Famecrawler

Michael Jackson Never Legally Adopted Kids!

Posted by josh loposer on June 30th, 2009 at 3:00 pm

425jacksonjacksonjacksonjacksonlc062909 Michael Jackson Never Legally Adopted Kids!

Now that we know that Debbie Rowe ISN’T the biological mother of MJ’s kids, and it’s highly likely that he’s not the biological father… you might have thought that Michael had taken the precaution to quietly adopt Prince Michael and Paris Michael. But he didn’t.

True, nobody ever accused Michale of being practical… but didn’t his lawyers/family/friends advise him to adopt?

Perhaps they didn’t know the whole story, but they had to know that there was at least a chance (since they look absolutely nothing like him) that Michael wasn’t Prince Michael and Paris’ biological father. The mother of MJ’s youngest, Blanket, was never recorded.

Strangest of all, I can’t imagine MJ leaving his parental rights wide open like that. He loved those children more than anything, yet he failed to protect them from being stripped away from him.

Apparently, Michael just didn’t think any third party (the biological father perhaps) would try to claim custody and try to get their hands on a piece of the MJ estate.

It remains to be seen whether Debbie Rowe will try to work her way into the MJ funds, but she did apparently carry the children. Confusing.

Source/Photo

 Michael Jackson Never Legally Adopted Kids!

Go Back To Famecrawler

9 Comments

[...] Michael Jackson Never Legally Adopted Kids! [...]

The REAL Biological Father Of Michael Jackson’s Kids Revealed? | Famecrawler commented on Jul 01 09 at 7:01 am

MJ was a big liar about everything. He said he only had two plastic surgeries and that was on his nose. He said he had a relationship with Blankets’ mom. He said those kids were biologically his over and over. He was a delusional, spoiled child who thought he could do anything and say anything. He bought those kids like pets. Of course he never thought to adopt them, he never thought to be a parent.

Ali commented on Jun 30 09 at 7:23 pm

Sometimes a donor can terminate the parental rights (potential ones) prior to the birth of a child. We don’t know what happened.

reader commented on Jun 30 09 at 7:43 pm

He did not adopt because a court probably would not have approved the adoption, considering his history and lifestyle.

Susan commented on Jul 03 09 at 8:27 pm

omg ofcorse theyre his. Poor children they’re life is really messed up right now and they get press saying that they dont have real parents now ?!
Just give them a break. Not every child has to look like their parents After all he did have plastic surgurey, and blanket might of been by a One night stand :S
RIP MJ xx

hannah commented on Jul 07 09 at 5:28 pm

CommentsI think it’s really sad to see that the kids Michael did all he could to protect from publicity, are now pictured everywhere. I think it’s sad that Joe has got anything to do with the kids, knowing that Michael have told that he beat him an was tyrannic towards him and his siblings growing up. And as to Omer being Michaels son, I don’t know. But Omer himself sais it’s not true. Maybe it’s the truth, or maybe he just want to protect himself, as obviosely Michael himself tried to do with all his kids.

I read all kinds of speculations about whos the biological father og Michaels children… Well, If there has been one blue eyed, fair skinned person in Michaels pedigree, that gene could reccesively have been carried down to these kids. So it is actuelly possible that blue eyes and feir skin could suddenly pop up when he mix his genes with a person who have two of these reccesive genes, wich his former wife must have had since she had the features… Usual? No, since Michael also needs to have a dark eyes/dark skin gene, that is dominant. But actually a 50% chance. And knowing Michaels tendency to do things out of the normal, and that the children was beeing artificially “created”, isn’t it possible he tested the sperm for dna? He could make a list of features he wanted, and they could find the right sperm cells for the children. ” I want a girl, with light skin, blue eyes, brown hair and a narrow nose.” “And I want a boy with light hair, brown eyes, narrow nose, and a light complection.” “OK, Mr. Jackson. Will do, Mr Jackson!”

So, it’s possible! Why don’t we leave the poor children alone? Everyone who come forward now, claiming to be one or the others father, don’t respect Michaels wishes. He wanted to be their father, and weather he was the biological or adoptive father, doesn’t matter. He was theri fater. The only one they have known. And the only one they should have to know. He also wanted to protect them from the public. I hope his sister can do that for him. I hope the children can decide for them self later in life if they want to be a public person or not…

But I know they won’t be able to, and it breaks my heart!

Norwegian biologist commented on Sep 01 09 at 5:52 am

He didn’t need to adopt Paris and Prince because he was married to their mother when they were born, so he is already the legal father. That’s why he and Debbie Rowe married.

CeCe commented on Nov 07 09 at 10:18 am

I have never thought that Michael was the father of any of the kids. I don’t agree with the saying that Debbie isn’t the mother. She is, At least, I think, For Prince I and Paris. Blanket; I had found an inconsistency in Michael’s story on the Bashir interview. So, he wasn’t being honest. God knows that I adore Michael, And I would never do anything to hurt him, But people who think that these kids are his biologically need to wake up and remove their head from Michael’s rear end. People see what they want to see. It is easy to try and point out features that may look like someone. Okay, Blanket’s eyes are dark, So what? How many people have dark eyes in the world? It could have been anyone. As for Prince I, I have seen some strikingly strong characteristics of him looking like Dr. Klein. People should see a Christmas photo that was taken of him with Michael and the kids. Prince looks just like him. None of the kids look like Michael prior to surgery. If no one had known these kids to be Michael’s, You would think that they were white kids. They do not look black. There was a confidentiality agreement that was signed between Debbie and Michael at the time of marriage, Why was that? Give me a good reason as to why he made her sign a confidentiality agreement if there were to be any legal issues in the future? If they were both the REAL parent(s), There would be no use for such a thing. A mixed baby is always going to have some dominant feature for it being black. Having an ancestor who is 200 years down the genetic line does not qualify you for having a child come out with black blood, Sorry. You can’t base that around that theory of the kids being his because he has white people in his lineage. (I don’t know if he does, But I have heard about him having Indian in the family tree), Still, It doesn’t matter because it is something far down the line. Get my drift?

Me commented on Dec 05 09 at 9:46 pm

You’re right CECE. I know just what picture you are talking about too. Prince is sitting smiling, and he looks a lot like the doctor. I was a fan of Michael too, but I am not going to pretend that he told the truth about his kids. None of the children have any black traits. I can understand one of the children looking non black, but all three? Darker genes are dominant. Yes Michael has some white ancestry. His father even has light eyes. But that does not mean those kids are his. When black people have white looking children, the black parent is usually biracial themselves, or have much more recent white ancestry. Michael does not. No way does original Michael with his kinky afro and dark skin going to pop out three kids in a row with zero sign of black hair texture. Biracial children usually have hair between the races. Not straight, but not nappy either. His kids all have “white” hair.

Lors commented on Dec 13 09 at 5:35 pm

Add your take:

Note: Babble is a supportive, diverse community. We encourage a range of opinions,
but any unduly hostile comments will be removed.


Comments are delayed up to 15 minutes

Most Popular on Facebook

Best of Babble.com


  • Christopher Rogers
  • Monica Bielanko
  • Shana Aborn
  • Joanna Mazewski
  • Sunny Chanel
  • Disney Online Moms & Family Portfolio

    The Walt Disney Company supports Babble as a platform dedicated to honest, engaged, informed, intelligent and open conversation about parenting. However, the opinions expressed on this site are those of individual parents/writers and do not reflect the views of Disney. In addition, content provided on this site is for entertainment or informational purposes only and should not be construed as medical advice, diagnosis, treatment, or safety advice. Click here for additional information. Privacy Policy | Terms of Service

    More in Famecrawler (50 of 26027 articles)