoke screen.  If someone can’t afford to eat safe, nutritious food free of poison, that person is basically starving.  Just because the United States has plentiful calories at low, low prices, doesn’t mean it has plentiful FOOD at same.  And the children eating empty–or even dangerous–calories are not doing so because they have “Bad Mommies” (that distinct middle-class invention where we confess our love of Twinkies), they are doing so because our society doesn’t value the health and well being of children.

Because when you take the government grocery budget to that big kitchen table on Capitol Hill, you find loads of money being poured into subsidizing farmers who grow the corn and soybeans that are the basis of the “food” engineered in labs for huge corporations that sell cheap, empty calories to the world.  A fraction of that money used to subsidize small, organic family farms could A) increase the number of those farms and thus the availability of better food and B) decrease the price of that food the way current subsidies make fast-food “dollar menus” possible today.

I’m not a better mother because I feed my kids as SOLE a diet as possible.  I’m a wealthier one.  But that doesn’t mean the health of children like my daughter’s biological siblings being raised in the direst of poverty by her birth mother across town, is not my problem.  Quite to the contrary, I think good, safe, healthy food (that–bonus!–happens to be better for the environment too) is very much my business and when children can’t get it, it is my responsibility to change that.

I am weary of the “Whole Foods Mom” versus “Walmart Mom” false debates.  It is time the Whole Foods shoppers and Walmart shoppers linked arms to demand the best possible food for the most possible children.  Stop letting them divide us.  It’s our kids who are the big losers in that war.

See Also: The Floundering Promise of Organic Milk

 Good Food Shouldnt Be a Mommy War   It Should be a Focus of Mommy Activism

Go Back To Strollerderby

31 Comments

I totally agree with you – but I think the issue is what constitutes healthy food. I used to work in a grocery store, where I would watch the women on government subsidies complain that they were being “forced” to spend their WIC checks on cheese, eggs, et al.

Coming from a socialist, help-the-poor background, it opened my eyes to the fact that people don’t just need money to buy good food. They need an education in nutrition to make it happen. And I say this as a mom who is loathe to buy into “organic.” I make my choices instead in the produce aisle, in avoiding the center aisles of the grocery store (be it Whole Foods or Wal-Mart). But the fact is, I make choices.

jeannesager commented on Jun 22 09 at 1:44 pm

If I lived in New York, that would be one thing. But organic is still not widely available in our backward-minded small city. I hit the Farmer’s Market, which is still not largely organic and the non-chain grocery but their selection is just as slim. We avoid a lot of general crap, obviously, because I’m working hard to do what I can but SOLE isn’t possible here. I mean, you’d think the local part would be somewhat attainable with the Farmer’s Market, right? Two stands have their stuff flown in. FAIL.

FireMom commented on Jun 22 09 at 1:51 pm

Shannon, it was our SIXTH anniversary yesterday too!

Manjari commented on Jun 22 09 at 1:58 pm

Parke at US Food Policy has a really thoughtful piece on the question of whether it is possible to live SOLE on a low-income budget. The answer boils down to it depends — mostly on whether you think it’s realistic to expect people to give up on significant meat consumption and use of convenience foods.

http://usfoodpolicy.blogspot.com/2009/06/question-not-just-answer-how-much-does.html

Elizabeth commented on Jun 22 09 at 2:00 pm

100% agreed, Jeanne. I say, teach nutrition in grade school and high school health classes. That would cost just about nothing. But some schools are also doing slightly more costly (usually charity or community-funded) gardening and cooking programs where the kids grow and prepare and serve food to their classmates. It probably wouldn’t cost a fortune to implement those programs more widely, too.

Shannon LC Cate commented on Jun 22 09 at 2:01 pm

No way Manjari, how cool is that? Congrats to you.

Shannon LC Cate commented on Jun 22 09 at 2:01 pm

Elizabeth–another matter of education, more than anything. Helping people adjust to different ways of eating. I know cutting meat in our diets by about 99% has made it possible for us to compromise less on food.

Shannon LC Cate commented on Jun 22 09 at 2:03 pm

I think that the distinction between “calories” and “food,” which you emphasize above, is a good one. Honestly, going into just a little bit more depth than that is a pretty basic education of what constitutes a healthy diet and what doesn’t, I think.

International trade barriers also get the way of cheaper food prices, not just subsidies. If it weren’t for notions like “buy America first,” we’d consistently be buying our strawberries for $1.00/pound. That may not meet the “local” criteria, but I’d rather be able to buy healthy non-local food at 25% of the current price than do local. I do think that sometimes we have to choose our battles, or take them one step at a time.

ChiLaura commented on Jun 22 09 at 3:00 pm

Not only are corn syrup and overly processed stuff subsidized, but the U.S. Dept of AGRICULTURE spends billions of dollars on propaganda that’s essentially advertisements. Most Americans think that the USDA is the kind of organization that the American Dietetic Association is — an organization that promotes healthy eating based on research. And I can see where people get that idea, since the USDA stuff is all over the place in schools and hospitals. But all it really is is advertisements for meat and dairy products, along with promoting the myth that cheap processed stuff is fine, because it satisfies their pyramid.

At my job we recently got brochures and training materials from WIC of all places that were absolutely horrible. The materials assumed that all people are eating too many calories and need to reduce their caloric intake. There were instructions to drink diet soda instead of juice. Seriously. And to avoid any condiments with calories or fat. No mention of how we need nutrients, just a thick colorful booklet telling us to eat chemicals instead of food so we can lose weight. What.

eeka commented on Jun 22 09 at 3:01 pm

That’s one of my biggest pet peeves, eeka–the notion that health = weight-loss. I read a similar article in Parents’ Magazine once about how you should substitute your kid’s ice cream for popsicles, because they are lower in fat. And zero in nutrition! Ice cream is waaaay more nutritious than a popsicle. But if you really want your kid to eat something fun and frozen and with fewer calories, try frozen yoghurt, or my kids’ favorite– frozen fruit, straight out of the freezer.

Shannon LC Cate commented on Jun 22 09 at 3:24 pm

Two years ago, I lost a hundred and five pounds in ten months. A hundred and twenty-five pounds in a year. But I’m retired, as I was then. I had time to research the good food solutions, and to understand them well enough to make good food choices. I hope.
I know a woman who is grossly overweight; blames it on diabetes. But watching her eat is an exercise in self defeating errors. She has a master’s degree, and taught at college for several years, but doesn’t have3 the time to study and understgand the difference between protiens and carbohydrates.
I can’t tell her. We’re not close. And if I did, wouldn’t it be a little bit like rubbing it in? I did mine. Why can’t you?

Bluster commented on Jun 22 09 at 3:56 pm

Happy Anniversary, Shannon!

I have a question about your statement – “complications that result from a bad diet–things like Type 2 Diabetes, food-born pathogens, and the increased cancer rates that are documented in children who rarely eat produce that has not been treated with pesticides.” I have heard about these things being linked to kids who rarely eat any kind of produce, and eat processed foods instead. However, I always read that there is no link between pesticides and these types of ailments. Could you provide a link?

I try and buy organic as much as possible, more for the environmental reasons and conditions for people who work on farms, but I always thought that the big health issue was that there are kids who get no fresh food at all.

Cali Mom commented on Jun 22 09 at 5:15 pm

I can’t provide a link for that, as I read it in a book. It’s “Healing Foods” by Michael Murray.

Shannon LC Cate commented on Jun 22 09 at 5:17 pm

Oh–and maybe there’s syntactical confusion too. The only part tied to pesticides per se is cancer. The other stuff–yeah–diet problems in general including lack of fruits and veggies.

Shannon LC Cate commented on Jun 22 09 at 5:18 pm

Great piece, Shannon and I am hoping to see Food inc soon (and many congrats on your anniversary!) I live in a quasi food desert – we don’t have grocery stores, just corner stores with overpriced junk and a Food Lion (admittedly that’s the only place I can find my Omega 3 enhanced peanut butter). We JUST got a local indep store w/in walking distance after waiting 3 years – an organic smorgasboard. Alas, I don’t cook and so often make poor personal choices (I am open to being stuffed with sauteed kale but I won’t do it myself). There are some local farmers that set up shop on street corners these days to try and provide veggies and fruits as an alternative. Still so much more work needs to be done.

Julie M commented on Jun 22 09 at 6:21 pm

Thanks!

Cali Mom commented on Jun 22 09 at 6:30 pm

Happy anniversary, Shannon.

With all due respect (and I respect you enormously, even if my comments don’t always reflect that), I still think that the whole food-quality-crisis thing is overblown. The vast majority of people in this county have no idea how lucky we are to have access to the food that we take for granted. Even going back a mere century or two, our ancestors would be flabbergasted by the variety, availability, and yes… safety of our food. We’ve gotten so caught up in nit-picking over every little thing that we’ve lost sight of the fact that compared to the vast majority of the world and the entire scope of human history, we eat very, very well. Even those of us who shop at Wal-mart rather than Whole Foods.

I don’t argue that things could be better… sure, what couldn’t? But damn. I spent a summer working in Guatemala and it changed my entire outlook. You’d never, ever hear a normal person there brag that they’d cut the cable or their clothing budget before slicing into their food money because almost everything they made went towards housing and keeping food on the table. And we’re not talking about all-organic farm-fresh etc, we’re talking about just FOOD.

So what if we do all switch to a SOLE national diet, all organic and local and to hell with the subsidies? Well, this country is largely responsible for feeding our vastly over-populated world. If our food output were to drop in favor of SOLE standards, we couldn’t feed the developing world along with our own population. We’d be looking at mass starvation and suffering on a scale unimaginable to most of us who spend our days in air-conditioned homes and have the luxury of picking between Wal-Mart and Whole Foods for our shopping.

I’m not arguing with anything that you said, Shannon. I just want to point out that we’re talking from a place of enormous privilege and that our food-production industry is both complex and fragile. If it falls apart (for any reason), billions of innocents will suffer.

Knitty commented on Jun 22 09 at 7:40 pm

Well, except that the corporate food industry is doing its best to put local farmers all over the world out of business. One point the film made is that some of the cheap, exploited labor used in slaughterhouses and other undesirable work environments are displaced Mexican corn farmers who lost their farms because they couldn’t compete with cheap, subsidized U.S. corn.
I don’t disagree that this is a highly privileged discussion, but I also don’t think moving away from monoculture industrial farms controlled by monopolies is in any way a bad idea.

Shannon LC Cate commented on Jun 22 09 at 8:16 pm

I’ll have to watch the film once it comes out on DVD. I’m sure that’s true about the corporate food industry; you’ll never hear me championing them, but it’s also important to remember just how *fragile* the entire food production system is and who will suffer the most if it’s disrupted.

Knitty commented on Jun 22 09 at 9:03 pm

I live in Clinton Hill, Brooklyn and can totally see why it is easy in New York for a family on food stamps to get fresh food if they are willing to make the trip. Every Saturday there is a farmer’s market at Fort Greene park and all of the vendors accept food stamps and a vast majority do grow things organically, but cannot afford to get the “ORGANIC” stamp which is usually only held by mch larger corporations here in the US. There has also been an initiative to get “green carts” into poorer neighborhoods where grocery stores have traditionally felt that providing fresh produce to their customers was not worthwhile. Just last week there was an interview on the Brian Lehrer Show I believe where they talked about what a success these green carts have been and how they want to expand them and set some up to accept food stamps. They have been such a success that bodega and fast food joints in poorer neighborhoods have started to complain about the loss in profit because of people choosing to buy an apple instead of a soda. In addition, they have finally managed to get the Costco here in New York City (not sure which burough) to agree to accept food stamps. And I can say from personal experience it has been much cheaper for my family to just buy local rather than peppers from Holland or strawberries from Mexico.
And ChiLaura, why would you want something like strawberries from another country for a $1, considering they are never properly ripe and have no flavor by the time you get them. It is just not worth it. And if you have a proper farmer’s market in your area, you are buying directly from the farmers; helping your community and providing your family with better tasting produce. I admit not everything I buy is local. I sometimes do buy those out of season fruits and veggies shipped in from Peru. But when I can, I buy local and it is pretty much always cheaper. I look forward to the day that all Americans can have access to safe food. And all those subsidies are only benefitting lare corporations, not local farmers.

Shana commented on Jun 22 09 at 10:27 pm

First, I’d like to say that I find this conversation extremely interesting. Admittedly, food quality and safety is not my expertise, and I always wonder if buying organic is a good thing, or is it just another label used by agri-business to get us to buy more expensive stuff.

I do wonder about Shana’s comment, looking forward to the day that Americans can have access to safe food. But don’t we have access to that now? I do agree that people in poor neighborhoods often do not have access to even a conventional supermarket, and that is a huge problem. However, I never thought of our food as being particularly unsafe.

I have been in the medical business, and I have found that, as things get safer due to more regulation, people get the idea that things are less safe. For example, we have more rules and more post-market surveillance required than before, so we can catch problems where we would not have in the past. Because of this, we are more aware of the problems and therefore believe the problems are getting worse. (This is why you often hear people say that herbal supplements are safer than OTC or prescription drugs – there is little regulation on herbal supplements, so it is hard to know if there is a problem.) I often wonder if this is the case with our food supply – we hear more about contamination, so we think it is getting worse, but is it really?

Laura commented on Jun 22 09 at 11:42 pm

Actually, Laura, there’s less regulation now than, say, the 70′s and 80′s. The industry has been working hard–lobbying hard and getting their people into high positions with the supposed regulatory agencies, for several years.

it is true that the big food companies can charge more for something organic and so want to be able to slap that label on more food, but so far the organic label really does mean something. meanwhile, small farms that grow food more or less in the organic way can’t always affford to be certified organic, so they can’t have the label. That’s why local is nice too. If you can ask the farmer how it was grown, you may be able to save a bundle on pretty much “organic” food and have it fresher and better anyway.

Another note about “catching things” and becoming more aware: e. coli is a great example of the fact that the way we produce food has changed the environment. We aren’t just “catching” the cases of e. coli contamination now. There never used to be any such thing because human bodies could fight off and kill harmless e. coli found naturally in beef (for example). But after antibiotics came on the regular industrial farming scene, e. coli became resistant and developed into something deadly. So you didn’t hear about e coli outbreaks when you were a kid because it didn’t really exist then.

Shannon LC Cate commented on Jun 22 09 at 11:55 pm

Laura, what I meant by safe food is the fact that many regulations have been ignored or repealed over the years because of large corporations just as Shannon pointed out. I am the last person that would take herbal supplements. I am up to date with all my vaccinations (except tetanus) and I am twenty eight. Things are certainly better than they were say eighty years ago, but not thirty years ago. And as someone that has personally experienced grocery shopping in a low income community, I can comfortably say that I can see why many families bypass the “fresh” fruits and vegetables and stick with the packaged stuff. Hell half the chicken in that grocery had obviously expired (something that was a problem in my current neighborhood until just a few years ago). And a lot of the contamination is a result of one of two companies having a monopoly on the processing of specific things. Look at the whole thing with peanuts recently. All of that was caused by one company. On top of all of that there have been the diminishing conditions farm workers have been under that are getting worse and worse despite so-called regulations. Hell, look at China. That country has wonderful regultions as far as how people should be treated and how food should be handled. But it is all worth nothing since it is barely ever enforced and we are heading in that direction.

Shana commented on Jun 23 09 at 12:12 am

I slept on knitty’s comment too, and wanted to add that global food systems are not NOT part of the reform desires of the film’s key players. I can see how a nit-picky obsession with MY personal food could misrepresent this movement, but actually, the global food system isn’t really working now anyway.

There is a book recommended at the film website that I’m planning to read about this, in fact. Something about the first world being glutted with empty calories and the third world having NO calories. I was also remembering how, when I lived in Trinidad, the whole island was given over to sugar cane production, but at the grocery store, you couldn’t buy cane sugar at all, let alone Trinidadian cane sugar. It was all beet sugar imported from the U.S. I asked someone who was working on labor issues in sugar cane fields why that was and he said Trinidad couldn’t afford its own sugar.

That sounds pretty darned broken, if you ask me.

Shannon LC Cate commented on Jun 23 09 at 10:59 am

eeka – how apalling. My sister in law recently gave birth and is on WIC and they seem to be a little more sane around these parts. One of the farmer’s markets in my neighborhood accepts WIC stamps, and the entire market started a program to accept food stamps so that is a nice turn of events, although 5 dollar pints of strawberries are tougher to swallow.

jessica commented on Jun 23 09 at 12:10 pm

Happy Anniversary Shannon!
I really enjoy reading your posts and discussion when I have the time. This one especially is appreciated as it’s a constant struggle to eat right, and I’m sure that with children it will be even more challenging. I do not have anything intelligent to add, but just wanted to voice my appreciation for the issues you frequently bring up in your posts.

Genevieve commented on Jun 23 09 at 1:28 pm

Jessica, WIC does have a nationwide program for shopping at farmer’s markets. But they also do a lot of backwards stuff nationwide; that “nutrition” curriculum is federal, and people from the various WIC offices are doing outreach to teach faculty at Early Intervention and Head Start about their backwards nutrition practices. Oh, and they also have some weird guidelines for the actual program like allowing processed American cheese food, but not any natural antibiotic-free cheeses and no soy cheese. All the info I can find suggests that the program has caved in in response to conservatives complaining that the government better not be paying for any of them fancy foods for low-income people, hence not allowing many natural foods even when the prices are similar.

eeka commented on Jul 02 09 at 3:49 pm

Isn’t it also true that WIC and food stamp programs cut deals with various food companies? I have a friend who used to be a checker at the grocery store and she said a baby cereal with bananas wouldn’t be eligible for purchase with food stamps, but the same cereal with apples would (for example) based on the gov. having cut deals with the apple growers and not banana suppliers–that sort of thing.

Shannon LC Cate commented on Jul 02 09 at 5:00 pm

organic farms will be the trend of the future coz we don’t like artificial stuffs inside our body:”*

Round Mirror  commented on Oct 20 10 at 4:42 am

Add your take:

Note: Babble is a supportive, diverse community. We encourage a range of opinions,
but any unduly hostile comments will be removed.


Comments are delayed up to 15 minutes

Most Popular on Facebook

Best of Babble.com


  • Joslyn Gray
  • Amber Doty
  • Julianna Miner
  • Monica Bielanko
  • Sierra Black
  • Meredith Carroll
  • Carolyn Castiglia
  • Sunny Chanel
  • Madeline Holler
  • Wendy Michaels
  • Rebecca Odes
  • Danielle Smith
  • Danielle Sullivan
  • Katherine Stone
  • Disney Online Moms & Family Portfolio

    The Walt Disney Company supports Babble as a platform dedicated to honest, engaged, informed, intelligent and open conversation about parenting. However, the opinions expressed on this site are those of individual parents/writers and do not reflect the views of Disney. In addition, content provided on this site is for entertainment or informational purposes only and should not be construed as medical advice, diagnosis, treatment, or safety advice. Click here for additional information. Privacy Policy | Terms of Service

    More in Strollerderby (50 of 10516 articles)