Being Pregnant
When All Options Are Gone
With Caesarean births in the news so much recently, I started thinking to myself about the options women have after they give birth via Caesarean, especially if they have had more than one, like I have.
I am fortunate enough to have prospective providers who will work with me in my care and the choices for the childbirth I would like — just like all women should have when it comes to prenatal care. But what about the women across the country that do not have a voice?
In recent months, I have been witness to several discussions on internet forums of women from all over the country, many of them looking for the option of vaginal birth after Caesarean (VBAC), but coming up empty-handed in the area they live in — either because the closest doctor who will allow VBAC is not covered by their insurance, or the local hospitals have banned the act of giving birth naturally with a previous uterine scar.
It got me thinking about this: When there are no other options, what happens to these women? Sadly, the answer is pretty cut and dry. They are forced to undergo a Caesarean section again, when it is not medically necessary or even wanted in the case of the mother. Sounds like a human rights violation, considering this is not something they wish to take part in.
It is estimated across the country that one out of every three hospitals that have a labor and delivery unit have banned a woman from giving birth vaginally — a normal process that women’s bodies are built and trained to do — after having a Caesarean section. And with over one million babies being born via Caesarean section annually, that is a lot of women being left with absolutely no options.
When there are no options at all for women, some are taking things into their own hands, like a woman I spoke to earlier in the year who planned to have an unassisted birth at home because her local hospitals had banned VBAC and it was illegal for a midwife to attend her delivery in her state because of outdated birthing laws.
Despite new ACOG recommendations, it sounds like we are dealing with the medical community of the 1900s! Well it’s 2010 and now I am faced with dealing with this issue myself because I have had two previous Caesarean births. It makes me angry as a woman and a mother!
Go Back To Being Pregnant
0 Comments
ceridwen commented on Sep 17 10 at 11:53 amWow. It’s good to hear what’s really happening out there, even with the guideline changes. But it’s also really depressing. The negative repercussions of women having to go “underground” with dangerous, unassisted or otherwise insufficiently supported births is no good for ANYONE. it also skews the perception of normal or “natural” birth to be this freakish subcult enterprise as opposed to an entirely reasonable idea. Anyway, I could go on… and often do.
Julie commented on Sep 18 10 at 1:29 amYou’re certainly not the only one who is outraged. I tried in vain to point out to my provider that ACOG released a statement last July encouraging their community to avoid repeat cesareans, and she tried to blame it on the anesthesiologist. Oh yes, it’s totally the people who dispense epidurals for cesareans that are stopping my provider from giving me the birth I want. Seriously, I not only have to deal with someone telling me I can’t attempt a vaginal birth, but one who doesn’t even have the guts to admit that she’s the one stopping me from it! Something you might want to keep in mind, no provider or hospital can actually force you to have a c-section. You always have the legal right to deny any form of medical treatment, and hospitals are required by law to accept a woman in labor. It’s not pretty, and it’s not every woman who is brave enough to do it, but you can actually back them against a wall in this regard. You can read more about it here: http://www.ican-online.org/vbac/your-right-refuse-what-do-if-your-hospital-has-banned-vbac-q
Meg commented on Sep 21 10 at 10:08 amBonkers. Totally bonkers.
Julie commented on Sep 21 10 at 10:40 amOh god I’m so happy to be French…
Galen commented on Sep 21 10 at 1:46 pmUnfortunately natural birth is bad business. Hospitals and doctors make more in less time doing a cesarean than letting nature provide. When my wife was pregnant we asked about VBAC at a number of providers as part of our interview practice. We found that while many said they would let us “try” only one practice had a doctor that had a VBAC success rate above 10% and they cycle their doctors doing delivery so the odds of getting him at a time designated by nature is really low. Similar story with breech births. I don’t think a doctor should be allowed to practice obstetrics if the only competence they have at supporting birth us surgical.
Lani commented on Sep 21 10 at 3:14 pmI’m currently pregnant with my second and am looking to do a VBAC. Our local hospital is one of the ones that refuses to do VBACs. My insurance (through the Army) will pay for me to go to another hospital to do it, but I’ll have to drive over an hour while in labor. It doesn’t sound like much fun, but I’d rather do that than go through a c-section and the recovery again. And if we end up having the baby in the van on the way to the other hospital, at least I won’t have had to go through the c-section again.
Alicia commented on Sep 21 10 at 3:19 pmIt is messed up that we women still don’t have 100% control of our own bodies, and that there are women who have to deal with being patted on the head like they have no clue what their bodies are capable of. Yes, there’s a risk with a VBAC, but there’s risk with everything in life. Doctors and hospitals are just being lazy and money hungry. Grrrr!
Canuckmom commented on Sep 21 10 at 5:30 pmIn a country where people sue each other for much less, is it any wonder that doctors are scared of their patients? You attempt a VBAC and something goes wrong, it’s automatically the dr’s fault. They’re just covering their butts.
Dr. Mama commented on Sep 21 10 at 8:15 pmThis is pretty shocking. As someone who had TWO perfectly safe VBACS after TWO c/s in the 80′s and 90′s, it makes me sad to think that this is no longer an option for most moms. And as a physician, I’m well aware that the risks of major surgery (and a c/s IS major) are almost always greater than the risks of VBAC.
Shame on us!
Susan commented on Sep 21 10 at 8:46 pmI am scheduled for a cesarean on November 1st. In the city where I live, of all of the hospitals here (there are numerous) only one allows a woman to try for a VBAC. It is the university/research hospital. A few more facts in my case:
1) I had one cesarean previously. I believe it was because I was induced, and because I reacted so much to the epidural – I could feel NOTHING from the waist down. I pushed for hours for nothing.
2) My insurance (different from the first time I was pregnant) that I have offers me this option: I either schedule a cesarean this time around, and pay a certain deductible, or I try to have a VBAC at that one hospital, and if for some reason, I have to have a cesarean instead, I am forced to pay extra on top of that deductible, as it will then be considered a complication.
I am up against a wall. I have no choice but to go with the scheduled cesarean. In my case, I am not that worried about it, I guess. I mean, I believe that I will be fine, and that my baby will be fine. However, in principle, and as part of the broader problem, I am simply disgusted by insurance providers and hospitals and OBs who block a woman’s choice when medical evidence is so much in our favor.
Only time will tell. Hopefully in only a few short years, VBACs will be commonplace across this country.
Marlene commented on Sep 21 10 at 9:36 pmAny woman in America has a choice… hire a surgeon to oversee what should be a natural function, hire a midwife, the HCP of choice for healthy pregnant women, according to the W.H.O., or simply do nothing… the baby will still come out w/o any “help”!
Many women world over don’t have that choice. Be glad we do!
Theresa commented on Sep 22 10 at 9:48 amI totally agree… i had a vbac and my female ob and i were so happy to do it.all was well and my baby was 9pds!… my question is who is on the board of these hospitals? any women? i wonder… it is messed up that women don’t have control and it is a shame that the hospital and the state is saying if you want control then you have to have it at home by your self! otherwise you do it our way. would they do it this way if it were a man? i believe the question is warranted.
Danielle625 commented on Sep 22 10 at 10:14 amMarlene, Unfortunately for women like myself, with more than one previous cesarean, midwife care is often out of the question.
With my first pregnancy, my insurance wouldn’t cover midwifery care despite being cheaper than care with an OB/GYN. Which put me up against a wall. Then with my second, I saw midwives because I was “allowed” to by my insurance, and got to pick my own providers. This time around, it is like looking for a needle in a hay stack for a midwife that will take me, or be ALLOWED to take me to give birth in a hospital, because with my past birth experiences, home birth is out of the question.
Granted for first time mothers, the option of midwife care at home, or out of hospital setting is ideal, but for someone in my situation, or other women with previous surgical deliveries, sometimes isn’t best.
Danielle625 commented on Sep 22 10 at 10:15 am@Theresa, The hospital boards are often made up of men, or people who can afford to buy a position, which doesn’t do much for the every day folk unfortunately.
Danielle625 commented on Sep 22 10 at 10:36 am@Canuckmom Unfortunately until we have tort reform, this won’t stop either. Although negative outcomes are more likely from repeat cesarean deliveries.
Alanna commented on Sep 22 10 at 12:27 pmI am pregnant with my husbands and I 7th child and i plan to do a vbac. My first 3 births were vaginal and then i had 2 c-sections. 1 b/c of a breech presentation and the other was emergency. My 6th child was born vbac with no problems and i plan to do it again. the recovery is so much faster and i wouldn’t have it any other way. my ob has delivered all of my children except #6 b/c he wasn’t on call. he knows my body and my history well so he is willing to work with me. thank goodness for such a great and wonderful doctor. i hope this gives any women hope that it can be done b/c i am proof.
Susan commented on Sep 22 10 at 1:14 pm@Marlene: You’re naivety is astounding. You may as well say, “Money, time, proximity, and previous experience is not an issue for me, so why should it be for you?”
AlanaM commented on Sep 23 10 at 11:42 pmThank goodness I had my VBAC in 2002, not now. It was the best thing possible and I am so glad I didn’t have to fight for such a normal thing.
Jane commented on Sep 23 10 at 11:53 pmMost of these posts are a more than a little skewed. With a hint of misinformation and a bushel of naivete.
I am an ob/gyn. I have delivered at hospitals that allow VBAC and those that don’t. The hospitals that don’t aren’t vast conspiracies of male-dominated hospital boards… they are likely struggling to provide care for ALL of their patients and the threat of a lawsuit (which in a VBAC gone wrong can cost upwards of 30 million), means that’s a whole hell of a lot of care that they won’t be able to provide to their elderly, their newborns and every other patient they welcome into their care. There are women on their boards, to be sure, and the women are savvy businesswomen, they’re not skewed by thinking with their vagina. Their thinking rather about their budget. As they should be. They have a malpractice carrier, they’ve run the numbers and the numbers don’t make financial sense for them. End of story. The “conspiracy” theories speak more the their author’s view of the world generally, than they do to the actual, real delivery of health care.
As to the physicians (the OB/Gyn who “blamed” it on the anesthesiologist). It’s definitely true than anyone on the “team” can state that they feel uncomfortable with the parameters. Why? Because when you’re baby ends up gorked, on tube feedings for the rest of her life, unable to speak or leave a chair or bed, secondary to severe blood loss and hemorrhage in your attempted VBAC, you can bet your sweet ass that your well-appointed attorney is going to sue that anesthesiologist too.
We doctors, heaven forbid, have little kids too that we hope will have meaningful and fruitful lives. Taking away their mother’s or father’s ability to earn a living and care for them is a BIG deal. As it would be for you too.
As to the physician advocating for VBAC after 2 cesareans, and speaking to the surgical risk…. I’m guessing that she was never present on a uterine rupture where the infant’s Apgars were 1, 5, and 7. And the pH of the infant was 7.02. And the baby was blue and limp and had minimal respiratory effort. I’m guessing she hasn’t had the experience of finding the infant up by the mother’s liver after her uterus ruptured in an attempted VBAC. Such that the mother required 6 Units of Packed Red Blood Cells, has derangement of her coagulation cascade and thus also needed Free Frozen Plasma, Platelets and maybe even some Vactor VII in order to merely LIVE long enough to see her baby alive.
And for those of you that say that doctors and hospitals are just “lazy.” Screw you. I work sometimes upwards of 72 hours a week… and am a mother to 2 young children. My husband works full time. I’m board certified and I take great pride in taking the best possible care of my patients according to the best evidence that I can ascertain, which means reading all my journals every month, and staying on top of the lastest data and literature. Screw you, is what I have to say.
At my hospital, I don’t many one frickin’ penny for doing a cesarean versus a vaginal delivery. THINK. STOP AND THINK FOR JUST A WEE-LITTLE MINUTE BEFORE YOU THROW OUT YOUR PEJORATIVES AND YOUR THREATS AND INSINUATIONS. There isn’t a vast right- or left-wing military-birth industrial complex out to get you. Just humans, making the best decision they can given their circumstances. If you care this much…. direct your energy to your congressman/woman or senator and demand tort reform. That would make for a much more meaningful and substantive post.
Susan commented on Sep 24 10 at 3:40 pmI am sure that this Jane, who claims, fairly convincingly, b.c. of the medical jargon on a failed VBAC case, that she is an OB, has good intentions – but, Jane, the way you present your argument doesn’t help your own cause. It isn’t comforting to know that budget alone drives the motives of a hospital board. It isn’t comforting to know that an OB is apparently stressed to the max regarding her chosen career. It isn’t comforting to know that an OB has this much animosity toward her chosen patient group. It is up to all women to make sure that choices like a safely chosen VBAC is an option. I know that you aren’t concerned about insurance provider practices, but it is a big issue in my case, and I don’t blame simply the doctor, nor do I believe any of these women do, for the state of our birthing choices. It feels out of our hands, and when it deals with something so important as this, it FEELS like the biggest conspiracy. Profit-driven health care is who we need to blame. OBs like yourself need to calm down and realize the source of our angst, ok?
Jane commented on Sep 25 10 at 1:11 amSusan, with all due respect, hospitals do make decision on budgets, not feelings. And, I don’t appreciate your insinuation that I’m “stressed to the max.” Solely that I have a family too, that I’ve been through the birth process to, so I’m not the drone or the robot that so many comments like to refer to. In fact, I don’t even know how to play golf, but I can’t tell you how many women assume that doctors are waiting to cash in their Cesarean delivery so they can make it out onto the green. It’s insulting to my intelligence, and my ethics. I have NO animosity toward my patient group. I wish every woman had every right to make an informed decision about how she chooses to birth. But we don’t live in that world. There are hospital, like the one I currently practice at, that refuse VBAC. Do I think they’re evil? No. Do I think they’ve made a bad decision for women? No. I think they’ve made the best possible decision in the circumstances with which they are faced. So the fact that it FEELS like a conspiracy, again, says more about the person feeling that conspiracy, than it does about the situation. Talk to the hospital that is refusing your VBAC and have a genuine conversation as to why? If it’s the difference between being able to afford valuable nurses salaries over excessively high premiums for malpractice insurance to cover the VBAC…. are you really truly, really truly, going to fault a hospital that’s trying to provide the best possible care to ALL its patients? My advice is still the same, if you want hospitals and doctors to provide VBAC across the board, then send all this great energy you have (and you have a lot) to your congressman/woman or senator and ask for REAL TORT REFORM.
Kathy commented on Sep 27 10 at 11:23 amThanks Jane for your comments and information. I’m having my 2nd baby on Nov. 4th in an scheduled C-section because my first was an emergency C-section. I really contimplated a VBAC, but am a little nervous about it so close to my last delivery (my 1st baby just turned one, so it will only be 14 months since the surgery). I was thinking my doctor just wants me to do the c-section because it’s quick and easy and will make more money!! It’s good to know that’s not the case. My niece had to have an emergency c-section and almost died because they were trying to go natural and had her push for 3-hours straght. When they finally did the c-section, the baby was stuck in the canal and had to be pushed and pulled out. My niece had over 250 stiches and was lucky to survive. The thought of something like that happening is so scary!
I’m good with my choice of a 2nd c-section (and my recovery from the 1st one was amazing!! I don’t know if it was me or my doc. that made it so good, but I can’t complain one bit)!
Joy Szabo commented on Dec 22 10 at 6:10 pmJane,
its not the doctors decision to make. It is primarily in OB and Peds that strangers feel the right to make healthcare decisions for other people.
Even if the patient wants to do something stupid, its not anyones job to force their point of view on others.
I think where we need to put our energy is not so much tort reform, but getting patient autonomy to be a constitutional right.
Heather commented on Dec 22 10 at 6:32 pmI think you’re right Joy. Shall we draft up a Patient Autonomy Constitutional Amendment together? I bet in the current political atmosphere, it wouldn’t be difficult to garner support for such an amendment. I think tort reform is important as well though. Defensive medicine is really getting out of hand. I just don’t think it’s coming anytime soon, seeing as most politicians receive a great deal of money from lawyers.
I spend a lot of time on Solace for Mothers, a forum for women who have experienced birth trauma. Many of these women suffer from post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) for years after they give birth. I can’t convey in words the kind of hell they suffer, but through inquiry I have found a common thread in all their experiences. Choice, and respect. Ultimately, these women made an informed decision for themselves and their little ones, and those choices were ignored by their care providers. Some even relate screaming “no” and trying to kick nurses, only be be sedated. In my case, I politely said “no” (to a repeat cesarean), and they effectively said, “too bad.” I knew kicking and screaming would do no good. They’d have their way with me regardless.
This time, I went in, politely said “no” again, received the same response, and took my business elsewhere. Unfortunately, that meant I had to go underground for reasons similar to some of those listed in the original post. I don’t feel like fighting for VBAC while in labor is very conducive to a good experience.
Kristen commented on Dec 22 10 at 8:40 pmI’ve often thought that hospitals that institute VBAC bans should have to make some sort of extra effort to limit primary c-sections. (No elective/non-indicated inductions?) This would at least help to prevent cases where women feel as if they are stuck between a rock and a hard place (i.e. an unwanted repeat cesarean and a not-entirely-desired unassisted birth/birth at a hospital many miles away).
Cheryl commented on Dec 29 10 at 12:04 pmI can’t speak to US experience, but in Canada, part of the problem is the experience of the OB/GYNs. The default to C-section for many complicated births mean that there is little in the way of experience for many when dealing with breech and VBAC.
One thing I think women also need to consider when examining their birth options, is why you are choosing a certain path. What brought you to a c-section in the first place and why do you want a VBAC? In my case I had a breech baby that was not moving the first time. When I asked to go for a VBAC the OB/GYN was happy to let me try because she said I had a good attitude and that goes a long way towards success. In other words, I preferred a VBAC, but I wasn’t going to lose my mind if it didn’t happen. I had a toddler at home, I simply didn’t want the recovery of a c-section. It had nothing to do with my first experience.
This ties to my bigger point. We took a class, run by our health authority, on VBAC to remind ourselves about labour. The doula teaching the class had us do an exercise with double sided cards. One side said things like short labour, tearing, or epidural. The other side said things like long labour, episiotomy, and drug-free. We were supposed to pick our preferences and rank them. Both my husband and I took one look at the cards and raised our hands. Where was the card for healthy baby? Healthy mom? The focus was so much on the labour experience and not the ultimate outcome. So we set the cards aside and waited until we discussed the actual techniques for coping/helping with labour.
So many times the focus is on the labour experience for the mom. I’m not dismissing that, but frankly, it isn’t the most important thing. It’s like paying all that attention to a wedding when it is a 1 day affair and ignoring the fact that you are getting married. Your goal should be a healthy baby, regardless of how it arrives.
(And yes, I was able to have a hospital VBAC, but it was indeed risky at times. I had great doctors and nurses. More importantly, I have a healthy and adventurous 2.5 year old!)
denne commented on Dec 31 10 at 4:04 pmHospitals also make decisions based on evidence based research, not just budgets. Maybe if midwives compiled their data and presented it in a more scientific rather than emotional/anecdotal format, the higher ups would be more apt to listen. Personally, I would hate to be the attending during a uterine rupture. I feel like as a physician you should be able to refuse to take that risk because inevitably the responsibility and ensuing drama will fall on you, not the hospital, and most certainly not the mother. In the end it’s about having good outcomes with the least risk, whatever method it takes. Everyone wants to see a healthy mom and baby roll out the door together.
Swede commented on Jan 07 11 at 12:29 pmKristen, as much as I hear so many people villify vbac moms for wanting an “experience” over a healthy baby, I have yet to hear from a single mom, anywhere, that wouldn’t gladly wheel herself down to the operating theater if surgery was what her baby truly needed. But so many times, it has nothing to do with the health of the baby, and everything to do with her care provider’s or hospital’s perception of risk. Unfortunately, risk is involved in any decision a woman makes during pregnancy and birth. A woman who chooses a repeat c-section has a higher risk of dying during childbirth, has a higher risk of complications, stillbirth, ectopic pregnancy, and life- and/or uterus-threatening placenta problems in future pregnancies, as well as of secondary infertility. A woman choosing a vbac has a higher risk of uterine rupture, cord prolapse, and other labor complications. It’s not a matter of one choice being necessarily safer than the other; it’s a matter of which risks are more acceptable to the mother, and which outcome provides the most likely chance of a healthy baby *and* a healthy mother in the current and all future pregnancies. Why should a doctor, or a hospital board, or insurance companies decide for a mother what is the most acceptable risk for her to undertake? All we vbac moms want is the ability to make the best decision for ourselves and our families, instead of being forced to undergo a surgery because someone else, somewhere, is afraid of being held responsible if the risk we’ve chosen to undertake ends up coming to pass.
Stop blaming moms for wanting to be healthy, sane, fertile, and autonomous. And care providers, if you’re so terrified of women choosing vbac, then don’t cut us in the first place.
Add your take:
Note: Babble is a supportive, diverse community. We encourage a range of opinions,
but any unduly hostile comments will be removed.
Comments are delayed up to 15 minutes







Aela Mass
Casi Densmore-Koon
Rebekah Kuschmider
CaitlinHTP (Caitlin Boyle)
Michelle Horton
Ceridwen Morris
Katie
Devan McGuinness
The Walt Disney Company supports Babble as a platform dedicated to honest, engaged, informed, intelligent and open conversation about parenting. However, the opinions expressed on this site are those of individual parents/writers and do not reflect the views of Disney. In addition, content provided on this site is for entertainment or informational purposes only and should not be construed as medical advice, diagnosis, treatment, or safety advice.

0