Famecrawler
Dennis Hopper’s 7-Year-Old Daughter Not at His Funeral
Dennis Hopper was laid to rest over the weekend after losing his battle with prostate cancer. Unfortunately, his seven-year-old daughter, Galen Grier Hopper, wasn’t there to see him off to his final resting place. That’s because Hopper and his wife, Victoria Duffy are in the midst of a nasty divorce battle over his estate, and neither Duffy nor Hopper’s representatives seemed able to broker a deal that would allow Galen to attend her dad’s funeral.
What a shame. I don’t care what happened between Hopper and Duffy, or how much they hated each other’s guts. You’re talking about a little girl here, and her dad, and not only did she have a right to be at his funeral, but the adults in her life had an obligation to make it happen. Sadly, they didn’t.
So are they making amends now, and trying to help Galen grieve? Nope. They’re still bickering over the details.
Duffy’s side is saying Galen was disinvited from attending. Hopper’s side is saying that Duffy wouldn’t let Galen attend unless she was personally able to escort her.
Here’s what we actually know: Hopper’s attorney sent a letter to Duffy’s representatives, outlining Hopper’s wishes for Galen to attend without her mother, who had said some pretty nasty stuff about Hopper and his family in his final months. (Apparently, Hopper’s family was also not that wild about having her there.) They suggest Galen fly to New Mexico for the funeral with her nanny instead. Duffy’s side maintains that the letter arrived the day of the funeral and it was unrealistic to think a mother would send a 7-year-old on a plane alone.
Who to believe? Who cares? A seven-year-old kid missed her dad’s funeral. So the details don’t really matter, do they?
Source/Photo: axelle/bauergriffinonline.com
Go Back To Famecrawler
12 Comments
Michele Smith commented on Jun 08 10 at 3:24 pmSpeaking as a psychotherapist and a mother, it’s highly likely that the child’s welfare was put first enough to decide that 7 years old was too young to go to the funeral. We have no idea how they decided to deal with the child’s understanding of her father’s death, but it is likely that it was discussed. Given that Mr. Hopper was allowed visitation (with partial custody?) indicates there was some level of cooperation. My understanding through the media over the years is that Mr. Hopper’s art collection was extensive, and extremely valuable. People get ugly when there is large amounts of wealth involved. Again, as a therapist, often the parents may fight about money but put the child first or at least attempt to separate the issues. 7yo is young for what would doubtless be a huge funeral. Do you know if she was allowed alone time with family at funeral home before the funeral? We can hope that these adults figured out a way to say goodbye to dad. Given their resources it is likely that professional help was and will be involved dealing with the loss.
It really is too bad to make drama out of a situation that we know nothing about. Would it be as interesting to readers to discuss how difficult it will be to lose her father,who most likely will leave her some very valuable items, who was an icon? That may be an interesting spin and one that doesn’t feed judgmental assumptions. How about finding out what was his priceless collection contained and how he handled that with the kids and the wives? Something real.
Bennett commented on Jun 08 10 at 6:38 pmI try to think of what Dennis Hopper would say? Go to Appocalypse Now ” What are they gonna say about him? What are they gonna say? That he was a kind man? That he was a wise man? That he had plans, man? That he had wisdom? Bullshit, man!” Dennis’s co-actors will put the little girl right by telling her who Dennis Hopper really was.
gr8faithful1 commented on Jun 08 10 at 10:45 pmMichelle Smith said: “Speaking as a psychotherapist and a mother, it’s highly likely that the child’s welfare was put first enough to decide that 7 years old was too young to go to the funeral.” Speaking as a psychotherapist it appears you know nothing about death of a close family member or friend and the process of grieving. Birth, death, and everything in between are part of life and when children are sheltered too much it can damage them just as much as physical or psychological abuse. Children who grow up never learning to deal with life’s challenges with loving support end up thinking life should be easy and then have more trouble as adults dealing with life’s struggles. ALSO the mother insisting on coming to the funeral is more about control than anything else. She was not putting the daughter’s best interests at heart. She wouldn’t let her daughter go anywhere near the wake or funeral, so how could the daughter have “family” time with her father’s side of the family? Maybe YOU need to go back to school because you didn’t give a professional opinion, you gave a PERSONAL opinion. ALSO this child needs the connection with her father’s side of the family and her siblings to help her grieve. THEY are the only people in her life who genuinely KNOW how she feels about losing her father. Her mother clearly has no feelings of grief over the loss and cannot support her daughter the same way as others. I am not saying take the mother out of the daughter’s life, that would also be disastrous. I am saying that if the mother has the daughters best interest at heart then she would understand how much her daughter needs to grieve in a supportive environment.
ALSO don’t be fooled by an order of the court for “shared”, “joint”, and “partial” custody issues. Agreements may be made in court with opposing attorneys negotiations (or ordered by the judge), this does not mean that the parents get along. I have seen many parents AGREE to shared parenting in court and still use THE CHILD(REN) as tools to hurt the ex and the ex’s family (even when the ex dies). It’s a shame this child is so young because the mother is likely to keep her from his family just to spite them. It’s more likely that the mother is acting like a spoiled brat and more immature than the daughter! She’s like a whiny child: “I didn’t get my way so I’m going to hurt you however I can!”
Speaking as a mother (who has lost children and other family members) I know it doesn’t take a psychology degree (which I didn’t have at the time) to know that children need to be part of the process at funerals and obtain support from as many close family and friends as possible. The mother needs to let go of issues with her husband that don’t apply any longer and start thinking about her daughter’s well being. No one on her mother or father’s side should bash the other parent or family to the daughter.
This is a sad situation and I pray this young girl DOESN’T end up in counseling later in life because people were so selfish about revenge that they didn’t think of her first. Who cares about the money anyway? It doesn’t really apply here. This and similar situations happen all the time regardless of money and possessions and the only people who really suffer are the children. It’s a crying shame!
texasemt commented on Jun 09 10 at 5:11 amMichele, you’re so stupid that it hurts. As a divorced father I have no doubt in my mind that if something happened to me tomorrow my ex wife wouldn’t allow my 5 year old son or my 3 year old twin daughters to attend my funeral. How do I know this? Because she’s a selfish #itch. Yeah my kids might not understand what a funeral is, but know what? One day they will be adults, and then they will understand. A funeral is about closure and no one is saying that that little girl will be there by her self. My children wouldn’t be attending my funeral by themselves, they would have my parents, my aunts, my uncles, my cousins and their children. That woman should be strung up by her wrists and horsewhipped for hurting that innocent little girl like that. My heart goes out to her and her father’s family, I always liked Mr Hopper and am glad he is finally at peace.
gr8faithful1 commented on Jun 09 10 at 10:31 amTexasEMT, It’s a sad situation when any parent doesn’t work to get along for the children after a divorce. I have seen both men and women engage in a battle only concerned with their own personal victory. The children get hurt more than anyone. You may do well in the future if you start keeping a diary now. Date and write anything the mother does that is vindictive or controlling. Especially when she adverts your rights that are written in the court order for visitation. Never miss a visitation, either attempt to switch time (if you cannot take them during your scheduled visit) or ask for more time (family reunions, funerals, weddings, little league sports, etc.) When she declines events which scheduling is out of your control then write it down. If and when (probably when) you ever go back to court to work out additional terms, then ask for visitation allowances for these family events with so much notice (usually 48hrs to 2wks). The courts favor BOTH parents staying involved with their children. Never put their mother down to them, and don’t allow your family put her down either. Find a family member or friend to talk to about everything. When the children start talking about what the mother says about you (most likely they will), listen and say supportive things: “Well mommy is just hurting right now, and sometimes people say things they don’t mean when they hurt. We both love you very much, and that will never change.” Then privately write what they told you in your journal.
My experience is not just professional, it’s personal. As a divorced mother of over 15 years with 4 children we have always worked to remain civil, and put the children’s best interest first. It’s the ex’s wife who has a problem and puts me down to the kids. They have grown to hate her because of this. One example is we had two children graduate on the same day (youngest 8th grade, one high school). The 8th grade grad the ex’s wife didn’t come and we all sat together as a family. Our adult children, grandchildren, me, my fiancee, and my ex.) Later that day at our other graduation, she was there and they sat at the other end of the gym. Our children and grandchildren were split between us. This is just one example, as the children grew up similar situations occurred at sports and school events. I have seen too many children become emotionally damaged because both parents use them for control and fight. If you don’t put them in the middle by fighting back they have a good chance of emotional stability and will more likely come to you later in life for advice. If the mother persists they will also learn to see her as the emotionally troubled on and get tired of her dramatic attempts for attention.
It’s easy to hold onto anger which fuels more problems in the parental relationship. Letting go of it and responding with encouragement to the children will deny the mother the attention she craves. Your power comes with giving the children positive support, and writing down everything she does to interfere with your parental role, and your credibility with the children.
Another thing: when I lost my daughter (stillborn) I had 3 children 2-6. The two year old didn’t know what was going on, but the 3 and 6 year old did. When my son passed from meningitis (@ 6yrs) I had 3 remaining children ages 3-11. They all knew what was going on and of all the funerals they’ve been to as children they have learned that death and grief are a part of life just as birth is. I had one more child after the loss of my son, and when my youngest was 5 my father passed away. When I told him grandpa passed (before the funeral) he told me that he sees the soul like the heart but it keeps on living after we die. That was his way of seeing this, and he showed more understanding about death than I had ever talked about with him.
I feel for the Hopper family as well. Mostly I feel for his daughter and the loss she is feeling all alone. The rest of his family have the love and support through each other and I know the absence of his daughter creates more grief. She is the one being hurt more because she is denied the closure she needs.
God bless you and your beautiful children.
gr8faithful1 commented on Jun 09 10 at 10:45 amSo I wrote a book, yet wanted to add one more thing. As a counselor of children/adolescents it’s clear they recognize improper behavior in one or both parents. The emotional struggle comes from being pushed to choose sides. Even if they appear to choose a side, most likely they will flip opinions often because of internal conflict. When one or both parents encourage the bond of the other parent, the children are free to be themselves without fear of losing the approval of their parents. Even if your ex puts you down and uses the children for control, the most help you can give them is to encourage their love for their mother. Believe me, it will work to your favor, because in the end it will be their choice to trust in you more. They may do things initially to keep the peace with the mother, however if you are consistent in their lives in a supportive way, they will feel more comfortable with you because they won’t have to compromise their love to keep the peace with you. I really do hope this all helps you and your children. It’s really all about the children, not about you, me, or the ex. Ironically when you put your children first, you will have the closest relationship with them possible very soon.
ROSEVIER commented on Jun 11 10 at 2:28 pmHurray for that mother refusing to let the only child of she and Big Bunny Rabbit go without her to the ceremony of death. No one could substitute for the mother as interpreter or guardian there, and to be dished out there with a “nanny” would turn it into a restaurant visit of some sort—a somewhat impersonal meal. And would remind her the rest of her life that mommy was bad, and that she, the little girl, was to be cursed forever as mostly mommyless and certainly daddlyless.
Horrors, the custody-mongers—all claiming that shopping your child around with split homes and split lives, as if the child is some carveable meal—-horrors.
Hurray for that mother saying if she does not go with me, she does not go.
MARRIOTT commented on Jun 11 10 at 2:29 pmHurray for that mother refusing to let the only child of she and Big Bunny Rabbit go without her to the ceremony of death. No one could substitute for the mother as interpreter or guardian there, and to be dished out there with a “nanny” would turn it into a restaurant visit of some sort—a somewhat impersonal meal. And would remind her the rest of her life that mommy was bad, and that she, the little girl, was to be cursed forever as mostly mommyless and certainly daddlyless.
Horrors, the custody-mongers—all claiming that shopping your child around with split homes and split lives, as if the child is some carveable meal—-horrors.
Hurray for that mother saying if she does not go with me, she does not go.
Angie commented on Jun 12 10 at 12:04 amI agree with above. And if Hopper had given a damn or God had given a damn, that child would be loved, honored, and protected there by her mother.
stan commented on Jun 12 10 at 2:31 pmWomen who take all our money should shut up. Do what the court says or the man’s family says. That woman will get her day in court and she won’t like it one bit. She’s lucky she’s not in court with me.I’ve got two exes and now they’re both doing what I say, they learned.
moira commented on Jun 12 10 at 2:32 pmThis is about Dennis Hopper and his family, not you.
jhcryer commented on Jun 12 10 at 2:35 pmDennis Hopper is not here anymore. Just the family wolves.
Add your take:
Note: Babble is a supportive, diverse community. We encourage a range of opinions,
but any unduly hostile comments will be removed.
Comments are delayed up to 15 minutes






Christopher Rogers
Shana Aborn
Joanna Mazewski
Sunny Chanel
The Walt Disney Company supports Babble as a platform dedicated to honest, engaged, informed, intelligent and open conversation about parenting. However, the opinions expressed on this site are those of individual parents/writers and do not reflect the views of Disney. In addition, content provided on this site is for entertainment or informational purposes only and should not be construed as medical advice, diagnosis, treatment, or safety advice.

12