Dadding

Why You Should Wait At Least Two Years To Have Your Second Kid

Posted by Jason on November 18th, 2011 at 2:00 pm

equation 300x199 Why You Should Wait At Least Two Years To Have Your Second KidTiming is everything. After my wife and I settled on the number of children we planned on having (she wanted three, and after I’d stopped my hysterical, slightly panicked laughing fit I countered with one, so we split the difference and went with two) we then discussed our schedule. Three years apart seemed about right; both of us are four years older than our siblings, and we wanted our kids to be a bit closer in age. At the same time, the thought of having two kids in diapers made us recoil in horror. (Sorry, John Cave Osborne.) Three years seemed to be the perfect gap. Being completely and unabashedly selfish – hey, when one’s a senior in high school, the other will be a freshman, and that means he can drive them both to school so we don’t have to – we moved forward with our plan, and thus far it’s worked out well. My son’s seven, my daughter’s four, they get along pretty well, and he’s gotten her interested in surfing, skateboarding and Batman. Everything is proceeding according to my plan.

Turns out we might have been right, for an entirely different reason. The team of übergeniuses at Freakonomics inform us that a recent study indicates that siblings who have at least a two-year age gap may perform better academically. Researchers at Notre Dame found that these kids had higher reading and math scores than kids who were born less than two years apart. The study’s authors’ basic conclusion: older kids benefitted more, possibly due to getting more attention from their parents during those early formative years.

Of course, there are probably a multitude of reasons why this may be the case: one commenter in the piece notes that older children often spend time “teaching the baby”, which in turn benefits the older child – as they say, the best way to learn is by teaching.

And while that may not be quantifiable, I find that there’s definitely some truth to it. The other night, for example, we were in the car; my son farted loudly, and shortly thereafter my daughter followed suit. The two then began arguing over whose fart actually smelled worse. “Mine does!”, Zoë yelled. “You can’t tell”, Lucas calmly told her, “because the farts mix together in the air. They’re a GAS. We learned that in Science.” Zoë paused to consider this. “Ohhhh”, she said, processing this revelatory bit of knowledge. My son the learner had become the teacher. “Well done, dude”, I said to him, visions of his future Nobel Prize in Chemistry dancing in my head.

Read more of Jason’s writing at DadCentric.

And don’t miss a post! Follow Jason on Twitter!

 

 Why You Should Wait At Least Two Years To Have Your Second Kid

Go Back To Dadding

11 Comments

LOL! Here I was about to make an intelligent comment, and then you ended your post with a fart joke. When my brain reverts back to my current, mature age, I’ll follow up…

…At least I can confidently say that I planned out the distance between my kids pretty well. Baby #2 will be born when #1 is 3 years and 3 months (possibly to the day). 3 years apart and birthdays far enough from each other that they won’t have to share a party or gifts. (I’m sure they will still find something else to hate me for as teenagers.)

BabyBumpBeyond Heather commented on Nov 18 11 at 2:26 pm

Well, then my brother and I are the exception to this poppy cock rule as are my two oldest children. My brother is 12 months and 10 days older than me and both of us excelled in school. And my children are thirteen months and a day apart, both honour students and my daughter has the highest grade point average of her entire grade.

As they say, rules are meant to be broken.

My sister, who is three years younger than myself, however, struggled academically her entire life.

So. Every family and every family, as always, is different.

Redneck Mommy commented on Nov 18 11 at 2:42 pm

And crap. By that last sentence and my poor grammar, you’d never know I was a smart kid.

Perhaps there is merit in this theory after all.

Redneck Mommy commented on Nov 18 11 at 2:44 pm

I agree with the ~2 years padding. My 3 girls are almost perfectly spaced at 2.5 years (Feb, Aug & Jan birthdays). That is enough spacing for them to be unique and get attention, but close enough so that they aren’t all like “only children” and can form bonds (and hopefully do the high-school driving plan that you outlined – assuming I even let them drive!)

Michael Sheehan commented on Nov 18 11 at 3:04 pm

Let’s face it–the youngest is always going to be the family screwup. There’s a reason the eldest got the birthright back in the day!

the muskrat commented on Nov 18 11 at 3:35 pm

So, this is interesting. My youngest three are each 18 months apart, while my oldest and #2 were separated by nearly four years. He’s witty, charming, and gets good enough grades to get into IU next fall. She’s also quite brilliant (if I do say so myself) and plans to pursue an engineering track beginning her high school freshman year. My last two? They watch Annoying Orange, listen to Dragonforce and Lady Antebellum (respectively), and eat too many pancakes and eggs. They’re screwed . . .

Brian commented on Nov 18 11 at 6:13 pm

And it’s great to see you here, Jason. And Ron. And Mike. And Michael. Represent, brothers . . .

Brian commented on Nov 18 11 at 6:21 pm

My wife and I always talked about aiming for a 2 year split. My siblings are each about 2 years older and younger than me, respectably, and I’ve been fairly close with both of them my whole life. My wife’s only brother is 4 years older than her, and she always felt like they were a little too far apart and lived in different worlds until they were both adults. We got lucky enough that our planning worked out, and now have two sons about 2 1/4 years apart. It seems about right.

That said, we were just talking today about how much more complicated life is with two of them; trying to deal with an inquisitive toddler while caring for a baby is rough. But I’m sure that however nice it would be to have the help of an older brother who was more capable and responsible, it would be offset by the added pressures and difficulties of that age too.

Chris Routly (Daddy Doctrines) commented on Nov 19 11 at 8:36 pm

My brother and I are less than 2 years apart while my husband is 6 years older than his brother and he feels that gap is too big. We decided to split the difference and wait until our son was 3 before having another child. It would have worked out too if we hadn’t had some medical issues (/facepalm). So now it looks like the difference will be almost 4 years. The idea that they may turn out smarter for it makes me feel better about a plan gone awry :)

Great post.
Tracy
scribblesaurus.blogspot.com

Tracy @ Scribblesaurus Me commented on Nov 21 11 at 2:11 pm

Dunno that I agree with this. My brother is 13 days short of 2 years younger than I and HE is the accountant! While my other brother and sister are 15 mos. apart and HE is the engineer and SHE is the avid reader. Where do the benefits of being close in age and aiding in education ( ie- my brother learned to read at age 3 because I was 5 and doing so in kindergarten! He has always been more advanced than me in Math also. We were in calculus together in high school! Couldnt have survived it without him!) come in? My other brother and sister have always done most things together, they practically have their own language, even at ages 23 and 24! She helped him with speech when they first started talking ( she talked first, would interpret for him, then he started talking). Now he is the engineer and she is still a fan of words! ( she loves reading, acting, singing and talking…alot!) With 6 years between my sister and I all four of us have helped each other with some aspect of education at one time or another. I dunno that being further apart in age matters, I believe it’s the closeness in age that will help all children involved with education.
ps- my son and daughter are 15 mos. apart. He began walking at age 9 mos. ( denote that to wanting to keep up with big sister) and can identify letters, letter sounds, colors, and numbers as well as if not better than his older sister! They learn from each other!

Kate commented on Nov 21 11 at 4:44 pm

An interesting study, and while the idea of planning how far apart to space your kids is great, it doesn’t always work out that way in real life. I planned on having two kids about 2.5 years apart. My body decided otherwise and now my oldest will be nearly 4 when his sibling is born. Others may have always planned on having kids a couple years apart, but perhaps medical conditions or the lack of a partner made it necessary to have kids as quickly as possible before time ran out. Just something to keep in mind when these sorts of studies come out. Life just doesn’t always take what you had planned into consideration.

Jennifer commented on Nov 26 11 at 12:25 am

Add your take:

Note: Babble is a supportive, diverse community. We encourage a range of opinions,
but any unduly hostile comments will be removed.


Comments are delayed up to 15 minutes

Most Popular on Facebook

Best of Babble.com


  • Cody
  • Whit Honea
  • Serge Bielanko
  • Mike Adamick
  • Disney Online Moms & Family Portfolio

    The Walt Disney Company supports Babble as a platform dedicated to honest, engaged, informed, intelligent and open conversation about parenting. However, the opinions expressed on this site are those of individual parents/writers and do not reflect the views of Disney. In addition, content provided on this site is for entertainment or informational purposes only and should not be construed as medical advice, diagnosis, treatment, or safety advice. Click here for additional information. Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Interest-Based Ads

    More in Dadding (50 of 442 articles)