Being Pregnant

Baby Names That Are Against The Law

Posted by Monica Bielanko on July 29th, 2011 at 9:39 am
4real Baby Names That Are Against The Law

For real?

Yesterday I presented you with a list of the hottest baby names of 2011, so far. And I loved every single name on the list. Today, the opposite. Baby names so bad they’re against the law.

Can they do that? Can they actually ban a baby name?

It seems so bizarre. Yet it’s happening all the time in New Zealand and several other countries around the world and as your about to read, it’s for VERY good reason.

New Zealand’s baby name registrar has officially banned the name “Lucifer” after not one but THREE sets of parents tried to name their babies after the spawn of the devil.

Lucifer isn’t actually such a bad name. I mean, I get the whole devil thing, but I’d rather Lucifer than Hitler. I have an ex-boyfriend who named his beloved dog Lucifer and called him Luci.

But that’s just the tip of the iceberg.  As the Globe and Mail reports, Lucifer isn’t the only name the registrar has banned and is far from the worst:

In the past two years, the country has banned 102 names deemed to be too out there. The list includes Baron, Bishop, Duke, General, Judge, Justice, King, Knight and Mr. Those names were banned because they were deemed to be too similar to titles.

The name Messiah has also been turned down, as have requests to name kids 89, C, D, I and T. As well, the agency has refused to give a pass to full stops, asterisks, virgules and other punctuation marks.

I certainly know some celebrities that should get the New Zealand treatment. Jermagesty, anyone? How about Bear Blue, Pilot Inspektor or Audio Science.

I suppose New Zealand they had to eventually start cracking down on stupid parents. In 2008, the registrar approved the names Benson and Hedges, given to a pair of twins by parents who presumably loved the cigarette brand. That same year it also approved the names Violence and Number 16 Bus Shelter, both for boys.

Number 16 Bus Shelter? DOUBLE-YOU. TEE. EFF?

Strangely, although approving that atrocity they shot down parents who wanted to name their baby 4Real. When the couple discovered they couldn’t have a name that begins with a number they tried to name him Superman.

In Sweden, where a naming law governs just what monikers parents can bestow on their children, courts have banned Metallica, Elvis and Superman, yet passed Lego and Google. One couple wanted to name their child Brfxxccxxmnpcccclllmmnprxvclmnckssqlbb11116, pronounced Albin.

The name isn’t banned in America but when Deborah and Heath Campbell of Pennsylvania tried to order a birthday cake for their son, Adolf Hitler Campbell, Child Protective Services were called. Incidentally, his sisters were JoyceLynn Aryan Nation Campbell and Honszlynn Himmler Jeannie Campbell.

Just when I think I’ve heard it all… What do you think? Should parents be able to name their children whatever they want or do you applaud bans on baby names?

 Baby Names That Are Against The Law

Go Back To Being Pregnant

12 Comments

It’s about branding a child like a commodity instead of naming a child. Personally, I don’t think the government has any right to tell anyone that they can’t name themselves or their kids whatever cockamamie thing they want. People have been naming their kids stupid things since time began and everyone survives just fine.
.
And while I think the white supremacist parents who named their kid Adolf Hitler are morons, calling CPS is a waste of resources that should be used for children who are truly in horrible situations. When I think of all the kids who are being abused and mistreated and can’t get help and yet CPS went rushing in because of a name, I get sick to my stomach.

jeneria commented on Jul 29 11 at 10:03 am

I actually applaud whoever called CPS. As sickening as it is to witness the physical abuse of a child people tend to sleep on the psycological and emotional abuse kids suffer. I work with “at risk” (hate that term but for lack of better words) kids in a urban school district. The majority of my HARDEST cases are trying to undue the sheer amount of extreme psycological abuse that these kids have suffered. Little girls who watch domestic violence, young boys who grow up watching thier parents sell meth, indoctrination of street culture and violence. OMG…these are the same kids that are exhibiting some of THE WORST displays of acting out and out of control behavior. Enviornment is not only critical when there is physical abuse. The problem is that it’s hard to prove that a parent is willfully psycologically damaging their child so how can the state intervene. But if a parent is STUPID enough to name their kid Hitler then they flat out are advertising that “yes i will be psycologically abusing my kid for their entire childhood”. What if little Hitler grows up and becomes a seething racist fundamentalist and pulls an act like the dude just did in Norway. HITLER…com’on! Then you will have the exact same people saying CPS is wasting thier time on the flip end asking why noone caught this sooner. Training your kid to have that level of hate and racism is equivelant to teaching them how to steal or how to hold a hand gun. FLAT OUT IRRESPONSIBLE and they dont need to have kids…period.

I also take slight issue with the assumption that CPS went “rushing in over a name” at the expense of a child in an physically abusive situation. I dont know if you work in child protective services or not but if you do you have to know the vast amount of work that each case manager has. A. the article said that CPS was called, not the child was removed. They should have been called and CPS has a obligation to invistigate considering it has legitimacy. I am almost certain none of those children will be removed (although in a perfect world they would) but it at least starts a paper trail and lets the God Awful Parents know that they are being watched and if those children start to progress past ideology to outward violence or issues at school they can be removed. B People have a very unrealistic and skewed vision of CPS. When a child is abused or falls through the cracks it is CPS’s fault because they “didn’t catch it”. There is a sickening connotation that CPS wasts time with the small stuff while the “truely” neglected kids go unnoticed. That is garbage. There are some terrible case managers, but the reality is most truely care and take their jobs seriously. They are not the bumbling elitist snobish socialworkers (which is another stereotype). The problem is that the atmosphere in this country through drugs, violence, poverty is getting increasingly worse, thus the parents are getting worse, thus the case loads are higher. Some are going to fall through the cracks because there are NOT enough casemanagers to even begin to tackle the problem. Also there are not enough effective treatment programs to help the families. Also there is not enough jobs so that these impovershed families can better their situations and excape the ghetto and their ghetto mentalities. So please be sickened by the state of the Nation, not CPS.

ndea commented on Jul 29 11 at 12:16 pm

p.s FUNNY article. Im about to FB it :)
and name your kid anything you want…just be able to deal with the consequences of it like:
a. CPS calls
b. Their total resentment of you in the future for being such an idiot
c. Unless they are going to be athletes or entertainers being prepared to take care of them for the rest of their life( noone can take a resume w/ Superman Jones on it serious…lol)

ndea commented on Jul 29 11 at 12:32 pm

I don’t really think it’s anyone’s business what parents name their kids…in this situation, interfering on the child’s behalf seems unnecessary because no matter what these kids end up with as their names, if they have parents like this they’re going to be really screwed up anyway.

Lisa commented on Jul 29 11 at 1:48 pm

Number 16 Bus Shelter is probably where the child was conceived! LOL

Louellen commented on Jul 29 11 at 2:02 pm

I have to agree with Jeneria. It’s a slipperly slope if governments start dictating what we can and cannot name our children. That should be between the parent, child. Otherwise, where do you draw the line? Standardized spelling of names? Ban names from other languages besides the country’s native language? Taste is so subjective – one man’s “‘Pluto Lives Smith’ is an awesome name!” is another man’s “Dude, that’s wack.” And the name “Lucifer” was around long before English speakers somewhat arbitrarily ascribed it to the devil – it means “light bearer” and was originally used to describe Venus, or the Morning Star.
I also agree that CPS should not have been called on the PA family unless they were physically, emotionally or sexually abusing their children. However awful it is that they decided to name their children that, and however dreadful racism is, it is not illegal to pass on appalling beliefs or political ideas to one’s children. Freedom of speech (and names) has to apply to the things we do not like as well as the things we do.

sarahh commented on Jul 29 11 at 2:06 pm

I think they should be able to ban names that can be mentally damaging to the child. (mean names) my mom was a teacher in memphis and one of her students name was Da Mistake. Im totally serious! I totally think our gov should step in when it comes to names that are cruel but something wierd no thats not needed.

Lori commented on Jul 29 11 at 6:14 pm

Well, I couldn’t name my son in New Zealand. He is due in a short while and his name will be Bishop Roswell. :) I love the name and am glad I can name him whatever I like. This is the land of free speech so I do not think it is appropriate for us to restrict people on naming their children. Most people have a little common sense. Those that don’t well their kids will let them know they hate the name or that they get picked on etc.. and the kids can always change it later. Its not hard and is not expensive.

sara commented on Jul 29 11 at 6:29 pm

Wow. Some of these names are so awful… And I personally thought my husband had lost his mind when he wanted to name our son “Optimus Prime”. And yes, I mean LEGALLY name our son that, not a nickname.

Heather Sellers commented on Jul 29 11 at 6:45 pm

We are going with Savannah Rayne for our little girl. Not too out there but not common either. It’s the meaning it has behind it for us that makes it a bit funny. My husband and I used to breed purebred cats before we ever thought kids were in our future. We always gave our cats a human name because they are members of our family, so when we found out we were having a human baby, we decided to name her after a breed of cat! We picked the Savannah cat (it is a cross between a Serval and a domestic cat, but also one of the most beautiful breeds out there!) As for the Rayne, our first beloved queen was named Kianna Rayne and we are giving her the middle name Rayne to remember our Kiki by. Had she been a boy she would have been named Zaidyn, in honor of our Bengal Kaidyn. Not too weird, not too normal and I hope it won’t scar her for life! I can just see it now though, “MOM I WANT A DOG!” lol

Chanda commented on Aug 09 11 at 5:52 pm

I agree with those bans. I also think that parents should always think of how the child is going to feel when they start going to school and have to write the name that their parents gave them on their school work. Or, oh my gosh, when they have to sign their name for checks or anything else in life.
Anyway that’s why my children are Ashley Nicole and Luke Isaac.

Tina commented on Dec 21 11 at 1:34 am

P.S. We know a man who legally changed his name to Santa Claus who every year plays Santa Claus and otherwise moonlights for the U.S. Census so people might be able to get jobs even if they have ridiculous names.

Tina commented on Dec 21 11 at 1:51 am

Add your take:

Note: Babble is a supportive, diverse community. We encourage a range of opinions,
but any unduly hostile comments will be removed.


Comments are delayed up to 15 minutes

  • MailChimp

    Sign up for Babble

  • iPhone App Ad

  • Best of Babble.com


    Most Popular on Facebook

  • Aela Mass
  • Casi Densmore-Koon
  • Rebekah Kuschmider
  • CaitlinHTP (Caitlin Boyle)
  • Michelle Horton
  • Ceridwen Morris
  • Katie
  • Devan McGuinness
  • Disney Online Moms & Family Portfolio

    The Walt Disney Company supports Babble as a platform dedicated to honest, engaged, informed, intelligent and open conversation about parenting. However, the opinions expressed on this site are those of individual parents/writers and do not reflect the views of Disney. In addition, content provided on this site is for entertainment or informational purposes only and should not be construed as medical advice, diagnosis, treatment, or safety advice. Click here for additional information. Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Interest-Based Ads

    More in Being Pregnant (50 of 5074 articles)