[...] Foster Kids or Political Pawns? [...]

leahsmom- In our state it is illegal to have pictures of foster children in any sort of media. They can not show the actual baby if the laws are the same in that state. My foster mom friend has to make sure to duck out of television cameras if she takes her foster kids to anything that the local news is covering. She is absolutely not allowed to have her kids printed in newspapers or on the internet either. It is for their safety.
As far as the article- my opinion aside, if the state is not going to allow gay couples to adopt then they should not allow them to foster. If they are good enough to foster, they are good enough to adopt.

A lot of people do not realise that this is a human experiment in creating as much trauma for babies, children and adults involved in order to cause soul fragmentation, making these human beings easier to control in the future.

So, now thse trauma clinics are opening up, making more money from the deliberate destruction of human souls.

We are nothing more than sacks of rice to the elite, who legally traffic children worldwide and use needy adults in their chess game.

Adopters are having their egos fed in order to use them to buy the children.

Let us humans face the truth- Georgia Tann- Baby Thief- with the help of a judge and others provided the present day lot of child snatchers with the legal way to do this.

Many children in “foster care” are also being drugged, raped, tortured, prostituted and used in porn and the corporate parent is loving every child destroyed in the process.

We humans need to wake up and learn who these evil people are and how Earth Children are a valuable commodity, easier to traffic than drugs and more lucrative too.

Portia- Seriously? Adoption through foster care is FREE. Yep, that’s right FREE! It is a way for children in bad homes to get loving families. And a way for people who can not/ do not have biological children to be able to raise children of their own in a stable, loving environment. That doesn’t sound like the rich now does it?
As far as not showing the heads of foster children that is a safety concern. These kids are taken from neglectful or abusive homes. These children need to not be found by their abusers. What do you think a biological abusive parent would do when thumbing through the Sunday news to see their bio kid smiling at a carnival or better yet participating in an event the bios would not like? It really is for their safety. Besides, most of these kids have been violated enough in their short little lives, we don’t need the media to get a hold of them also.
Not everything is a conspiracy theory. The foster parents I know are very good people. Some already have biological children and some that I know could not procreate nor did they have thirty thousand dollars to do a domestic adoption so foster care was a route they could afford while helping kids in desperate need.
While we will all admit we have heard of bad foster parents, I hope they are few and far between and that states will crack down on poor foster parenting homes. I would hope that the state could employ enough workers mixed with CASAs to check up on these precious kiddos. I think the amount of good foster homes far exceeds the amount of bad.

But I’m not saying put the actual foster kid in the photo – most of the photos here don’t seem to be photos of the actual content – many are simply stock photos. Why not use a stock photo of a baby with a head? I’ll even pay for the license for you! I understand the need to protect privacy, and support it – I didn’t say, put this kid’s face up. I asked, why use a headless body? Shannon, I like your answer – if it’s your kid, I understand totally your not wanting to post his or her head. But why not use a stock photo with a whole kid in it, instead of part of one? These choices do send a political message – especially when we post about biokids, with photos of whole kids, and nonbio kids, with photos of partial kids. I’m not saying you intended to send this message – I know that you are very aware and conscious. But I do feel that it’s a message some of us receive.

If these women are providing this child with a loving and stable home, then they should become her legal parents.
It is really none of the government’s business who people choose to love (unless it is an adult child thing….). It is also none of my business or the government’s what two adults choose to do in their bedroom. Which is really what is the issue is here. Gay people are people first…they have hearts and souls and are no different than anyone who is heterosexual. I don’t get not letting any loving couple or single person adopt or foster a child. And I’m Catholic and Republican….

Comments I’m glad that careing individuals are willing to step up to the plate to help care for children who are uprooted from their families.
I my self was taken away from my family at the age of 11. I lived with my dad and grandmother on a very large farm along with my brother and sister. At the time I didn’t understand why the police would show up at 3:00 am with guns to pack me and my brother and sister away from the farm which had every thing we needed. Food, water, shelter, and unlimited space to Rome. it’s now 18 years later. I’m adult with children of my own. 5 years ago my grandma died, 1/2 million dollar farm got sold and of course was split between my aunts and father, I was in foster care about 7 years and was emaciated at the age of 18. Now I think about it the state took us over the farm. 7 years in foster care charging my father child support. which he could not afford at the time, add that to the interest over time.
my father 2 years ago finally finished paying the state child support. now as child in states custody your life isn’t yours. Your classified as a case number. going from one home to the other. living with families who had their children. and be legal slave. being treated like your and alien corralled by state cover ups and heavy medications, I was robbed of my own family history. and I don’t get interest or any thing.