Being Pregnant
Duggars Share Photos Of Miscarried Baby at Funeral
The Duggars, stars of TLC’s 19 Kids and Counting, handed out photos of the daughter they named Jubilee Shalom at her funeral service yesterday. Another family member, according to Jezebel.com, tweeted out the photos of the baby. Michelle Duggar learned she miscarried while at an appointment to learn the baby’s gender.
People grieve in so many different ways and who are any of us to judge how someone chooses to get through one of life’s most difficult events: death. The death of a child, no less! And I know it’s pretty common for parents to photograph stillborn babies… but from a second trimester miscarriage? Is that a common occurrence? (*Edit: Michelle Duggar learned her baby had no heartbeat at her 20 week ultrasound. Miscarriages that occur after 20 weeks of gestation are generally considered stillbirths so Duggar was right on the fence). And it isn’t the taking of the photos that feels most uncomfortable to me. It’s handing them out and tweeting them that just feels, well, weird. But. That’s just me. Like I said, people mourn in a million different ways and I’m all for whatever it takes for someone to make it to the other side of the grieving process. However, that doesn’t change the fact that the photos make me uncomfortable.
As Jezebel.com reports, TMZ is running 7 photos of the tiny baby on its website. I saw the first photo of teensy weensy little feet and absolutely could not continue.
When I worked at Fox news we did a couple of really beautiful stories on families who choose to photograph babies that are stillborn and I can understand the need to do so but… I don’t know. I can’t pinpoint exactly what bothers me about this situation. I’m the first one to let Michelle Duggar choose to have as many kids as her body can birth and not utter a judgmental word, but this time I have to question her judgment, especially since she knows she and her family are celebrities and the photos are likely to be splashed in all the wrong places – like TMZ – on the same page as a Girls Gone Wild advertisement.
Here’s what Jezebel had to say about the photos:
Honestly we can’t pinpoint what it is about this that made us stare at our computer screens, mouths agape, for a good two minutes. It isn’t uncommon for parents mourning after a miscarriage to photograph their child, so maybe it’s the inspirational captions? Is it the idea of a family member sharing the shots on Twitter? Or perhaps it’s the fact that TMZ tracked down the pics (which only show hands and feet) and posted pixelated images on the same page as a story about Girls Gone Wild and a poll on which Marilyn Monroe impersonator you’d rather screw, Lindsay Lohan or Michelle Williams. Maybe it’s a mix of all of the above.
Okay, so I went back and clicked through the first three photos. It was very upsetting for me. I know this is a very touchy subject and I’ve not ever suffered a miscarriage so I can’t really say what I’d do if it happened to me. The loss of a child is the absolute worst thing I can fathom. What about you? What are your thoughts? If you miscarried in the second trimester would you take photos and hold a similar service? Why or why not?
More on this: For Shame! TMZ Posts Photos of Michelle Duggar’s Miscarried Baby
You can also find Monica Bielanko on her personal blog, The Girl Who.
Go Back To Being Pregnant
138 Comments
Jenn commented on Dec 15 11 at 10:13 amThat reminds me of something Senator Rick Santorum did years ago when his wife miscarried their 20-week old fetus. They took it home with them, let their older kids cuddle with it for a few hours, and then slept with the dead baby’s body between them that night. (and also took photos). It was very disturbing to read about. I can see myself possibly taking a photo or two, but I would never show them to anyone. It’s just too much. I think it’s possible to adequately mourn a miscarriage without the physical reminder of what was lost.
MonicaBielanko commented on Dec 15 11 at 10:16 am@Jenn – WHAT? He did that? Man. Like you, I can see myself taking a couple photos and then storing them in a special place for only me and dad and maybe the kids to look at when they’re older.
Devan McGuinness commented on Dec 15 11 at 10:24 amI think their service was beautiful and the photos are beautiful. & though i am not familiar with what happened with Rick Santrorm I don’t see any problems with what they chose to do to remember their child.
I do not think there is anything wrong with them sharing these photos either. Their choice & the whole idea of ‘putting them in a box and storing for just us to see’ is perpetuating the idea that *this should be secret.
MonicaBielanko commented on Dec 15 11 at 10:33 am@ Devan – I see your point and of course it’s their choice and I’ve not had a miscarriage so I can’t speak out of turn but I guess handing out photos of a dead person – whether a tiny fetus or a grown adult – makes me uncomfortable and it has NOTHING to do with the ideal that a miscarriage should be kept secret. Again though – who knows how I’d feel if I had a miscarriage. When you put it in perspective like that I could totally see myself wanting to cuddle with my dead baby but I don’t think I’d ever pass it around to my kids. That’s a little much for me.
SJP commented on Dec 15 11 at 10:40 amI have a friend on FB who had the same thing happen about two months ago — she went in for the 20 week and there was no heartbeat. Her profile photo on FB is now is a professional photo of her still born babies legs sticking out from under white lace hankercheifs, with her wedding band laying next to the feet. While it was shocking at first, after some thought I see no problem with my friend or the photos from the Duggers. They are just of the hands and feet. People want to brush these things under the carpet and not talk about it. These photos help remind us that these babies were very much real, very much human. They remind me just how precious life is… and that even at about 20weeks, it’s a baby, with 10 fingers and 10 toes.
LizL commented on Dec 15 11 at 10:58 amPeople is reporting that those photos were released without the Duggar’s permission and they are actually very upset about it. I never ever ever judge what people do in their grief (including Rick Santorum, even though I might not agree with it) because I am not there, and I am not them.
Cristin commented on Dec 15 11 at 10:59 amIf the Duggar’s want to take pictures of their miscarried baby, I think that’s fine. It’s the TWEETING of them that doesn’t sit well with me. Who in their right mind does that? Especially since it was another family member and not the Duggar’s themselves. It seems like something that should have been kept private.
jeneria commented on Dec 15 11 at 11:01 amAs a society, we are far too uncomfortable with death, mourning, and the grieving process. I see nothing wrong with the photos nor is there anything wrong with wanting to share those photos with family at a funeral. Perhaps posting them to Twitter is too much, but for a society that revels in violence, gore, and Hollywood death, we are hypocritically Puritanical when it comes to real death which is a natural process, inevitable, and not to be feared.
Lisa commented on Dec 15 11 at 11:19 amI gave birth to my first son at just 17 weeks after my water broke. He lived for three hours. We held him and loved him until he passed away. To us, he was beautiful and perfect. We have an album of his photos, and while I don’t share them with the world, I am more than happy to share them with anyone who asks. He is our son. How could I not want to show him off? When people die later in life, we often have photos of them living to remember them by. So yes, we don’t tend to take photos of them after they have passed. But for parents who don’t get that opportunity, the photos taken of their deceased babies are all they have. Having them and looking at them and remembering all of his tiny little features – including toes that look just like mine and a nose that he definitely got from his dad – has been really important to our healing.
Leigh commented on Dec 15 11 at 11:59 am@LIZL is right. These photos are apparently being released without the Duggar’s permission, so…. really, if that is the case, TMZ should be ashamed of themselves.
Stuff and Nonsense commented on Dec 15 11 at 12:00 pmif i had to hazard a guess
as to why they made this decision
i surmise they did it to show the world
(who watches them so intently)
the wonder and design of a child
still meant to be protected in the womba sort of pro-life statement
about their lost childjust a guess.
alison
Heather commented on Dec 15 11 at 12:01 pmMonica, I’m so disappointed in you. I’ve always liked reading what you write, but this. This was a LATE TERM miscarriage – because she was under 20 weeks, it’s called a miscarriage, which is ridiculous. She had to go through labor and delivery for that little baby girl.
If one of your children were born before 20 weeks, you WOULD want those pictures to remember who’s feet and hands they had. Who’s nose they had. Who’s ears they had. The perfect little fingernails/toenails. Which person they resembled the most. (They are perfectly formed tiny babies at that point and you CAN see all those features.) Time makes memories fade – so in time, her perfect little features would be forgotten without photos. Jubilee was a little girl and one to be celebrated and mourned. Why should she not be?
My firstborn son was stillborn in 2006 and bereavement photography wasn’t well known back then. We took 6 pictures with our camera and I WISH we had taken more. Our second son died at 4 days old and the 1,000 pictures we took aren’t enough. The pictures they took of their daughter are something to be cherished forever. And honestly, how many of you would have even known that the hands/feet in those pictures weren’t from a live baby if you hadn’t been told? People rarely think babies at the same gestation as Jubilee even have hands/feet (I can’t tell you how many times I’ve heard “it was just a clump of cells” when someone hears the term “miscarriage”, even if it was just under 20 weeks).
Very disappointed, Monica. Until it happens to you, keep your mouth shut.
Daddy Files commented on Dec 15 11 at 12:02 pmFirst of all I see nothing wrong with what they did. It was their baby and they can mourn any way they see fit. If people don’t like it, don’t look.
But what I find fault with is your annoyance with WHERE the photos surfaced. So what if it’s on TMZ. that’s not the “wrong” place. Who are you to determine that?? You think it’s OK to run the “beautiful” stories and pictures you worked on at Fox but TMZ can’t do the same because the pictures appear next to ads you find morally questionable?? Give me a break. That is such a load of complete crap.
Tiphanee commented on Dec 15 11 at 12:03 pmI have suffered 2 miscarriages & although I understand what & somewhat why they took the photos I agree that they should be kept to themselves. Theres no way u keep a miscarriage a secret especially in the second trimester cuz there’s a bond with that baby and you’ve probably already shared the news of your pregnancy. I just think things like this are private & personal. I got angel wings to remember my 3 angels I lost looking at pictures would hurt too much. Even sonos I have from yes ago make me sad. Going by the hospital I lost them at hurts. As parents u know ur babies are irreplaceable no matter how many u have before or after. But to each his own I guess. The worst thing this could be is for publicity.
Trina commented on Dec 15 11 at 12:05 pmI think their pictures are beautiful. I have photos of my 22 week old son who died in utero. I did not think at the time, to take pictures of him with us and kick myself for not doing so.I also had a watercolor portrait painted of my son, as in their raw state the photos of him are very hard to look at. Hands and feet are a great idea. She is their child, this is how they are grieving, it is very much in keeping with their professed beliefs about children and humanity. Kudos.
Stephanie commented on Dec 15 11 at 12:08 pmI lost my son, Keagan 5 months into my pregnancy. After the 20 week mark the body is sent to a funeral home and the parents decide what to do with the child’s remains. I chose to have a graveside service for my son so that myself and everyone who had been so excited to meet him could say good bye and give him the respect of a proper burial. We did not hand out pictures of him, although a photographer did come to the hospital and take some. But we did have his footprints on the front of the program. I have a framed photo of him in my home, but otherwise keep these pictures for myself. This year on his birthday my mother gave me a charm with his footprints, name, and birthday on it. I wear this around my neck everyday to symbolically keep him with me. The death of a child is always a difficult time and I believe it is up to the family to decide how to grieve, regardless of what their situation is.
Toni Williams commented on Dec 15 11 at 12:09 pmI can understand where Michelle is coming from. I miscarried my little boy Nov. 10th, 2011 and I had pictures taken of him. He was 2.6 ounces and 6 inches long. I would do the same thing Michelle, by sending out pictures, because we never got to have memories with our baby, so we take pictures to remember him/her. Losing a child is the worst thing anyone could ever go through. I had post partum depression after having my son, Braiden, and I could think about is “Why did you take my baby away from me” but now, I know he’s in abetter place and everything happens for a reason. But Michelle, just like me, was in mourning and even though not everyone cares to see the pictures of our babys we would like to think that everyone does.
Tiphanee commented on Dec 15 11 at 12:09 pm@Heather I don’t think Monica’s talking about them taking pictures I think it’s the fact that they were handed out knowing they’re “celebrities”. As someone whos suffered from losses could u imagine if the photos of your loved ones got in the wrong hands or was taken the wrong way or out of context. I think that’s the issue. Not that they took photos of her. Discretion & privacy are not what they used to be especially for people in the public eye. She had to almost know they could and would get leaked whether by a family member or someone stole them etc.
Samira commented on Dec 15 11 at 12:10 pmI’m very private about my grief or really any feelings so I’m pretty sure if this was me I’d lock myself in my room and cry for days and possibly weeks. I don’t think there would be any pictures to speak of let alone tweeted or shared at a funeral. I don’t blame the Duggers or the Senator for their choice and their grieving process I just feel its a little too much for me personally. Everyone grieves in their own way and it is not at all disturbing to me that they followed their path. I wish that we could live in a perfect world where things like this never happened and there was no war and everyone got along and was happy, but since we don’t I guess all I can hope for is that I can be non-judgmental and help those of us who have to deal with these things the best way I know how by being there to listen and offer a tissue or a shoulder or just an ear.
Sara S commented on Dec 15 11 at 12:10 pmI think the problem that most people are having is they are calling THE BABY a fetus which it is not as you can see its a human being when looking at the pictures.
Fetus is a word used to desensitize the fact that its an actual baby and people are having abortions around these times. Whatever anyone chooses to with their child is up to them. They shouldn’t be limited to only a couple photos to be kept a sercert as if their child shouldn’t be remembered. I encourage everyone to watch the 180 movie if you feel otherwise.
Michelle commented on Dec 15 11 at 12:11 pmI delivered a still born baby in ’09. The hospital took a few photos. It took me months to look at them. I had a very small private service. No one actually saw the baby except me, the dad & my parents. It was hard to see a small baby that had passed. I didn’t want to put anyone else thru it. I think tweeting something like that is just wrong. But everyone does grieve in there own ways… I’m sorry for her. I hope she doesn’t regret this in a year or more when the pictures come back up on the anniversary.
Leslie Matteson commented on Dec 15 11 at 12:12 pmI’ve lost a baby before (granted he was born at 29 weeks & lived for 11 hours) but I’ve also suffered two early pregnancy losses & you mourn for each child that you lose, even the ones so small you can hold in your hand to the ones who you never get to meet. A family needs the freedom to grieve in their own way. Pregnancy & infant loss is swept under the rug. Parents are expected to just move on & be “normal” .. it is NEVER like that. Each child is a precious gift & especially if those parents were excited to be pregnant.. to lose that child is the worst, most intense pain anyone can endure. It is the most unnatural of losses .. to bury your own child & I am glad that they are doing what THEY need to in their grieving process. Because it’s their own journey & no one has the right to tell them how to do it.
So as a bereaved parent myself .. if you have never been in my shoes.. then you should respect that you have no idea what you are talking about & keep it to yourself.
Still lovin’ my baby: Dexter (March 9, 2009 – March 10, 2009)
Stacey A. commented on Dec 15 11 at 12:16 pmMy mom had a stillbirth very late (she might have been 37 weeks). I was in seventh grade at the time, so the details are not clear to me. I know there was one (very hard to see) photo taken, her hospital band, and a small dress the hospital had given my mom for the baby. We named her, and I wrote a poem. Aside from that, we moved on as a family, and yes, we don’t talk about it much. Maybe it was how I was raised, or my own views on death, but I feel that respect should be shown for the life lost, and then move on.
On the flip side, my cousin had a very late term miscarriage a year or so after my mom’s stillbirth. Her husband had been snipped and the sperm that got thru was not normal, hence the baby won’t survive. It was terrible for my cousins, as well as me and my sister who spent a lot of time with them. My cousins had a funeral for their baby. I found out later I upset that side of the family because I was not crying during the service. I attended to pay my respects, and was respectful through the services. In my mind, I guess, it was hard for me to be horribly, openly upset over someone I hadn’t known. I wasn’t even openly upset about the sister I lost.
As it’s been said, everyone grieves in their own way. If this is what the Duggars feel they need to do, then God Bless. Me, personally? I won’t. But as my stories show, I’m not an openly, grieving type of person anyway.
Dawn commented on Dec 15 11 at 12:17 pmA persons a person no matter how small.and how a family grieves the loss of their child should not be criticized by people who have never been in that place.
Rachell commented on Dec 15 11 at 12:20 pmI personally have been through the same thing as the duggars. My husband and I learned that we lost our daughter Hailey after 28 weeks of pregnancy. I was induced into labor and gave birth to a beautiful 2 pound 11 ounce baby girl at 4:20 in the afternoon. We kept her with us for several hours. I slept with her in the hospital bed, rocked her in the rocking chair and allowed any family member that wished to hold her. We even had a priest come in to baptise her. We didn’t allow the funeral home to come take her until after 2 am. Those are precious hours that I am so glad that we didn’t miss out on. At the funeral service they went against their normal routine and allowed us to have an open casket. I would not have had it any other way. In my opinion if people are bothered by the way different parents choose to grieve their babies that’s their issue. The Duggars grieved for their child in a way that was appropriate for them and until you go through this yourself (which I pray you’ll never have to because this is a loss I wouldn’t wish upon my worst enemy) I suggest you open your mind and understand that no matter how uncomfortable this makes you, their daughter was a fully formed baby who deserved to be loved and treated as such.
amanda commented on Dec 15 11 at 12:20 pmi had a ectopic pregnancy that i carried to 6 wks and lost when mytbe ruptured although that baby ws barely anything at all he or she was still a child, a planned pregnancy, a part of my husband and i and i still mourned the loss ….we had a memorial of sorts we tied helium balloons to the roses i received after my surgery and let them go, the hospital chaplain gave me an ornament of a mother and infant inside a teardrop….ill have that forever. so anyways what im getting at is i think taking the pictures and having the funeral service is beautiful and the phrasing a clump of cells disgusts me …
Brandi commented on Dec 15 11 at 12:21 pmAgreed Heather .
I lost a baby at 16w5d and although in medical terms he was considered a ” miscarriage” or 2nd trimester miscarriage , and late miscarriage , He was still my baby . He looked exactly like a person not cells not an alien or whatever other terms people consider unborn babies , but because he was 20 weeks gest. he wasnt considered stillborn . [[ Although there is a state that considers pregnancies 16 weeks and on , if you dont carry to term , your baby is stillborn , NOT miscarriage ]] I wish I had photos:/Although , I know someone who lost their 2nd baby at 10 weeks and she had a funeral for the baby as well as cremated and carried the ashes of her baby on a necklace ….
I dont think I could go that far with it
A commented on Dec 15 11 at 12:24 pmPeople grieve in their own ways and I don’t believe that anyone has the right to judge any parent that looses a child, whether it is a miscarriage or a child that lived for any amount of time. I have experienced what a miscarriage is like, and how it can tear relationships apart. When my son died inside me it turned my life upside down and almost drove me over the edge. I have pictures of him still to this day, and it was my personal choice not to post them on any social network or share them with the world in any other way, but they are not a secret. No one has the right to tell anyone how to deal with things like this in life, especially if you have never been through something like this. I believe that everyone is entitled to their opinion, but unless you have experienced this you will never fully understand what “we” have gone through. Some things are better left unsaid, and I believe some of these comments fall under that category. What ever happened to being supportive of each other?
Jill @BabyRabies commented on Dec 15 11 at 12:24 pmI don’t think anyone ever has the right to judge the way others grieve. Ever. Full stop.
Corie commented on Dec 15 11 at 12:25 pmI miscarried at about 7 weeks along and at the time it did not hit me. But when the delivery date pasted I stopped to think of what could have been. I got pregnant the month after I lost my babe so I think that is why I did not mourn but now two and half years later it does creep up in my thoughts. Now here is what I want to share about my mom who before I was born was expecting twins. She got poisoned and the twin boys died around 4 months. She did not abort natural and was induced around a normal six month gestation. Those doctors took those two precious boys and stuffed them in to jars and then down the trash. My parents NEVER had the opportunity to cuddle and even spend a second with those twins. My mom has NEVER gotten over this. I could not imagine this they were babies perfectly formed and they were treated like garbage. It is a horrible thing to lose a baby and I thought the pictures were a wonderful reminder about life and how it is created.
Sunny commented on Dec 15 11 at 12:27 pmEveryone mourns/grieves in their own. Some people share their feelings while others do not. Allow this family (and all families) to grieve their losses as they see fit.
Aviva H. commented on Dec 15 11 at 12:27 pmI have miscarried, although earlier. I think that if it was meaningful to the Duggars, I am glad they were able to do it. To me, a miscarried fetus or a still born child are both the same in that they represent the potential for life that will never be. It is really the possibilities, the hopes, and dreams we had that we mourn, not the person they were. In fact, they were never people.
I am sure my comments will anger some readers, this is how I feel. I respect your right to feel otherwise, I hope you will respect me.
Melissa commented on Dec 15 11 at 12:29 pmI don’t know. I can share the same feeling that photos like these make me a bit uncomfortable, but so would any other picture taken postmortem. But, I am not the least bit worthy to tell Michelle Dugger how she should handle the death of her child – the one she knew, carried and loved. I think what makes me most sad about these pictures is the fact that people are going to jump all over this, and her, at a time where people should be respectful and let her grieve. I know they open themselves up for that but it just seems like too much, too personal to be our business.
Marie-Eve commented on Dec 15 11 at 12:31 pmIt’s a very touchy subject and I’m deeply sorry for your losses, Heather. That’s way too much heartache for one lifetime. :( However, I don’t think Monica should be scorned for this.
MrsLeyk commented on Dec 15 11 at 12:33 pmI think the way you worded this article is perfect. You aren’t judgmental but you’re still able to share your opinion. You openly admit that you aren’t sure how you would react, which is all anyone can ever say, until you’re in the position you simply don’t know. I appreciate this post with your openness and honestly as a writer. You bring a realness that is becoming more and more difficult to find.
Marissa commented on Dec 15 11 at 12:36 pmI think if it as… People keep Ashes of loved ones. Some people find it creepy while others find it comforting. I think the pictures were a nice tribute tho. The words that they chose were words to honor her. Death is always disturbing for alot of people. But what do we say about those who celebrate it? Are they sick in the head? Or are they honoring the life of a loved one while providing comfort in a time of personal loss and tragedy. Everyone mourns differently
Karen commented on Dec 15 11 at 12:38 pmThese photos will b all they have of that child, these photos can bring them peace believe it or not…my misc.s were all 1st tri. There wasnt anything distinctive to photograph…all i have is a ultrasound pic of one my angels..whenever i felt down about the loss i would look at that photo n gave.me comfort somehow…my daughters godmother had her baby emergency c section at 25 weeks, she lived for 6weeks before passing…she has a whole photo album of her daughter….yes photos can b disturbing to those who never experienced a loss…yes the photos bring back memories that make u sad but they also give u a sense of peace at the same time…think about any family.members u have.lost..grandparents, parents,uncles,aunts…ect. When they died did u get rid of all photos of those ppl? No..i doubt u would…
Sarah Partain commented on Dec 15 11 at 12:39 pmShe is grieving and lives a very open life. This makes sense and again, is not what we might do ourselves, but how we can we tell someone how to walk through this?
Candace commented on Dec 15 11 at 12:51 pmI have not problem, whatsoever, with the pictures.
AB commented on Dec 15 11 at 12:52 pmThe photos are beautiful, not at all disturbing.
StrawBerry commented on Dec 15 11 at 12:53 pmA loss is a loss, everyone handles it differently, no one has the right to judge it. I had a second trimester miscarriage also. Yes I took pictures of my baby, that was my baby. I may have been only 15 weeks, but he already had our features, mostly he looked liked his daddy. I had to endure labor and the hormone changes just like anyone else who has a baby. The difference being I didn’t get to leave the hospital with a live baby, but empty arms and planning a funeral. I’m surprised at the insensitivity of some people. If you don’t want to see the pictures then don’t look at them. Most of my family and friends did want to see my pictures, they were excited about my pregnancy and sad about the loss too. Sure not as sad as myself, but they didn’t get to bond with him the way I did I didn’t expect them to be, but they were at least sensitive to my feelings. It’s not just the loss of “a bunch of cells”, it’s a loss of all the hopes and dreams that go with that child. In my case he was still alive at least two hours before his birth, and we were helpless as doctors won’t try to stop labor before 20-24 weeks. I cherish the couple pictures I do have because that is all I have of him. We didn’t have a funeral but we did have a burial with a few close relatives at a family graveyard plot. It gave us some closure that was really needed. No one should ever have to say goodbye and bury their own child, it’s a pain that is unimaginable. He was loved, he was our child, and we gave him the respect he deserved. People need to do the same for this child.
Sara S commented on Dec 15 11 at 12:55 pmReading the stories of the women who miscarried has me in tears right now. I also had a miscarriage at 17 weeks and on the 17th it will be two years from now. I took pictures and spent the night in the hospital with the baby some of my family came up but I tried to keep everyone away. At first I didnt want to see my little boy but I did and my aunt took pictures. I’m so glad that I did because it has help me move on and keep him in my memory and although you can never get past the loss of your own child. Looking back and reading these stories I wish I had done more and allowed all my family to come up. The family that did come even though I said not to it was comforting having them there and I’m glad they did come. Life should be cherished even If they weren’t given a chance to be with us on earth you can meet them and life eternally with them one day in heaven, and for that day I cannot wait to meet my little boy once agin.
Cheryl Moore commented on Dec 15 11 at 1:04 pmI misscarried two little girls, I never took pictures Im affraid it woulf be a source of sadness for me, my last daughter I had a funeral an shes buried in are family cemitary an my first misscarrage the cathlic hospital took an creamated in a public creamation with other fetus we found out latter, when they called an wanted.a.donation to help with the cost of this, being young I wasnt sure what was there or to do, we were never guided, we left the hospital days latter not sure what to do, I grive that baby, they should of giving me the opption to bury her. I wont allow anyone to take pictures of my babys sleeping, its to scarey, ive seen babys in caskets I dont like that at all
MB commented on Dec 15 11 at 1:10 pmIronic that Babble- which has been bombarding my FB page endless pics of labor/delivery now has an opinion piece questioning why someone grieving would take & share these pics. To me these precious photos are much more meaningful & appropriate than having someone else’s labor or umbilical cord splashed across my computer screen. And yet- even if you think TMZ was wrong to post them- at least their site posted a warning to people before they clicked. If only Babble’s endless birth photo campaign would do the same. For those of us who’ve had painful/difficult births those photos are an unwelcome emotional trigger.
Anne-Marie commented on Dec 15 11 at 1:26 pmWhat’s the problem with “their” “daughter’s” pictures??? Nothing! You all should be more respectful and worry about other people aborting what you see in the Dugger’s pictures. Seems like your disturbed for the wrong reason.
Bunnytwenty commented on Dec 15 11 at 1:39 pmI understand the impulse to take pictures and keep them for yourself. But… it’s still pictures of a corpse. That’s what’s disturbing and weird about this. I think having pics of the tiny hands and feet is the most tasteful way to handle it, though.
Angi commented on Dec 15 11 at 1:40 pmI have pictures of my son that was born at 25 weeks and 5 days, and he looks like a perfect little baby boy, however I have only shared them with a select few people because he is intubated in the photos. I for one understand the need to have a couple picutres of your baby. However my pictures are for me and my family not for everybody. I love my son so much he is my first born, he was born alive and died 35 mins after being born. I cherish my photos, and keep them in a fireproof safe to keep them out of harms way, I can’t have him in my arms but I will always be able to go to the those pictures and see how beautiful he is, forever my baby, forever my Angel! I will be delivering my daughter in the next few days and can’t wait to see if they look alike!
BuenoBaby commented on Dec 15 11 at 2:02 pmOh my goodness, so many of the stories you all are sharing are making me weepy.
Maryanne commented on Dec 15 11 at 2:40 pmIf you havent suffered a loss of baby, you shouldnt voice your opinion. I have had three losses, the last being at 19w. I delivered my child, held her, cried over her, had her baptized, buried her with a service and visit her grave often. When I went to the hospital a few friends advised me to take lots of pictures, which at the time I found odd…however, I did do that, and am so grateful that I did…
Did I hand out her photos? No, but they are with me, and they comfort me, and so be it…I dont necessarily agree with the Duggars and their brood, no one should judge how they express their grief. Holding your lost angel is comforting to a parent, helps you grasp what has happened, and helps you heal. Photos are a remembrance when everyone else forgets…
If you are disturbed by the photos, then dont look, but please dont judge anyone until you have walked in their shoes (which I hope you never have to)…
Juli commented on Dec 15 11 at 3:05 pmMy miscarriages were all within the first trimester. Would I have taken photographs had they been late-term miscarriages? Honestly, since that was never my circumstance, I don’t know for certain but I am leaning towards probably.The only thing I can say with certainty is those photographs would be kept in a special place and only viewed by myself, my husband and our other children when the time was appropriate. Each grieving parent should do what they need in order to heal and move forward. If the Duggars want to publicly share the photo of their miscarried baby, I will not judge. Thankfully I do have a choice about viewing the photo and I choose not to.
Kayla commented on Dec 15 11 at 3:34 pmIt’s not our place to speak and I don’t believe anyone should waste their voice passing judgment on the Duggars. It’s not our right to ask questions of them just because they are in the spotlight. It’s not our choice. Whatever they chose to do as a family was right for them, whether or not it would be right for you.
Melissa commented on Dec 15 11 at 3:42 pmI see no issue with them taking photos. I belong to a large parenting forum here in Australia and there is a very active community of parents who have lost their children, all at various stages, from early miscarriages, to late term, to stillborn, neonates, years later.
It’s not just common for parents losing a second trimester (or any time after) baby to take photos. I think that is normal. I personally would not tweet them (though I don’t believe the family themselves have done this, in which case whoever did this is a disgrace, especially because it leads to ignorant pieces like this being written by people who know now of what they speak).
A 20 weeker is tiny, of course. And red. And hard for some to look at. But to the parents (and others who are more attuned to those feelings), it is still a perfectly formed baby, who was much loved and wanted. She deserves to have pics taken of her and to be mourned. Her parents deserve to have those on hand.
rhonda commented on Dec 15 11 at 3:42 pmI think it’s up to the Duggar’s whether or not they share these photos. Not a single person is required to look at them, so if it bothers you then don’t look at it. The computer is a very simple thing, if we don’t like something we can look away. Personally I don’t think I would share photos like this, I probably would not even take them, but I have never had a later term miscarriage.
alifurt commented on Dec 15 11 at 4:32 pmthese photos can be very tastefully done by an amazing organization http://www.nilmdts.org who is prepared for any type of stillbirth. without that organization, i would have so many regrets after losing our son at 20 weeks in a very similar situation as the Duggars. i show the tasteful photos with whoever wants to see but keep our raw, color photos of the day to ourselves and family. the photos are all we have left to show for the short life of our son and i would not trade those photos for anything. when you can’t even begin to imagine what it’s like to go through a stillbirth (and i hope you never do) pictures of the day are very helpful to preserve the one and only memory of our firstborn son. http://www.alifurtwangler.com
AD commented on Dec 15 11 at 5:50 pmI worked as a newborn photographer at the hospital and while it was usually a carefree enjoyable job, occasionally I was called on to photograph a stillborn or miscarried child for the family. Not all of them chose to keep them as a reminder, but it was an important part of the healing process. You’re already putting your child in a box in the ground, why hide them in a box in the closet too? Pain that is bottled up and hidden has untold consequences.
Alicia commented on Dec 16 11 at 3:00 amI think those pictures are beautiful. They’re not distasteful in any way, especially since they only show the hands and feet. It’s very hard for anyone who’s a parent to face pictures of babies who have died, especially if you haven’t been in that situation, but if you make yourself get over your own discomfort and really look, you will see a much loved, beautiful baby whose parents just want to make the world recognize that their baby was real, it was loved, and will never be forgotten. Sure, some parents don’t share their pictures with the whole world, and of course that’s fine, but others do want to share their photos and I think it’s the best thing for people to get over their own discomfort over the pictures to appreciate the beauty of it. If those parents could share photos of their baby as alive and healthy, they would, but they have only what they have, and they shouldn’t be ashamed of sharing those photos. It doesn’t matter at what point in pregnancy a baby is lost, it’s a major heartbreak when that baby is wanted and loved. I too have been fortunate not to have experienced a miscarriage or stillbirth or the loss of a child after birth, but I know and care about a lot of women who have experienced all of those things, and I force myself to get over my own discomfort to really face the reality that these things happen, and while it’s so hard to face in a day and age where our culture has such good medical care that death isn’t a constant thing in people’s lives, we still need to realize that this happens. Years ago, when babies and children died all the time, it wasn’t even something worth mentioning if someone shared a rare photo of the child lost, even if it was taken after the death. It was merely accepted as a memorial of the child. That shouldn’t change now. I think that when parents share these photos, it’s in everyone’s best interest to embrace the photos and the choice the parents made as a way to show our support of those parents who have experienced the greatest loss in life ever.
Alicia commented on Dec 16 11 at 3:10 amBunnytwenty – that’s a funny thing about our modern day culture. We hide death so much as if it’s taboo when in fact it’s merely a part of life. It used to be that everyone saw at least one corpse in their life when it was so common for people to die, especially kids, that it wasn’t some big taboo subject to share. Nowadays we hide death, and now pictures of a corpse is gross and wrong. How can something so natural be wrong? Especially when the photos don’t show anything disturbing such as internal organs or violence on the body? I think our modern culture needs to try getting over this whole “death is taboo to even look at!” mentality. It happens. It sucks, it hurts when it’s a loved one, but it something we’re all guaranteed to go through sooner or later.
Sheila commented on Dec 16 11 at 8:29 amI think the photos are beautiful and I wish I had photos of the children I lost. I wouldn’t share them with the world, but I wouldn’t be on a reality show, either. If the Duggars didn’t want the photos shared, then it’s very sad that their wishes were not respected…but not in the slightest bit surprising.
I honestly don’t understand why the photos are “disturbing”–only the hands and feet are visible. Or is it that people don’t want to be reminded that a baby is a human from the moment of conception, that’s it’s legal to kill a human that size, that maybe it shouldn’t be?
boybyee2000 commented on Dec 16 11 at 11:54 amwhy is anyone upset with these pic? just awhile back did they not show gadafi’s blood slpattered corpse on tv. what about the leaked photos of michael jacksons autopsy even bin laddens fake corpse pic. and tmz of all people have any nerve callin something disturbing their whole show is disturbing
Jennie commented on Dec 16 11 at 1:48 pmThese are horrible people who shit out 20 kids and want to be treated like heroes.
Now they are turning their dead baby into the embarrassing circus their living ones are in.
Tragic that we have crafted a society that tolerates this kind of absurdity.
Let them go live on the prairie with Doctor Quinn if they want to pretend its the 1800s. Civilized people should stop rewarding their abusive antics with attention.pathetic and exploitive. Other than that, great plan Duggers.
LolaK commented on Dec 16 11 at 1:58 pmI find it incredibly ironic that most of the people condemning Monica for thinking she is being judgmental in this opinion piece are doing so in a far more judgmental way.
“If you havent suffered a loss of baby, you shouldnt voice your opinion.” are you freakin kidding me? We are no longer allowed to voice opinions of things we don’t have first hand experience with? That’s ridiculous!
And “it’s not our right to ask questions of them just because they are in the spotlight”….really? Because here in America it literally IS our right to do just that. We can ask questions of people. Out loud. And have an opinion of them.
And you get to disagree too. Just keep in mind that you pretty much lose credibility (and plain decency) when you’re calling someone judgmental in one sentence and then throwing insults and judging them for their opinions – mostly b/c they’re not the same as yours – in the next.
another monica commented on Dec 16 11 at 2:08 pmcome on, people. the writer was just commenting on her surprise regarding something that is very foreign to her, and made a special point to say that she hadn’t experienced the loss of a baby or anything- she obviously wasn’t trying to hurt anybody’s feelings! no need to shame her like that! take the opportunity to teach or explain, if anything, to show her a different side to her own of the human experience, what is it with all the yelling?
Been There commented on Dec 16 11 at 2:12 pmWhen a baby dies, sometimes all you have left is a picture, and it becomes very precious.
I think that because the gestational age of the baby was over 20 weeks, what MIchelle Duggar had was actually a stillbirth rather than a miscarriage.
I lost a son at 20 weeks, he was born alive though and lived for about 5 minutes. A picture was all I had of my so longed for son. I didn’t publish them, but I think the photos of the Duggar baby’s hands and feet are in good taste.
Also, I’ve seen a beautiful picture of a smaller baby that was miscarried, and to me it wasn’t ugly or bad. In fact, seeing the humanness of that baby at that gestational age was very helpful to me in how I think about human life. That can be found by googling “Blessing’s photo adopted”
Smallest Wingless by Craig Cardiff on Youtube, please listen to it if you get a chance.
Dear son, we’ve been waiting for you
Thrilled beside ourselves that you’ve arrived
White coats came in, heads held low
Talked for a bit, shuffled outsideWe closed the curtains,
Held each other,
And cried
We said hello at the same time that we said goodbye.And smallest wingless, oh you came to us
Leaving as soon as you’d arrived
But sadness is just love wasted
With no little heart to place it inside
Been There commented on Dec 16 11 at 2:15 pmAlso, I wonder if it bothered you because you’ve been conflicted about your abortion?
Kristin commented on Dec 16 11 at 2:36 pmMonica did not pass judgment on the fact that the Duggars chose to have pictures taken of the baby they had lost. Having never been in that situation, she asked if it was common to take photos of a baby who died during the second trimester, and many people have answered that question. It is common, and it is common for all kinds of beautiful and heartbreaking reasons.
What she said she found uncomfortable is the fact that the pictures were handed out at the funeral and then tweeted. One issue raised is whether it was wise for the Duggars to distribute the photos, given that their reality show and their fame made it a virtual certainty that someone would Tweet them or post them, and they would wind up on a site like TMZ. If reports are accurate that Michelle Duggar is upset that someone tweeted the photos, she might have some different thoughts on the idea of sharing the photos at the funeral — but she might not. We don’t know, because, as far as I know, she hasn’t said.
Clearly many people are uncomfortable seeing pictures of a corpse, and I don’t think this has anything to do with abortion, as some people have claimed. It is not at all typical for people to distribute photos of a deceased love one’s corpse, so people find it surprising that there are *publicly-distributed*, post-mortem photos of the baby the Duggars lost. Not wanting to see pictures of a corpse does not have anything to do with wanting to sweep under the rug any existence of a miscarried, stillborn, or live-born baby who subsequently died. (Unfortunately there are far too many people who do want to sweep the existence of all baby death under the rug, which is heartbreaking for the people who go through it. But I see it as a separate issue from publicly sharing these photos).
For me personally, the high likelihood that those photos would have reached the internet would have prevented me from distributing them at the funeral. Would I have taken pictures? Yes. Would I have shared them with people who wanted to see them? Yes. But I believe (and of course others are welcome to disagree) that there should also be some consideration of people who were present at the funeral who might be uncomfortable with pictures of a dead person at any age, gestational or otherwise.
Richelle commented on Dec 16 11 at 2:40 pmI don’t think voicing an opinion is judgemental. Monica never experiencing loss like that does not negate her right to speak on the subject in the way that she did in this article. She admitted her discomfort in a respectful and curious way. There is nothing wrong, hurtful or disappointing about that no matter what you believe.
Fredericka commented on Dec 16 11 at 2:47 pmMonica,
Is there really no other topic you could have chosen other than to cast judgment on grieving parents? Oh, I forgot, anything for a click right? The more controversial the better, right? Have you no shame anymore? This grieving family has every right to do ANYTHING they want to celebrate the existence and then loss of their child. Really, how dare you. How this family grieves is NONE of your business and it’s extremely crass of you to blog about it. Don’t you have anything better to do like write posts that are so honest and brave about committing domestic violence against your husband. Babble/Disney–really can’t understand how you can support this type of cruel post.
GreenInOC commented on Dec 16 11 at 2:47 pmI haven’t read through all the comments but I am a bit surprised by the negative reactions to this post.
I think that Monica couched her view of the incident very well and without one whit of judgement and lots of sensitivity. She very simply states that it made her uncomfortable but not sure why but also clearly states that she has never been in this position so she doesn’t know what she’d do. How else should someone express their feelings about something?
There is an appropriate time to get all hot and bothered but this really seems to me to be “smoke looking for a fire”.
Anon commented on Dec 16 11 at 2:53 pmYou aren’t the only one who feels this way.
Claudia S. commented on Dec 16 11 at 3:02 pmWhat’s surprises me is that there are a lot of “essays” saying little more than “I find this weird”, “seriously?”, “come on, people”. If that’s what writers are being paid for these days, I’ll stick to the old books/newspapers/magazines. I expect more than “feelings” if I choose to read something. I know that I don’t have to pay to read Babble and I know that I can just go away. I guess I just don’t know why I keep coming, and apparently it’s ok to come here and say just that and think that people might be interested in such an inarticulate opinion.
LolaK commented on Dec 16 11 at 3:19 pmFredricka, don’t take this the wrong way, but is your post serious? Or are you being sarcastic? I ask because it is completely condescending and so ironic to the point that it’s laughable.
Your comment might be the most judgmental and insensitive of them all. And yet the point you are trying to make is that Monica is judgmental and insensitive, right?
Janet commented on Dec 16 11 at 3:20 pmI can’t read all of the comments. I understand and also believe that everyone has the right to grieve however it is that they need to. I don’t think Monica said anything derogetory about the WAY they were showing their grief. Her problem is with the fact that someone tweeted the photos, which of course made their way to the tabloids (or whatever you want to call TMZ). It is a private funeral and a private grief, not for the public’s eyes. I think everyone that is all upset with her should reread the post.
Cristin commented on Dec 16 11 at 4:05 pmFrederika,
Monica is not attacking or judging. She’s voicing her opinion. Take it easy. I don’t see anything insensitive with what she wrote. She relayed the facts and shared her feelings.
And “Been There,” geez, talk about insensitive.
Amelia commented on Dec 16 11 at 4:07 pmI come from your other blog, where you posted a summery of what this is about. I can not read this article, or the comments yet, as my grip on self control is very tenuious, so I will just give you my experience.
December 6 I gave birth to a very wanted baby boy at 23 weeks who did not live. Before having him I was of 2 minds about having pictures of him taken. We had many complications, so he did not look even what a normal baby at 23 weeks would look like. I was afraid to see him, I was afraid to hold him, and I thought it might be more then a little creepy to take pictures of my dead baby.
Until they gave him to me.
He’s mine. He’s my baby I wanted more then anything, just like your babies that you got to take home. The 700 pictures you take in the first month celebrating them are just the same as the 10 I have of him. I am just as proud to be his mom as you are of your babies, I love him just as much as you do yours, he’s the most beautiful thing I have ever seen, no matter your opinion. It’s not creepy, it’s my baby. Nothing more.
And if I thought people would honor and be as happy to see him as I am, I would give them pictures too.
Kate commented on Dec 16 11 at 4:13 pmEven though I think their decision to have so many children is not he best idea, I was really sad to hear that she’d miscarried. To lose your baby after 20 weeks of a wanted pregnancy would be really terrible and I can understand why they took the pictures. The whole Tweeting them and sharing them on social media aspect, however, seems to trivialize what must be a horribly painful time for the family. I can’t imagine why the cousin would have done that, but maybe that’s a peek at what is to come with how easy Twitter, etc. makes it to share information quickly.
Lori Zambito commented on Dec 16 11 at 4:25 pmIt’s fine to be uncomfortable with it, or to be okay with it. Monica obviously hit on a sensitive topic for many mothers who have had miscarriages. I have had two myself and it isn’t an easy thing to go through. Saying you are uncomfortable with what the Duggers did isn’t “judging” per say. It’s just sharing an opinion. It’s not everyday that we hear about people sharing pictures of their unborn children who have died, so there are bound to be a lot of different opinions about it. For a reality check though, when you have 20 kids, you are going to have some miscarriages. It comes with the territory. Which is not to say that they don’t have the right to grieve however they feel appropriate. But it shouldn’t really come as a surprise, especially at her advanced maternal age.
D commented on Dec 16 11 at 5:42 pmI remember a couple years ago a friend of mine got a christmas card in the mail, and along with the family photo (with their 3 healthy kids) they sent out a picture of their sill born baby. Unexpectedly opening that in a Christmas card was quite disturbing. I understand taking pictures, I’m pretty sure I would too, but I would keep them for private viewing only.
Been There commented on Dec 16 11 at 5:49 pmMy bestir had a miscarriage @ 19 weeks 4 days. He was an 8 oz. little boy. She has photos but they r private. I understand why the Duggars took the photos. I am saddened that they were made public. Same as any other photos of dead bodies. Even open casket funerals make me uncomfortable. But it’s sad. Plain & simple. I totally meant what you were getting at.
kate commented on Dec 16 11 at 6:00 pmI’m with you Monica. I find it disturbing and distasteful. A relative of mine had a misscarriage and posted a very graphic photo on her blog that the whole family reads. Without warning. I thought my mother (who had three miscarriages back when she was of childbearing age) was going to have a heart attack.
GreenInOC commented on Dec 16 11 at 6:26 pm@Amelia – I’m so sorry.
I know you didn’t read the article but the last part of your comment I exactly what Monica is getting at.
The family lives in the public arena and has to know that anything they do is fodder for the masses. Having them out there increases the possibility astronomically that the photos will not be honored by those that view them.
I myself have not suffered a miscarriage but I am the sister, sister-in-law, family member and friend to many that have. I myself am always honored to receive the memory of the baby however the parents decide to do so or not do so.
Oana Hogrefe commented on Dec 16 11 at 7:01 pmThe point is simple: she does not have any other pictures of this child to remember her by. I am sure she would have rather passed around images of a living baby.
As a photographer/coordinator for Now I Lay Me Down to Sleep, I fully appreciate the value and meaning such images have for the family, in celebrating this child’s life, however short. Just because the baby passed in the womb does not imply the family must be ashamed of her having ever lived. They are the ones in need of comfort for a real loss, not us for a mere self-centered discomfort.
They handed these pictures to people at the funeral, who no doubt were close enough to the family to be able to support their need for remembrance without judgment.
Desiree Durang commented on Dec 16 11 at 7:09 pmI am a photographer, mother as well as suffered four miscarriages. I experienced the same thing in that we discovered the heart beat stopped during a check up. I came to realize what a stigma is attached to miscarriage. Like its a secret. Like the whole – we arent telling people we are pregnant until after the first trimester just in case we miscarry. Like its something to hide. People! It’s a death in the family! And it should be treated as such. I have worked alongside a national organization of volunteer photographers called Now I Lay Me Down To Sleep. They provide photographic services to families who experience a fetal demise. They rush to hospitals at all hours of the night in order to memorialize their child. So many photographers. Volunteer this service as a way to assist the grieving process. As painful as it is, it is good to have something to hold on to as a rememberance. All I have are a couple ultrasound pictures. These photos are tasteful and totally appropriate. TMZ on the other hand is entirely different conversation.
erose commented on Dec 16 11 at 8:24 pmI think people should grieve in whatever way feels right for them. However, I have a real problem with these photos being passed out and published in the media (and let’s face it – the Duggars clearly knew this would happen). I think my discomfort lies in the fact that it is just disrespectful to the dead. Regardless of the deceased’s age, it is disrespectful to take and publish photos of their corpse. If my family took photos of my dead body and passed them out at my funeral, I would come back from the great beyond and haunt them until they were all in mental wards.
Jill commented on Dec 16 11 at 10:05 pmI posted the following comment on Monica’s blog so I thought I’d post it here too. But first I want to point out that I find the personal and hurtful comments about both Monica and the Duggars to be terrible and unnecessary. Monica was just voicing her opinion. While I don’t agree with her, the nasty comments about her and her abortion are out of line. Similarly, whether you agree or disagree with the Duggars or their parenting philosophy or religious beliefs, they are parents who just buried their stillborn daughter. Have a little compassion. Now for my comment:
My first son was almost stillborn at 27 weeks. Like Michelle Duggar, I had severe preeclampsia (sudden onset), and my baby was severely growth restricted. He was born via emergency c-section (and I mean emergency, medical staff running down the hall as I was rushed into the operating room). He was born limp and blue with no sound weighing just under 700 grams with an apgar score of 1 (and he only got the one because he had a faint heartbeat). After a heart-breakingly long period of resuscitation, they got him intubated and rushed him into the NICU. He later died, never having taken a breath on his own. I consented to the withdrawal of life support and held him in my arms as he passed away.
The pictures were all I have left of my baby. At his funeral, I had a slideshow with pictures of him, his hands, and his feet. I chose not to share any pictures of my son after he passed away (the NICU took some pictures of my baby after he passed away–I still can’t bear to look at these pictures). But if the pictures I did share made anyone uncomfortable or feel weird, well too damn bad. Don’t come to a baby’s funeral. If I was a celebrity or semi-celebrity and thought that my pictures might be publicized, I think I still would have made the same choices.
Until your baby dies or is born stillborn (as the Duggar’s baby was), I don’t think you have ANY idea of the choices you’ll make when you’re faced with such all-consuming crushing grief. If the Duggars want to have a funeral/service or not, their choice. If they want to share pictures of their dead baby or not, their choice. If they want to talk incessantly about their dead baby and grief, or speak to no one about the gaping hole in their heart, their choice. I don’t judge them or anyone else for any choice they make under such horrendous circumstances. May they find peace, and may their daughter rest in peace.
Keny C commented on Dec 17 11 at 12:49 amAt one point in my life, my best friend suffered a miscarriage, and I can honestly say I said ALL the wrongs things and did all the wrong things while trying to comfort her. I had never experienced the pain, the utter sadness, and grief that comes from a loss. I was ignorant. Then I suffered my very own loss, and I too experienced all those feelings that she had felt, and I knew what AN incredibly big idiot I had been. People say dumb and ignorant things after a loss, because they don’t know any better. I know that now, and therefore I tried to be forgiving when it happened to me. I am taking this blog post, Monica, as being written from somebody that has never experienced a loss and hopefully never will because it is a pain that I wouldn’t wish on my worst enemy. Please stop writing about this until you know more about the situation. Seek out someone who has suffered a loss and maybe run by these kinds of post with them and ask if they are insensitive. It is extremely painful and hurtful to some to read these words about being “uncomfortable” about how parents grieve. Yes pictures of the deceased are uncomfortable, yes it is unfortunate that they were released to the media, but please don’t question whether their reaction to the loss of their daughter is “normal”. There is no normal when it comes to grief.
inmourning commented on Dec 17 11 at 2:45 amI hope you never have to actually experience a pain like this. Your insensitivity on this and so many other issues is astounding.
JenC commented on Dec 17 11 at 3:08 amI’m actually not entirely sure how I feel. I mean I know how I feel about the Duggars and their attempts to continue to have children. I also appreciate how their decision has opened a discussion about how best to mourn a miscarriage or stillbirth (two things I think are actually very different). Personally, if I had a stillbirth, say a baby born at 22+ weeks, I may (I’m not sure) have wanted to have a picture. Not for public consumption, but for me to look at and miss. I say may, because I’m not entirely sure that is how I would feel. I think I may just want to say to myself that was a tragedy to my family and live it with from there on. I don’t know that a photograph would make the loss any more or less real. Its still a loss, Mostly I think that everyone has a different way of grieving, a different way of remembering their loss, and a different way of thinking of the Duggars.
Julie commented on Dec 17 11 at 6:44 amSome of you remind me why I do my best to avoid mommy blogs. It’s one thing entirely to have an opinion and share it when asked, but saying things like “I am dissapointed in you” is condescending and rude. Fredericka’s comment says more about her than it does about the subject at hand. Get over yourself. Stop clutching your pearls long enough to at least let go of your own judgements.
The Duggars have every right to grieve the way that they choose, and no one has said otherwise. But let’s not pretend that the actions of people who choose to live a portion of their lives on TV won’t be discussed.
MonicaBielanko commented on Dec 17 11 at 10:08 amI’m really not sure how I was insensitive. I went out of my way to carefully express that I feel people should be able to mourn in whatever way they choose but that this particular way of mourning was upsetting to me personally. Frankly, I’m astounded so many people are judging me simply for sharing my honest to God opinion on this. It seems a bit hypocritical for all of you to be judging me for allegedly judging the Duggars when I was just sharing how I feel in as careful a way as possible. If I did have a miscarriage and shared this very same opinion, would you still judge me so harshly? Also, what other issues have I been insensitive about?
MonicaBielanko commented on Dec 17 11 at 10:10 amMy discomfort with photos of dead people and the distribution of them have absolutely nothing to do with perpetuating a stigma about miscarriage. I have a right to feel this way and voice a non-judgmental opinion, which I feel that I did.
MonicaBielanko commented on Dec 17 11 at 10:11 amThey also posted the photos on the home page of their website, which makes me uncomfortable as well.
MonicaBielanko commented on Dec 17 11 at 10:14 amDid you even read what I wrote? Where is the judgment? I voiced my opinion in as careful a way as I could and said the VERY same sentence you wrote: “A grieving family has a right to do anything they want to mourn the loss of a child” but that doesn’t change the fact that I find the distribution of photos, including posting them on the internet, of a dead person uncomfortable. I can say that and not be judgmental. It’s all of you – and your post in particular – that I find to be cruel and the most judgmental.
MonicaBielanko commented on Dec 17 11 at 10:15 amSeriously? I can’t be bothered by a photo of a dead baby being passed around and posted on the internet without it having to be linked to an abortion I had at 8 weeks along?
MonicaBielanko commented on Dec 17 11 at 10:15 amI find all of those photos disturbing and didn’t look at any of them.
MonicaBielanko commented on Dec 17 11 at 10:17 amI understand that. But the very act of distributing the photos bothers me and I think I should be able to share that opinion and still acknowledge that a grieving parents should do WHATEVER they need to do to mourn a child.
MonicaBielanko commented on Dec 17 11 at 10:17 amNobody’s talking about hiding anything. I just think distributing the photos at a funeral and on the internet uncomfortable and yes, weird.
MonicaBielanko commented on Dec 17 11 at 10:18 amNobody’s passing judgment. The Duggars are entitled to mourn in whatever way they want. If I’d had a miscarriage and voiced this same opinion would you accept it then? It’s an opinion. I’m entitled to it.
MonicaBielanko commented on Dec 17 11 at 10:20 amMaryanne, if I suffered a loss I’d probably do the exact thing you did. It’s the handing out of the photos I find uncomfortable and I don’t think I did anything wrong in sharing that opinion while still agreeing that everyone else has a right to mourn in whatever way they see fit.
MonicaBielanko commented on Dec 17 11 at 10:21 amAnne-Marie – Thanks for telling me when I should and shouldn’t be disturbed. Next time I’m bothered by something I’ll check with you first to see if my feelings are okay to feel.
MonicaBielanko commented on Dec 17 11 at 10:22 amMy opinion is my opinion and doesn’t reflect some blanket Babble policy of what to write about. There are dozens of people writing for Babble and we all write about whatever we want.
MonicaBielanko commented on Dec 17 11 at 10:23 am@Marissa – Well said.
Been There commented on Dec 17 11 at 10:58 am1….”this particular way of mourning was upsetting to me personally. Frankly, I’m astounded so many people are judging me simply for sharing my honest to God opinion on this.”
You judged the Duggars. Why can’t people judge your personal opinion?
Shrug.
Been There commented on Dec 17 11 at 11:07 amMonica, you are judging the Duggars and implying that the small photos of a baby’s hand and baby’s foot are distasteful and somehow wrong and since it disturbs you (something you do not even have to look at) you feel like you are entitled to judge what the Duggars did.
Fine. I really don’t have a problem with that. It’s the internet. You get paid to post your opnion about various topics. But just own it and stop whining about “being judged” when that’s what you yourself are doing.
You were asking at your blog for everyone to PLEASE give you hits here at Babble. Now you are getting hits at Babble. But the problem is, the people here are not going to s*ck up to you and pretend like they agree with your opinion.
You want to attack the Duggars, go right ahead, many people do. I doubt they care very much. But by denigrating the pictures of a tiny baby, you hurt a large part of the populace who lost a baby and they obviously find your “distaste” to be distasteful.
And your abortion at 8 weeks wasn’t any less a human baby than the Duggar baby. I know a lady who had a miss carriage at 8-9 weeks and contrary to the Palnned Parenthood abortion industry claim that it’s “just a mass of cells” that isn’t the case. That baby already had hands and feet, fingers and toes. Google “Blessings photo adopted.”
dmitri commented on Dec 17 11 at 12:13 pmRe: your fears of being a trainwreck on the internet: Girl, you passed that mark long ago. I love watching you meltdown when somebody dares to suggest that perhaps you said something others might find offensive. What? I’m just giving my opinion! I’m not saying it’s bad or good, that’s just how I feel! I’m not being judgmental and frankly if you say you don’t like it then YOU are the judgmental one. ;)
dmitri commented on Dec 17 11 at 12:55 pmP.S I think it’s fine that you think the photos are weird. No comment there. It’s SAYING that you find them weird that gets people upset. Everybody is judgmental about how people do things, in every aspect of their lives, but some things you just do not comment about.
Dana commented on Dec 17 11 at 1:45 pmNone of it is wrong. The wrong part is that is is soooo publicized. Its a very private thing. They just seem to be all about attention anymore. That is sad to me.
rebekah commented on Dec 17 11 at 1:54 pmIn 2009 my sister called me screaming “they put my baby in a trash bag”..she miscarried at about 3 to 4 mos, I ask her who put the baby in the trash bag.. The EMTs called the baby bio-hazardous waste. She almost died, the stupid hospital said she passed the baby, well she went to take a shower and the baby fell out. I was with her after, it was sad. She did get pg almost a year after the loss, Now that baby is almost a year old.
Meg commented on Dec 17 11 at 1:55 pmWe all judge– that being said. We base those thoughts on prior actions. The fact that the Duggar family has no problem putting their 19 other children in the national spotlight taints how I view these pictures. It seems bizarre to me that you would take something so personal and throw it up on Twitter or your show’s website. I can’t view them with the purity they were probably meant for, I have to question the motives.
I must also add, I worked with Monica when I miscarried my baby at 12 weeks. She not only comforted me, but made it less awkward when co-workers ask about the baby or forgot about my loss. She is a very kind person…
Caitie commented on Dec 17 11 at 1:59 pmThankfully i have never been in the situation Michelle and her family as long with many other families are facing.
And because of that, i cannot judge how they grieve their loss having never been in their shoes.
What they decided to do in no way altered or negatively effected your life. Its wrong for TMZ to have posted the pictures, but no one forced you to look at them.Let the family grieve, and i would hope if you ever saw yourself in the same situation you would be lucky enough to stay away from people so judgmental as yourself.
Kenyatta commented on Dec 17 11 at 2:16 pmWell the pics are ok for yourself not really sure why they need to be on TMZ and all of that. I from MD and I watched a new story about a photographer who actually does professional photos of stillborn babies. I thought that was very nice! as for taking the baby home and sleeping with it that seems a bit much however I wasn’t in their place so im not sure how I would handle the situation
KS commented on Dec 17 11 at 2:16 pmI think how each person decides to grieve is an individual choice. My husband and I found out our son had died in utero just as I was going into labor (I was full term), and after the birth, our nurse suggested having a professional photographer come in and take photos at no charge (thanks to a wonderful nonprofit organization called Now I Lay Me Down to Sleep). Our first instinct was to say no, but our doula told us that if we decided we didn’t want the photos, we could always discard them, but we’d never be able to have them taken again. So in the end, we did (though it was a very painful process), and we’re both very glad, because even though you think the image of your stillborn child’s perfect face will be burned into your mind forever, memory does fade. The photos are beautiful and tastefully done, and our son looks like he’s only sleeping peacefully. We chose to e-mail one photo to family and close friends; however, we kept all talk of what had happened off of Facebook–not because we think things like stillbirth and miscarriage should be kept secret, but because we’re private people and didn’t think it was appropriate. Some people need to broadcast their sorrow to cyberspace, while others need to grieve in private. It’s up to the individual. So no, I wouldn’t dream of doing what the Duggars did in terms of tweeting the images–but I’m not them.
April commented on Dec 17 11 at 2:32 pmIf it makes them feel better, than I won’t begrudge them that. A normal non reality tv family can do something like this by sharing it with family and friends and to have a rememberance of their baby and it would not be weird or wrong. The problem and the only thing that creeps me out is because of who they are as a family it went out to the WHOLE world. That is what makes it just a violation of that baby’s privacy and the privacy that a family should be able to have after such a horrific loss.
I can’t help but feel this is attention whoring. If they were doing it just for themselves and their loved ones, I would have no problem with it. But they are doing it for the whole world and I don’t know about that.
Saffron commented on Dec 17 11 at 3:28 pmMaybe it’s because I am British and therefore (maybe) I am more reserved, but the last thing in the world I could do is show my dead baby to the world. For all the Duggar’s percieved innocence of the 21st century that are not so niave as to think that with their fame or should that be infamy, that to share a photo of their dead baby at the funeral will not get out into the media! To exploit their live children is dubious to say the least, to exploit their dead baby is beyond reprehensible.
I had my son at 27 weeks, He is sitting next to me know, a beautiful 12 year old boy, he is the light of my life, and I would die for him, actually I nearly did! After J was born, we took loads of photos and video of him, but we have never shown the outside world these photo’s they are ours, our family’s, our son’s they are for our family to look at and coo over, they are not for the outside world, even if J had died and believe me he came close to death very often I still wouldn’t of shared photo’s of my perfect J.
Debbie commented on Dec 17 11 at 8:38 pmI think that little person has a right to be remembered in more than just their parents memories, they were a person after all. They never had the chance to live and be seen, the least we can do is take their picture and let them be seen. She was a beautiful little baby, not something to be hidden. We proudly show off pictures of our living children, I think showing pride in our deceased children through pictures is of great respect to them. To me it says: “These parents loved their daughter so much. They took great pride in her strength to battle for survival and want to show the world her beauty before it fades from memory and into dust”.
I think these photos make people so uncomfortable because they remind us that babies are human beings long before they are born. When it comes to understanding a 20 week fetus, most of us know very little. The most that the general population knows is about what size a pregnant womans belly looks like at that stage, the few sentences that online pregnancy trackers tell us about babies at that stage, crude sketches in the encyclopedia and at best, black and white ultrasound pictures taken at that stage. For a long time I wore a lapel pin on my hat or winter jacket that was to scale and the anatomically correct golden representation of the bottom of feet of a 10 week old fetus. They looked just like little baby feet. People would ask me about the pin and I would answer. I could see the discomfort and confusion in their eyes. They would study the pin for a moment and then quickly look away, making themselves forget about it so that they could continue believing what they wanted to. It’s easier to forget when the feet you see are an unnatural gold color than when they are pink and real. We see the humanity in babies who are but mere 10 and 20 weeks gestational ages, but we still think it’s ok for someone to decide that regardless of their human appearance that it’s ok for someone to willfully end their lives.
Jacie commented on Dec 17 11 at 9:32 pmMonica, I totally agree with you. I actually really like the Duggars and their children, even though I couldn’t be more different from them. But it’s the media aspect of this that makes me feel icky. Definitely not something I would do, and yes, I had a visceral reaction to the picture I saw. But if I put myself in their shoes, I see why they did it – it’s so closely tied to their (self-avowed) purpose here.
Anyway, I thought you handled this sensitive subject very well. I’m surprised that people refuse to see your balanced rhetoric and tone. They are clearly internalizing this discussion, so just don’t bother trying to defend yourself (will only make you look worse).
Been There commented on Dec 18 11 at 1:15 am“I’m surprised that people refuse to see your balanced rhetoric and tone.”
Ha, ha, nice try.
It isn’t balanced at all to write a public post attacking people for having a picture of their deceased baby’s hand and feet in the funeral program.
And to continually say “photos of dead people” when it wasn’t that at all is just being hateful. Not balanced.
MonicaBielanko commented on Dec 18 11 at 12:33 pm“Attacking people”? I’m not sure what post you read but it wasn’t mine. I didn’t attack anyone. I acknowledged everyone’s right to grieve as they see fit, acknowledged that I was treading carefully because I’ve never had a miscarriage and have no idea how I’d behave if I did have one but stated that it felt weird and uncomfortable to me to publicly pass around photos of a dead person. If anyone could be said to be attacking anyone, I believe it’s you attacking me. Say what you will, but I don’t feel like saying that the photos make me feel uncomfortable and weird is hateful.
MonicaBielanko commented on Dec 18 11 at 12:38 pm@ Debbie – I don’t understand where in my post you gathered that I said a “little person doesn’t have a right to be remembered”. The ONLY point of this post is that publicly passing around photos of a deceased baby – particularly if you’re in the public eye – makes me uncomfortable and not because it reminds me that babies are human long before they’re born. I’m aware of that. I find photos of anything that has died to be weird. Additionally, I think it’s weird to pass around photos of a 20 week old fetus and post them on a website when you’re very much in the public eye. It feels exploitative to the sweet baby in question and I should be able to carefully express that opinion – which I believe I did – without being hatefully attacked by a legion of judgmental women.
MonicaBielanko commented on Dec 18 11 at 1:14 pm@Dmitri – Who’s melting down, “girl”? I reply to comments on a post I wrote and I’m “melting down”?
P.S. – Thanks for approving of my opinion that the photos are weird. Because I totally need YOUR judgmental validation.
Claudia S. commented on Dec 18 11 at 6:02 pmWhy on earth did you write this on your personal blog – “Maybe I came off judgy instead of simply voicing my opinion, as I meant to do?” – and then reacted like you have to these comments?!
It’s strange that this feels exploitative to you. You have repeatedly said that you don’t see a problem with reality shows where parents expose their kids’ lifes (the kids obviously can’t decide for themselves). If your kid is alive, go ahead and make as much money as you can!
Claudia S. commented on Dec 18 11 at 6:08 pm“Because I totally need YOUR judgmental validation.”
Asking for people’s comments and clicks and then respond like this. Now, that’s classy!
kate commented on Dec 18 11 at 6:56 pmMonica,
I think people get too stuck on “being judgmental”, we’re all judgmental all the time, it’s not a bad thing, it’s called thinking. The problem is when people are insensitive and mean, and I certainly think your post was insensitive and bordering on mean. I doubt you’d say to a grieving Duggar family at the funeral, “no thanks for the photo, I find it distasteful and weird”.
You’re coming of here, your own blog, and in the comments on Katie’s blog as so defensive. You’re aren’t the victim here, you said things that hurt people’s feelings. If you’re sorry that you’ve hurt people say that, if you don’t mind say nothing. You sound like someone that just needs to mature a little.
MonicaBielanko commented on Dec 18 11 at 7:07 pm@Kate – But I’m not at the Duggars funeral. I’m writing for a pregnancy-related blog where I think this discussion and my opinion are appropriate. And why is my responding to comments, many of them mean and degrading towards me and my personal life, considered being “defensive”? Isn’t that what comments are for? I’m backing up my original opinion which I still stand by.
MonicaBielanko commented on Dec 18 11 at 7:10 pm@Claudia – I think a lot of y’all are being hypocritical in calling me judgmental while in the same sentence you are heaping judgment upon me. I think my responses to some of your comments, including people bringing up my abortion, are actually very classy considering some of the things you guys are saying.
kate commented on Dec 18 11 at 7:39 pmNo you’re not at the funeral, but you are on a very public site. You are discussing your opinion about something so sensitive and private, it’s very tacky and insensitive. You’ve mentioned before that you hate people giving opinions on other women breastfeeding their babies and that we should all be more supportive. How is this post supportive at all of other women?
kate commented on Dec 18 11 at 7:49 pmAlso you had to have know that there may be women reading this who had had stillborns and had done something similar to this. The fact that you feel good about stating your opinion that it’s “weird” is exactly why you seem immature to me. There’s nothing very interesting about that opinion, nothing that you could have thought people were going to learn from, it’s just kind of catty.
Jill commented on Dec 18 11 at 9:25 pmThere’s not a lot of classy behavior going on around here. But there’s plenty of meanness and defensiveness to go around. As Katie Allison Granju wrote, “The fact that those photos of Jubilee Duggar’s little foot and hand might make other people uncomfortable – people who didn’t just have their child die – isn’t the point … In fact, expressing our own preferences or tastes in criticizing the way another parent chooses to memorialize her recently dead child strikes me as being in far worse taste than anything the bereaved parent might have done.” In my humble opinion, Katie got it exactly right.
April Teee commented on Dec 18 11 at 10:09 pmIt’s not that I find those photos weird or disturbing but I must admit, I cringed a bit. Just the thought of a tiny baby like that being dead. Period. My family has taken pictures in the past of people at funerals in their casket but never would they ever “tweet” them or hand them out to people. Maybe the fact that this IS a family who is famous is what the hullabaloo is about?
As a side note, Monica, I honestly feel like about 75% of the people who are commenting you and being extremely harsh towards you are simply jealous. Just keep in mind that even THEY are reading your stuff on here, which I find fantastic… Let the haters hate, you still get paid! :-)
Teresa commented on Dec 19 11 at 10:32 amI think people take the photos and share them because they want everyone to know that there is nothing weird about their baby, their baby is loved, and they want to be proud parents just like the rest of us. I totally get it.
Calla commented on Dec 19 11 at 12:01 pmFor parents who have lost children, hearing others, especially non-bereaved parents, discuss their *discomfort* with a newly bereaved parent’s mourning practices is bound to raise hackles. Your or my or anyone else’s *feelings* about this family’s choices in early mourning are immaterial. How parents choose to process grief at the death of a child is their choice, their decision, their prerogative. To call this into question is insensitive.
As a bereaved parent myself, I can tell you: I would never comment on another parent’s mourning rituals, however uncomfortable I might feel. The way people cope with their grief has nothing to do with me; it is deeply narcissistic to critique others’ choices for the alleged impact these choices might have on total strangers. If one is personally disturbed by photos of the deceased or their extremities, one has the choice not to look at them. The sensitive thing to do, however, is to refrain from passing judgment, and keep our opinions to ourselves. That is what’s kind; that is what’s appropriate.
And if you are fortunate enough to have never lost a child to miscarriage, stillbirth, or death, I urge you to feel grateful life has spared you this particular tragedy, and to withhold commentary on how you might act in the event of such misfortune. From the tone and tenor of your post, it is clear that you do not know what you do not know.
Mark Kamoski commented on Dec 19 11 at 2:30 pmPro Choice people are faced with reality by such actions.
My prayers are with the family.
May God have mercy on those who do not respect life at all stages.
Chante commented on Dec 19 11 at 5:37 pmI also think you were insensitive. I have reread your post to try and find the point were I felt you were being insensivtive and it still isnt clear. I think for women who have miscarried or have had stillborn babies this will always be sensitive on this topic. I am one of them. Twins who were 30w2d. We took pictures. I was unconfortable with it at the time but I knew later I would need those photo’s. You had to know some of your readers would fall into this catagory. So to have such a strong opionion of the Duggars taking pictures and handing them out all the while never feeling the terrible loss of your baby is what may be so insensitive. You clearly mention you dont know how you would grieve this kind of loss, which BTW that is a great place to be in. So maybe this is one topic where you just dont say anything at all.
gina commented on Dec 19 11 at 9:15 pmYeah, everyone has their own way of dealing it. I know of a woman who had the precious tiny body of her miscarried baby set in a small clear chunk of polyurethene. When I lost my only child, could not bear to look inside the precious little package it was delivered in. I put it in a tiny velvet ring box with a circle of little flowers and blessed it with perfumed oil and salt ( symbolic for life) and put a tiny scripture in the box and asked my husband bury it in our flower bed. Real deep and well hidden so I could never find it again…no markers please. My poor husband could not deal with it for several weeks…I finally screamed at him to bury it and he did….oi…sad.
Sarah commented on Dec 21 11 at 1:23 amI have to say that I am more than a bit shocked with the comments on here. I read the Monica’s article and I understood exactly where she was coming from. I personally do not have any problem with the way that any person needs to grieve a loss. However I do find it odd that a family that is so in the spotlight would choose to share such personal and private images knowing full well that the media would eventually get their hands on them(and please do not think that these people do not have handlers of some sort, TLC would not risk their name). We are all on here more than willing to pass our own judgement but take a look in the mirror. We use only or first names or a screen-name. Monica had the guts to state an OPINION on a subject that most of us would not dare share with our close friends. Yes this is a emotional topic that most do not understand unless we have been there, but such is life. Think before you write or you are no better than what you criticize.
Angeerah commented on Dec 21 11 at 10:39 amI hope to gawd that I never experience the loss of child and I know Monica feels the same way. I honestly do not believe she is attacking the Duggars. Is she judging? Sure, she can judge as the last time I checked, we are allowed to do that publicly! And yes, we, the readers, can voice our opinion. But where it crosses the line is when it becomes nasty. I genuinely feel sorry for the so many women here who have lost a child and I can understand the knee jerk reaction to feel anger towards Monica. However, let’s step back and reread her post again. She is not casting judgment on the fact that they TOOK the pictures. She is UNCOMFORTABLE about the publicized nature of the photos on Twitters (by family members no less, how horrible) and TMZ. And honestly, I cannot help but agree with her.
Em Hughes commented on Dec 21 11 at 11:51 amHave all of you all lost your minds???
Nowhere in this post has Monica expressed an opinion—she described her feelings. You all do know what an opinion is right? It IS a judgment as it is not something that has empirical facts supporting it. Go ahead, look it up…I’ll wait.Then, in what can only be described as perverted grief many of you fall all over yourselves in describing when you lost your children and seem to want to outdo yourselves in your descriptions of grief, all the while telling Monica she has no right to her…feelings? She has no right to express a feeling, because yours are bigger, better, stronger, sadder feelings? THIS is how you honor your dead children??????
People, you do know this is a commercial blog right? That means that Monica gets paid by page views. That means every time we come back to click the page Monica gets paid. Monica has a personal blog for which she does not get paid. She links to this blog from it, she asks people to come to Babble and click, you do, you pay her salary. She described feelings about a current event, asks for feedback and you provide it. She feeds back your feedback and Christmas is saved.
LetFreedomRing commented on Dec 21 11 at 12:06 pmThe Duggars did what so many others do when they lose a loved one — celebrated her life in pictures. They did it very tastefully and affectionately in honoring this life that was cut far too short. If you have a problem with the pictures because this particular child happened to still be in the womb when she died, then that’s YOUR problem. Criticizing the Duggars for taking these pictures in loving memory of their child is inapprorpriate, in my opinion. No one is being forced to look at them. If they make you uncomfortable, don’t click on the links and don’t look at them. Beyond that, what business is it of yours? Condolences to the Duggar family on the lost of their little precious one.
Debi Pharis commented on Apr 05 12 at 12:52 amFirst of all who r u people to judge? 2nd have you ever lost a precious child or loved one? Call me sick to but I have pictures of my parents in casket and other loved ones. Would u want to be forgotten.? Hey they passed we don’t need to remember them. Who r u fooling? I think the pictures the Duggars have are totally awsome, and they can have them forever to cherish. Those of you that want to judge you will be judged one day. They ask no one for anything so why judge? Actually they help others. Do you or is your job just to judge and complain. Trust me if you take care of your own business and the problems you have to deal with daily you will not have time to worry what the Duggars or anyone else does. Make sure your front porch is clean before you judge them.
Thank you for listening and I hope God gives you the peace to let others live there life and you live yours, God Bless All of you. I have been judged all my life over being overweight. What I would give to be able to go have the lapband. I can’t but that’s my problems not yours shall I judge you? Shall i send all the hate. Absolutely not if it’s meant to be it will happen. I will not blame others or God. Judgement day does not scare me but all this judging by everyone should scare them for judgement.
Add your take:
Note: Babble is a supportive, diverse community. We encourage a range of opinions,
but any unduly hostile comments will be removed.
Comments are delayed up to 15 minutes







Aela Mass
Casi Densmore-Koon
Rebekah Kuschmider
CaitlinHTP (Caitlin Boyle)
Michelle Horton
Ceridwen Morris
Katie
Devan McGuinness
The Walt Disney Company supports Babble as a platform dedicated to honest, engaged, informed, intelligent and open conversation about parenting. However, the opinions expressed on this site are those of individual parents/writers and do not reflect the views of Disney. In addition, content provided on this site is for entertainment or informational purposes only and should not be construed as medical advice, diagnosis, treatment, or safety advice.

138