Famecrawler

Will New Autism Study Affect Jenny McCarthy’s Credibility?

Posted by lulu and moxleys mom on May 21st, 2010 at 11:40 am

jenny mccarthy elves evan vaccines e1274454082149 Will New Autism Study Affect Jenny McCarthys Credibility?In what would seem to be another setback for Jenny McCarthy’s autism activism, a study was just released that shows the gluten and casein-free diet that Jenny McCarthy advocates for children with autism — and what she claims helped her son Evan “recover” — does not improve the symptoms of autism.  While I’m sure McCarthy truly believes everything she’s said about autism, she’s also made a substantial amount of money and enhanced her visibility being what she calls a “Mommy Warrior.” So will this medical study affect her credibility?

My guess is no.  The medical establishment has long called McCarthy’s expertise on autism into question, and since then she’s landed a recurring spot on Oprah’s Fridays Live, signed a development deal with Oprah’s new network OWN and published a best-selling book.  Perhaps McCarthy’s fans like the hope she gives, the passion she has for the topic given her son fought the same battle. And no amount of medical establishment naysaying can trump that.

 Will New Autism Study Affect Jenny McCarthys Credibility?

Go Back To Famecrawler

9 Comments

Does Jenny McCarthy have any credibility to lose?

Not in my house. And, yes, I have an autistic child.

LBRB Sullivan commented on May 21 10 at 2:29 pm

It’s extremely important to note that our scientific understanding of Autism is still very primitive. One of the key missing pieces is the understanding of different types of Autism. We now know there are different causes of Autism, but the picture is not yet complete. Without the ability to categorize and identify different subsets of Autism, it’s impossible to prove statistically that one treatment does not improve the condition.

It’s important to look at both scientific discovery as well as anecdotal evidence. While scientific discoveries are obviously a lot more solid than anecdotal treatment, they are inevitably behind. So for parents who are running out of time, there’s a very solid and rational ground for trying out reasonable methods that have garnered anecdotal successes.

Subtype commented on May 21 10 at 5:41 pm

Jenny McCarthy is a joke. Come on people, Don’t waist your time. She thinks that her x husband gave her son Autism.Then she cheats on the guy with Jim Carrey and claims she has the cure for Autism. Anyone ever ask how her son is doing in all of this? Last time I heard Jenny was in Vegas drinking vodka and doing a hand full of pills. Get your advice from your doctor like the rest of us.

Matt L. commented on May 21 10 at 8:38 pm

If allergy test indicate need for the diet than
it works. Each child is a individual and test for allergy only can help a child feel better. So if a child feels better why would it not work? Testing is the key!

Teresa Fresco commented on May 23 10 at 4:07 pm

Jenny McCarthy has no credibility so how can she loose any more of it? Her ideas are not based on sound scientific testing but from whatever quack she’s talked to last.

Cathy Carey commented on May 23 10 at 5:27 pm

Maybe some of you idiots should try it before knocking it. My daughter is one child who has made great strides by being on this diet. It has been confirmed by a traditional doctor that she has a severe allergy to milk and pineapple. He said that she probably does have intolerance to other foods too, due to the long term damage from 2 1/2 years of allergen exposure. She is 3 and besides a speech delay, you would not know that she is Autistic now. This is far from where she started 9 months ago. She had no eye contact, would wake up all hours of the night, had only 5 words, hand flapped and ran around like superman. Explain that to me Einstein? She wasn’t one the kids having tons of other theapies at the time either.

Sharla W. commented on Jun 15 10 at 12:38 am

Oh and by the way, Jenny rocks. At least she has a voice for her son. Do any of you even advocate for you children?

Sharla W. commented on Jun 15 10 at 12:39 am

The diet does not work, if you child has sensitivites than it is fine for you to use, but don’t force it on a child who doesn’t need it. Has anyone ever done a double blind study on it? We have. We have 7 children with autism, we put some on the gluten/casien free diet, some on a natural foods diet, and the rest were allowed to eat anything they wanted. Guess what, they all made the same amounts of progress around the same times! Same thing with the whole vaccination debate, we had some children vaccinated, some were not, and guess what, ALL ended up with autism. You know what that tells us, Genetics plays the role, not foods, not vaccines, genetics is the key! You want your children to succeed, work with them, force them out of their comfort zones and make them work with you, even if it means they cry and fight you for hours! Forcing them out of their comfort zone makes them understand that the world does not run how they want it to, that they have to adapt to live in it. You know how I know, my husband and I have autism too. (Autistics attract! Who else could understand us more than one of our own?) We were told our children would be non-verbal and they had severe autism, but each of them is fully verbal and you cannot tell any of them have it except for the occasional hand flap, noise, or out of place laugh.

CJ commented on Aug 05 10 at 6:14 pm

This was a very poorly designed study.The University of Rochester Study excluded Autistic children who have co-morbid bowel disorders then declared that GFCF diet doesn’t help with Autism symptoms. Yet it was never parents of kids without bowel disorders that reported benefits to GFCF to begin with. It is the kids with bowel disorders whose parents report benefits from GFCF. Autism is not all one condition. This is what happens when studies are designed in ivory towers without considering sub-groups. A better designed study was recently done by Penn State: http://www.huck.psu.edu/about/news-archive/autism-gluten-casein

University of Rochester could learn something about Autism and adequate study design from Penn State.

I know that GFCF diet saved my son’s life because he stopped getting out of the house and wandering the street when he was put on the diet (and if he gets contaminated by those foods it starts up again, every time). So to answer your question – The poorly designed Rochester study does not damage Jenny McCarthy’s credibility on GFCF in my book. It only makes me question the motives of the person who wrote this article. It is a study on GFCF and Autism – why bring Jenny into it?

Marina commented on Apr 25 12 at 4:08 pm

Add your take:

Note: Babble is a supportive, diverse community. We encourage a range of opinions,
but any unduly hostile comments will be removed.


Comments are delayed up to 15 minutes

Most Popular on Facebook

Best of Babble.com


  • Christopher Rogers
  • Shana Aborn
  • Joanna Mazewski
  • Sunny Chanel
  • Disney Online Moms & Family Portfolio

    The Walt Disney Company supports Babble as a platform dedicated to honest, engaged, informed, intelligent and open conversation about parenting. However, the opinions expressed on this site are those of individual parents/writers and do not reflect the views of Disney. In addition, content provided on this site is for entertainment or informational purposes only and should not be construed as medical advice, diagnosis, treatment, or safety advice. Click here for additional information. Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Interest-Based Ads

    More in Famecrawler (50 of 27474 articles)