Babys First Year Blog

Another Doggy-Inspired Product for Kids

Posted by roni on June 28th, 2011 at 10:02 pm
Screen shot 2011 06 28 at 9.54.05 PM Another Doggy Inspired Product for Kids

My 411 Wristbands - Tag Your Child

I know I insulted some of you when I joked about ‘raising kids, not dogs’ on my 10 Baby Items I CAN Live Without post. I didn’t mean to be disrespectful, it just sort of flew out of me when I saw the picture of the tiny play pen and two toddlers attempting to play in it. I felt so sorry for them. I can totally see how play pens can be useful and actually needed. I’m just not a fan.

That being said, I have a new child product to tell you about that also immediately made me think of dogs. And no, it’s not a leash although….. I kid. I kid. ;)

It’s a tag.

Well, the company is calling it a 411 Wristband. It acts just like a dog tag, but for your child, providing contact information if he/she gets lost.

I actually think the idea is intriguing. Children, especially toddlers, don’t or can’t always remember their address and telephone number. What does happen if you get separated? Wouldn’t it be easier if the child had some form of identification on them to help the authorities locate you?

On the other hand, do we really want to “tag” our children like our pets?

“If lost please return to..”

That just doesn’t sit well in my gut when referring to children.

What do you think? Would you equip your child with a 411 wristband just in case? Or does the thought of “tagging” your child seem utterly ridiculous?

 Another Doggy Inspired Product for Kids

31 Comments

If it gets a lost child back to you quickly – why wouldn’t you? With that being said however, I think that this is more applicable in situations where your child is likely to free roam – like the beach ( I see lost kids there every weekend!), or at the zoo or a situation where the children out number the supervising adults. I still stand by the idea that it is a parents responsibility to have their eyes on their child at all times ( there is really no excuse not to) but there are definitely a few situations where this could be a good precautionary measure.

Cindy commented on Jun 28 11 at 11:38 pm

I like the idea of tags for kids who can’t communicate because of autism or speech disorders. I also thought they’d be great to alert people about my son’s peanut allergy. It would be easier to put on when it’s needed (such as away from home or day camp) instead of a medical ID bracelet that I’m not sure I could get him to wear all the time.

tiger g commented on Jun 28 11 at 11:46 pm

I guess I just don’t see the point of being turned off of a potentially good idea just because the product may have come from an idea originally conceived for something else. (in this case, ID tags). I suppose you also think “dog tags” for the military personnel are also dumb? I mean, I’m not offended, I just don’t get it.

Lbh commented on Jun 29 11 at 3:45 am

It’s called playing devils advocate. I don’t think it’s dumb at all. I’m just trying to start a conversation. I’d rather see what other people think then to continue spewing my thoughts out there over and over again. The wristband idea is great but I can see how some may think it’s creepy. How many people would also put the name of their child on the band which I think would be a bad idea.

Roni commented on Jun 29 11 at 6:51 am

It’s very similar to a Road ID. I just got one and I’m really glad that I did. If anything were ever to happen to me while running, they can contact my husband and they know who I am.

Marie commented on Jun 29 11 at 7:41 am

I actually just ordered Charley a Road Id Slim Bracelet – Just for occasions like above – where we are at the beach, boardwalk, amusement parks, field trips I can’t go on etc. They also have fake tattoos you can get to put on them for things like that too.

Not that I plan on ever having my eyes leave her when we are out in public, but with 2 kids soon on the move I am worried if it is just me and I turn around to do something for Andie and Charley sees something she wants to go look at…she’s out of my sight in seconds.

We’ll see what Jimmy thinks of it though ;)

Carrie commented on Jun 29 11 at 9:59 am

or you could just micro-chip them…LOL

that’s a joke y’all

Maria @ my waist loss journey commented on Jun 29 11 at 10:06 am

LMAO

THAT’s exactly what popped into my head when I saw it. Next step… bar code tattoos..

Bad.. I know.

Roni commented on Jun 29 11 at 10:09 am

Roni, I feel your posts are always written with a condescending and judgemental tone. You seem to look to the negative side often. People tag their luggage, their lunch boxes, and many other things besides their pets. I’m not saying you cannot have your “opinions,” “gut reactions,” or even “play devil’s advocat,” but the way you express yourself tends to come off in an ugly way.

As for the writsbands. If “tagging our children like dogs” helps even one child return to their mother after getting lost, I don’t think it’s something to write-off. Instead of looking at it as a bad thing, to treat a child like we treat a pet, I would say that someone who tags their pet clearly loves it and should treat their child with just as much caution and concern when in a busy place. Please try to look beyond the obvious comparrison for your next post.

Emily commented on Jun 29 11 at 10:25 am

*advocate – I apologize.

Emily commented on Jun 29 11 at 10:29 am

Emily – I think its hysterical that you think I’m negative. I’m known as being an overall positive blogger but here on babble I’m out of my element and am still trying to find my niche. If you look at my history of posts..

http://blogs.babble.com/babys-first-year-blog/author/roni/

You’ll notice a whopping TWO that take a negative spin which, honestly, were my BAD attempts at making jokes and trying to stir up traffic. Which is out of character for me. Most of my posts are simply documenting the life of my son. Problem is, baby pictures and stories about naps only bring in so much traffic.

You can think I’m “condescending”, “judgmental” and express my opinions in an “ugly way” but if you look at the post above all I did was ask a question. Just because a wristband made me think of dog tags doesn’t mean I’m judging people that use them. It just means it made me think of dog tags. If you feel judged that’s on you not me. I would actually use this product regardless of what others thought.

So please try to see that bloggers sometimes have multiple goals when writing posts. I started a conversation about a product I think is interesting useful. I brought the product to your attention. I got you to read my post by using a silly title. I even got you to comment. My job as blogger is done.

Roni commented on Jun 29 11 at 10:51 am

I love this string Of posts and comments. I also think it is smart of designers to draw from other applications when making products for babies.

There is a time and place for everything. I wouldn’t want my little guy to wear an ID bracelet all the time but if we go somewhere big and full of people (Disney World, god forbid) then I would want him labeled in some way. Just in case.

The dog inspired thing that drives me nuts are when people have their toddlers on a leash and the parent is chatting on the phone. That seems a little unfair.

Vicki commented on Jun 29 11 at 11:17 am

To take another side to this – I was discussing tags and “Mommy Cards” with a few web gals. What if an abductor or sex offender gets ahold of your info? Say your little angel is walking around and loses said tag or if you’re at an amusement park, waiting in a long line, surrounded by people that can see the tag and possibly memorize. Granted, it can be a long shot but is it really worth it? Sure, if your child is lost, you would want them found…but you also run the risk of them getting “found” by someone that you wouldn’t want your kid even remotely near.
While I like the idea of some form of ID, I don’t think I’d like it to be on my kiddos wrists.

jessica commented on Jun 29 11 at 11:38 am

YES! See there is another side. Thanks for adding your thoughts Jessica. I think it’s a great product but there is SOMETHING that doesn’t sit right with me about it. This is why we discuss. :)

Roni commented on Jun 29 11 at 11:43 am

Regardless of your motives, the tone turns me off to these posts, and in some ways to you. If your goal is to ignite a discussion, there are plenty of ways to do that in an eloquent and non-offensive manner. It’s not just this post, which you’re right – wasn’t overly agressive, but think in general. Your posts about the school, the products you can’t stand, have rubbed me the wrong way. I haven’t found any real advice or motivation from your contributions.

Since it was your mission to instigate opinions, you’ve done your job with me, but you’ve also deterred me from clicking “continue reading” on your future posts for fear that I will finish it feeling irritated or bated into an argument. Maybe it is me, and I’m too easily coaxed…oh well.

Emily commented on Jun 29 11 at 12:18 pm

You mean this one?

http://blogs.babble.com/babys-first-year-blog/2011/06/09/little-bean-not-allowed-at-big-brothers-school/

Well I do feel strongly about family being allowed at school functions. I’m not going to apologize for that!

As I have learned.. blogging (as with most things) requires tough skin. It’s hard to share your opinions in a public forum. Maybe you just can’t relate to me. Maybe you wouldn’t like me if we met at a party. It happens. I’m guessing this is why Babble hires tons of different style bloggers. To each their own.

Roni commented on Jun 29 11 at 12:31 pm

Jessica’s post is exactly what I was going to point out. I don’t like the idea of having my kids’ information just there. Too many ways for that to go wrong, although I do understand the other side as well. I just wouldn’t use the product on my own kids.
Also Roni, I have been reading your blogs for years now and I don’t think you are negative at all! lol!! You always make me laugh and you seem to always look at things “glass half full” in my opinion. And I think your jokes are pretty funny! My brother in law also thinks of play yards as a dog kennel. I used them to block things from my kids, and tried to use them to “contain” my kids when I was cleaning or something but they didn’t work for me that way! My son would just push it around till he got where he wanted to go! lol!! Keep up the entertaining blogs and ignore the negative comments, you don’t need them!!

Brandy Jo commented on Jun 29 11 at 12:51 pm

Our family are road cyclists and we wear the Road ID bracelets. Road ID is similiar to the tags you mentioned above. The bracelets are on our wrists when we ride in case we suffer a bad crash – our name and emergency contact phone numbers are listed on the band (there is even room for a Med Staff Note if need be).

I have purchased a Road ID for our toddler too, in case they get lost. It serves a multi purpose in this case. The nice thing is that it doesn’t list where we live, just emergency contact numbers. However if my baby gets lost, I have some comfort knowing that our contact information to our cell phones is readily accessible.

Bret commented on Jun 29 11 at 12:59 pm

Hi Roni – I am a member of BTL and seen this while looking through your blogs. I have a different perspective to offer. I have a child who has a very rare genetic disorder. She is 1 year old and LOOKS perfectly healthy but she is not. I have looked into similar items for those times when we are in a crowd or on vacation. I would put her medical information on it along with emergency contacts, etc. I can understand how mom’s would not want to “tag” their children for everyone to see. For my older children (7 and 4) I have pinned a paper with our information on the inside of their clothing when we have went to a large event such as a carnival, zoo, etc. I explain to them if they get lost to find a person that is like “grand dad” (a cop) and show them the information. Once my youngest gets old enough to walk I will start using some kind of “tag” system with her. It would mean the difference between her living or dying.

Amber commented on Jun 29 11 at 1:19 pm

Can’t imagine how some people think there’s a negative tone in this post?! I think it’s humorous and a great conversation starter. You even begin the post by saying “I actually think the idea is intriguing.”

People, read carefully and seriously lighten up!

Tina commented on Jun 29 11 at 1:46 pm

At our local fair they hand out tags that have a spot for a parent last name and a cell number. The stickers are for a child’s back (so they can’t peel them off). This would enable a child to be reconnected promptly, but doesn’t give out much to any potential threat. A predator wouldn’t have a first name, for example, to attempt to befriend with a “hi, johnny! of course you remember me from Sunday School! your Mommy Sally brought you!” We have since done a similar thing at a large sporting venue. We put phone number and seat number along with a parent last name. If the child got lost, security could immediately locate us. That said, at large venues such as those mentioned above, our children probably had indentations from us gripping them so hard! : ) Just a thought….

Debi commented on Jun 29 11 at 2:43 pm

Amber – You’re right, I didn’t think of special needs kids until after I posted. My niece would greatly benefit from this!

Roni commented on Jun 29 11 at 3:47 pm

@Emily, I have been reading Roni’s blogs for quite a while now, and I don’t understand where you are coming from. It may be that you are particularly sensitive to the topics she is talking about, but if that is the case, maybe you should move on to another writer. I don’t think it is productive for you to spend your time arguing about what is or isn’t offensive to you personally, when it doesn’t seem like anyone else is offended.

As for me, I’m all for identification!!! The risks are minimal, as far as I am concerned. As a former veterinary office worker, microchips are great…if the owners remember to register them! Maybe not for the kids, though. :)

Mehgann commented on Jun 29 11 at 4:28 pm

for the record, Emily isn’t the only one put off by the tone. And from what I understand, the whole point of the comment section is, well, commenting. But as far as the tone being offensive, I understand that sometimes people come off in ways they don’t mean to, especially over the internet. FOr example, when telling a commenter the point of playing devil’s advocate, I personally would have said, “I am playing devils advocate” instead of saying “It’s called playing devils advocate.” Yes, I know what it’s called. Thanks. So, yeah, things like that may contribute to some folks (not just Emily) thinking there is a negative tone here. But you know, that’s what the mouse is for. I don’t have to read if I don’t choose to and neither does anyone else, right?

LBH commented on Jun 29 11 at 5:26 pm

Nice try Emily and LBH…You two sound pretty silly…sorry but you do. Maybe another blog would fall for your tag team stuff but I believe Roni and her readers are intelligent enough to recognize you for what you are…Erika

Erika commented on Jun 29 11 at 9:29 pm

@Erika – I have not, and would never insult Roni or her readers’ intelligence. I wasn’t looking to “tag team” either. I happened to have a calm morning at work and felt like letting people know how the post came off to me. I don’t follow Roni on another blog, and haven’t known her for years, but from the past few weeks of dropping by this page, I feel her posts come with an extra shot of sarcasm and bitterness. Almost like “I’m above rules, and using all of these silly products.” That is all.

Emily commented on Jun 29 11 at 10:55 pm

You did insult me. According to you, I’m negative, condescending, and judgmental.
This is simple. If you don’t like my posts then please don’t read them and comment. I don’t understand the need to call out a blogger you don’t like. Just stop reading.

This post was written to start a conversation about a product but you felt the need to comment about my tone as well. I’m not going to sit back and let you insult me without a response.
I’ve written about 80 posts in 3 months, I don’t expect you to like them all. I don’t expect anyone to like them all. For pete’s sake, I don’t like them all.
Can we move now?

Roni commented on Jun 29 11 at 11:15 pm

Bravo, Roni (with regard to your last comment!)!! Well said! There are many of us that do follow all or a lot of your blogs and love your tone and your attitude! You give me a much needed smile and laugh on a daily basis! Don’t change a thing (although, I was sure you wouldn’t anyway!). :)

Mandi commented on Jun 30 11 at 10:48 am

I know kids who are diabetic and wear cute bracelet that let people know about their condition but aren’t as obvious as a medical bracelet. Something like this http://www.n-styleid.com/butterfly-kids-medical-bracelets.html could be a way to identify without being so obvious.

Liz commented on Jun 30 11 at 2:14 pm

I hesitated responding again because I hate when piddly things get my goat, but I can’t let the comments about being Silly and “Oh Good try” go unanswered… Sorry, I know we have 1001 things more important to worry about. I’ll just say this and move on:
wow, I guess I thought I was on a national website with a comment section, not a private blog where you’re not allowed to disagree or have any opinion about the authors tone…. I was trying to be conciliatory in my last comment because I don’t think it’s any big deal that I don’t see eye to eye and I certainly don’t think any ill of Roni as a person–I don’t know her and again, things come off over the internet that can easily be misconstrued. If you read both Emily’s and my own comments, we absolutely did not comment on Roni’s character as a human being– we commented on how the post was written and in my case how it comes off to us personally. I didn’t agree with the tone of the post and I think I’m allowed that opinion. I just find it bizarre that in, AGAIN, a national forum–not a personal blog, you’re not allowed to have an opinion that may address how the post is written without someone insulting you or asking you to leave?? I support Roni’s right to defend her writing. I actually got a different perpective from her responses. To insinuate that because we dont’ like the writing we must LEAVE or shut up/whatever. Now, that, my friend, is silly. If the editors of Babble would like to weigh in, I’d love to hear it. Otherwise,I’ll continue to read (or not read) and comment and I’d appreciate the same respect you’re asking of me.

LBH commented on Jun 30 11 at 3:44 pm

LBH.. I’m the same way.. can you tell?? :)

Of course you can disagree! I was actually looking for conversation on both sides of this product. I guess I just don’t understand the need to comment about the tone of the post instead of the content or even the questions that were asked to purposefully initiate conversation.

If you read my original post again you’ll see I didn’t say anything negative about the product at all. That’s why I’m confused to where the “tone” comes in. I simply tried to initiate conversations on both sides of the story. According to you, I did a bad job. And that’s your opinion and you have a right feel that way.

Exactly what you said about commenting I can say about my post. I don’t understand how I can’t write a post soliciting opinions without being insulted. Of course you have the right too respond anyway you like, but why negative against the author? What is it accomplishing? To make the blogger feel bad? To let them know you don’t like their writing? That’s not what the post was about. It was about a wristband.

And just as you have the right to respond to the original post, I have the right to respond to the comments. Emily’s comment came across as mean spirited and unnecessary to me. I didn’t tell her that, I just responded to her points.

I think this comes down to different personality types. I wouldn’t bother to comment on someone’s post I didn’t like. Of course I would share my opinion if I disagreed, but too tell someone you don’t like their writing? I’d just stop reading. There’s too many bloggers I do like. Life’s too short.

Roni commented on Jun 30 11 at 4:43 pm

Add your take:

Note: Babble is a supportive, diverse community. We encourage a range of opinions,
but any unduly hostile comments will be removed.


Comments are delayed up to 15 minutes

Most Popular on Facebook

Best of Babble.com


  • Lauren Jimeson
  • Lauren Hartmann
  • Emily Elling
  • Meredith Carroll
  • Emily Malone
  • Molly Thornberg
  • Selena Burgess
  • Casey Mullins
  • Madeline Petersen
  • Disney Online Moms & Family Portfolio

    The Walt Disney Company supports Babble as a platform dedicated to honest, engaged, informed, intelligent and open conversation about parenting. However, the opinions expressed on this site are those of individual parents/writers and do not reflect the views of Disney. In addition, content provided on this site is for entertainment or informational purposes only and should not be construed as medical advice, diagnosis, treatment, or safety advice. Click here for additional information. Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Interest-Based Ads

    More in Babys First Year Blog (50 of 3275 articles)