MomCrunch

Why Activists, Policymakers and Political Candidates Should Tap Into Women Influencers Online

Posted by justicefergie on September 29th, 2011 at 10:52 pm

amp twitter avatar 300x300 Why Activists, Policymakers and Political Candidates Should Tap Into Women Influencers OnlineThis afternoon I had the pleasure of speaking at the Activism+Media+Policy Summit (@AMPSummit) on a session alongside PunditMom, Kelly Wallace and Lawyer Mama that was part of their Engagement Track entitled Networked: What Women Want and Why You Should Care.  This was the panel description:

In the world of politics, activism & policy, lots of people haven’t yet gotten the news that women are majority users & influencers online. Yet the world of marketing has. What can those on the Hill learn from marketers as to how & why they should care about women online & best practices — what works and what doesn’t?

The panel engaged in a lively and honest discussion with the audience on the differences between consumer brands and non-profits, political candidates, and causes engaging women and moms in their marketing strategies.

The biggest question was: Why has the consumer brand market embraced mom bloggers so heartily in their advertising campaigns?

The panelists offered a couple of potential reasons:

Dollars and Cents.  By now it’s common knowledge that moms are the main influencers when it comes to household purchasing decisions.  In addition, they are often the ones doing the actual shopping and holding the purse strings.  There are countless studies evidencing this fact and perhaps traditional brands reach out to women and moms more readily as a result.  In contrast, politics and other campaigns are still very male dominated; also, without the concrete figures to back up the ROI of investing in women, convincing activists and policymakers to reach out to women may be a tougher sell.

Resources. Non-profits are typically limited in the financial and human capital resources that they have to devote to any particular project or campaign.  While engaging women through social media may be an attractive idea to many, the reality of having limited manpower to learn, setup and consistently tweet, Facebook, and conduct blogger outreach may be more than a non-profit can handle given the demands on their time and money.

We also shared examples of campaigns that were successful in engaging women to advocate on their behalf and advance their messages with their communities.

And there was a general consensus that, in order for political candidates to capture our attention and use us a vehicles to support their platforms, it is critical that they engage with us, listen to us, and connect their campaign issues to those that affect us personally.  Those of us who live in the social media space are anticipating the upcoming election to be very different than the last. The candidates, lobbyists and other interested parties will no doubt be going full force with their social media strategies to win votes.  The question is: will women play a larger role this time around?  Which campaigns will be smart enough to tap into our powerful spheres of influence?

Interested in fidning out more about how women and social media are revolutionizing politics in America? Start with PunditMom’s book: Mothers of Intention.

 Why Activists, Policymakers and Political Candidates Should Tap Into Women Influencers Online

Go Back To MomCrunch

5 Comments

It was a great panel, wasn’t it? So happy to have been part of such a great discussion with you all.

Stephanie Himel-Nelson commented on Sep 29 11 at 11:29 pm

Stacey, Thank you so much for being a part of the panel and sharing your insights on so many of these issues. Fingers crossed that we can get a few more men in the room next time. ;)

Joanne Bamberger aka PunditMom commented on Sep 30 11 at 10:29 am

Is there a reason for why the panel was super mom-centric? Just wondering. I figure if you’re talking about women in general you’d want all types of women.

I know that you, Stacy, weren’t the creator but it’s a valid question.

Heather B. commented on Sep 30 11 at 10:32 am

Heather, the panel wasn’t pitched or promoted as mom-centric, and the panelists chosen this year were solely for their expertise — Kelly Wallace for media, Stacey Ferguson to address communities of color and Stephanie Himel-Nelson for her experience with Blue Star Families and interaction with the White House. None of my questions were focused on moms — the audience steered the conversation that way, which I was sad about and tried to re-direct as much as possible.

Joanne Bamberger aka PunditMom commented on Sep 30 11 at 10:55 am

Heather, wasn’t trying to bite your head off (I think you know that!) Just wanted to let you know where we were coming from on the panel! :)

Joanne Bamberger aka PunditMom commented on Sep 30 11 at 11:43 am

Add your take:

Note: Babble is a supportive, diverse community. We encourage a range of opinions,
but any unduly hostile comments will be removed.


Comments are delayed up to 15 minutes

  • Send Us Your Tips

  • Most Popular on Facebook

    Best of Babble.com


  • Paula Bernstein
  • Cecily Kellogg
  • Ria Sharon
  • Janice Croze and Susan Carraretto
  • Alli Worthington
  • Disney Online Moms & Family Portfolio

    The Walt Disney Company supports Babble as a platform dedicated to honest, engaged, informed, intelligent and open conversation about parenting. However, the opinions expressed on this site are those of individual parents/writers and do not reflect the views of Disney. In addition, content provided on this site is for entertainment or informational purposes only and should not be construed as medical advice, diagnosis, treatment, or safety advice. Click here for additional information. Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Interest-Based Ads

    More in MomCrunch (50 of 952 articles)