Eleven Hours of Kindergarten a Day?
Toddlers in one Canadian province might be spending almost eleven hours inside a school building if lawmakers pass a proposal to combine kindergarten with daycare.
Kids as young as four years old would enter a school building at 7:30 a.m. and not go home until 6 p.m. It sounds like a godsend for parents, but is this too much, too fast for little kids?
The plan would focus on four- and five-year-olds, extending the kindergarten program from the early morning to the early evening, keeping the kids out of daycare centers. It would save parents money, not to mention eliminating the need for shuffling children around during the day from a daycare in the morning to the school and then back to daycare or into a latchkey program.
A Lifenet News story on the subject cites studies that have shown kids who attend daycare in the before school are more likely to exhibit behavior problems in the classroom and another claiming that preschool itself will trigger bad behavior. Honestly, I’m not sure if these are supposed to make the case FOR the program or AGAINST it?
Because this will, in essence, be a preschool program. . . education outside of the home for kids who are four-years-old. On the other hand, it isn’t a strict daycare setting. It’s expected to be more akin to a regular school setup.
And that’s where I have a problem with this. Leaving a kid in daycare all day - for almost eleven hours - at four-years-old - happens for a lot of families because they have no other choice. But even those with an educational component to the day give the kids a breather for much of that ten-and-a-half-hour span. It isn’t school, and when they finally get to school, it will be a different experience entirely.
I’m wary of putting kids into such a rigorous school program at too young an age, lest the love of academia is pounded right out of them. Eleven hours is A LOT for a four-year-old. With kids already worn out by the increases in homework (did you have worksheets in kindergarten when you were a kid) and the increased pressure to get good grades and make it into college, many of our kids are already losing out on the pure joy of learning much too early.
As an adult, I’m tired after a long day at work. Now imagine putting a four-year-old to work for that long . . . all day, every day. Forget learning anything, they’ll be too pooped to move!
Would you put your kids in school for ten and a half hours at four years old?
Image: HerDaily
Related Posts:
-
Who Really Cares if They Have Perfect Attendance?
-
Sixth Grader’s Project on Harvey Milk Banned by School
-
School Makes Teen Reveal Pregnancy
-
Clerical Error May Add 34 Days to School Year
- Freak Out-Free First Day of School
- Redshirting Might Not be Magic After All
- Tutors For Kindergarten Readiness
- Teaching Self-Control in Kindergarten
- They Say: Let Kids Sleep Late on Weekends to Fight Obesity
Tags: daycare, education, Jeanne Sager, kindergarten, learning, nursery school, preschool, school day, schools
17 Comments
[...] fame. We’ll be discussing the really long day that some Canadian kiddie may have - an 11 hour day, to be precise. Is that too long? Or would you love to sign your kids up? We’ll also probably [...]
Babble Talk Radio LIVE Friday June 26 at 12:30pm | Strollerderby commented on Jun 25 09 at 10:23 pm[...] fame. We’ll be discussing the really long day that some Canadian kiddie may have - an 11 hour day, to be precise. Is that too long? Or would you love to sign your kids [...]
Reminder: Babble Talk Radio Today at 12:30pm | Strollerderby commented on Jun 26 09 at 11:41 amManjari commented on Jun 18 09 at 10:36 amNo I wouldn ‘t. I think that would be too long for ME, and I’m 34.
Marie commented on Jun 18 09 at 10:57 amI think it will be too much pressure to the kids.
Jellybean Jen commented on Jun 18 09 at 12:37 pmIs 11 hours in daycare better than watching TV all day? I wonder….
Given what the report actually said (instead of blogger supposition), the proposed program does not recommend more structured or desk learning. It recommends more focus on learning and early education techniques in general. The point is to reduce transfers (which cause stress on both the child and parent) and ensure better continuity of high quality care.
The quality of the care and the resources available to the children during these additional hours will improve. Especially for those whose families are unable to afford higher quality after/before school programs. Many children spent hours each day in some neighbour’s house watching tv waiting for their parents to either pick them up after work or for the caregiver to drop them off at school. A stimulating, social environment with trained EECs and other professionals seems to be a better solution.
Piper commented on Jun 18 09 at 1:55 pmI don’t think the facts in the story above are quite right - I live in Ontario and from what I have read the intent is that schools are open from 7:30 am to 6 pm and therefore parents can use whatever part of that time they need to obtain care for their kids. It would not be a full day of “school” but would be a combination of school and childcare. Believe the child care situation in Toronto is a disaster - the only way to get a spot is to put your name on a list when you’re pregnant and even then there is no guarantee - and licensed daycare is very very expensive.
BabyMamaOH commented on Jun 18 09 at 5:49 pmLet’s assume that a good part of the day is unstructured, as well it should be in Kindergarten. I would have a little bit of a hard time footing someone else’s childcare bill as a taxpayer though. I think it’s great that a school offers before and after school care but it needs to be paid for by the parents who use it.
carefree childhood commented on Jun 18 09 at 6:38 pmWhy? In that case only children of the rich or extremely well motivated will be exposed to enriching after-school experiences Children most at risk will be watching TV or wandering the streets. If we believe that everyone should be given every opportunity to live up to their full potential not just for their own sake but for ours as well, why shouldn’t it be free? In many US cities the most dangerous time is between 3 pm and 6 pm when kids are out of school but their parents are still at work. True, that’s more a reason to support after school programs for high schoolers than for kindergarteners.
Angi commented on Jun 19 09 at 8:23 amThat is a long day for such a small child. I used to work in the day-care field. We had kids that came when we opened and didn’t leave till we closed. It was nearly a 12 hour day and they were miserable!
Me commented on Jun 19 09 at 10:15 amIt’s a great idea, but will be defeated by another conservative attack dividing stay at homes vs. working moms. There was a plan for national daycare in Canada, defeated by the federal Tories on a sham choice platform.
I have awesome amazing kind and educational daycare, we signed up in her 2nd trimester and can afford the 1500 a month. Unfortunately that is out of the question for thousands of my fellow Torontonians.
Quebec has its 7 dollar a day daycare, a program that has helped 80 000 women off welfare, and helped reduce child poverty.
SINGLE WOMEN WITH CHILDREN are the most vulnerable and poorest class in North America, regardless on how a women gets in that situation, I dont care I only know that people need help and there are a lot worse things to do with my taxes.
Jellybean Jen commented on Jun 19 09 at 12:21 pmThanks for saying that Me. I fully agree. We all say we want community, but apparently it’s everyone for herself.
BabyMamaOH commented on Jun 19 09 at 6:46 pmI’m fine with subsidizing daycare… kind of like federal hot lunch. You should have to qualify for it. I understand the stay at home mom vs. working moms debate. I quit my teaching job to work part time (around my husband’s schedule) to be home with my babe. My problem is this program benefiting two parent working families who can afford big houses they don’t need, vacations, etc. I could probably do that too if the taxpayers were footing my daycare bill.
Angi, you are right. Kids are miserable after a 12 hour day in the same place with the same people. I’d argue that kids are just as well off, if not better, at home doing errands with mom and going to the park than they are in daycare. Being at home can be just as educational as structured daycare activities.
No, I don’t have a problem subsidizing daycare for those who NEED help. I do have a problem offering it for everyone at no cost.
ChiLaura commented on Jun 19 09 at 6:51 pmAmen, BabyMamaOH! I’m with you on the tax issue and on the staying-at-home-isn’t-making-my-kids-dumb philosophy. I’d love it if someone subsidized me for staying home and raising my kids, but I sure don’t expect that, as I made a CHOICE to stay home. (Also, I don’t want those high taxes.) If someone NEEDS help, fine, but if someone CHOOSES to work and not stay home, that shouldn’t come out of my pocket.
marcy commented on Jun 22 09 at 7:54 amOk, WHAT high taxes? When I was on maternity leave, my husband was headhunted to work at Amazon and its like in California. The problem was, we would have paid more in income taxes in California and a couple other states where they had offices than we do in Ontario, paying both federal and provincial income taxes. And you might want to read the details of the program- it’s optional for parents to use the daycare part. Many parents do not have flex hours, nor can they afford the $70-90 a day price tag of daycares in the Toronto area. For those of us who are already going to pay taxes, I damn well prefer the kids get decent daycare and learn from accredited teachers and ECEs. I can tell you this much– socialization at a young age really shows up in high school where I teach. I say, more power to McGuinty, if he can get this off the ground.
Me commented on Jun 22 09 at 8:43 amYeah Marcy!!
A collective program is just that collective. We are not planning on building a charity (see Fed hot lunch), if ‘rich’ people use it all the better, they pay higher taxes, and would provide the political clout needed to protect it. (and they probably have private child care).
If you stay at home great, but thousands can’t, the program is not about the “you”, its about the “all off us”.
Moreover you don’t know where your life will take you, I was born into 6 bedroom houses, a nanny and private school, buy the time I was ten I lived in a shelter for beaten women with my Mother and little Brother.This is the great family values issue, not how one values their family but rather all famillies.
If you are conservative “pro-life” be pro childcare.
If you are Pro-choice be pro childcare (choice only exists if there are choices).
I come from Quebec, which is traditionaly pronatalist, and more collective then the rest of North America.
edamommy commented on Aug 07 09 at 10:12 pmWe’re in Toronto, and actually moved to a far off suburb because we couldn’t find a decent childcare spot in the city. Only 9% of the childcare spaces in the city are actually federally-approved, registered spots with ECEs working there. Many people I know have paid exorbitant fees and ended up with unmonitored spots where bad things happened (serious biting, overcrowding, no outdoor time, etc.). We need to prioritize children more. I am relieved that there will be a before/after school care program for my daughter once she starts kindergarten. Yes, I hate that she’s there for 10 hours per day. If there were a daycare integrated into my workplace, I’d pay whatever it cost to have her close by and to spend more time with her. If I could get a decent job that offered flex hours I’d take it in an instant. I worked hard to find a position other than the neighbourhood Starbucks, one that actually pays a decent wage, and has less hours than full-time - these mythical jobs are nowhere. Sure - the 10-hour kindergarten day isn’t perfect, but it’s better than what’s happening right now. In an ideal world, there would be more flexibility in the working world and better benefits for parents, and we wouldn’t need full-day kindergarten, but that’s not reality. As it is, I have turned down two promotions since having my daughter - greater responsibility = longer work hours. I’ve given up on thinking that there’s a way to enjoy a fulfilling career and have a family. In this society, we have to choose.
tciccone commented on Sep 12 09 at 3:32 pmComments
I agree this kind of stuctured day is not a good idea for children who are so young and let’s not forget that some of the JK students who are December born will be well under four. They still need a nap and let’s not forget healthy hot lunches, tender loving care and the ability to simply be children. What is the rush for our children. Law makers continually look to children to earn brownie points. Why not leave early childhood education to the child care sector where teachers are educated to work with this age group. Did the government stop to think of how this move would cripple the child care industry?Perhaps all that money that is going to be pumped into establishing this system should be directed to the needs of students in older grades who need help.







