Famecrawler

Five Reasons The New Zodiac Signs 2011 Should Be Changed Back PRONTO!!!

Posted by tonifitz76 on January 13th, 2011 at 8:52 pm
zodiac 300x235 Five Reasons The New Zodiac Signs 2011 Should Be Changed Back PRONTO!!!

New zodiac signs 2011: Let's go back to the old ones

I can finally identify with Rip Van Winkle: The world has changed overnight. I went to bed last night a Virgo; I woke up a Leo. I know I’m not the only one outraged over the new zodiac signs 2011. I’m ready to start a petition against the new zodiac signs. Who’s with me? Here’s five reasons they need to change the new zodiac signs 2011 back to the old zodiac signs PRONTO:

  1. No one can pronounce the new sign, Ophieuchus.
  2. I’m suddenly the same sign as Spencer Pratt – ewww.
  3. Parents will have to have their kids’ astrological charts done all over again. (Not me though. I haven’t even gotten around to their baby books yet.)
  4. You will never, never remember to look at the right sign in the newspaper anymore.
  5. When you ask someone “what’s your sign,” it will lead to a long, involved discussion about the new zodiac signs vs. old zodiac signs when really you just wanted to break the ice.

Why do you want the new signs to go away?

Photo: Wikipedia

Other recent posts by ToniFitz76:

Who Are The New Virgos: Dates And Traits Of The New Zodiac Sign

Complete List of New Zodiac Sign Dates: Are Your Fave Celebs Affected?

Five Things About Brandi Favre, Plus Link To Her Facebook Page

Kristen Stewart and Robert Pattinson Break Up (Suuuure They Did)

Teen Mom`s Farrah Abraham: Check Me Out In A Bikini!

 Five Reasons The New Zodiac Signs 2011 Should Be Changed Back PRONTO!!!

Go Back To Famecrawler

21 Comments

You’re an idiot… the signs aren’t changed because someone decided to shake things up, they changed because the sun and the stars don’t align the same way they did 2000 years ago.

Drebob commented on Jan 13 11 at 9:21 pm

An other reason…if you are like me and proud of your sign…you would have a tattoo of your sign…and now what am I supposed to do…

Brittany commented on Jan 13 11 at 9:21 pm

Yeah! I was outraged when my friend told me about this! I was a Gemini but now Im a Taurus?! I mean, Im not even going to remember that! Ill definitely sign the petition

Michelle commented on Jan 13 11 at 9:24 pm

………… there’s nothing you can do about it, fool. It’s something that wasn’t noticed before and now everyone’s just beginning to correct it. Get on with the times.

creeper commented on Jan 13 11 at 9:25 pm

If they can change the signs just like that, how can I possibly attach any credibility to the zodiac?

Diane commented on Jan 13 11 at 9:30 pm

The earth’s position with all the other planets/moon/sun HAS changed. It’s the truth. Which means it doesn’t effect those only born after 2009, it’s everyone. The planetary alignment that used to affect you has shifted over and been replaced with a new one. Why did everyone feel such a strange change in themselves last year? The universe is speaking. People need to quit being so bull-headed. My old sign made no sense to me my entire life as a Virgo.New astrology says I’m a Leo and it makes perfect perfect sense.

Debbie commented on Jan 13 11 at 9:40 pm

The earth’s position with all the other planets/moon/sun HAS changed. It’s the truth. Which means it doesn’t effect those only born after 2009, it’s everyone. The planetary alignment that used to affect you has shifted over and been replaced with a new one. Why did everyone feel such a strange change in themselves last year? The universe is speaking. People need to quit being so bull-headed. My old sign made no sense to me my entire life as a Virgo.New astrology says I’m a Leo and it makes perfect perfect sense.

Debbie commented on Jan 13 11 at 9:41 pm

And if you got a tattoo of your old sign, big deal! Get another one lol. Funny for me is I got a big lion tattoo 3 years ago and now I’m a Leo.

Debbie commented on Jan 13 11 at 9:43 pm

Exactly Michelle, its a bunch of Bull**** because some jerk wants major fame to his name! Im a LEO and will ALWAYS BE a LEO!

Get with the times my A**!!!!!

Monica commented on Jan 13 11 at 9:45 pm

I just got my taurus tattooed on my arm…wow. Idc what anyone says, I’ll always be a Taurus. So 3000 years later they decide to look and find out the signs are a fees day different now…WTF. I’ll sign that petition.

Jenn commented on Jan 13 11 at 10:01 pm

Watch full video at: http://new-zodiac-signs.notlong.com

Sachin Pruthi commented on Jan 13 11 at 10:08 pm

I love how people are getting so worked up over some thing that doesnt really matter XD

Zach commented on Jan 13 11 at 10:14 pm

New Zodiac Signs 2011 List And Information…http://www.12newsalerts.com/2011/01/14/new-zodiac-signs-2011-list-and-information/

Adnan Sharif commented on Jan 13 11 at 10:45 pm

i herd it dosnt change what u used to be i was a taurus im still a taurus its the ppl that are born from now on that change

kimberly commented on Jan 13 11 at 11:01 pm

If you were born BEFORE 2009 then you are still whatever sign you were born as. The new Zodiac signs only apply to those born AFTER 2009. It’s still really confusing and stupid but it is what it is.

Cristin commented on Jan 14 11 at 1:13 am

This “news blast” returns almost as reliably as Hailey’s Comet and each time people panic in the streets claiming the sky is falling. We can always predict that this little misinformation meteor will dash across headlines with similar results each time. No reason to worry about your natal sign. What surprises me is that someone actually hauls it out as if it is a ‘shocking new discovery’, when all anyone has to do is run a Google search and find the identical story repeated over and over again through the years, 2007, 2003, 1999, 1994….there even books on this stuff. But suddenly it newsworthy? Maybe in the Babylonian Free Press, circa 200BC….

Every four or five years there is a news blitz to the effect that astrology as we know it has changed and we are no longer the sign are what we once were or thought we were, and astrology and all of our prognostications are wrong by default. Suddenly you are no longer a Leo and now you have to turn that Lion tattoo into a Crab. And to make matters worse, a new Zodiac invader, the “13th Zodiac sign” Ophiuchus, has entered the scene. Shock!…Awe!

NEWS FLASH: There are twelve divisions or signs along the zodiacal belt, that once generally aligned with twelve of the prominent constellations in that ecliptic. These are Solar oriented ecliptical divisions, mapped in the sky by Lagranian orbital separations and the spaces in between them as seen from Earth’s perspective. As we are fully aware, this has shifted over time; I think they teach this in elementary schools now kiddos, don’t they? But some people seem to be still a bit out of the loop on this one.

Nothing has changed, except maybe someone finally woke up to this fact and declared it a ‘new discovery’…all over again.

One thing you can count on with certainty, most astrologers are quite aware of complex astronomical functions and almost all astronomers are completely clueless when it comes to even the most basics fundamentals of astrological

From Michael Erlewine
Technical Stuff that might be over the heads of astronomers that we astrologers are fully aware of….

Sidereal Zodiac: One of several zodiacs used by various astrologers, both ancient and modern, which is fixed with reference to the stars. Conversion from the Tropical Zodiac to a Sidereal Zodiac is normally specified by giving the longitude of the Vernal Point in terms of the Sidereal Zodiac, or (equivalently) the value of the Ayanamasha for a specific date. Western sidereal astrologers use the value of the SVP (Synetic Vernal Point) specified by Fagan and Allen, which defines the mean longitude of the Vernal Point of the epoch BY1950.0 to be exactly 335°57’28.64″, which is equivalent to stating that its Ayanamsha is 24°02’31.36″. The Fagan-Allen determination leads to a Zodiac which is identical to that used by ancient astrologers (Egyptian, Babylonian, Persian, Arabian, Magi). Its use has been established to within 0.1° for the period BC786-AD500, and to within less than 5° as early as BC2767. All ancient astrologers used the same Sidereal Zodiac, but its universality diminished from the time of Claudius Ptolemy (about 75AD) until its re-discovery by Cyril Fagan in our century. Modern {Hindu Astrology}, which is clearly derived from Greek sources after the Alexandrian conquests which followed his rise to power in BC336, and reflect much of the work of Ptolemy, uses one of a set of Ayanamshas, which yield coordinate systems some of which are only approximately fixed with reference to the stars. And so on….

The Astrologian commented on Jan 14 11 at 2:21 pm

i think this new sign crap is rediculous what about the people that have been a virgo or a leo or a capricorn for the last 80 years you expect them to remember what there new signs are now i think they should change back and stay the way they where no one really agree’s with this new change any ways and what about all the people who have there signs tattoo’d to there bodys are they suppose to just pay to have them removed now? i think who ever changed the astology should pay to have them all removed

Andrea commented on Jan 14 11 at 5:30 pm

I’m sorry to tell U but. . . . I haven’t changed in the LEAST BIT since last year OR 2009 so. . . . yea. Who cares about all this, it’s all just a bunch of mumbo jumbo that is made for fun & some nuts took it seriously in this world & then many people followed. It’s just a sign, does it affect your life? Did it change U completely? Are all of your plans ruined? Does it change who U really are? Is the world gonna end?. . . . Get over it.

Destiny commented on May 03 11 at 7:38 pm

Add your take:

Note: Babble is a supportive, diverse community. We encourage a range of opinions,
but any unduly hostile comments will be removed.


Comments are delayed up to 15 minutes

Most Popular on Facebook

Best of Babble.com


  • Christopher Rogers
  • Shana Aborn
  • Joanna Mazewski
  • Sunny Chanel
  • Disney Online Moms & Family Portfolio

    The Walt Disney Company supports Babble as a platform dedicated to honest, engaged, informed, intelligent and open conversation about parenting. However, the opinions expressed on this site are those of individual parents/writers and do not reflect the views of Disney. In addition, content provided on this site is for entertainment or informational purposes only and should not be construed as medical advice, diagnosis, treatment, or safety advice. Click here for additional information. Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Interest-Based Ads

    More in Famecrawler (50 of 27508 articles)