Being Pregnant

Induced Labors Twice As Likely To End In C-Section

Posted by ceridwen on June 22nd, 2010 at 6:12 pm

davef 300x225 Induced Labors Twice As Likely To End In C Section(via ReutersA new study involving nearly 8,000 first time mothers suggests a strong link between inductions and c-sections. Researchers found that women who had their labors induced were twice as likely to have a c-section.

Published in the July issue journal Obstetrics & Gynecology, these results are in keeping with much of what we already know. Inducing labor increases the chance of a c-section and is therefore not recommended by the the American Collage of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) as a routine procedure. It’s questionable whether these recommendations are being adhered to in most hospitals.

In this study, 44% of the women were induced. Of those inductions 40% were “elective inductions” (inductions done for non-medical reasons). That number leaps out at me. It seems very high and not in synch with current medical recommendations.

There are good reasons to medically induce a labor including maternal or fetal medical conditions (such as pre-ecclampsia); a post-date pregnancy (42 weeks onwards); or a situation where the waters have broken and labor does not start spontaneously within 24 hours. The latter is not very common. Of the 10% of women whose water does break before labor starts 85% of them will go into labor all by themselves within 24 hours.

Medical induction replaces the body’s labor hormones with artificial ones. It often works but sometimes doesn’t. (In this study, researchers pointed to “failed induction” as the reason for 20 % of the c-sections performed.) Also pitocin– the drug used to stimulate contractions– isn’t as gentle as the naturally occurring hormone oxytocin. Women often find contractions from pitocin harder and/or more intense than non-induced contractions.  This makes an epidural more likely. An epidural is not necessarily going to lead to surgery. In fact, epidurals given late in a very long labor can reduce the chance of a c-section. But an early epidural is associated with c-section.  It’s all a very delicate balance; starting a labor from scratch involves revving pretty hard without the body’s support.

The findings in this study suggest that we look again and more closely at why these inductions are taking place. A c-section is a very commonly performed and generally safe surgery. But it is surgery and brings with it an increased risk of infection or blood clots for the mother and increased chance of respiratory issues and infection for the baby. The c-section rate has risen dramatically over the last several decades. And though obesity and other issues are doubtlessly playing into this trend, inductions are clearly another factor.

“Even among the 4,600 women in the study considered ‘low risk’ for needing a labor induction — because they were not post-term, were free of diabetes, high blood pressure and obesity, and the fetus was not overly large — 29 percent had their labor induced…” writes Amy Norton for Reuters, “Among these low-risk women, one-quarter of those who had a labor induction ended up needing a C-section, versus 14 percent of those who had a natural labor.”

Dr. Caroline Signore, a scientist with the U.S. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development wrote an editorial published with the study, in which she argues that women considering elective induction should be given better information: “Labor induction performed for no medical reason is an area for us to target.”

What’s the take-away for pregnant women wanting to avoid an unnecessary induction or c-section? Talk to your care-provider about his or her induction policy and rates. Care-providers with high induction rates are more likely to give inductions and vis a versa. Always ask what your options are. What are the risks? What are the benefits? What are the alternatives? What if we wait? What if we do nothing? It’s good to get in the habit of being actively involved in your medical care; there’s certainly no harm in asking. In fact, studies have also shown that doctors and midwives respond positively to engaged and curious patients.

 Induced Labors Twice As Likely To End In C Section

Go Back To Being Pregnant

8 Comments

[...] to 1 in 2 births. Obesity has a big role in this, as recent studies have shown. But so does the over-use of induction of [...]

World Health Organization Drops Recommended Cap on C-Sections | Being Pregnant commented on Jul 01 10 at 2:16 pm

Great entry. I have def felt pressured to induce even days after my due date. Given than due dates are determined by less-than precise calculations, it seems alarming how ready docs in DC are to pull the trigger on induction. Nice blog

catrin commented on Jun 22 10 at 7:58 pm

My doc wouldn’t do an induction til I was postdate (he was actually pretty cranky that we had to pick a date three weeks ahead, should I be “post date” because another practice in the region regularly did “convenience” inductions at 38-39 weeks, then he was stuck with a woman who would truly be in medical need and no room at the inn, so to speak). Wasn’t there research last year that the risk wasn’t significantly higher for a C with an induced labor with postdate?
No C section hear, even with said induction (again, I was PD, already dialating, just not having active or productive contractions…)

PlumbLucky commented on Jun 24 10 at 8:42 am

I was pressured with my second to be induced…I went 15 days over my due date and went into labor on my own.
Baby number 3 I had some medical issues that became hard to ignore at 37 weeks…had to be induced…Dr. said that because my body had done this before it was unlikely that there would be a problem. I also asked that they start off very slow to more mimic natural labor instead of fast and furious…my water was broke a few hours after induction started…labor started and progressed…I delivered 8 hours after induction was started and 3 hours after contractions started…not to bad and easy delivery!
But I would ask for non-stress test as I did when post date…this can tell how the baby is doing and thus give you reason to keep waiting!

Got the T-shirt commented on Jul 27 10 at 10:24 pm

The baby’s brain releases a signal that sets of a chain of hormonal reactions (eventually increasing prostaglandins) that lead to the start of labor. The same hormone helps mature the baby’s lungs. So it’s really important not to artificially induce, for the sake of the baby’s full physical development, unless the women is considered postdate (42 weeks or more). Should be paying more attention to what a baby needs, and not what the doctor’s schedule needs.

eevon commented on Nov 07 10 at 12:23 am

i had 2 be induced due 2 having type 1 diabetes, much 2 my dissapointment. Carrying full term as a diabetic mother can be dangerous for an unborn baby as their liver can become fatty and risk having a much larger baby. Eg 10lb+ this of course would end in c-section for the benefit of both mother and baby. I was induced at 38wks. I had a pessary inserted first and this started my contractions, i then had hyposensitive contractions, which are extremly painful and useless as they do not help progress labour. I then had a hormone drip put in and epidural as hyposensitive contractions worse than ever. Gave birth 5hrs later 2 the wards 9th baby only one 2 deliver naturally without c-section. Induction of labour does work eventually for some but definatly should not b offered 2 anyone who does not need it, it is not a quick way 2 meet ur baby!

sarahmummy commented on Jan 31 11 at 10:18 am

My doctor wanted to induce me even if I was only a day or two late and I said no because I don’t want to end up a c-section and he said ok we can wait. I was 4 days late and went into labor on my own. Too many c-sections are being performed because doctors & hospitals are treating labor as a “job” to get you in and out as fast as possible. They also get paid more for a c-section since it’s surgery. This needs to stop! Labor is a natural process and needs to be respected as that!

Joy commented on Aug 24 11 at 3:11 pm

I was induced almost a month early the day before my baby shower. My doctor thought I couldn’t tell that my water had broken. Great lady, but she was wrong. They had to break my water for me and I ended up having a c-section because of fetal distress 2 hours before my shower was to start. My first labor experience was extremely unpleasant because of being induced. The thought of doctors actually letting people choose to do it for non medical reasons is ridiculous and irresponsible.

Joy Lynn commented on Apr 23 12 at 11:43 pm

Add your take:

Note: Babble is a supportive, diverse community. We encourage a range of opinions,
but any unduly hostile comments will be removed.


Comments are delayed up to 15 minutes

  • MailChimp

    Sign up for Babble

  • iPhone App Ad

  • Best of Babble.com


    Most Popular on Facebook

  • Aela Mass
  • Casi Densmore-Koon
  • Rebekah Kuschmider
  • CaitlinHTP (Caitlin Boyle)
  • Michelle Horton
  • Ceridwen Morris
  • Katie
  • Devan McGuinness
  • Disney Online Moms & Family Portfolio

    The Walt Disney Company supports Babble as a platform dedicated to honest, engaged, informed, intelligent and open conversation about parenting. However, the opinions expressed on this site are those of individual parents/writers and do not reflect the views of Disney. In addition, content provided on this site is for entertainment or informational purposes only and should not be construed as medical advice, diagnosis, treatment, or safety advice. Click here for additional information. Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Interest-Based Ads

    More in Being Pregnant (50 of 5070 articles)